Re: Ask Ubuntu Question on Volume.

2012-08-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
I sent a reply -- basically we need to determine if it's something that 
is broken in config, or with pulseaudio. There's a new upstream version 
he can test, and we can see if the older version of the audio stack 
works for him. Finally, thew pulseaudio folks will likely have asome 
tweaks to try.


Nicholas

On 08/12/2012 10:45 PM, John Kim wrote:

Is there a way to solve this?

Volume jumps to 100% when inserting or removing headphones
http://askubuntu.com/q/175121/71219?sem=2




--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] ISO Testing Feedback

2012-08-13 Thread Greg Faith
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote:

 Greetings everyone! After each milestone I generally review everything that 
 happened during the milestone, trying to understand how we did, and how it 
 went for you as a community. The release team does the same, comparing how 
 their team did on respins, communicaton, etc. However, especially given the 
 recent confusion of cadence testing, and it itself being an experiment, I'd 
 like to take a moment to specifically invite everyone to provide feedback on 
 how iso testing has been this cycle, and in particular this last week. This 
 is entirely open-ended, but I'll leave some questions for you to think about.

 Did you find the testing itself easy to complete?
 Was it easy for you to follow along with how the testing was going?
 Did you have fun!?
 Specific to the idea of cadence testing (that is, to test outside of 
 milestone at regular intervals), did you find the testing useful or otherwise 
 productive expenditure of our collective time and effort as a community?

 I don't want to share too much of my thoughts so as to not influence the 
 discussion at first. However, I will say it can be difficult to keep abreast 
 of what's happening during the testing weeks as it is and that without the 
 ability to use the isotracker effectively during a cadence week makes it even 
 harder. During the cadence week, using the isotracker, people were lost as to 
 what to do or the status of what was trying to be achieved. If we continue to 
 aim for this type of testing, we'll need to expand the workarounds and 
 ultimately enhance the isotracker to support the testing effort.

 Nicholas

 P.S. Just a quick note; I am always available for feedback or discussion in 
 any manner you wish. Email, IRC, voice or google hangout, skype, whatever you 
 wish. Any idea or topic is fair game. I'd love to hear from you!

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Nicholas et al,

Personally I think the testing last week was well timed with the
changes that are taking place in Ubiquity.  We found some bugs that
will allow the devs a little more time to fix before the next cycle.
If those changes led you to call for the cadence testing you did well.

It appears a couple of critical ubiquity bugs will be cleared with
ubiquity - 2.11.21.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1035167

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1034954


Maybe in tomorrow's spins. I will test a few tomorrow for sure.

As far as fun goes.. Yeah I have fun testing mostly on my new/refurb
Lenovo T61p.

My 2  1/2 cents,
Greg nm_geo

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] ISO Testing Feedback

2012-08-13 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi Nick,

(you will have to tell me one day if you prefer nicholas over nick :) )

One thing that I pick up time and time again is 'red' bugs for ubiquity.
Any system can make a 100% installable system, but if Ubiquity falls over,
we are all . chooses polite word How about Up the creek without a
paddle. I do, hand on heart, say that not enough attention and testing of
the default installer is done.

Regards,

Phill.

On 14 August 2012 01:47, Greg Faith gregfa...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
 nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote:
 
  Greetings everyone! After each milestone I generally review everything
 that happened during the milestone, trying to understand how we did, and
 how it went for you as a community. The release team does the same,
 comparing how their team did on respins, communicaton, etc. However,
 especially given the recent confusion of cadence testing, and it itself
 being an experiment, I'd like to take a moment to specifically invite
 everyone to provide feedback on how iso testing has been this cycle, and in
 particular this last week. This is entirely open-ended, but I'll leave some
 questions for you to think about.
 
  Did you find the testing itself easy to complete?
  Was it easy for you to follow along with how the testing was going?
  Did you have fun!?
  Specific to the idea of cadence testing (that is, to test outside of
 milestone at regular intervals), did you find the testing useful or
 otherwise productive expenditure of our collective time and effort as a
 community?
 
  I don't want to share too much of my thoughts so as to not influence the
 discussion at first. However, I will say it can be difficult to keep
 abreast of what's happening during the testing weeks as it is and that
 without the ability to use the isotracker effectively during a cadence week
 makes it even harder. During the cadence week, using the isotracker, people
 were lost as to what to do or the status of what was trying to be achieved.
 If we continue to aim for this type of testing, we'll need to expand the
 workarounds and ultimately enhance the isotracker to support the testing
 effort.
 
  Nicholas
 
  P.S. Just a quick note; I am always available for feedback or discussion
 in any manner you wish. Email, IRC, voice or google hangout, skype,
 whatever you wish. Any idea or topic is fair game. I'd love to hear from
 you!
 
  --
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
  Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

 Nicholas et al,

 Personally I think the testing last week was well timed with the
 changes that are taking place in Ubiquity.  We found some bugs that
 will allow the devs a little more time to fix before the next cycle.
 If those changes led you to call for the cadence testing you did well.

 It appears a couple of critical ubiquity bugs will be cleared with
 ubiquity - 2.11.21.

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1035167

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1034954


 Maybe in tomorrow's spins. I will test a few tomorrow for sure.

 As far as fun goes.. Yeah I have fun testing mostly on my new/refurb
 Lenovo T61p.

 My 2  1/2 cents,
 Greg nm_geo

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


QA Meeting, call for testing on Ubuntu Studio and meeting log

2012-08-13 Thread Ho Wan Chan


-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: QA Meeting, call for testing on Ubuntu Studio and meeting log

2012-08-13 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello everyone.

I'm Howard Chan, member of Ubuntu Studio Team and also a member of the
community QA.

For Ubuntu QA testers, please read point 1 and 2. For Ubuntu Studio Users,
please read point 1 and 3.

1. Call for Ubuntu Studio testing

The Ubuntu Studio team is looking for testers.

Please join https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers in Launchpad and
also test ISOs in http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/. We would like to see testing
efforts on Ubuntu Studio 12.04.1 and 12.10.

2. Reminder for QA meeting on Wednesday

I will be chair again for Ubuntu QA Meeting tomorrow at 14:00 UTC in
#ubuntu-meeting. The agenda is in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings.

Phill Whiteside (phillw) has removed the Ubuntu Flavors item from agenda.
We will mix it with Ubuntu Updates section.

Please come to the meeting.

3. Ubuntu Studio Meeting Logs and action items

The log is now in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2012August13

The action items are as follows!
Action items

   - Len-nb and smartboyhw to find more people to test 12.04.1 daily images
   - : stochastic to write a draft for changes between 12.04 and 12.04.1
   - holstein and Len-nb to find someone to publishing committs
   - : Len-nb to add menu item on xchat that starts #ubuntustudio
   - : stochastic and Len-nb and holstein and smartboyhw to set up a
   graphics and publishing sub-committee for teh abovementioned metas

Thank you all for reading this email.


2012/8/14 Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com



-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa