Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Not using gobby (UWN)

[Eldo Varghese]

Hi t u
Actually with gobby it saves the the information of who did the edits, 
and as long as the documented is still in the gobby server you can 
access it and find out who wrote what. Granted it uses whatever name 
they gave to the gobby server, but it does also keep their ip etc. in 
the logs. So we can tell who wrote what,when and from where in gobby.
- Eldo

t u wrote:
 Corey Burger wrote:
 On 12/10/06, t u [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi,

 Is it possible not to use gobby? It's just horribly hard to find out
 what changed between pre-gobby and post-gobby changes. Have a look:
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue24?action=diffrev2=34rev1=29


 The show changes feature of our wiki is really not useful (looks bad,
 which means it's hard t ofigure out everything quickly). So I prefer to
 check the changes via email alerts (which shows incremental changes like
 patch files).
 Yes, Gobby makes things hard to see who did what. We also left 24 in
 gobby for a long time. The issue is that we need the collaborative
 real time editing for the UWN. Without it we it takes much much
 longer.

 Corey

 Hi,
 
 Just to clarify, the reason I mentioned this now and not before is
 because if too many [Turkish] people know about the news item on Kurdish
 Ubuntu, this UWN will most probably be vandalized (I'm Turkish, I am
 familiar with our sensitivities... ;) ) and I've been closely monitoring
 it.
 
 So... with a gobby edit like this (so hard to verify what info survived
 the edit), I almost dropped dead with an anxiety attack ;)
 
 Just clarifying, no need to reply :)
 
 Thanks

-- 
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] diy website update

[Martin]

On 12/11/06, Daniel Buch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Well, not to confuse things any further, but I just bzr pushed a new
 revision :-)   Some of the things you've changed with styles to the
 main page were nearly identical to what I just worked on, with some
 small differences (figures :-P ) ...

 Either way, if you're willing to keep a copy of the site on your
 uluga.com domain, it will make for some more dynamic feedback
 sessions.

I'll keep it up there, no problem
This is why I wanted you to point me to some specific task, so we
don't bump into each other.  ;D

What can I help with now?


It renders fine in Firefox and Konqueror, but it seems to break 
terribly in IE6.
  
   Perfect, no?

 Thanks again for working on the browser compliance! I'm afraid I'm
 with Jenda on the IE6 issue - why bother if this site is primarily for
 Ubuntu users?  Spreadubuntu.com, on the other hand, will probably
 warrant such time spent as we'll be appealing to the un-converted as
 well as Ubuntu believers.


I'd love not to have to get it working in IE, so you won't get many
arguments from me.

-- 
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing