Re: [Papercuts-ninja] unicode / emoji in documentation (was Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real)

[José Antonio Rey]

Maybe then we would fall into the situation where people who use other
OSs and don't have the Emoji font installed in their systems cannot see
them properly, or even the same stuff as with the Android/iOS example
that was given before.

On 06/22/2014 11:07 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> On 18/06/14 18:00, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:
>> I would say it’s because you have the font. Ubuntu doesn’t display
>> emojis out-of-the-box because it has no fonts supporting those
>> characters.
> 
> Shall we ask to include these by default?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
José Antonio Rey

-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real

[Thomas Ward]

*Sent from my iPhone.  Please excuse any typos, as they are likely to happen by 
accident.*

> On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:48, Dario Ruellan  wrote:
> 
> I was following this discussion passively, trying to filter-out the emoji
> situation ;)
> About the final "Common situations" I have two questions:
> 
> "Its software has not been packaged by Ubuntu, but by a third party." Agree
> that can't be fixable by Ubuntu, but, it is still a Pepercut
If and only if you work with upstream/third-party to fix it.  That's outside 
the realm of Ubuntu bug triage and probably papercuts...

> "The user mangled the "/etc/apt/sources.list" file" is not the same as "The
> user misconfigured the system"? Looks redundant.
Looks kinda redundant, in my opinion, yes.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella <
> es204904...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I've been writing a list of common situations where a bug isn't real:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Do you know of some other?
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
>> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
>> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Darío Ruellan [image: Google Profile]
>  [image: Linkedin]
>  [image: Twitter]
> 
> Information Technology Professional
> 17CC 5A20 2F75 610F BB0F
> 57A2 9D7F 54F3 5705 DDD3
> -- 
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Re: Common situations where a bug isn't real

[Dario Ruellan]

I was following this discussion passively, trying to filter-out the emoji
situation ;)
About the final "Common situations" I have two questions:

"Its software has not been packaged by Ubuntu, but by a third party." Agree
that can't be fixable by Ubuntu, but, it is still a Pepercut?
"The user mangled the "/etc/apt/sources.list" file" is not the same as "The
user misconfigured the system"? Looks redundant.

Thanks!


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella <
es204904...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been writing a list of common situations where a bug isn't real:
>
> 
>
> Do you know of some other?
>
> Regards.
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>



-- 
Darío Ruellan [image: Google Profile]
 [image: Linkedin]
 [image: Twitter]

Information Technology Professional
 17CC 5A20 2F75 610F BB0F
57A2 9D7F 54F3 5705 DDD3
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality