Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
> Only the i386 ones work properly.

Following up one more time on i386 emulator. It boots! The SDK is unable 
to "autocreate" the kit for it (process completes without errors, but 
still no kit listed/recognized), but this is some progress for me.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/21/2016 12:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS? I
> think someone once had a similar issue with that.

For posterity, my CPU (skylake i7) supports virtualization, Intel's 
VT/VT-d, and it's enabled in BIOS.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Wayne Ward]

Dont think you will get a kvm running 
but maybe a virtualbox

WayneOn Tue, 2016-06-21 at 12:41 +0200, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
> Running 
> $> kvm-ok
> INFO: Your CPU does not support KVM extensions
> KVM acceleration can NOT be used
> 
> And after checking my cpu (Intel P7450) doesn't support hardware
> visualization (http://ark.intel.com/products/36734/Intel-Core2-Duo-Pr
> ocessor-P7450-3M-Cache-2_13-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB)
> 
> So it means I can't use emulators at all ? 
> 
> 2016-06-21 9:16 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Zeller  com>:
> > Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS?
> > I think someone once had a similar issue with that.
> > 
> > 
> > On 06/21/2016 08:42 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
> > > I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one
> > > using the command line :
> > > 
> > > > sudo ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable
> > > myinstance
> > > 
> > > then running 
> > > > ubuntu-emulator run --scale=0.8 myinstance
> > > and I fall in the same situation. I'll create a bug in launchpad.
> > > 
> > > The complete log is in attachment (emulator.log)
> > > 
> > > I've also tried from unbuntu-sdk and the result is even worth, my
> > > load avg kept increasing (I think I've stopped the processes at
> > > 12). And there was some segfault errors in my syslog  (see
> > > attachment also) and the nice screenshot of the screwed GUI of
> > > the ubuntu-sdk.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 2016-06-21 5:20 GMT+02:00 Unix One :
> > > > On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> > > > > At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a
> > > > i386/stable
> > > > > emulator as default.
> > > > 
> > > > As seen in this blog post
> > > > https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers
> > > > -new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
> > > > it doesn't suggest one way or the other, it just lets you pick.
> > > > The post
> > > > also mentions that
> > > > 
> > > > "for creating click packages for the phone we will need an
> > > > armhf target"
> > > > 
> > > > which I read as I won't be able to do this with the i386
> > > > target. Is this
> > > > wrong?
> > > > 
> > > > > Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you
> > > > just did not
> > > > > wait long enough.
> > > > 
> > > > OK, this time I started the emulator and waited for over an
> > > > hour for it
> > > > to boot. In the first couple of minutes (roughly) it quickly
> > > > reached the
> > > > spot where it gives the "basename: missing operand" error and
> > > > then for
> > > > the next hour, while taking up 100% of a CPU core, stayed
> > > > there; at
> > > > which point I stopped it.
> > > > 
> > > > My laptop is Dell XPS 13 9350 which has Skylake i7 and 16GB
> > > > RAM, most of
> > > > which was free during this time. I would think if the emulator
> > > > were
> > > > making progress it would have finished the boot, or at least
> > > > gotten past
> > > > that point in that 1 hour time period.
> > > > 
> > > > > Also they can get stuck randomly.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, seems like stuck in an infinite loop during boot, at
> > > > least.
> > > > 
> > > > Unless anyone has suggestions, I think I'm giving up for now,
> > > > and I'm
> > > > going to use the phone; and alternatively see how useful the
> > > > i386
> > > > emulator is.
> > > > 
> > > > I would, however, suggest updating the wiki -
> > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator - and maybe few other
> > > > places,
> > > > suggesting that arm emulators may not be reliable for now and
> > > > to use
> > > > i386 or the physical devices, in the hopes of avoiding
> > > > frustration of
> > > > newcomers who might not know.
> > > > 
> > > > Finally, I am new to all this. So please forgive my ignorance.
> > > > My intent
> > > > is to ask questions, learn, and hopefully give feedback. And I
> > > > am
> > > > grateful for any help I get. Thank you!
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > > > Post to     : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > > > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > http://krampstudio.com
> > > http://github.com/krampstudio
> > > https://twitter.com/kramp
> > > 
> > > 
> >  
> > --
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > Post to     : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Bertrand CHEVRIER]

Running
$> kvm-ok
INFO: Your CPU does not support KVM extensions
KVM acceleration can NOT be used

And after checking my cpu (Intel P7450) doesn't support hardware
visualization (
http://ark.intel.com/products/36734/Intel-Core2-Duo-Processor-P7450-3M-Cache-2_13-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB
)

So it means I can't use emulators at all ?

2016-06-21 9:16 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Zeller :

> Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS? I
> think someone once had a similar issue with that.
>
>
> On 06/21/2016 08:42 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
>
> I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one using the
> command line :
>
> > sudo ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance
>
> then running
> > ubuntu-emulator run --scale=0.8 myinstance
> and I fall in the same situation. I'll create a bug in launchpad.
>
> The complete log is in attachment (emulator.log)
>
> I've also tried from unbuntu-sdk and the result is even worth, my load avg
> kept increasing (I think I've stopped the processes at 12). And there was
> some segfault errors in my syslog  (see attachment also) and the nice
> screenshot of the screwed GUI of the ubuntu-sdk.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-06-21 5:20 GMT+02:00 Unix One :
>
>> On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
>> > At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a i386/stable
>> > emulator as default.
>>
>> As seen in this blog post
>>
>> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
>> it doesn't suggest one way or the other, it just lets you pick. The post
>> also mentions that
>>
>> "for creating click packages for the phone we will need an armhf target"
>>
>> which I read as I won't be able to do this with the i386 target. Is this
>> wrong?
>>
>> > Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you just did
>> not
>> > wait long enough.
>>
>> OK, this time I started the emulator and waited for over an hour for it
>> to boot. In the first couple of minutes (roughly) it quickly reached the
>> spot where it gives the "basename: missing operand" error and then for
>> the next hour, while taking up 100% of a CPU core, stayed there; at
>> which point I stopped it.
>>
>> My laptop is Dell XPS 13 9350 which has Skylake i7 and 16GB RAM, most of
>> which was free during this time. I would think if the emulator were
>> making progress it would have finished the boot, or at least gotten past
>> that point in that 1 hour time period.
>>
>> > Also they can get stuck randomly.
>>
>> Well, seems like stuck in an infinite loop during boot, at least.
>>
>> Unless anyone has suggestions, I think I'm giving up for now, and I'm
>> going to use the phone; and alternatively see how useful the i386
>> emulator is.
>>
>> I would, however, suggest updating the wiki -
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator - and maybe few other places,
>> suggesting that arm emulators may not be reliable for now and to use
>> i386 or the physical devices, in the hopes of avoiding frustration of
>> newcomers who might not know.
>>
>> Finally, I am new to all this. So please forgive my ignorance. My intent
>> is to ask questions, learn, and hopefully give feedback. And I am
>> grateful for any help I get. Thank you!
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://krampstudio.com
> http://github.com/krampstudio
> https://twitter.com/kramp
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Bertrand CHEVRIER]

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phablet-tools/+bug/1594685

2016-06-21 8:42 GMT+02:00 Bertrand CHEVRIER :

> I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one using the
> command line :
>
> > sudo ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance
>
> then running
> > ubuntu-emulator run --scale=0.8 myinstance
> and I fall in the same situation. I'll create a bug in launchpad.
>
> The complete log is in attachment (emulator.log)
>
> I've also tried from unbuntu-sdk and the result is even worth, my load avg
> kept increasing (I think I've stopped the processes at 12). And there was
> some segfault errors in my syslog  (see attachment also) and the nice
> screenshot of the screwed GUI of the ubuntu-sdk.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-06-21 5:20 GMT+02:00 Unix One :
>
>> On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
>> > At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a i386/stable
>> > emulator as default.
>>
>> As seen in this blog post
>>
>> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
>> it doesn't suggest one way or the other, it just lets you pick. The post
>> also mentions that
>>
>> "for creating click packages for the phone we will need an armhf target"
>>
>> which I read as I won't be able to do this with the i386 target. Is this
>> wrong?
>>
>> > Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you just did
>> not
>> > wait long enough.
>>
>> OK, this time I started the emulator and waited for over an hour for it
>> to boot. In the first couple of minutes (roughly) it quickly reached the
>> spot where it gives the "basename: missing operand" error and then for
>> the next hour, while taking up 100% of a CPU core, stayed there; at
>> which point I stopped it.
>>
>> My laptop is Dell XPS 13 9350 which has Skylake i7 and 16GB RAM, most of
>> which was free during this time. I would think if the emulator were
>> making progress it would have finished the boot, or at least gotten past
>> that point in that 1 hour time period.
>>
>> > Also they can get stuck randomly.
>>
>> Well, seems like stuck in an infinite loop during boot, at least.
>>
>> Unless anyone has suggestions, I think I'm giving up for now, and I'm
>> going to use the phone; and alternatively see how useful the i386
>> emulator is.
>>
>> I would, however, suggest updating the wiki -
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator - and maybe few other places,
>> suggesting that arm emulators may not be reliable for now and to use
>> i386 or the physical devices, in the hopes of avoiding frustration of
>> newcomers who might not know.
>>
>> Finally, I am new to all this. So please forgive my ignorance. My intent
>> is to ask questions, learn, and hopefully give feedback. And I am
>> grateful for any help I get. Thank you!
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://krampstudio.com
> http://github.com/krampstudio
> https://twitter.com/kramp
>



-- 
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Benjamin Zeller]

Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS? I 
think someone once had a similar issue with that.


On 06/21/2016 08:42 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one using 
the command line :


> sudo ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance

then running
> ubuntu-emulator run --scale=0.8 myinstance
and I fall in the same situation. I'll create a bug in launchpad.

The complete log is in attachment (emulator.log)

I've also tried from unbuntu-sdk and the result is even worth, my load 
avg kept increasing (I think I've stopped the processes at 12). And 
there was some segfault errors in my syslog  (see attachment also) and 
the nice screenshot of the screwed GUI of the ubuntu-sdk.







2016-06-21 5:20 GMT+02:00 Unix One >:


On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a
i386/stable
> emulator as default.

As seen in this blog post

https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
it doesn't suggest one way or the other, it just lets you pick.
The post
also mentions that

"for creating click packages for the phone we will need an armhf
target"

which I read as I won't be able to do this with the i386 target.
Is this
wrong?

> Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you
just did not
> wait long enough.

OK, this time I started the emulator and waited for over an hour
for it
to boot. In the first couple of minutes (roughly) it quickly
reached the
spot where it gives the "basename: missing operand" error and then for
the next hour, while taking up 100% of a CPU core, stayed there; at
which point I stopped it.

My laptop is Dell XPS 13 9350 which has Skylake i7 and 16GB RAM,
most of
which was free during this time. I would think if the emulator were
making progress it would have finished the boot, or at least
gotten past
that point in that 1 hour time period.

> Also they can get stuck randomly.

Well, seems like stuck in an infinite loop during boot, at least.

Unless anyone has suggestions, I think I'm giving up for now, and I'm
going to use the phone; and alternatively see how useful the i386
emulator is.

I would, however, suggest updating the wiki -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator - and maybe few other places,
suggesting that arm emulators may not be reliable for now and to use
i386 or the physical devices, in the hopes of avoiding frustration of
newcomers who might not know.

Finally, I am new to all this. So please forgive my ignorance. My
intent
is to ask questions, learn, and hopefully give feedback. And I am
grateful for any help I get. Thank you!

--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone

Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net

Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone

More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




--
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp




-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a i386/stable
> emulator as default.

As seen in this blog post 
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
 
it doesn't suggest one way or the other, it just lets you pick. The post 
also mentions that

"for creating click packages for the phone we will need an armhf target"

which I read as I won't be able to do this with the i386 target. Is this 
wrong?

> Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you just did not
> wait long enough.

OK, this time I started the emulator and waited for over an hour for it 
to boot. In the first couple of minutes (roughly) it quickly reached the 
spot where it gives the "basename: missing operand" error and then for 
the next hour, while taking up 100% of a CPU core, stayed there; at 
which point I stopped it.

My laptop is Dell XPS 13 9350 which has Skylake i7 and 16GB RAM, most of 
which was free during this time. I would think if the emulator were 
making progress it would have finished the boot, or at least gotten past 
that point in that 1 hour time period.

> Also they can get stuck randomly.

Well, seems like stuck in an infinite loop during boot, at least.

Unless anyone has suggestions, I think I'm giving up for now, and I'm 
going to use the phone; and alternatively see how useful the i386 
emulator is.

I would, however, suggest updating the wiki - 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator - and maybe few other places, 
suggesting that arm emulators may not be reliable for now and to use 
i386 or the physical devices, in the hopes of avoiding frustration of 
newcomers who might not know.

Finally, I am new to all this. So please forgive my ignorance. My intent 
is to ask questions, learn, and hopefully give feedback. And I am 
grateful for any help I get. Thank you!

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Benjamin Zeller]

On 06/20/2016 05:07 PM, Unix One wrote:

On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:

What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
Only the i386 ones work properly.

Hello! That's great information to have. Are you saying we shouldn't
expect armhf (which is the default) emulators to work at all? If so,
this would have been a critical piece of information to have had on the
emulator wiki. All I have tried was arm, because I was trying to emulate
the phone device.
At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a i386/stable 
emulator as default.

But it also appears that some are able launch arm emulator successfully,
so I'm a bit confused.


Probably, but they are extremely slow. Its possible that you just did not
wait long enough. Also they can get stuck randomly.

--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
> Only the i386 ones work properly.

Hello! That's great information to have. Are you saying we shouldn't 
expect armhf (which is the default) emulators to work at all? If so, 
this would have been a critical piece of information to have had on the 
emulator wiki. All I have tried was arm, because I was trying to emulate 
the phone device.

But it also appears that some are able launch arm emulator successfully, 
so I'm a bit confused.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/20/2016 02:13 AM, Andrea Bernabei wrote:
> I somehow missed you tried development and stable channels already.
> It seems to work here with the stable channel.

Yes, I did, with the same result.

> I have the same "basename: missing operand" error in the log, so I don't
> think that's critical, and it boots fine without maxing CPU or anything
> out of the ordinary.

Aha! That's useful information to have! When booting for the first time, 
does it get "stuck" on that error message for a long time? Or you see it 
for a second or two, and the boot sequence keeps going with other messages?

How many minutes did the first boot take for your for stable armhf? What 
hardware do you have?

Thank you.
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/19/2016 11:46 PM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
> Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
> It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your phone badly.
> I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on rc-proposed.
> Actually the best way for me is to test on a tablet since you can resize
> your app in it and even use in windowed mode without the need of an
> external display.
> I guess there's no tablet emulator yet available though.

OK, thanks for the suggestions. I don't own the tablet, but if I can't 
get the emulators to work, I'll have to use the phone.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Bertrand CHEVRIER]

I've created them from the ubuntu-sdk-ide GUI. I've tried both
architectures, but don't remember which channel. I'll try again this
evening and let you know.

2016-06-20 11:16 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Zeller :

> What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
> Only the i386 ones work properly.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 06/20/2016 11:13 AM, Andrea Bernabei wrote:
>
> mmm
>
> I somehow missed you tried development and stable channels already.
> It seems to work here with the stable channel.
>
> I have the same "basename: missing operand" error in the log, so I don't
> think that's critical, and it boots fine without maxing CPU or anything out
> of the ordinary.
>
> Not sure how to help here :/
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Andrea Bernabei <
> andrea.berna...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Good morning everyone :)
>>
>> I have just tried creating an emulator with
>> ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance
>>
>> and it booted correctly to the startup wizard :)
>>
>> Can you please try again, this time specifying the --channel?
>>
>> If you don't specify the channel it will try creating an emulator from
>> the /devel channel, which is, as the name suggests, unstable :)
>> (I've just pinged some colleagues to know why it defaults to devel
>> instead of stable channel)
>>
>> I have 0 experience with the emulator, but I thought I could give this a
>> try and report my experience.
>>
>> Let me know if you manage to get it booting that way! :)
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio <
>> kugi_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
>>> It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your phone badly.
>>> I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on rc-proposed.
>>> Actually the best way for me is to test on a tablet since you can resize
>>> your app in it and even use in windowed mode without the need of an
>>> external display.
>>> I guess there's no tablet emulator yet available though.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Unix One < un...@live.com>
>>> *To:* nick luigi eusebio < kugi_...@yahoo.com>;
>>> Bertrand CHEVRIER < 
>>> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
>>> *Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" <
>>> ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
>>>
>>> On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
>>>
>>> > You should use your phone for testing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently
>>> recommending using emulators.
>>>
>>> Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to
>>> test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or
>>> different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case where
>>> emulators are useful.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Andrea Bernabei]

mmm

I somehow missed you tried development and stable channels already.
It seems to work here with the stable channel.

I have the same "basename: missing operand" error in the log, so I don't
think that's critical, and it boots fine without maxing CPU or anything out
of the ordinary.

Not sure how to help here :/

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Andrea Bernabei <
andrea.berna...@canonical.com> wrote:

> Good morning everyone :)
>
> I have just tried creating an emulator with
> ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance
>
> and it booted correctly to the startup wizard :)
>
> Can you please try again, this time specifying the --channel?
>
> If you don't specify the channel it will try creating an emulator from the
> /devel channel, which is, as the name suggests, unstable :)
> (I've just pinged some colleagues to know why it defaults to devel instead
> of stable channel)
>
> I have 0 experience with the emulator, but I thought I could give this a
> try and report my experience.
>
> Let me know if you manage to get it booting that way! :)
>
> Hope that helps,
> Andrea
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio 
> wrote:
>
>> Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
>> It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your phone badly.
>> I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on rc-proposed.
>> Actually the best way for me is to test on a tablet since you can resize
>> your app in it and even use in windowed mode without the need of an
>> external display.
>> I guess there's no tablet emulator yet available though.
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Unix One 
>> *To:* nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER <
>> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" <
>> ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
>>
>> On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
>>
>> > You should use your phone for testing.
>>
>>
>> Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently
>> recommending using emulators.
>>
>> Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to
>> test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or
>> different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case where
>> emulators are useful.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Benjamin Zeller]

What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
Only the i386 ones work properly.




On 06/20/2016 11:13 AM, Andrea Bernabei wrote:

mmm

I somehow missed you tried development and stable channels already.
It seems to work here with the stable channel.

I have the same "basename: missing operand" error in the log, so I 
don't think that's critical, and it boots fine without maxing CPU or 
anything out of the ordinary.


Not sure how to help here :/

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Andrea Bernabei 
mailto:andrea.berna...@canonical.com>> 
wrote:


Good morning everyone :)

I have just tried creating an emulator with
ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance

and it booted correctly to the startup wizard :)

Can you please try again, this time specifying the --channel?

If you don't specify the channel it will try creating an emulator
from the /devel channel, which is, as the name suggests, unstable :)
(I've just pinged some colleagues to know why it defaults to devel
instead of stable channel)

I have 0 experience with the emulator, but I thought I could give
this a try and report my experience.

Let me know if you manage to get it booting that way! :)

Hope that helps,
Andrea

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio
mailto:kugi_...@yahoo.com>> wrote:

Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your
phone badly.
I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on
rc-proposed.
Actually the best way for me is to test on a tablet since you
can resize your app in it and even use in windowed mode
without the need of an external display.
I guess there's no tablet emulator yet available though.



*From:* Unix One mailto:un...@live.com>>
*To:* nick luigi eusebio mailto:kugi_...@yahoo.com>>; Bertrand CHEVRIER
mailto:chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>>
*Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>"
mailto:ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>>
    *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM

*Subject:* Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:

> You should use your phone for testing.


Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's
currently
recommending using emulators.

Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might
want to
test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or
different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case
where
emulators are useful.




--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-phone>
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-phone>
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp







-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Andrea Bernabei]

Good morning everyone :)

I have just tried creating an emulator with
ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance

and it booted correctly to the startup wizard :)

Can you please try again, this time specifying the --channel?

If you don't specify the channel it will try creating an emulator from the
/devel channel, which is, as the name suggests, unstable :)
(I've just pinged some colleagues to know why it defaults to devel instead
of stable channel)

I have 0 experience with the emulator, but I thought I could give this a
try and report my experience.

Let me know if you manage to get it booting that way! :)

Hope that helps,
Andrea

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio 
wrote:

> Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
> It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your phone badly.
> I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on rc-proposed.
> Actually the best way for me is to test on a tablet since you can resize
> your app in it and even use in windowed mode without the need of an
> external display.
> I guess there's no tablet emulator yet available though.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Unix One 
> *To:* nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER <
> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net"  >
> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
>
> On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
>
> > You should use your phone for testing.
>
>
> Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently
> recommending using emulators.
>
> Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to
> test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or
> different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case where
> emulators are useful.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
> You should use your phone for testing.

Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently 
recommending using emulators.

Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to 
test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or 
different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case where 
emulators are useful.
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[nick luigi eusebio]

Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)It's so much easier doing so 
and doesn't really affect your phone badly.I think it's okay to test only on 
stable and not yet on rc-proposed.Actually the best way for me is to test on a 
tablet since you can resize your app in it and even use in windowed mode 
without the need of an external display.I guess there's no tablet emulator yet 
available though.

  From: Unix One 
 To: nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER 
 
Cc: "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" 
 Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
   
On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
> You should use your phone for testing.

Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently 
recommending using emulators.

Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to 
test on stable, as well as development/rc or other channels, or 
different screen sizes and architectures. That is one use case where 
emulators are useful.


   -- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

On 06/19/2016 02:43 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after
> eating all my CPU for a while.
> I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your
> message it seems it's in the emulators themselves.
>
> It's really an issue for an app developers, for now I'm testing my
> developments only against the desktop mode. I've a bq 5, but it's my
> main phone and I don't want to screw it by testing apps on it.
>
> Let's see how it goes. If one can also let us how we can help, that
> would be great!
>

Thanks for confirming. I'm glad I'm not crazy, or the only one seeing 
this. I think it's crucial to get emulators working. If for nothing 
else, it's a sane way to test multiple architectures, versions, etc.
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[nick luigi eusebio]

You should use your phone for testing. You won't screw it just by testing your 
app :)It's not as if you're messing around with the system.

  From: Bertrand CHEVRIER 
 To: Unix One  
Cc: "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" 
 Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 5:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
   
Hi,

I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after eating 
all my CPU for a while.
I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your message 
it seems it's in the emulators themselves.

It's really an issue for an app developers, for now I'm testing my developments 
only against the desktop mode. I've a bq 5, but it's my main phone and I don't 
want to screw it by testing apps on it. 

Let's see how it goes. If one can also let us how we can help, that would be 
great!


 

2016-06-19 0:23 GMT+02:00 Unix One :

Hello,

Has no one else encountered this, am I missing something obvious, or
maybe I didn't provide enough details, or maybe this isn't the right
list to ask this question?

Here are some more details just in case:
- the host is 16.04 fresh install
- hardware: Dell XPS 13 9350 with Intel HD graphics
- I followed SDK installation steps here:
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/phone/platform/sdk/installing-the-sdk/
- I followed emulator creation/start instructions in the links I already
provided
- I tried creating emulators for armhf with both development and stable
channels, e.g. sudo ubuntu-emulator create myinstance
- and then try to run it with: ubuntu-emulator run myinstance

Here's the `ubuntu-emulator list` output, which lists 3 different
instances I tried:
$ ubuntu-emulator list
myinstance      ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2
testarm
ubuntu=20160506,device=20160401.1,custom=20160506,tag=OTA-10.1,version=19
testarm2        ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2

I'd be extremely grateful if someone could help or at least point me in
the right direction.

Thank you!

On 06/16/2016 07:40 AM, Unix One wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to Ubuntu Touch development and setting up the SDK, and I feel a
> bit dumb unable to get the emulator to launch successfully. It starts
> with the new window, and after few minutes hangs consuming 100% of a CPU
> core, with these last few lines in the log:
>
> [   54.54] systemd-logind[942]: New seat seat0.
> [   54.99] init: force-adb pre-start process (627) terminated with
> status 1
> [   56.39] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
> [   64.25] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> Unknown unit: user@0.service
> [   65.60] systemd-logind[942]: New session c1 of user root.
> [   72.56] init: ssh-keygen main process (1289) terminated with status 1
> [   76.90] init: failsafe main process (1073) killed by TERM signal
> [   81.85] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> Unknown unit: user@32011.service
>    * Setting up X socket directories...
>     [ OK ]
> /lib/init/init-d-script: 12: /etc/rc2.d/S02whoopsie: -c: not found
> basename: missing operand
> Try 'basename --help' for more information.
>
> I've tried both
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator
> and now
> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
> with the same result.
>
> Searching for answers I found:
> http://askubuntu.com/questions/725085/running-ubuntu-touch-emulator-failing
> (unanswered)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/lxc-android-config/+bug/1458043
> (saying it's fixed in overlay)
>
> Is it known/expected that following the instructions in emulator wiki
> will land me in this state? Should I be using the overlay? Or am I
> missing something else?
>
> Thank you!
>


--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to     : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to    : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help  : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


  -- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Bertrand CHEVRIER]

Hi,

I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after
eating all my CPU for a while.
I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your
message it seems it's in the emulators themselves.

It's really an issue for an app developers, for now I'm testing my
developments only against the desktop mode. I've a bq 5, but it's my main
phone and I don't want to screw it by testing apps on it.

Let's see how it goes. If one can also let us how we can help, that would
be great!




2016-06-19 0:23 GMT+02:00 Unix One :

> Hello,
>
> Has no one else encountered this, am I missing something obvious, or
> maybe I didn't provide enough details, or maybe this isn't the right
> list to ask this question?
>
> Here are some more details just in case:
> - the host is 16.04 fresh install
> - hardware: Dell XPS 13 9350 with Intel HD graphics
> - I followed SDK installation steps here:
> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/phone/platform/sdk/installing-the-sdk/
> - I followed emulator creation/start instructions in the links I already
> provided
> - I tried creating emulators for armhf with both development and stable
> channels, e.g. sudo ubuntu-emulator create myinstance
> - and then try to run it with: ubuntu-emulator run myinstance
>
> Here's the `ubuntu-emulator list` output, which lists 3 different
> instances I tried:
> $ ubuntu-emulator list
> myinstance  ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2
> testarm
> ubuntu=20160506,device=20160401.1,custom=20160506,tag=OTA-10.1,version=19
> testarm2ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2
>
> I'd be extremely grateful if someone could help or at least point me in
> the right direction.
>
> Thank you!
>
> On 06/16/2016 07:40 AM, Unix One wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm new to Ubuntu Touch development and setting up the SDK, and I feel a
> > bit dumb unable to get the emulator to launch successfully. It starts
> > with the new window, and after few minutes hangs consuming 100% of a CPU
> > core, with these last few lines in the log:
> >
> > [   54.54] systemd-logind[942]: New seat seat0.
> > [   54.99] init: force-adb pre-start process (627) terminated with
> > status 1
> > [   56.39] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
> > [   64.25] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> > Unknown unit: user@0.service
> > [   65.60] systemd-logind[942]: New session c1 of user root.
> > [   72.56] init: ssh-keygen main process (1289) terminated with
> status 1
> > [   76.90] init: failsafe main process (1073) killed by TERM signal
> > [   81.85] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> > Unknown unit: user@32011.service
> >* Setting up X socket directories...
> > [ OK ]
> > /lib/init/init-d-script: 12: /etc/rc2.d/S02whoopsie: -c: not found
> > basename: missing operand
> > Try 'basename --help' for more information.
> >
> > I've tried both
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator
> > and now
> >
> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
> > with the same result.
> >
> > Searching for answers I found:
> >
> http://askubuntu.com/questions/725085/running-ubuntu-touch-emulator-failing
> > (unanswered)
> >
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/lxc-android-config/+bug/1458043
> > (saying it's fixed in overlay)
> >
> > Is it known/expected that following the instructions in emulator wiki
> > will land me in this state? Should I be using the overlay? Or am I
> > missing something else?
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
http://krampstudio.com
http://github.com/krampstudio
https://twitter.com/kramp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

Hello,

Has no one else encountered this, am I missing something obvious, or 
maybe I didn't provide enough details, or maybe this isn't the right 
list to ask this question?

Here are some more details just in case:
- the host is 16.04 fresh install
- hardware: Dell XPS 13 9350 with Intel HD graphics
- I followed SDK installation steps here: 
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/phone/platform/sdk/installing-the-sdk/
- I followed emulator creation/start instructions in the links I already 
provided
- I tried creating emulators for armhf with both development and stable 
channels, e.g. sudo ubuntu-emulator create myinstance
- and then try to run it with: ubuntu-emulator run myinstance

Here's the `ubuntu-emulator list` output, which lists 3 different 
instances I tried:
$ ubuntu-emulator list
myinstance  ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2
testarm 
ubuntu=20160506,device=20160401.1,custom=20160506,tag=OTA-10.1,version=19
testarm2ubuntu=20151127,device=20150910,custom=20151127,version=2

I'd be extremely grateful if someone could help or at least point me in 
the right direction.

Thank you!

On 06/16/2016 07:40 AM, Unix One wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to Ubuntu Touch development and setting up the SDK, and I feel a
> bit dumb unable to get the emulator to launch successfully. It starts
> with the new window, and after few minutes hangs consuming 100% of a CPU
> core, with these last few lines in the log:
>
> [   54.54] systemd-logind[942]: New seat seat0.
> [   54.99] init: force-adb pre-start process (627) terminated with
> status 1
> [   56.39] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
> [   64.25] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> Unknown unit: user@0.service
> [   65.60] systemd-logind[942]: New session c1 of user root.
> [   72.56] init: ssh-keygen main process (1289) terminated with status 1
> [   76.90] init: failsafe main process (1073) killed by TERM signal
> [   81.85] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service:
> Unknown unit: user@32011.service
>* Setting up X socket directories...
> [ OK ]
> /lib/init/init-d-script: 12: /etc/rc2.d/S02whoopsie: -c: not found
> basename: missing operand
> Try 'basename --help' for more information.
>
> I've tried both
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator
> and now
> https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
> with the same result.
>
> Searching for answers I found:
> http://askubuntu.com/questions/725085/running-ubuntu-touch-emulator-failing
> (unanswered)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/lxc-android-config/+bug/1458043
> (saying it's fixed in overlay)
>
> Is it known/expected that following the instructions in emulator wiki
> will land me in this state? Should I be using the overlay? Or am I
> missing something else?
>
> Thank you!
>


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand

[Unix One]

Hello,

I'm new to Ubuntu Touch development and setting up the SDK, and I feel a 
bit dumb unable to get the emulator to launch successfully. It starts 
with the new window, and after few minutes hangs consuming 100% of a CPU 
core, with these last few lines in the log:

[   54.54] systemd-logind[942]: New seat seat0.
[   54.99] init: force-adb pre-start process (627) terminated with 
status 1
[   56.39] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[   64.25] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service: 
Unknown unit: user@0.service
[   65.60] systemd-logind[942]: New session c1 of user root.
[   72.56] init: ssh-keygen main process (1289) terminated with status 1
[   76.90] init: failsafe main process (1073) killed by TERM signal
[   81.85] systemd-logind[942]: Failed to start user service: 
Unknown unit: user@32011.service
  * Setting up X socket directories... 
   [ OK ]
/lib/init/init-d-script: 12: /etc/rc2.d/S02whoopsie: -c: not found
basename: missing operand
Try 'basename --help' for more information.

I've tried both
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Emulator
and now
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
with the same result.

Searching for answers I found:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/725085/running-ubuntu-touch-emulator-failing 
(unanswered)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/lxc-android-config/+bug/1458043 
(saying it's fixed in overlay)

Is it known/expected that following the instructions in emulator wiki 
will land me in this state? Should I be using the overlay? Or am I 
missing something else?

Thank you!
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp