UVF exceptions for Universe - batch 4
Hello Colin, hello Matt, would you please consider the following Upstream Version Freeze exceptions discussed by the MOTUs: * schroot (0.1.7 -> 0.2.2): lots of fixes (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/400) * bluefish (1.0.4 -> 1.0.5): some important fixes, upstream recommends it (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/348) * kyamo (0.2a -> 0.3): some fixes, no huge changes (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/343) * gtk-gnutella (0.96b -> 0.96cvs): only way to make it work again (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/326) * scim-tables (0.5.5 -> 0.5.6): improved cjk input (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/275) * nemerle (0.9.1 -> 0.9.2): big bug fixes (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/377) * banshee (0.10.4 -> 0.10.5): critical bug fixes (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/362) * liferea (1.0.3 -> 1.0.4): focused bug fix release (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/384) * bakery2.3 (2.3.16 -> 2.3.17): focused bug fix release (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/365) * gtk-sharp2 (2.8.0 -> 2.8.1): pure bug fix release (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/358) * texmaker (1.2.1 -> 1.3): doesn' ship internal libqt anymore, builds with qt4 (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/356) * ejabberd (0.9.8 -> 1.0): stabilisation release (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/295) * lighttpd (1.4.9 -> 1.4.10): mainly fixed some bugs like crashes or cgi didn't work under some circumstances (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/334) Thanks for your time. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF for chroot 0.1.7 -> 0.2.2
Hello, Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > I'm using schroot personally together with a recent sbuild script to > build on lvm snapshots. I'm very pleased with schroot 0.2.2, and I'm > using it for some time now. Looks like a good idea to do it. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF-exception: skim-1.4.4(fix bug)
Hello, Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2006, 19:22 -0600 schrieb Ming Hua: > As skim 1.4.4 is already uploaded (1.4.4-0ubuntu1 on Feb. 2nd, > 1.4.4-0ubuntu2 on Feb. 8th), I think it's unnecessary to discuss about > this request any more. Ok sorry, must have missed it. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF-exception: skim-1.4.4(fix bug)
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:31:47PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2006, 14:58 +0800 schrieb Zhengpeng Hou: > > skim has new upstream release , and this release can fix this bug : > > https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29255 > > can we get diffstat and changelog for this. > > Who would like to take care of getting it in (once it's approved)? As skim 1.4.4 is already uploaded (1.4.4-0ubuntu1 on Feb. 2nd, 1.4.4-0ubuntu2 on Feb. 8th), I think it's unnecessary to discuss about this request any more. Ming 2006.02.12 -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: "official" MOTU projects (was: Morgue for MOTU ?)
hi, Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2006, 21:47 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 11/02/06 at 13:07 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: > > http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/relationship exists, seems nobody feels the > > need to read it or base his improvements off this, but if i do a search > > in the wiki i find 15 pages like > > > > ContributingToDebian > > DebianCollaboration > > UniverseAndDebian > > (among 15 hits) > > Have you actually read them ? Of course, there is some redundancy, but > not as much as you seem to think. > i take that as a rhetorical question, you know i did and we discussed them to dead in #ubuntu-motu ... > > (i.e. some > > months after dholbach announced the motu teams model for ubuntu, debian > > suddenly started discussing heavily about team maintenance and > > apparently it gets adopted ... i dont say dholbach imvented this model, > > i know there were ideas in debian about it before, but our annuncement > > triggered a wider change in mind in debian). > > Team maintenance is "encouraged" inside Debian, it hasn't been > "adopted". no matter how you call it, it doesnt change the proposition of the paragraph, it had positive influence on debian which is good and as i hope will happen more often in the future ... the core statement of my mail still stands: dont soak the negative things from debian into motu, but try to bring the positive improvements from motu to debian. we have our own identity, there is no need to become a funny copy of debian with all its bureocracy, policies and flamewars. ciao oli signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: ocaml-transition
Gauvain Pocentek wrote: > A part of the work is submitted on malone. Here are the source packages > which can be rebuild without any dependency issue (with malone bug number): thank you very much for the list. Keep up the good work! Greetings, Reinhard -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: "official" MOTU projects (was: Morgue for MOTU ?)
On 11/02/06 at 13:07 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: > http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/relationship exists, seems nobody feels the > need to read it or base his improvements off this, but if i do a search > in the wiki i find 15 pages like > > ContributingToDebian > DebianCollaboration > UniverseAndDebian > (among 15 hits) Have you actually read them ? Of course, there is some redundancy, but not as much as you seem to think. > (i.e. some > months after dholbach announced the motu teams model for ubuntu, debian > suddenly started discussing heavily about team maintenance and > apparently it gets adopted ... i dont say dholbach imvented this model, > i know there were ideas in debian about it before, but our annuncement > triggered a wider change in mind in debian). Team maintenance is "encouraged" inside Debian, it hasn't been "adopted". -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF-exception: skim-1.4.4(fix bug)
Hello, Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2006, 14:58 +0800 schrieb Zhengpeng Hou: > skim has new upstream release , and this release can fix this bug : > https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29255 Sounds good, but could we have the changelog and diffstat before? Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception bluefish
Hello, Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > can somebody check this out? Looks like a good idea to do it. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: [UVF Exception request] Kyamo 0.2b1
Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 14:16 +0100 schrieb Raphaël Pinson: > This is a request for an exception to upgrade K-Yamo with version 0.2b1. It looks ok, the changes are not hugely. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF Request for gtk-gnutella
Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2006, 11:32 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > This is a UVF Request for gtk-gnutella. The current version is unusable: > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gtk-gnutella/+bug/6472 > > Debian has now a new CVS Snapshot which fixes these issues. Seems to make sense. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF-exception: skim-1.4.4(fix bug)
Hello, Am Donnerstag, den 02.02.2006, 14:58 +0800 schrieb Zhengpeng Hou: > skim has new upstream release , and this release can fix this bug : > https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29255 can we get diffstat and changelog for this. Who would like to take care of getting it in (once it's approved)? Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception request: scim-tables 0.5.6
Hello, Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2006, 00:23 -0600 schrieb Ming Hua: > Comments? Looks like a very good idea to have it. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception: liferea 1.0.3
Hello, Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2006, 17:59 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Dröge: > As promised... here ist 1.0.4 ;) looks ok to me. Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception: banshee 0.10.5
> Hi, > banshee 0.10.5 was released some days ago and fixes many critical bugs. > In a few days 0.10.6 will be released which fixes other bugs and I'm > planning to get a UVF exception for this and the next releases as > upstream is currently only focusing on bugfixing. Upstream is pretty much in their own feature freeze for NLD / SuSE 10.1. This fixes a few annoying ones, please allow exception. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception: liferea 1.0.3
> Hi, > I want to ask for a UVF exception for liferea 1.0.3. This is a pure > bugfix release. > In some days I'll most probably ask again for liferea 1.0.4 and > afterwards for other releases in the 1.0 line as only bugfixes will be > applied > Attached is diffstat and changelog diff Bugfix only, very small changeset, please allow exception. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception: nemerle 0.9.2
> Hi, > I wanted to ask for a UVF exception for nemerle 0.9.2. > This release contains many new features of this language, some rather > big bugfixes and cleanup. No rdepends, no reason not to allow the exception. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: UVF exception: liferea 1.0.3
Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Dröge: > Hi, > I want to ask for a UVF exception for liferea 1.0.3. This is a pure > bugfix release. > > In some days I'll most probably ask again for liferea 1.0.4 and > afterwards for other releases in the 1.0 line as only bugfixes will be > applied As promised... here ist 1.0.4 ;) bye PS: attached diffs are from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4... for 1.0.2 to 1.0.3 see the previous mail --- liferea-1.0.3/ChangeLog 2006-02-01 00:40:26.0 +0100 +++ liferea-1.0.4/ChangeLog 2006-02-11 01:53:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,26 @@ +2006-02-10 Nathan Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + Version 1.0.4 + + * Removes GDK locking to avoid freezing the program when a new + browser window is created or a flash plugin is used. Note that + this only effects users of the mozilla renderer and not the + gtkhtml2 renderer. + * When browsing the World Wide Web inside of Liferea, tab titles + now change to the title of the HTML page being viewed. Also, a + similar change was made for the location bar. + * Fixes a crash in the Atom 1.0 parser. + * Tray icon reports if Liferea is in offline or online mode. + (Thomas de Grenier de Latour) + * Long headlines are now ellipsized when displayed in the + item list. + + Translations: + + * Update of Spanish translation (Carlos Fenellosa Biesla) + * Update of German translation + + 2006-02-01 Lars Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version 1.0.3 ChangeLog | 23 INSTALL | 69 Makefile.in | 354 + aclocal.m4| 8499 -- compile | 157 config.h.in |4 configure | 1263 +- configure.ac |2 css/liferea.css |2 depcomp | 103 doc/Makefile.in | 171 doc/html/Makefile.in | 109 install-sh| 471 +- liferea-SuSE.spec |2 liferea.1 | 28 liferea.desktop |7 liferea.glade |6 liferea.spec |2 missing | 144 mkinstalldirs | 89 opml/Makefile.in | 116 opml/feedlist.opml|1 opml/feedlist_de.opml |1 opml/feedlist_es.opml |1 opml/feedlist_fr.opml |1 opml/feedlist_sk.opml |1 pixmaps/Makefile.am |5 pixmaps/Makefile.in | 131 pixmaps/available_offline.png |5 pixmaps/empty_offline.png |5 po/POTFILES.in|3 po/bg.gmo | 18 po/bg.po | 551 +- po/ca.gmo | 16 po/ca.po | 551 +- po/cs.gmo |2 po/cs.po | 551 +- po/de.gmo | 75 po/de.po | 550 +- po/es.gmo | 75 po/es.po | 564 +- po/fi.gmo |2 po/fi.po | 551 +- po/fr.gmo | 90 po/fr.po | 558 +- po/it.gmo | 18 po/it.po | 553 +- po/ja.gmo | 18 po/ja.po | 551 +- po/ko.gmo | 14 po/ko.po | 551 +- po/liferea.pot| 550 +- po/mk.gmo |2 po/mk.po | 551 +- po/pl.gmo |2 po/pl.po | 551 +- po/pt_BR.gmo | 18 po/pt_BR.po | 551 +- po/ro.gmo |2 po/ro.po | 551 +- po/ru.gmo |2 po/ru.po | 551 +- po/sk.gmo | 18 po/sk.po | 551 +- po/sv.gmo | 81 po/sv.po | 554 +- po/zh_CN.gmo |2 po/zh_CN.po | 551 +- po/zh_TW.gmo |2 po/zh_TW.po | 551 +- src/Makefile.am |1 src/Makefile.in | 363 - src/atom10.c | 60 src/callbacks.c | 15 src/callbacks.h |2 src/conf.c|9 src/feed.c|1 src/gtkhtml2/Makefile.in | 240 - src/gtkhtml2/gtkhtml2.c | 12 src/interface.c | 19 src/main.c| 15 src/mozilla/Makefile.in | 330 - src/mozilla/mozembed.c| 34 src/net/Makefile.in | 442 -- src/ui_enclosure.c|3 src/ui_feedlist.c |1 src/ui_htmlview.c |2 src/ui_htmlview.h |2 src/ui_itemli
Re: REVU DAY!
On 2/12/06, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Raphaël Pinson wrote: > > Ok I feel if we wait no date is gonna be chosen... > > > > So how about next Friday? The 17th of February? > > > > Would you be ok for a REVU day on this date? > > This is the HUG Day so I think maybe the 15th might be better. Give a > days rest in between and there is a MOTU Meeting scheduled that day so > there should be plenty of MOTUs around to REVU ;-) > I'm fine with that date, seems good :) -- Raphaël Pinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://raphink.multiply.org Ichthux - http://www.ichthux.org - Christian Linux Distribution -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: Version of Speex
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > I'm the author of Speex and have noticed 1.1.6 is still being included > in Ubuntu. Ubuntu/dapper currently ships Version: 1.1.11.1-1. I assume you mean our stable release, breezy. > Considering that 1.1.6 is an old version on the unstable > branch and that it has several bugs, I really think a later version > (1.1.11.1 or 1.1.12 which I will release this week) should be > considered. The problem is, that ubuntu 5.10 (codenamed breezy) has been released, and we cannot change any package in breezy anymore. > Here are some of the bugs in 1.1.6: If you think that these bugs are important enough to warrant an update, we would need a minimal diff to the package in breezy, which can be hand reviewed. If the patch is reasonably small, convincing the reviewer that the update has no impact on other package, and fixes serious problems (makes the package usable again, etc), then it is a candidate for breezy-updates. This is to minimize the risk of having package updates which break other packages, causing even more load on the developers. Greetings, Reinhard -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: REVU DAY!
Hello, Am Samstag, den 11.02.2006, 18:23 -0800 schrieb Jordan Mantha: > This is the HUG Day so I think maybe the 15th might be better. I still might be busy with GNOME, but I'll do my best. > Give a > days rest in between and there is a MOTU Meeting scheduled that day so > there should be plenty of MOTUs around to REVU ;-) Good idea - thank you! Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Version of Speex
Hi, I'm the author of Speex and have noticed 1.1.6 is still being included in Ubuntu. Considering that 1.1.6 is an old version on the unstable branch and that it has several bugs, I really think a later version (1.1.11.1 or 1.1.12 which I will release this week) should be considered. Here are some of the bugs in 1.1.6: 1) Infinite loop in the encoder. This only affects the CLI encoder (speexenc), but not libspeex itself. When the input is a wav file, speexenc continues to read past the end of file, without stopping. 2) Unstable (in the signal processing sense) encoding. I have discovered that some unusual signals (e.g certain sinusoids) could trigger an instability problem in the encoder. When that happens, at best the encoded file cannot be seeked, but it may happen that just playing it results in NaNs and no audio at all. Note that unlike #1, this bug affects libspeex itself. 3) Incorrect terminator bits. When an application tries packing multiple frames in a packet, the terminator bits are appended incorrectly. But #1 is fixed in 1.1.7, bug #2 is fixed in 1.1.8 and bug #3 is fixed in 1.1.11. Jean-Marc -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
