Re: suspend/resume test in
On February 24, 2012 02:31:38 Sergio Zanchetta wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out.
> Glen, does "sleep_test -d" perform a full test as "suspend_test
> --full" did before?
sleep_test -d is very basic: one 60-second suspension, no interaction. Passing
a
"-i NUM" argument to check for flakiness in repeated suspensions would be
worthwhile. ("-d" output from a run on Precise below.)
> Is there a specific test available for servers (as "suspend_test
> --server" before) ?
No, but sleep_test didn't do anything that "suspend_test --server" didn't do.
---
2012-02-24 21:51:08,829 DEBUGRunning with these options
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGdebug: True
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGmax_sleep: 120
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGwake_time: 60
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGiterations: 1
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGmode: mem
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGThe following sleep states were found:
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGmem
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGdisk
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 INFO mem sleep state supported, continuing test
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGCurrent epoch time: 1330120269
2012-02-24 21:51:08,830 DEBUGWake alarm in 60 seconds
2012-02-24 21:52:13,608 DEBUGSuccessful suspend
2012-02-24 21:52:13,608 DEBUGCurrent RTC entries
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGupdate IRQ enabled: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGalrm_date: 2012-02-24
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGDST_enable: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGrtc_date: 2012-02-24
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGperiodic IRQ frequency: 1024
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGBCD: yes
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGperiodic_freq: 1024
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGrtc_time: 21:52:13
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGperiodic_IRQ: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGalrm_time: 21:52:09
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGalrm_pending: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,609 DEBUGHPET_emulated: yes
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGalarm_IRQ: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGperiodic IRQ enabled: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGbatt_status: okay
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGmax user IRQ frequency: 64
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGupdate_IRQ: no
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUG24hr: yes
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGCurrent wakealarm None
2012-02-24 21:52:13,610 DEBUGalarm was cleared
--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: suspend/resume test in
2012/2/24 Brendan Donegan : > On 24/02/12 05:15, Glen Ditchfield wrote: >> >> The Extended Suspend/Resume test snr-002 in >> http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/LaptopTesting says to run >> /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/suspend_test. A recent comment on bug >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/848553 says that >> suspend_test is deprecated, and recommends >> /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/sleep_test. >> > As a maintainer of Checkbox (and the person who left the comment...) I can > confirm this is correct. I wasn't aware there was a dependency on our > scripts on the laptop testing wiki pages. Whoever has permission to should > update that page. > Thanks for pointing this out. Glen, does "sleep_test -d" perform a full test as "suspend_test --full" did before? Is there a specific test available for servers (as "suspend_test --server" before) ? > > -- > Ubuntu-qa mailing list > Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- Sergio Zanchetta https://launchpad.net/~primes2h -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: suspend/resume test in
On 24/02/12 05:15, Glen Ditchfield wrote: The Extended Suspend/Resume test snr-002 in http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/LaptopTesting says to run /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/suspend_test. A recent comment on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/848553 says that suspend_test is deprecated, and recommends /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/sleep_test. As a maintainer of Checkbox (and the person who left the comment...) I can confirm this is correct. I wasn't aware there was a dependency on our scripts on the laptop testing wiki pages. Whoever has permission to should update that page. -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
suspend/resume test in
The Extended Suspend/Resume test snr-002 in http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/LaptopTesting says to run /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/suspend_test. A recent comment on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/848553 says that suspend_test is deprecated, and recommends /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/sleep_test. -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
