Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-13 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, tanmoy gope  wrote:
> m not fake :) was busy doing college projects. yup dere was a mistake
> as i replied dis same thingh in 3 mails sorry for dat
> no problem if u remove me. i was nly trying 2 learn how 2 help open source
> community.

Could you please refrain from substituting numbers for letters and "d"
for "th"?  I'm a native English speaker and having trouble reading
this;  I can only imagine the trouble the non-native speakers are
having.

Thanks.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-12 Thread Andruk Tatum
Oops, I spoke too soon, sorry!

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, tanmoy gope  wrote:

> m not fake :) was busy doing college projects. yup dere was a mistake
> as i replied dis same thingh in 3 mails sorry for dat
> no problem if u remove me. i was nly trying 2 learn how 2 help open source
> community.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Andruk Tatum wrote:
>
>> I believe the last poster is a fake, as this is the third thread in
>> ubuntu-qa where this message was copied verbatim; would it be possible to
>> remove this poster's membership if this is the case?
>>
>> Thanks mods!
>> -- @
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:19 PM, tanmoy gope  wrote:
>>
>>> respected sir/madam
>>>
>>> m very new 2 dis stuff. can ny1 tell me nything dat i can do n how 2
>>> start. i jst luv opensource. want 2 contribute to communitym studying
>>> computers in college.hav done n+ ccna n mcsa.
>>> thank u
>>>
>>
>>>
>> --
>>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>
>>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-10 Thread Andruk Tatum
I believe the last poster is a fake, as this is the third thread in
ubuntu-qa where this message was copied verbatim; would it be possible to
remove this poster's membership if this is the case?

Thanks mods!
-- @

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:19 PM, tanmoy gope  wrote:

> respected sir/madam
>
> m very new 2 dis stuff. can ny1 tell me nything dat i can do n how 2 start.
> i jst luv opensource. want 2 contribute to communitym studying computers in
> college.hav done n+ ccna n mcsa.
> thank u
>

>
--
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-09 Thread tanmoy gope
respected sir/madam

m very new 2 dis stuff. can ny1 tell me nything dat i can do n how 2 start.
i jst luv opensource. want 2 contribute to communitym studying computers in
college.hav done n+ ccna n mcsa.
thank u

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
mathieu...@ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Bruce Miller 
> wrote:
> > I have been considering for some time filing a bug report about nvidia
> and my
> > monitor. I will hold off, for the time being, pending a reply to this
> > message. What I would appreciate is knowing exactly what info itwould be
> most
> > useful to provide.
> >
> [...]
> > I shall try booting into a recovery console to see what can be salvaged.
> If I
> > cannot manage anything, I will re-install. If that continues to leave me
> unable
> > to bring up 1920 x 1200, please let me know what information would be
> most
> > useful to help troubleshoot the problem. Should I do it here? or in a bug
> > report? or both?
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> What you're describing doesn't seem to me like quite the same problem.
> In any case, please default to filing a bug (the ubuntu-bug command is
> great for this!). It's easy for developers to go back to it and mark
> it as a duplicate later anyway, and it makes sure we get the
> information about your specific problem and that we can work on fixing
> it by having all the information that pertains to that case: hardware
> model, PCI IDs, etc.
>
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
> 4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-09 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Bruce Miller  wrote:
> I have been considering for some time filing a bug report about nvidia and my
> monitor. I will hold off, for the time being, pending a reply to this
> message. What I would appreciate is knowing exactly what info itwould be most
> useful to provide.
>
[...]
> I shall try booting into a recovery console to see what can be salvaged. If I
> cannot manage anything, I will re-install. If that continues to leave me 
> unable
> to bring up 1920 x 1200, please let me know what information would be most
> useful to help troubleshoot the problem. Should I do it here? or in a bug
> report? or both?

Hi Bruce,

What you're describing doesn't seem to me like quite the same problem.
In any case, please default to filing a bug (the ubuntu-bug command is
great for this!). It's easy for developers to go back to it and mark
it as a duplicate later anyway, and it makes sure we get the
information about your specific problem and that we can work on fixing
it by having all the information that pertains to that case: hardware
model, PCI IDs, etc.

Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-09 Thread Bruce Miller
- Original Message 
> From: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
> To: Michael Haney 
> Cc: ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
> Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 2:55:20 PM
> Subject: Re: The Final Straw
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Michael Haney  wrote:
> [...]
> > Manually editing the xorg.conf file is the only option at this point,
> > but its not something the average user can do on their own, so many
> 
> Right. Even with experience doing this type of thing I constantly find
> myself having to search for the syntax rules to write the right parts
> of config to do what I want to do, and it's never a pleasant
> experience.
> 
> [...]
> > submitted a Bug Report about the problem and even posted in the Ubuntu
> > QA list about it, I've begged and pleased, and for more than a year
> > now there's been nothing done.  No progress has been made to fix this
> > issue at all.  Its considered a "low priority", yet more people than I
> > can count have been effected by this problem.
> 
> Could you please respond with the bug report number again? I know
> you're posted in on the list before, but I believe this would have
> much more benefit than petitions. It's good that you bring it up here,
> and it's good that you feel strongly about this, because with some
> additional work and by helping and inviting other users with the same
> issues to come up and let us know about it is how you can really drive
> this forward. Personally I'd be very interested in looking at the bug
> report to see if something can be distilled from it -- like a pattern
> of specific hardware that has the issue.
> 
> My suggestion for you, without having seen the bug report yet, would
> be to ask the people who have signed your petition (if you can contact
> them again) to add information to your bug report with the make and
> model of monitor they use, as well as the make and model of graphics
> card. Opening new bugs and/or pointing to their own bug report is good
> too. That way we can know for sure whether you are part of a small
> group of unlucky people with Panashiba monitors that don't return
> valid EDID information, or a larger group of people with specialized
> equipment that we hadn't heard about before.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
> 4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93

I have been considering for some time filing a bug report about nvidia and my 
monitor. I will hold off, for the time being, pending a reply to this 
message. What I would appreciate is knowing exactly what info itwould be most 
useful to provide.

I have been using Kubuntu for many years; if my memory serves me right, I 
started in late 2005 with Breezy Badger. In early 2006, I upgraded to a Dell 
2405 FPW LCD widescreen monitor. I have used this monitors with two different 
desktops, both with nVidia graphics adapters. The latest is now almost three 
years old; again, by memory (I am not at home), it is a GS7600. The nVidia card 
and drivers have always driven the monitor at 1920x1200.

This adapter / monitor combination has always worked well with every release of 
Kubuntu up to and including 10.04 (lucid) --- and until the release of the 
first 
development builds of Maverick.  In Maverick, I  have never once been able to 
raise the screen resolution beyond 1440 x 1024. I have used both native KDE 
utilities and nvidia utilities and have re-installed the driver (using the cli 
utility jockey-text) several times.

The Maverick set-up is now entirely foo-barred. A graphical session always fail 
with the low-res "graphics problem" dialogue; attempts to log into a login 
virtual console simply leave me staring at a black screen without even so much 
as a flashing cursor. It has been a while and I cannot recall what happens if I 
try to boot into a recovery console. Because I know that it is a development 
release, I do most of my work in Lucid and changes in my personal situation 
have 
delayed plans to reinstall Maverick from scratch.

I shall try booting into a recovery console to see what can be salvaged. If I 
cannot manage anything, I will re-install. If that continues to leave me unable 
to bring up 1920 x 1200, please let me know what information would be most 
useful to help troubleshoot the problem. Should I do it here? or in a bug 
report? or both?
 --
Bruce Miller, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
br...@brmiller.ca; (613) 745-1151
Just when you think your software is idiot proof, somebody comes up with a 
better idiot
Keyboard not found...Press any key to continue. 


-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-09 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Hi Michael,

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Michael Haney  wrote:
[...]
> Manually editing the xorg.conf file is the only option at this point,
> but its not something the average user can do on their own, so many

Right. Even with experience doing this type of thing I constantly find
myself having to search for the syntax rules to write the right parts
of config to do what I want to do, and it's never a pleasant
experience.

[...]
> submitted a Bug Report about the problem and even posted in the Ubuntu
> QA list about it, I've begged and pleased, and for more than a year
> now there's been nothing done.  No progress has been made to fix this
> issue at all.  Its considered a "low priority", yet more people than I
> can count have been effected by this problem.

Could you please respond with the bug report number again? I know
you're posted in on the list before, but I believe this would have
much more benefit than petitions. It's good that you bring it up here,
and it's good that you feel strongly about this, because with some
additional work and by helping and inviting other users with the same
issues to come up and let us know about it is how you can really drive
this forward. Personally I'd be very interested in looking at the bug
report to see if something can be distilled from it -- like a pattern
of specific hardware that has the issue.

My suggestion for you, without having seen the bug report yet, would
be to ask the people who have signed your petition (if you can contact
them again) to add information to your bug report with the make and
model of monitor they use, as well as the make and model of graphics
card. Opening new bugs and/or pointing to their own bug report is good
too. That way we can know for sure whether you are part of a small
group of unlucky people with Panashiba monitors that don't return
valid EDID information, or a larger group of people with specialized
equipment that we hadn't heard about before.

Kind regards,

Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


Re: The Final Straw

2010-09-09 Thread Matthew Shannon
I don't know if this is the case for you but with my nvidia hardware I need
to use the nvidia X Server settings program to change the resolution and
such. It is under System > Administration. ATI probably has a similar
solution. If you run the program from the command line as root it will allow
you to save the settings to xorg.conf

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Michael Haney  wrote:

> Several versions ago Ubuntu once had a feature where you could go to
> the same window where you selected your screen resolution, then click
> on a tab and manually select your monitor hardware.  After this
> feature was removed myself a very large number of others have had
> problems with Ubuntu.  The main problem is we cannot install the 3D
> accelerated drivers, because if we do our screen resolution is limited
> to an unusable 640x480.
>
> Manually editing the xorg.conf file is the only option at this point,
> but its not something the average user can do on their own, so many
> give up.  I've seen a lot of new users throw up their hands in disgust
> and abandon ever trying Ubuntu because of this problem.  I've
> submitted a Bug Report about the problem and even posted in the Ubuntu
> QA list about it, I've begged and pleased, and for more than a year
> now there's been nothing done.  No progress has been made to fix this
> issue at all.  Its considered a "low priority", yet more people than I
> can count have been effected by this problem.
>
> So, I created a Petition to force the issue.
>
> http://www.petitiononline.com/ubu2010/petition.html
>
> If this doesn't work I'll make another one and another and another
> until someone at Canonical finally pulls their head out of the sand
> and realizes something needs to be done to fix this.
>
> --
> Michael "TheZorch" Haney
> "The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking
> of morality by religion." ~ Arthur C. Clarke
> "The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion and
> politics, but it is not the path to knowledge, and there is no place
> for it in the endeavor of science. " ~ Carl Sagan
>
> Visit My Site:  http://sites.google.com/site/thezorch/home-1
> To Contact Me:
> http://sites.google.com/site/thezorch/home-1/zorch-central---contacts
>
> Free Your PC from the Bondage of Windows http://www.ubuntu.com
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa


The Final Straw

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Haney
Several versions ago Ubuntu once had a feature where you could go to
the same window where you selected your screen resolution, then click
on a tab and manually select your monitor hardware.  After this
feature was removed myself a very large number of others have had
problems with Ubuntu.  The main problem is we cannot install the 3D
accelerated drivers, because if we do our screen resolution is limited
to an unusable 640x480.

Manually editing the xorg.conf file is the only option at this point,
but its not something the average user can do on their own, so many
give up.  I've seen a lot of new users throw up their hands in disgust
and abandon ever trying Ubuntu because of this problem.  I've
submitted a Bug Report about the problem and even posted in the Ubuntu
QA list about it, I've begged and pleased, and for more than a year
now there's been nothing done.  No progress has been made to fix this
issue at all.  Its considered a "low priority", yet more people than I
can count have been effected by this problem.

So, I created a Petition to force the issue.

http://www.petitiononline.com/ubu2010/petition.html

If this doesn't work I'll make another one and another and another
until someone at Canonical finally pulls their head out of the sand
and realizes something needs to be done to fix this.

-- 
Michael "TheZorch" Haney
"The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking
of morality by religion." ~ Arthur C. Clarke
"The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion and
politics, but it is not the path to knowledge, and there is no place
for it in the endeavor of science. " ~ Carl Sagan

Visit My Site:  http://sites.google.com/site/thezorch/home-1
To Contact Me:
http://sites.google.com/site/thezorch/home-1/zorch-central---contacts

Free Your PC from the Bondage of Windows http://www.ubuntu.com

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa