Re: flashplugin-nonfree: problems with Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon

2007-12-26 Thread Michael R. Head
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 21:06 +0100, Pierluigi Falorni wrote:
> All,
> the installation of the subjected package terminate with an error
> condition. Follow the stdout:

> The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
> Can you fix it?

You can try directly installing the hardy version:

http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/f/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.115.0ubuntu2_i386.deb

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards
>   PLF
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> dott. ing. Pierluigi Falorni
> 
> mob.: (+39) 347 90 24 139
> 
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
-- 
Michael R. Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://picasaweb.google.com/demiri.head.wedding


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: Failing to unpatch

2007-12-26 Thread Cesare Tirabassi
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 22:53:51 Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:

> I working (or trying to) on Bug #178046 [1] and i have some doubts. Talking
> on #ubuntu-motu they have make me notice that the possible cause of the
> error is that some of the files is changing on build time and i need to
> backup it, but the facts are: - That patch modifies 181 files
>   - The patch has 1.9 Mb
>   - The patch is 60154 lines long
>
> That makes it a very hard work to find out what file is the problematic
> one, so i think the best to do here is to split the patch on smaller ones
> and then find which of them fails the thing is, can i split those files
> using filterdiff or i must use another dpatch method to do it the correct
> way. I have tried with filterdiff but something doesn't work fine but i
> don't know it was my error or it isn't the way to do it.
>
> 1. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dillo/+bug/178046

You can find which files/hunks fail by simply running "dpatch 
deapply-all --verbose" after the first build.

Cesare

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: flashplugin-nonfree: problems with Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon

2007-12-26 Thread Brandon Holtsclaw
known issue, being worked on

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/173890

--
Brandon Holtsclaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.imbrandon.com



> --
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
>
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: flashplugin-nonfree: problems with Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon

2007-12-26 Thread Nicolas Valcarcel
Did you apt-get update before installing the package?

On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 21:06 +0100, Pierluigi Falorni wrote:
> All,
> the installation of the subjected package terminate with an error
> condition. Follow the stdout:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall
> flashplugin-nonfree
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree   
> Reading state information... Done
> Suggested packages:
>   konqueror-nsplugins msttcorefonts ttf-xfree86-nonfree xfs
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   flashplugin-nonfree
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/18.1kB of archives.
> After unpacking 160kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> Selecting previously deselected package flashplugin-nonfree.
> (Reading database ... 95766 files and directories currently
> installed.)
> Unpacking flashplugin-nonfree
> (from .../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.2
> +really0ubuntu12_i386.deb) ...
> Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.48.0.2
> +really0ubuntu12) ...
> Downloading...
> --20:55:24--
> 
> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
>=> `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz'
> Resolving fpdownload.macromedia.com... 84.53.170.70
> Connecting to fpdownload.macromedia.com|84.53.170.70|:80...
> connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 3,036,127 (2.9M) [application/x-gzip]
> 
> 0K .. .. .. .. ..
> 1%  128.76 KB/s
>50K .. .. .. .. ..
> 3%  342.09 KB/s
>   100K .. .. .. .. ..
> 5%  422.83 KB/s
>   150K .. .. .. .. ..
> 6%  598.52 KB/s
>   200K .. .. .. .. ..
> 8%  499.91 KB/s
>   250K .. .. .. .. ..
> 10%  572.41 KB/s
>   300K .. .. .. .. ..
> 11%  270.29 KB/s
>   350K .. .. .. .. ..
> 13%   89.62 KB/s
>   400K .. .. .. .. ..
> 15%  139.64 KB/s
>   450K .. .. .. .. ..
> 16%  337.04 KB/s
>   500K .. .. .. .. ..
> 18%  415.45 KB/s
>   550K .. .. .. .. ..
> 20%  410.29 KB/s
>   600K .. .. .. .. ..
> 21%  448.18 KB/s
>   650K .. .. .. .. ..
> 23%  441.45 KB/s
>   700K .. .. .. .. ..
> 25%  358.35 KB/s
>   750K .. .. .. .. ..
> 26%  554.04 KB/s
>   800K .. .. .. .. ..
> 28%  383.29 KB/s
>   850K .. .. .. .. ..
> 30%  436.78 KB/s
>   900K .. .. .. .. ..
> 32%  438.38 KB/s
>   950K .. .. .. .. ..
> 33%  424.35 KB/s
>  1000K .. .. .. .. ..
> 35%  589.13 KB/s
>  1050K .. .. .. .. ..
> 37%  462.40 KB/s
>  1100K .. .. .. .. ..
> 38%  415.82 KB/s
>  1150K .. .. .. .. ..
> 40%  462.17 KB/s
>  1200K .. .. .. .. ..
> 42%  484.36 KB/s
>  1250K .. .. .. .. ..
> 43%  560.05 KB/s
>  1300K .. .. .. .. ..
> 45%  487.81 KB/s
>  1350K .. .. .. .. ..
> 47%  477.58 KB/s
>  1400K .. .. .. .. ..
> 48%  534.08 KB/s
>  1450K .. .. .. .. ..
> 50%  514.07 KB/s
>  1500K .. .. .. .. ..
> 52%  482.54 KB/s
>  1550K .. .. .. .. ..
> 53%  512.42 KB/s
>  1600K .. .. .. .. ..
> 55%  527.69 KB/s
> 

flashplugin-nonfree: problems with Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon

2007-12-26 Thread Pierluigi Falorni




All,
the installation of the subjected package terminate with an error
condition. Follow the stdout:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo
apt-get install --reinstall flashplugin-nonfree
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
  konqueror-nsplugins msttcorefonts ttf-xfree86-nonfree xfs
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  flashplugin-nonfree
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/18.1kB of archives.
After unpacking 160kB of additional disk space will be used.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package flashplugin-nonfree.
(Reading database ... 95766 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking flashplugin-nonfree (from
.../flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12_i386.deb) ...
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12) ...
Downloading...
--20:55:24-- 
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
   => `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz'
Resolving fpdownload.macromedia.com... 84.53.170.70
Connecting to fpdownload.macromedia.com|84.53.170.70|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3,036,127 (2.9M) [application/x-gzip]
  
    0K .. .. .. .. ..  1% 
128.76 KB/s
   50K .. .. .. .. ..  3% 
342.09 KB/s
  100K .. .. .. .. ..  5% 
422.83 KB/s
  150K .. .. .. .. ..  6% 
598.52 KB/s
  200K .. .. .. .. ..  8% 
499.91 KB/s
  250K .. .. .. .. .. 10% 
572.41 KB/s
  300K .. .. .. .. .. 11% 
270.29 KB/s
  350K .. .. .. .. .. 13%  
89.62 KB/s
  400K .. .. .. .. .. 15% 
139.64 KB/s
  450K .. .. .. .. .. 16% 
337.04 KB/s
  500K .. .. .. .. .. 18% 
415.45 KB/s
  550K .. .. .. .. .. 20% 
410.29 KB/s
  600K .. .. .. .. .. 21% 
448.18 KB/s
  650K .. .. .. .. .. 23% 
441.45 KB/s
  700K .. .. .. .. .. 25% 
358.35 KB/s
  750K .. .. .. .. .. 26% 
554.04 KB/s
  800K .. .. .. .. .. 28% 
383.29 KB/s
  850K .. .. .. .. .. 30% 
436.78 KB/s
  900K .. .. .. .. .. 32% 
438.38 KB/s
  950K .. .. .. .. .. 33% 
424.35 KB/s
 1000K .. .. .. .. .. 35% 
589.13 KB/s
 1050K .. .. .. .. .. 37% 
462.40 KB/s
 1100K .. .. .. .. .. 38% 
415.82 KB/s
 1150K .. .. .. .. .. 40% 
462.17 KB/s
 1200K .. .. .. .. .. 42% 
484.36 KB/s
 1250K .. .. .. .. .. 43% 
560.05 KB/s
 1300K .. .. .. .. .. 45% 
487.81 KB/s
 1350K .. .. .. .. .. 47% 
477.58 KB/s
 1400K .. .. .. .. .. 48% 
534.08 KB/s
 1450K .. .. .. .. .. 50% 
514.07 KB/s
 1500K .. .. .. .. .. 52% 
482.54 KB/s
 1550K .. .. .. .. .. 53% 
512.42 KB/s
 1600K .. .. .. .. .. 55% 
527.69 KB/s
 1650K .. .. .. .. .. 57% 
541.15 KB/s
 1700K .. .. .. .. .. 59% 
436.97 KB/s
 1750K .. .. .. .. .. 60% 
532.35 KB/s
 1800K .. .. .. .. .. 62% 
514.06 KB/s
 1850K .. .. .. .. .. 64% 
455.41 KB/s
 1900K .. .. .. .. .. 65% 
580.39 KB/s
 1950K .. .. .. .. .. 67% 
537.76 KB/s
 2000K .. .. .. .. .. 69% 
499.35 KB/s
 2050K .. .. .. .. .. 70% 
529.98 KB/s
 2100K .. .. .. .. .. 72% 
544.89 KB/s
 2150K .. .. .. .. .. 74% 
556.65 KB/s
 2200K .. .. .. .. .. 75% 
543.15 KB/s
 2250K .. .. .. .. .. 77% 
485.60 KB/s
 2300K .. .. .. .. ..

Failing to unpatch

2007-12-26 Thread Nicolas Valcarcel
I working (or trying to) on Bug #178046 [1] and i have some doubts. Talking on 
#ubuntu-motu they have make me notice that the possible cause of the error is 
that some of the files is changing on build time and i need to backup it, but 
the facts are:
  - That patch modifies 181 files
  - The patch has 1.9 Mb
  - The patch is 60154 lines long

That makes it a very hard work to find out what file is the problematic one, so 
i think the best to do here is to split the patch on smaller ones and then find 
which of them fails the thing is, can i split those files using filterdiff or i 
must use another dpatch method to do it the correct way. I have tried with 
filterdiff but something doesn't work fine but i don't know it was my error or 
it isn't the way to do it.

1. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dillo/+bug/178046
-- 
aka nxvl
Peruvian LoCo Team
Key fingerprint = 8104 21CE A580 7EB7 5184  8DFF 6A3A D5DA 24DC 6AF5
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 24DC6AF5


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Linuxdcpp package need update in 8.04 Hardy Heron]]

2007-12-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Andrea Veri wrote:
> Коржевин Дмитрий Константинович ha scritto:
>>  Forwarded Message 
>>   
>>> From: Steven Sheehy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Linuxdcpp package need update in 8.04 Hardy
>>> Heron]
>>> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:26:29 -0600
>>>
>>> Romain Beauxis wrote:
>>> 
 Le Tuesday 25 December 2007 17:44:19 Коржевин Дмитрий Константинович, vous 
 avez écrit :
   
>> yes, it seems upstream made some new changes at the cvs tree available
>> at [1]. Did you try to get in touch with Romain (Linuxdcpp's Debian
>> Maintainer) about this yet? if not, please open a wishlist bug against
>> this package inside the Debian BTS [2]. Feel free to mail me if you
>> notice any inactivity from him, so I gonna package/upload it for Hardy.
>> Thanks for your report and next time remember to open a bug on Launchpad
>> [3] as well.
>>   
 Yes, I'm aware of this.
 However, upstream maintainer told me I could wait for the 1.0.1 release by 
 the 
 end of this year..


 Steven: Am I right ?
 Also, I remember you wanted to propose another package description ?

 Romain

   
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just released 1.0.1. Here's the package description:
>>>
>>> Port of the Windows file-sharing program, DC++
>>>
>>> LinuxDC++ is a Linux port of the Direct Connect client DC++. Though it is
>>> primarily aimed at Linux, it has been shown to work on other Unix-based
>>> operating systems as well. It is written in C++ and makes use of GTK+ for 
>>> the
>>> user-interface. LinuxDC++ is free and open source software licensed under 
>>> the
>>> GPL.
>>>
>>> Direct connect is a peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing protocol. The most 
>>> popular
>>> Windows client implementing this protocol currently is DC++. Direct Connect
>>> clients connect to a central hub where they can view a list of clients or 
>>> users
>>> connected to them. Users can search for files and download them from other
>>> clients, as well as chat with other users.
>>>
>>> http://linuxdcpp.berlios.de
>>> 
>>
>>   
> 
> Debian just uploaded the new linuxdcpp's release [1], which will be
> automatically synced in Ubuntu really soon. (there seems to be no Ubuntu
> changes to be merged). Take a look at this page [2] and you will notice
> when the package will be synced inside the archive.

As we are past DebianImportFreeze you will need to ask the sync, as stated in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess

Cheers

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2007/12/msg02541.html
> [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxdcpp
> 
> Andrea
> 
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Linuxdcpp package need update in 8.04 Hardy Heron]]

2007-12-26 Thread Andrea Veri
Коржевин Дмитрий Константинович ha scritto:
>  Forwarded Message 
>   
>> From: Steven Sheehy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Linuxdcpp package need update in 8.04 Hardy
>> Heron]
>> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:26:29 -0600
>>
>> Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> 
>>> Le Tuesday 25 December 2007 17:44:19 Коржевин Дмитрий Константинович, vous 
>>> avez écrit :
>>>   
> yes, it seems upstream made some new changes at the cvs tree available
> at [1]. Did you try to get in touch with Romain (Linuxdcpp's Debian
> Maintainer) about this yet? if not, please open a wishlist bug against
> this package inside the Debian BTS [2]. Feel free to mail me if you
> notice any inactivity from him, so I gonna package/upload it for Hardy.
> Thanks for your report and next time remember to open a bug on Launchpad
> [3] as well.
>   
>>> Yes, I'm aware of this.
>>> However, upstream maintainer told me I could wait for the 1.0.1 release by 
>>> the 
>>> end of this year..
>>>
>>>
>>> Steven: Am I right ?
>>> Also, I remember you wanted to propose another package description ?
>>>
>>> Romain
>>>
>>>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just released 1.0.1. Here's the package description:
>>
>> Port of the Windows file-sharing program, DC++
>>
>> LinuxDC++ is a Linux port of the Direct Connect client DC++. Though it is
>> primarily aimed at Linux, it has been shown to work on other Unix-based
>> operating systems as well. It is written in C++ and makes use of GTK+ for the
>> user-interface. LinuxDC++ is free and open source software licensed under the
>> GPL.
>>
>> Direct connect is a peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing protocol. The most 
>> popular
>> Windows client implementing this protocol currently is DC++. Direct Connect
>> clients connect to a central hub where they can view a list of clients or 
>> users
>> connected to them. Users can search for files and download them from other
>> clients, as well as chat with other users.
>>
>> http://linuxdcpp.berlios.de
>> 
>
>
>   

Debian just uploaded the new linuxdcpp's release [1], which will be
automatically synced in Ubuntu really soon. (there seems to be no Ubuntu
changes to be merged). Take a look at this page [2] and you will notice
when the package will be synced inside the archive.

Thanks,

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2007/12/msg02541.html
[2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxdcpp

Andrea


-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu