Re: An updated version of proposed-migration is available to review

[Sebastien Bacher]

Hey Iain, thanks for the work!

Le 16/06/2020 à 19:07, Iain Lane a écrit :
> If you can see anything that's *wrong* in the output linked above, 
> please let me know. If you run any scripts which parse the yaml, please 
> try them against
>
>   
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.yaml
>
> and ideally adapt them as necessary.

(That's a .xz compressed version which is a bit confusing)

The by-team-report is unhappy with the new file, it doesn't like the
policy_info/autopkgtest section having no package listed, e.g from gcc-9

  policy_info:
    autopkgtest:
  verdict: REJECTED_TEMPORARILY

Skipping those cases as a test workaround gives a report where bug
references are buggy (listed as #0).

I plan to work on those issues tomorrow


Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

Re: An updated version of proposed-migration is available to review

[Iain Lane]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:49:18PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> I could maybe make a diff of subsets of the yaml, if that would be 
> helpful. Perhaps even just a diff of the candidates, and then people 
> can manually go back and inspect why something does or does not 
> migrate when it didn't/did before.

Done:

  
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses_diff.html

The current and new proposed-migration runs are not synced - they run on 
slightly different archive state - please bear this in mind when looking 
at that diff if you see things that aren't there but 'should' be, or 
differences in state like test results.

(rough-n-ready code: 
https://gist.github.com/iainlane/2607b426837fe885a1760e9639871a9c)

One thing this made me notice that I could have mentioned in the OP:

  - Sets of autopkgtest results where there is no action required (all 
pass, all alwaysfailed) are *omitted from the HTML output*, as you 
don't need to think about them. That could be a bit confusing if 
you're used to the current way.

Cheers,

-- 
Iain Lane  [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer   [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer   [ la...@ubuntu.com ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release