Re: [ubuntu-in] sound crashes when scroll the browser

2009-03-08 Thread Parthan SR
Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote:
 I know what I am recommending is not a solution but a workaround. I 
 hardly see anyone using Rhythmbox music player. Still wonder why Ubuntu 
 keeps it as the default.
   
Eh? I've been using it for the last two years now and I know a lot of 
people who use it by default.
 Ambika, I suggest you to get a good music player for your needs. This 
 may sound harsh, but this is the fact. Rythmbox is in the same state as 
 Windows Media Player of Windows 98.
   
Can you back up your statement with a fact/proof? The last release I see 
was made during July 2008. What do you mean by in the same state of?

-- 
With Regards,
Parthan SR technofreak

GPG Key 2FF01026
Fingerprint 5707 ECBD 8D8D 8E6E 28F8  DFA5 938B D861 2FF0 1026
Weblog  http://blog.technofreak.in


-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] sound crashes when scroll the browser

2009-03-08 Thread Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्ह ा)
Parthan SR wrote:
 Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote:
   
 I know what I am recommending is not a solution but a workaround. I 
 hardly see anyone using Rhythmbox music player. Still wonder why Ubuntu 
 keeps it as the default.
   
 
 Eh? I've been using it for the last two years now and I know a lot of 
 people who use it by default.
   

I also know people using it, but they are still outnumbered by people 
who prefer other players.
No offence meant, but its not at par with Banshee, or Amarok. Again its 
personal taste. Can you explain why people move away from it to other 
players? Atleast I can, since other players are far better than Rythmbox.

 Ambika, I suggest you to get a good music player for your needs. This 
 may sound harsh, but this is the fact. Rythmbox is in the same state as 
 Windows Media Player of Windows 98.
   
 
 Can you back up your statement with a fact/proof? The last release I see 
 was made during July 2008. What do you mean by in the same state of?

   

Fact/Proof? It's my personal experiences. I never found anything so 
great in it. Songbird and Amarok have better Album management esp the 
categorization of tracks. Not at am a KDE fan (dont use KDE), but still 
other players are far ahead.

BTW I don't intend to start a flamewar here. We have enough on DE's and 
Toolkits and Languages.

Regards,
Manish

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] sound crashes when scroll the browser

2009-03-08 Thread ambika divya
Hey guys.
take ice .and please cooldown..
It is discussion not war .
Please respect other opinon also .

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) 
m...@manishsinha.net wrote:

 Parthan SR wrote:
  Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote:
 
  I know what I am recommending is not a solution but a workaround. I
  hardly see anyone using Rhythmbox music player. Still wonder why Ubuntu
  keeps it as the default.
 
 
  Eh? I've been using it for the last two years now and I know a lot of
  people who use it by default.
 

 I also know people using it, but they are still outnumbered by people
 who prefer other players.
 No offence meant, but its not at par with Banshee, or Amarok. Again its
 personal taste. Can you explain why people move away from it to other
 players? Atleast I can, since other players are far better than Rythmbox.

  Ambika, I suggest you to get a good music player for your needs. This
  may sound harsh, but this is the fact. Rythmbox is in the same state as
  Windows Media Player of Windows 98.
 
 
  Can you back up your statement with a fact/proof? The last release I see
  was made during July 2008. What do you mean by in the same state of?
 
 

 Fact/Proof? It's my personal experiences. I never found anything so
 great in it. Songbird and Amarok have better Album management esp the
 categorization of tracks. Not at am a KDE fan (dont use KDE), but still
 other players are far ahead.

 BTW I don't intend to start a flamewar here. We have enough on DE's and
 Toolkits and Languages.

 Regards,
 Manish

 --
 ubuntu-in mailing list
 ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in




-- 
ambika
visit my website and celebrate an ancient art
http://ambika.web.officelive.com/default.htm
visit my blog www.kathakguru.blogspot.com
http://www.careerhelpforu.blogspot.com/
-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] sound crashes when scroll the browser

2009-03-08 Thread Parthan SR
Manish Sinha (मनीष सिन्हा) wrote:
 Parthan SR wrote:
   
 [1] When you're replying to a list mail, replying back to the mail is 
 enough and need not be sent personally as well.
   
 
 I hit Reply All button of Thunderbird, Since Reply sends replies 
 personally. I usually set the Reply-to header before sending.
   
Clicking Reply to a mail from this mailing list sends reply to the 
mailing list and not to the individual. :)

-- 
With Regards,
Parthan SR technofreak

GPG Key 2FF01026
Fingerprint 5707 ECBD 8D8D 8E6E 28F8  DFA5 938B D861 2FF0 1026
Weblog  http://blog.technofreak.in


-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] sound crashes when scroll the browser

2009-03-08 Thread Manish Sinha
Parthan SR wrote:

 Clicking Reply to a mail from this mailing list sends reply to the 
 mailing list and not to the individual. :)

   


Thanks God! In this list, the Reply-To field is set by default. In 
many other lists, I have this problem. So habituated to Reply All :D
Well, looks like Ambika's solution is left unattended.


Ambika, please post your reply/suggestions/progress.

Regards,
Manish

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in