VMI & KVM in Gutsy Kernels
For UME, what is the thinking around whether we should have virtualization available in the UME kernels ?? I think VMI and KVM are in the latest upstream kernels aren't they ?? Are both of these already set to be enabled in the desktop and server SKUs of Gutsy ?? Charles Johnson Ultra-Mobility Group Platform Software Engineering Intel Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 503-712-5181 -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Home applet development in Xephyr
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:39:02AM +0200, Johan Bilien wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > I've posted .debs of xorg-server with this patch, here: > > > > > >http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xorg-server/ > > > > > > (I plan to start using PPA for these kinds of test packages in the > > > future, but will beg forgiveness for just posting the raw .debs for > > > now.) > > > > > > Btw, I noticed a discrepancy between keithp's original patch and the one > > > proposed for Feisty. The former had a chunk in its patch that modified > > > the code to add some comparisons to 'CompRedirectNone' (which doesn't > > > appear to exist). Since I couldn't get that chunk to compile, I went > > > with the second proposed-for-Fesity version, but I'm curious about this > > > chunk, and if it's at all important? > > > > Yes I had the same problem, I'm not sure where CompRedirectNone comes > > from, probably Keithp's tree. Anyway I think it's meant to be 0, so > > removing the > > > > -if (pWin->redirectDraw) > > +if (pWin->redirectDraw != CompRedirectNone) > > > > should be harmless. It works fine without this part. > > Yep, from what I understood from the code, it looked safe to me too, > although I'm curious what CompRedirectNone is supposed to be. My only > other idea was that maybe he meant RedirectDrawNone there? Yes quite likely, Keith can you confirm? Is the unclipped manual redirect still planned for X server 1.4? We have now applied it in maemo and it will soon go to Ubuntu's X, it seems to woek very nice. Thanks, -- Johan Bilien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Home applet development in Xephyr
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:39:02AM +0200, Johan Bilien wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > I've posted .debs of xorg-server with this patch, here: > > > >http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xorg-server/ > > > > (I plan to start using PPA for these kinds of test packages in the > > future, but will beg forgiveness for just posting the raw .debs for > > now.) > > > > Btw, I noticed a discrepancy between keithp's original patch and the one > > proposed for Feisty. The former had a chunk in its patch that modified > > the code to add some comparisons to 'CompRedirectNone' (which doesn't > > appear to exist). Since I couldn't get that chunk to compile, I went > > with the second proposed-for-Fesity version, but I'm curious about this > > chunk, and if it's at all important? > > Yes I had the same problem, I'm not sure where CompRedirectNone comes > from, probably Keithp's tree. Anyway I think it's meant to be 0, so > removing the > > -if (pWin->redirectDraw) > +if (pWin->redirectDraw != CompRedirectNone) > > should be harmless. It works fine without this part. Yep, from what I understood from the code, it looked safe to me too, although I'm curious what CompRedirectNone is supposed to be. My only other idea was that maybe he meant RedirectDrawNone there? Bryce -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: UME Guide
Em Ter, 2007-07-03 às 09:08 -0700, Ian escreveu: > Ola, > I have finished migrating the content from all of the 'approved' UME > blueprints into the guide. I > have also created the .pot file for translation. If anyone wants to take a > look or help out it can > be downloaded from > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IanLawrence Thanks Ian! I'll give it a look. []s Adilson. -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
UME Guide
Ola, I have finished migrating the content from all of the 'approved' UME blueprints into the guide. I have also created the .pot file for translation. If anyone wants to take a look or help out it can be downloaded from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IanLawrence []'s Ian -- http://ianlawrence.info -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
power-aware applications
Hi, While reading through Power Policy Management [1], I started thinking about the changes required to applications to make them 'power-aware'. The minimum required would be that the application sends its configuration to the Power Policy Manager on start up. More sophisticated applications might change these configurations according to rapidly changing use profile. Is there a list of applications and libraries that are being made power-aware? Typically, these changes kill performance, so the sooner they are merged in, the better. Regards, Amit [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded/PowerPolicyManagement -- Amit Kucheria, Linux developer -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Testing
Sorry, I just moved systems and I'm testing my email. []s Adilson. -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Home applet development in Xephyr
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Bryce Harrington wrote: > I've posted .debs of xorg-server with this patch, here: > >http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xorg-server/ > > (I plan to start using PPA for these kinds of test packages in the > future, but will beg forgiveness for just posting the raw .debs for > now.) > > Btw, I noticed a discrepancy between keithp's original patch and the one > proposed for Feisty. The former had a chunk in its patch that modified > the code to add some comparisons to 'CompRedirectNone' (which doesn't > appear to exist). Since I couldn't get that chunk to compile, I went > with the second proposed-for-Fesity version, but I'm curious about this > chunk, and if it's at all important? Yes I had the same problem, I'm not sure where CompRedirectNone comes from, probably Keithp's tree. Anyway I think it's meant to be 0, so removing the -if (pWin->redirectDraw) +if (pWin->redirectDraw != CompRedirectNone) should be harmless. It works fine without this part. BR, -- Johan Bilien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
evdev Touchscreen calibration improvement patch
We recently got a patch from the Pepper project to improve support for touchscreen calibration. Unfortunately I don't have a touchscreen device handy to test on, but I've packaged it up for Gutsy here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/evdev/ If anyone here has a touchscreen they could test the above against and give me a thumbs up, and there don't seem to be any noteworthy regressions, I'll put it in for an upload. Thanks, Bryce -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Home applet development in Xephyr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:15:55AM +0200, Johan Bilien wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > I've added the patch in for my next xorg-server upload, which will go > > into Gutsy after the Tribe2 freeze is over and after I've had a chance > > to do some testing, probably within the week. > > Thanks, good news. It will also help us here. Hi Johan, I've posted .debs of xorg-server with this patch, here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xorg-server/ (I plan to start using PPA for these kinds of test packages in the future, but will beg forgiveness for just posting the raw .debs for now.) Btw, I noticed a discrepancy between keithp's original patch and the one proposed for Feisty. The former had a chunk in its patch that modified the code to add some comparisons to 'CompRedirectNone' (which doesn't appear to exist). Since I couldn't get that chunk to compile, I went with the second proposed-for-Fesity version, but I'm curious about this chunk, and if it's at all important? Bryce -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
