RE:Spyder Package Details In Need of Update

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

> Hello Mr. Vaillant and Debian/Ubuntu maintainers,

Hello

> My name is C.A.M. Gerlach, a member of the 
> Spyder IDE core dev team, and as part of the 
> broader effort in 
> spyder-ide/spyder-docs#39
>  I've been updating our project links (as our main and docs site have both 
> changed to a new, modern version recently) and description around the web. As 
> part of that, I've updated our ``setup.py`` information and details on PyPI 
> and conda-forge, and I've been contacting maintainers of downstream packages 
> to help accomplish the same.

thanks for taking care of your packages maintainers.


[...]

> If its more convenient for you for packaging purposes, Spyder 3.3.1 (fixing a 
>number of important bugs and UX issues with 3.3.0 and earlier versions) should 
>be released in the next few days, so that would be a great opportunity to 
>implement the aforementioned changes.

I already prepared the spyder-kernels whcih is a new dependency of spyder. I 
was already accepted[1] into Debian.

It would be nice if we could have a short and long description for this package.

another point is that  the current spyder-kernel package do not contain an 
expected spydata files or something like thaht whcih means, I had to nactivate 
the unit test.
It would be great to not forget about this file for the next release :).

Once released, I will update the spyder package with your description.

thanks again for your consideration.

Frederic

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/spyder-kernels

-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

Ok, I uploaded to debian unstable now it is fixed and synchronized for the 
ubuntu dev distribution.

I prepared a package for saucy, compiled with pbuilder-dist
I updated the description of the bug [1] for an SRU.
I attached the debdiff to the bug

the next things to do is to ask for this SRU and upload the new package

can you help me for these final steps.

thanks


Frederic

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tango/+bug/1250534
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

Hello,

I received a bug report about one of our users [3], explaining that my package 
(tango) is not working on ubuntu. (13.10).
Indeed this software does not work if it was compiled with this LDFLAGS 
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

So I put in the debian/rules file this line:

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

for ubuntu build (debian does not use this flags by default)
now if I look at the buildlog[1][2] of tango I see that this FLAGS is still 
passed to the configure script.

so what is wrong with the build toolchain. did I miss something ?

Thanks for you help.

Frederic

PS: please CC me I am not a subscriber to this mailing list

[1] 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/154750202/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.tango_8.1.2c%2Bdfsg-1_UPLOADING.txt.gz
[2] 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/140981728/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.tango_8.0.5%2Bdfsg-3_UPLOADING.txt.gz
[3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tango/+bug/1250534



-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions

This is trange because this was not a problem until recently...

I will do the change and see if it works.

thanks a lot

now my question is , is it possible to fix 13.10 once I fixed my package ?

thanks

Fred
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

 Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option
 and it became more pedantic, or perhaps it wasn't providing that flag
 previously?

maybe in fact it is saner like this.

 It seems to work for me.

I asked the upstream to double check this.

 Sure, and thank you for considering Ubuntu users.

 The details are at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. See
 the section labelled Procedure. You'll need to prepare a justification
 and attach a debdiff to the bug. If you need help with this, try
 #ubuntu-motu on Freenode.

In fact I do not have an ubuntu machine myself (I have a very old laptop), do 
you have some ubuntu port machine available for DD ?
so I should prepare a package on it ?.

I will personnaly upload to debian unstable to fix the LTP version of ubuntu

thanks for your answer

Fred
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel]

Thanks

now juste question

reading the StableReleaseUpdates, I understand that I need to target
saucy-proposed right ? even if my package is from univers.

the changelog version with the problem is: 8.0.5+dfsg-3

what is the version expected for this saucy update.

thanks


frederic
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu