Re: question
Mine is stable since Alpha 1. No issue...running smoothly on Dell Vostro 1450 Fauzi On 08/28/2012 01:54 PM, Ho Wan Chan wrote: Er, the Alpha and the Beta builds are more stable. However due to Feature Freeze and UserInterfaceFreeze and Beta 1 Freeze the daily builds may be very unstable. Indeed some Ubuntu distros may even experience image build problems in this week. Thankfully by next week as we test Beta 1 it will be more stable. 2012/8/28 Scott Lewin scott.aw.le...@gmail.com mailto:scott.aw.le...@gmail.com On 12-08-27 04:06 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: Hi, 12.10 has been quite stable, but as with any development release it can break with no notice! Please do not use it on a production machine. On 27 August 2012 20:56, Angel Dreams angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it The experience with Alpha and Beta systems really is different for each computer or device. For myself, up until the last couple days I have found 12.10 to be very unstable with constant crashes on many programs including compiz which was crashing every 20 minutes. -- Your friend, Scott Sent from a computer using Ubuntu Linux 12.10 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: 12.04.1 ISO Testing
Guys, Still got some warning error when upgrade or dist-upgrade http://paste.ubuntu.com/1162255/ Fauzi mfauzirahman@Quetzal:~$ unity --version; gnome-shell --version; uname -a; uname -m; lsb_release -a; unity 6.2.0 GNOME Shell 3.5.4 Linux Quetzal 3.5.0-11-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 16 21:03:52 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux x86_64 No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu quantal (development branch) Release:12.10 Codename:quantal On 08/23/2012 03:15 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: There's been a respin of the alternate images for this bug: LP:1039828 . package fontconfig-config 2.8.0-3ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade, makes system with that package fail to upgrade (LTS-to-LTS) Note it was found while upgrading an LTS-LTS without a network connection. Nicholas -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Call for testing on Webapps
On 07/27/2012 05:38 PM, njin wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 12:51 +0800, fauzi wrote: Nicholas, I'm new member in this testing group. Can you guide on how to open a bug? Regards, Fauzi Hallo Fauzi To do this you needs to have a launchpad account. SImply looking at the page of the test, eg this for webapps BBC http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/228/builds/19413/testcases/1324/results you can see a red written `Link to bug reporting instructions`, click on it, click on which browser you encounter the issue and a report page will be opened, write the title in the Summary box, click `Next', insert a complete description of the bug, scroll down till the confirm button. If you need to attach a screenshot or a file, then before confirm, click on the green written 'Extra option'. More detailed instructions on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs (due to the experimental nature of webapps, don't use ubuntu-bug but follow the above instructions). Fabio Fabio, Thanks for your help. Done submit it -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
