Re: [lubuntu-devel] Lubuntu Zesty Zapus Beta 1 Call For Testing

2017-02-23 Thread Walter Lapchynski
Lubuntu did not fully tested before we had to do a respin last night, so we
*urgently* need the full suite of testcases completed in order to release
Beta 1. According to the Release Team, it will be shipped in 4 hours with
or  without us.

That said, we need your help, regardless of whether or not you're familiar
with testing, whether you're on the Lubuntu Team, whether you use Lubuntu,
whether you have old hardware or new hardware, whether you have a machine
to install on or not (virtual machines work).

To get started, go to the [ISO QA tracker] [1], pick a Lubuntu testcase and
test. Instructions on how to use the tracker are at the top of the page.
Just make sure to record your results on the tracker. This is a formal
process.

If you have questions, come to #lubuntu-devel on IRC or reply back to the
lubuntu-devel mailing list. Feel free to ping tsimonq2 or myself.

Thanks for making Lubuntu better!

[1]: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/373/builds

@wxl | polka.bike
c563 cac5 8be1 2f22 a49d
68f6 8b57 a48b c4f2 051a

On Feb 23, 2017 04:37, "Simon Quigley" <tsimo...@ubuntu.com> wrote:

Another respin happened last night for Lubuntu images to fix touchpad
functionality.

We need help testing these new images so we can release Beta 1 later.

Thanks! :)

-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com

tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4

-- 
Lubuntu-devel mailing list
lubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
an/listinfo/lubuntu-devel
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1 Testing for flavors

2015-02-24 Thread Elfy
On 23/02/15 20:05, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
 Beta 1 Testing is going on this week for release this Thursday.


 Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu Kylin, UbuntuGNOME
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME, Ubuntu MATE, Xubuntu, and
 Ubuntu Studio are all taking part. Look for the milestone to appear
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ very soon. I trust someone will reply to
 this mailing with the milestone link once it's live.

 Happy Testing everyone!

 Nicholas

That'll be this then

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/334/builds

regards

-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Beta 1 Testing this week!

2014-08-26 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Beta 1 Testing is going on this week. Ubuntu is not participating, but 
many flavors are. You can find the builds on the tracker under the beta 
1 milestone:


http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/322/builds

As of this writing, Kubuntu, Ubuntu Gnome and Ubuntu Kylin builds are 
already on the tracker. I expect builds from lubuntu and xubuntu to be 
appearing as well. Howeber, remember it's an optional milestone and 
participation is not required for these flavors (just in case you don't 
see them :-) ).


Please help test the images today and tomorrow in preperation for the 
release of Beta 1 on Thursday. As usual, the tracker has helpful links 
at the top of the page, but I'll repeat them here. If you've never 
performed an iso test, have a look!


https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Walkthrough
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker

Thanks!

Nicholas

--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1

2013-09-04 Thread Christopher Wetzel
What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala but I
always tested by myself and just sent in the bug reports. I never was part
of a team at Ubuntu.
On Sep 2, 2013 6:14 PM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi,

 the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the pretty much the
 finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you want to see how
 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves, now is a really good
 time to grab it!!

 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds

 Regards,

 Phill.

 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1

2013-09-04 Thread Nio Wiklund
Hi Christopher,

Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
alternate iso and start testing it.

What kind of environment is available for you to test it?

safe end
- VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
- Dedicated test computer
- Your second computer (with a system installed)
- Your production computer
risky end

I suggest that you avoid testing in your production computer. The other
choices are OK, depending on your willingness to take risks. I have
tested Lubuntu Saucy in all my computers, and I don't think there is any
risk for the hardware, only the risk that you 'happen to' overwrite an
operating system or some data. So if you have a good backup, you can
relax, even testing in a computer with an important system installed.

There are instructions at the qa-tracker

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds

and see for example these links

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds/52711/testcases
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1437/info
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1438/info

Ask here or (since we both have gmail) we might have a gmail chat if you
need faster response to questions along the way.

Best regards
Nio

On 2013-09-03 11:43, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
 What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala but I
 always tested by myself and just sent in the bug reports. I never was
 part of a team at Ubuntu.
 
 On Sep 2, 2013 6:14 PM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com
 mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the pretty much
 the finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you want to
 see how 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves, now is a
 really good time to grab it!!
 
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
 
 Regards,
 
 Phill.
 
 -- 
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
 
 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 
 
 


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1

2013-09-04 Thread Christopher Wetzel
All together I have 8 laptops 6 desktops 3 tablets but they're in storage
but presently I have 1 laptop one desktop and one of my test tablets here.
I just finished testing Ubuntu  Raring Ringtail and I also test Ubuntu OS
on my Nexus 7 tablet and at the same time I was testing windows 8 and a few
other things so if its not real demanding I will take a break until I get
done moving which will be in a week or two. I will be moving to a bigger
house and I plan on setting up a massive server in the garage. But at the
moment I have Ubuntu 13.04 on my laptop still haven't used 13.10.
On Sep 4, 2013 3:39 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Christopher,

 Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
 alternate iso and start testing it.

 What kind of environment is available for you to test it?

 safe end
 - VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
 - Dedicated test computer
 - Your second computer (with a system installed)
 - Your production computer
 risky end

 I suggest that you avoid testing in your production computer. The other
 choices are OK, depending on your willingness to take risks. I have
 tested Lubuntu Saucy in all my computers, and I don't think there is any
 risk for the hardware, only the risk that you 'happen to' overwrite an
 operating system or some data. So if you have a good backup, you can
 relax, even testing in a computer with an important system installed.

 There are instructions at the qa-tracker

 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds

 and see for example these links

 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds/52711/testcases
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1437/info
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1438/info

 Ask here or (since we both have gmail) we might have a gmail chat if you
 need faster response to questions along the way.

 Best regards
 Nio

 On 2013-09-03 11:43, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
  What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala but I
  always tested by myself and just sent in the bug reports. I never was
  part of a team at Ubuntu.
 
  On Sep 2, 2013 6:14 PM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com
  mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the pretty much
  the finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you want to
  see how 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves, now is a
  really good time to grab it!!
 
  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
 
  Regards,
 
  Phill.
 
  --
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
 
  --
  Ubuntu-quality mailing list
  Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
  Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 
 
 


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1

2013-09-04 Thread Nio Wiklund
Hi again Christopher,

I think you know at least as much as I about testing :-D

Anyway, you need to live too, so only if you have some time now  ...
please try installing Lubuntu from an alternate iso. You would help us
perform a good beta 1 test. I think it will finish today or tomorrow.

If you have better time in a week or two it will be past beta 1, but
there will be beta 2 and release candidates before Saucy will be
released in October, so don't worry, there will be plenty of tasks.

Best regards
Nio

On 2013-09-04 11:00, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
 All together I have 8 laptops 6 desktops 3 tablets but they're in
 storage but presently I have 1 laptop one desktop and one of my test
 tablets here.
 I just finished testing Ubuntu  Raring Ringtail and I also test Ubuntu
 OS on my Nexus 7 tablet and at the same time I was testing windows 8 and
 a few other things so if its not real demanding I will take a break
 until I get done moving which will be in a week or two. I will be moving
 to a bigger house and I plan on setting up a massive server in the
 garage. But at the moment I have Ubuntu 13.04 on my laptop still haven't
 used 13.10.
 
 On Sep 4, 2013 3:39 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com
 mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Christopher,
 
 Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
 alternate iso and start testing it.
 
 What kind of environment is available for you to test it?
 
 safe end
 - VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
 - Dedicated test computer
 - Your second computer (with a system installed)
 - Your production computer
 risky end
 
 I suggest that you avoid testing in your production computer. The other
 choices are OK, depending on your willingness to take risks. I have
 tested Lubuntu Saucy in all my computers, and I don't think there is any
 risk for the hardware, only the risk that you 'happen to' overwrite an
 operating system or some data. So if you have a good backup, you can
 relax, even testing in a computer with an important system installed.
 
 There are instructions at the qa-tracker
 
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
 
 and see for example these links
 
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds/52711/testcases
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1437/info
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1438/info
 
 Ask here or (since we both have gmail) we might have a gmail chat if you
 need faster response to questions along the way.
 
 Best regards
 Nio
 
 On 2013-09-03 11:43, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
  What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala
 but I
  always tested by myself and just sent in the bug reports. I never was
  part of a team at Ubuntu.
 
  On Sep 2, 2013 6:14 PM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com
 mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com
  mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the
 pretty much
  the finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you
 want to
  see how 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves,
 now is a
  really good time to grab it!!
 
  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
 
  Regards,
 
  Phill.
 
  --
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
 
  --
  Ubuntu-quality mailing list
  Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
  Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 
 
 
 


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: Beta 1

2013-09-04 Thread Christopher Wetzel
Great, thank you and I am honored to be with you guys
On Sep 4, 2013 4:16 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi again Christopher,

 I think you know at least as much as I about testing :-D

 Anyway, you need to live too, so only if you have some time now  ...
 please try installing Lubuntu from an alternate iso. You would help us
 perform a good beta 1 test. I think it will finish today or tomorrow.

 If you have better time in a week or two it will be past beta 1, but
 there will be beta 2 and release candidates before Saucy will be
 released in October, so don't worry, there will be plenty of tasks.

 Best regards
 Nio

 On 2013-09-04 11:00, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
  All together I have 8 laptops 6 desktops 3 tablets but they're in
  storage but presently I have 1 laptop one desktop and one of my test
  tablets here.
  I just finished testing Ubuntu  Raring Ringtail and I also test Ubuntu
  OS on my Nexus 7 tablet and at the same time I was testing windows 8 and
  a few other things so if its not real demanding I will take a break
  until I get done moving which will be in a week or two. I will be moving
  to a bigger house and I plan on setting up a massive server in the
  garage. But at the moment I have Ubuntu 13.04 on my laptop still haven't
  used 13.10.
 
  On Sep 4, 2013 3:39 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com
  mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi Christopher,
 
  Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
  alternate iso and start testing it.
 
  What kind of environment is available for you to test it?
 
  safe end
  - VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
  - Dedicated test computer
  - Your second computer (with a system installed)
  - Your production computer
  risky end
 
  I suggest that you avoid testing in your production computer. The
 other
  choices are OK, depending on your willingness to take risks. I have
  tested Lubuntu Saucy in all my computers, and I don't think there is
 any
  risk for the hardware, only the risk that you 'happen to' overwrite
 an
  operating system or some data. So if you have a good backup, you can
  relax, even testing in a computer with an important system installed.
 
  There are instructions at the qa-tracker
 
  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
 
  and see for example these links
 
 
 http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds/52711/testcases
  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1437/info
  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1438/info
 
  Ask here or (since we both have gmail) we might have a gmail chat if
 you
  need faster response to questions along the way.
 
  Best regards
  Nio
 
  On 2013-09-03 11:43, Christopher Wetzel wrote:
   What do you need me to do? I have been testing since Karmic Koala
  but I
   always tested by myself and just sent in the bug reports. I never
 was
   part of a team at Ubuntu.
  
   On Sep 2, 2013 6:14 PM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com
  mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com
   mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com mailto:phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  
   Hi,
  
   the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the
  pretty much
   the finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you
  want to
   see how 13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves,
  now is a
   really good time to grab it!!
  
   http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds
  
   Regards,
  
   Phill.
  
   --
   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
  
   --
   Ubuntu-quality mailing list
   Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
  mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
  mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
  mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
   Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
  
  
  
 


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Ubuntu flavours 13.10 Beta 1 upgrade testing

2013-09-03 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Ubuntu Release Team, flavour's project leads and QA leads,

May I specifically remind you that the upgrade tests are NOT enabled for
Ubuntu 13.10 Beta 1. We at Ubuntu Studio decided to enable the upgrade
tests since we really need to try how it works for 13.04 - 13.10. Flavours
do NOT necessarily have to enable the upgrade tests, but you might want to
enable these for good:)

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
Ubuntu Studio Release Manager
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Beta 1

2013-09-02 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi,

the Beta 1's are now available for testing. They are the pretty much the
finished article (art work follows a bit later). If you want to see how
13.10 behaves on your system and ensure it behaves, now is a really good
time to grab it!!

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/302/builds

Regards,

Phill.

-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-14 Thread Nio Wiklund
I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
explain.

I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be
possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping
and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed.

But when you have something to test, I'm willing to check that it works
in my Pentium M computer.

On 2013-03-14 11:53, Alex Janko wrote:
 We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not require 7bit
 
 Like:
 
 If Pentium M {
  Skip PAE Check
 } Else If (PAE=1) {
  boot();
 } Else {
  paeErrorBoot();
 }
 
 Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :)
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Phill,

 I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's
 fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do
 it :-)

 Nio alias sudodus

 On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 Hi alex,

 I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
 We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Oooch!

 You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
 has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
 versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

 Regards,

 Phill.
 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/

 On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
 to respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring 
 step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
 people on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those
 this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-14 Thread Alex Janko
Well...I assume its in assembly or CSomething and I know neither of
those languages

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
 explain.

 I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be
 possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping
 and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed.

 But when you have something to test, I'm willing to check that it works
 in my Pentium M computer.

 On 2013-03-14 11:53, Alex Janko wrote:
 We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not require 7bit

 Like:

 If Pentium M {
 Skip PAE Check
 } Else If (PAE=1) {
 boot();
 } Else {
 paeErrorBoot();
 }

 Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :)

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Phill,

 I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's
 fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do
 it :-)

 Nio alias sudodus

 On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 Hi alex,

 I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
 We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Oooch!

 You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
 has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
 versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

 Regards,

 Phill.
 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/

 On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have 
 a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
 to respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring 
 step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
 people on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those
 this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-14 Thread Nio Wiklund
Is there a way to send this task to a developer, who would know

1. where that test is done (the source code)

2. how to do it (or pass the code to someone less skilled, but enough
skilled to compile and try out a snippet with that particular test on
various computers).

If it is plain C or a bash or sh shellscript, I might dare an attempt at
it, but I definitely need some handholding, above all, I have no idea
where to find where the test is done.

On 2013-03-14 12:42, Alex Janko wrote:
 Well...I assume its in assembly or CSomething and I know neither of
 those languages
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
 explain.

 I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be
 possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping
 and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed.

 But when you have something to test, I'm willing to check that it works
 in my Pentium M computer.

 On 2013-03-14 11:53, Alex Janko wrote:
 We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not require 
 7bit

 Like:

 If Pentium M {
 Skip PAE Check
 } Else If (PAE=1) {
 boot();
 } Else {
 paeErrorBoot();
 }

 Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :)

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund nio.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Phill,

 I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's
 fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do
 it :-)

 Nio alias sudodus

 On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 Hi alex,

 I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
 We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Oooch!

 You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the 
 machine
 has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
 versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

 Regards,

 Phill.
 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/

 On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod 
 -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to 
 have a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M 
 models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the 
 PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com 
 wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
 to respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring 
 step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
 people on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those
 this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars



-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-13 Thread Nio Wiklund
Hi Phill,

I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's
fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do
it :-)

Nio alias sudodus

On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 Hi alex,
 
 I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
 We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.
 
 Regards,
 
 Phill.
 
 On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
 Oooch!

 You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
 has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
 versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

 Regards,

 Phill.
 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/

 On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
 to respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
 people on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those
 this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

 --
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 
 
 
 
 


-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-12 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi Lars,

well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
didn't spot why Any ways,

12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what to
 respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


So, they're onto it :)

Regards,

Phill.
P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good people on
there do not bite :)


On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
  1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
  2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-12 Thread Alex Janko
Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed boot

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

Hi Lars,

well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
didn't spot why Any ways,

12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what to
 respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


So, they're onto it :)

Regards,

Phill.
P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good people on
there do not bite :)


On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
  1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
  2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-12 Thread Phill Whiteside
Oooch!

You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

Regards,

Phill.
1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/
On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what to
 respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good people
 on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
  1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
  2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

 --
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Fwd: Ubuntu Studio 13.04 Beta 1 testing is now on!

2013-03-12 Thread Ho Wan Chan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com
Date: 2013-3-12 下午6:39
Subject: Ubuntu Studio 13.04 Beta 1 testing is now on!
To: Ubuntu Studio Development  Technical Discussion 
ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com

Dear fellow testers:

The testing period for Ubuntu Studio 13.04 Beta 1 has started!

Ubuntu Studio 13.04 Beta 1 is a release milestone to release Ubuntu Studio
13.04. This is a beta release, so only testers and enthusiatic users should
use this release.

The Ubuntu Studio team has implemented lots of new features, including new
apps (supercollider, faust, lmms, kdenlive, recordmydesktop, Krita, and
create-resources), new wallpapers from the community, new ubiquity, new
menu items, and much more!

Please test the images which can be downloaded from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/raring/dvd/current/ . We especially
want testers with amd64 machines to test the amd64 ISOs since there was
normally a problem of not having enough testers. Just follow the testcases
for Ubuntu Studio in
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds.

After you have tested it report the result on the same page of the
testcases. If the ISO installs and boots and runs OK after installation,
submit a pass result. If it fails, please submit a failed result and also
leave the comment with the reported bug(s) and comment. It would also be
nice to give us the link of your hardware profile.

If you have any questions please contact Scott Lavender (scott-work), Kaj
Ailomaa (zequence)or Howard Chan (smartboyhw) in #ubuntustudio-devel on
irc.freenode.net.

Wish you a happy time testing!

Regards,
smartboyhw (Howard Chan)
on behalf of the Ubuntu Studio Team
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1

2013-03-12 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hi alex,

I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.

Regards,

Phill.

On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Oooch!

 You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
 has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
 versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.

 Regards,

 Phill.
 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/

 On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not anymore, no
 And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a chmod -R
 444 /var/www/dir/dir/ it decided to ignore all of that and start at /

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Alex,

 would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session
 and issue:

 ubuntu-bug ubiquity

 from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about
 it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have a
 think.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko ajbi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
 have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
 ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?

 I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed
 boot

 Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
 didn't spot why Any ways,

 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
 (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
 (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
 to respin
 (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images Raring
 server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring step
 [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992
 (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board


 So, they're onto it :)

 Regards,

 Phill.
 P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good
 people on there do not bite :)


 On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote:
  1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds
  2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing

 I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images.  Are we skipping those
 this
 time?

 Regards,
 /Lars

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality


 --
 Ubuntu-quality mailing list
 Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

 --
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality