[Bug 444479] Re: missing apparmor access rule
I am also not able to start the mysql process successfully, even after adding the line /sys/devices/system/cpu/ r, to /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld. Did an update of packages apt-get install mysql-client mysql-client-5.1 mysql-client-core-5.1 on ubuntu lucid. After this, when starting mysql with upstart script: service mysql start it just hangs, ps -e | grep my shows no processes. This happens when apparmor is running and when it is not, though settings (checked from a working mysql database server) seem to be correct. Something in the context/apparmor/security must be missing... any ideas? Could I remove profiles from apparmor to see if this is related without risking a server reboot? Apparmor status shows: /etc/init.d/apparmor status apparmor module is loaded. 6 profiles are loaded. 6 profiles are in enforce mode. /sbin/dhclient3 /usr/bin/freshclam /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action /usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient-script /usr/sbin/mysqld /usr/sbin/tcpdump 0 profiles are in complain mode. 1 processes have profiles defined. 1 processes are in enforce mode : /usr/bin/freshclam (1706) 0 processes are in complain mode. 0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79 Title: missing apparmor access rule -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 444479] Re: missing apparmor access rule
This solved my problem on Ubuntu Lucid: apt-get remove --purge mysql-server mysql-common mysql-client apt-get install mysql-server After purging and installing the packages, mysql started fine. Seems it was mysql-related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79 Title: missing apparmor access rule -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722621] Sync mailman 1:2.1.14-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
[Updating] mailman (1:2.1.13-4.1 [Ubuntu] 1:2.1.14-1 [Debian]) * Trying to add mailman... 2011-02-22 12:36:47 INFO - mailman_2.1.14.orig.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ 2011-02-22 12:36:50 INFO - mailman_2.1.14-1.debian.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ 2011-02-22 12:36:50 INFO - mailman_2.1.14-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ I: mailman [main] - mailman_1:2.1.13-4.1 [main]. ** Changed in: mailman (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mailman in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722621 Title: Sync mailman 1:2.1.14-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722619] Sync ethtool 1:2.6.37-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
[Updating] ethtool (1:2.6.34-3 [Ubuntu] 1:2.6.37-1 [Debian]) * Trying to add ethtool... 2011-02-22 12:36:16 INFO - ethtool_2.6.37-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ 2011-02-22 12:36:16 INFO - ethtool_2.6.37.orig.tar.bz2: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ 2011-02-22 12:36:16 INFO - ethtool_2.6.37-1.debian.tar.bz2: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ I: ethtool [main] - ethtool_1:2.6.34-3 [main]. ** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ethtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722619 Title: Sync ethtool 1:2.6.37-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
Suggested patch sent upstream: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/83964/ I'll put this in qemu-linaro 2011.03 one way or another. ** Changed in: qemu-linaro Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: qemu-linaro Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: qemu-linaro Milestone: None = 2011.03 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 607039] Re: NFS automount failover doesn't work
The problem does not appear on Fedora using autofs 5.0.5 so it looks like this is an Ubuntu specific bug. Please note that the description for this bug report is misleading as autofs doesn't do failover (as far as I know). However it is supposed to be able to automaticaly choose an available server from a list of replicated servers at mount time. Nico -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039 Title: NFS automount using replicated servers doesn't work -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 607039] Re: NFS automount using replicated servers doesn't work
I changed the title of this bug report from NFS automount failover doesn't work to NFS automount using replicated servers doesn't work as I believe it better reflects the problem and saying 'failover' in combination with may put of the maintainers as autofs isn't supposed to do real faillover (yet. correct me if I'm wrong). Anyway, just trying to increase the chances of somebody actually noticing this bug report and doing something about it :-) Nico ** Summary changed: - NFS automount failover doesn't work + NFS automount using replicated servers doesn't work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607039 Title: NFS automount using replicated servers doesn't work -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
That's awesome, thanks Peter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722770] Re: openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist
** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722770 Title: openipmi: change lock file path since /var/lock/subsys/ does not exist -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
Hi there! Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better. Could you please specify what is the affected version of rrdtool and what Ubuntu release are you using it on? Thank you!. ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 720071] Re: munin-node amavis spam stats
Hi there! Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better. Can you please specify which Ubuntu versions are affected by this and what version of the software in question? For now, I'll be marking this bug as incomplete as the required information is obtained. Thank you again! ** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720071 Title: munin-node amavis spam stats -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722698] Re: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.4-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi! Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better. Now, according to the attached logs the failure seems to be because of this: Starting amavisd: head: cannot open `/etc/mailname' for reading: No such file or directory The value of variable $myhostname is randallj-desktop, but should have been a fully qualified domain name; perhaps uname(3) did not provide such. You must explicitly assign a FQDN of this host to variable $myhostname in /etc/amavis/conf.d/05-node_id, or fix what uname(3) provides as a host's network name! (failed). Have you tried doing what the explanation indicates? If so, has this fixed the problem? If not, could you please follow indicates you and try to start/restart amavisd again. Please, let us know the results. For now, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete until the information requested is provided. ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722698 Title: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.4-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721649] Re: package rabbitmq-server 2.3.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi Curtis, Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better. I can see in the attached logs the following: Starting rabbitmq-server: FAILED - check /var/log/rabbitmq/startup_log, _err rabbitmq-server. Could you please attach the failure information from such log (/var/log/rabbitmq/startup_log) to help us determine the reason of this failure? I'm marking this bug as Incomplete until the requested information is provided. Thanks again! ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721649 Title: package rabbitmq-server 2.3.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log
Hi there Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better. Could you please provide the following information: 1. Better explanation of the issue and how it is affecting the package in Ubuntu. 2. Provide a step-by-step to be able to reproduce this bug. I'm marking this bug as incomplete until the information requested is provide. Thank you again! ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320 Title: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721649] Re: package rabbitmq-server 2.3.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
It contains a very unhelpful single line: Starting all nodes... ** Attachment added: rabbitmq startup log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/721649/+attachment/1865685/+files/startup_log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721649 Title: package rabbitmq-server 2.3.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
Thanks for the patch, Gustavo. qemu-kvm no longer ships an arm emulator in natty. So if I understand the SRU process right, I'll need to wait until this is fixed in qemu- linaro, then request an SRU to qemu-kvm for lucid and maverick? In the mean time I'll link source branches for both of those to this bug so we're ready. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 720071] Re: munin-node amavis spam stats
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04.1 and munin-node 1.4.4-1ubuntu1 from the default repositories without customizations. as a side note. I think it would be more appropriate to change the line in the graph containing surely spam to blocked as spam, see the attached patch. ** Patch added: change graph label https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/720071/+attachment/1865698/+files/amavis_label.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720071 Title: munin-node amavis spam stats -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 714335] Re: KVM SMP Linux Guests Hang
Unfortunately those commits do not cleanly cherrypick. I'll try to rewrite them from scratch, time permitting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714335 Title: KVM SMP Linux Guests Hang -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
.debs for lucid and maverick have been built (not yet tested). I will upload them when I've got a wider pipe. ** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/armllseek ** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/qemu-kvm/armllseek ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722815] Re: apparmor prevents ntp from reading gpsd
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722815 Title: apparmor prevents ntp from reading gpsd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 720071] Re: munin-node amavis spam stats
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720071 Title: munin-node amavis spam stats -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 715056] Re: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715056 Title: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 704766] Re: unable to install nagios3
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find. ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704766 Title: unable to install nagios3 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723312] [NEW] package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix while trying to install pbuilder ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-4.31-generic 2.6.38-rc5 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-4-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 22 18:41:21 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha amd64 (20110127) SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723312 Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723312] Re: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723312 Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723312] Re: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
if i do sudo mkdir /var/spool/postfix//etc/ssl/ then the installation completes, but i am not sure if that is just a bad workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723312 Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 720638] Re: snmpd crashes with segfault (libnetsnmpmibs.so.15.1.2)
I am seeing the same segfault on my lucid boxes, config file attached with sensitive information removed. None of the extended checks are actually being done on the machines that are crashing, as the first hosts we upgraded to lucid do not do anything that complex -- run lighttpd and that is all. They do push 200Mbps of traffic fairly constantly, but load is always below 1.0. ** Attachment added: snmpd.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/720638/+attachment/1865924/+files/snmpd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720638 Title: snmpd crashes with segfault (libnetsnmpmibs.so.15.1.2) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723330] [NEW] rename() function didn't work with /tmp dir
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php5 I got a error message trying rename a dir from DOCUMENT_ROOT to /tmp/ dir. Example: rename(myfolder/, /tmp/myfolder/); return this Fatal error message ( yes, it talk about copy() function but I called rename() ): The first argument to copy() function cannot be a directory. But, rename(myfolder/, myNEWfolder/); it works fine inside the same DOCUMENT_ROOT path. My enviroment: PHP Version 5.3.3-1ubuntu9.3 Linux rock 2.6.35-26-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Sun Jan 30 08:10:51 UTC 2011 i686 Apache/2.2.16 (Ubuntu) Suhosin Patch 0.9.9.1 safe_mode = off ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: php5 5.3.3-1ubuntu9.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-26.46-generic 2.6.35.10 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-26-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Feb 22 16:13:37 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: php5 ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723330 Title: rename() function didn't work with /tmp dir -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723330] Re: rename() function didn't work with /tmp dir
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723330 Title: rename() function didn't work with /tmp dir -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
rrdtool 1.4.3-1ubuntu2. Ubuntu natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
** Attachment added: lucid packages with proposed fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/721801/+attachment/1866084/+files/qemu-lucid-debs.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721801] Re: llseek bug in amd64 host
@Gustavo, do the packages in comment #7 fix the problem for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721801 Title: llseek bug in amd64 host -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 695857] Re: ssl protection not default for sensitive packages
I have tried to come up with some very good solutions, but it appears that we must lay (another) burden on packagers to realize this. 1) If an authenticating web app foo is installed and SSL is not installed then secure by default tells us that the user should see a splash page explaining that it would be insecure to not use SSL but that if you read README.NOSSL in the package then there are instructions to enable the unencrypted access anyway. OR there is a high prioryty quiestion to the admin during installation that results in doing the right thing. The default should be to be secure IMHO. I guess dpkg- reconfigure should re-ask that question and set things up according to the answer. 2) 1) takes care of 2) as well 3) Not sure what that means in terms of interaction with the admin 4) If SSL is installed then non-ssl access to the app should result in a redirect to the SSL url according to the principle of least surprise, and possebly also bug #1. In apache there is a number of ways to case configuration based on the presence of modules and so on. For ther httpds I don't know... Regards, Nicolai -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695857 Title: ssl protection not default for sensitive packages -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723361] [NEW] Apparmor security unavailable
Public bug reported: System: basic Lucid, with installation in accordance exactly with Ubuntu website instructions, etc, etc. Everything is basically default Lucid setup with up-to-date packages. KVM, installed XP Pro successfully. Runs well except for complete inability to make USB devices, etc, available. Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 qemu-kvm: Installed: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.4 Candidate: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.4 Version table: *** 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.4 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages libvirt-bin: Installed: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.8 Candidate: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.8 Version table: *** 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.8 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.7 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 0.7.5-5ubuntu27 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages ubuntu-vm-builder: Installed: 0.12.4-0ubuntu0.2 Candidate: 0.12.4-0ubuntu0.2 Version table: *** 0.12.4-0ubuntu0.2 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/universe Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.12.3-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages bridge-utils: Installed: 1.4-5ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.4-5ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.4-5ubuntu2 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status virt-manager: Installed: 0.8.2-2ubuntu8 Candidate: 0.8.2-2ubuntu8 Version table: *** 0.8.2-2ubuntu8 0 500 http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status USB devices become available with very dangerous chown -R of /dev/devices/...usb Dangerous edits, as per other filed bugs, to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/libvirt-qemu do not work. In Virtual machine manager, and in virsh, security model is not enabled / available / listed. No security is listed in the domain XML file. Changing /etc/apparamor/abstractions/libvirtd does not work. Rebooting dozens of times does not work. This is in many ways the opposite of bug #588369. I am filing as a bug because all the utilities and their docs mention apparmor, but fail completely and _silently_ when this problem occurs, and there is not even howto assistance. For example, the virtual manager GUI leaves the security model under overview as unselectable, and leaves the user completely in the dark. qemu.conf has the line: # security_driver = selinux The only file in /etc/apparmor.d/libvirt is the TEMPLATE file. No UUID- suffixed files exist. ** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723361 Title: Apparmor security unavailable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log
1. Better explanation of the issue and how it is affecting the package in Ubuntu. The debian bug report explains it quite nicely, but let me summarize... Without this patch, the Exim4 package on Lucid will generate warnings like this 2010-01-31 21:41:16 1Nbga6-0005ZL-FH DKIM: Error while running this message through validation, disabling signature verification. in /var/log/exim4/paniclog. These are not 'real' errors, they are just warnings. They can not be disabled. They do not belong in the paniclog, which should always be empty. 2. Provide a step-by-step to be able to reproduce this bug. Run a semi-busy mailserver on Lucid, and you will collect these warnings in your paniclog - on one of our machines, I'm seeing a couple a day on an average mail volume of 100,000 accepted messages. The patch is trivial, it's been applied to the Debian package, and it would be really nice to not have to manually patch Exim4 on Lucid for this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320 Title: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723361] Re: Apparmor security unavailable
Thank you for filing a bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Can you perform: $ sudo apport-collect 723361 This will collect various pieces of information from your system for debugging and attach them to this bug. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723361 Title: Apparmor security unavailable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 74896] Re: Forced bind to 127.0.0.1 is hardcoded' into /etc/default/snmpd instead of option in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
All me to add my support. I am NOT new to this. I have written snmp apps... This behavior goes against the man pages, the snmpconf tool, and most of what you find on Google. At the least, we need to add to the comments of the /etc/snmpd/snmpd.conf that /etc/default/snmpd exists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74896 Title: Forced bind to 127.0.0.1 is hardcoded' into /etc/default/snmpd instead of option in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 668369] Re: closing libvirt-lxc console kills container
Only the usual: 14:45:25.333: error : lxcFdForward:263 : read of fd 7 failed: Input/output error Fortunately Daniel Berrange just sent a patch upstream for this bug. I've extracted the core of what we need, and added it to the tree linked to this bug. The package I built worked! The complete patch from Daniel will go into the 0.8.7 merge. Then the smaller patch which is in the linked tree here can go into lucid and maverick for SRU. ** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/natty/libvirt/fix-console -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668369 Title: closing libvirt-lxc console kills container -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723361] Re: Apparmor security unavailable
Done! But I don't think it did anything. A message was issued in the terminal: Package libvirt not installed and no hook available, ignoring That may be because the package is libvirt, but the package is libvirt-bin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723361 Title: Apparmor security unavailable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 656646] Re: transient network/keyscan issues
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656646 Title: transient network/keyscan issues -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
** Description changed: Binary package hint: rrdtool $ rrdtool create bla.rrd DS:temp:GAUGE:1:2:3 RRA:MIN:.5:2:3 ERROR: This RRD was created on another architecture Fix in rrd_format.h: -#define FLOAT_COOKIE 8.642135E130 +#define FLOAT_COOKIE ((double)8.642135E130) http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool- trac/changeset/2069/branches/1.4/program/src/rrd_format.h Tested and working with new librrd4. + + This issue is present in Ubuntu natty i386 and not in Ubuntu natty + amd64. ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 695857] Re: ssl protection not default for sensitive packages
janl, thanks for the response! I've forwarded the bug to ubuntu-ser...@lists.ubuntu.com for further discussion. It may be a good candidate for a future spec in Ubuntu, but I'd like to hear the wider opinion. Given that, for now I'm marking the bug as Opinion. If it looks like we will do this, we can link the bug to the blueprint once it is created. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695857 Title: ssl protection not default for sensitive packages -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log
Hi again, Thank you for providing the information. I'll take a look at it as soon. Thanks again! ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320 Title: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722938] Re: This RRD was created on another architecture
** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) = (unassigned) ** Patch added: rrdtool.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rrdtool/+bug/722938/+attachment/1866427/+files/rrdtool.debdiff ** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722938 Title: This RRD was created on another architecture -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723480] [NEW] php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php5-fpm The defaults in the file /etc/php5/fpm/pool.d/www.conf states a pm.max_children count of 50. Combined with php5's new max_memory default 128M, means a default installation would expect some 6GB of memory, something I'd love to run my cloud webserver off, but I think few do. Using php5-fpm-5.3.3-1ubuntu9.3 on Ubuntu 10.10 pm.max_children should probably be something like 4, with a note in the comments to increase if memory allows. ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: defaults memory problems sane -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723480 Title: php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723483] [NEW] Package fails to configure and hangs if hostname not resolvable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rabbitmq-server Reproduced in: Maverick, Natty When trying to install rabbitmq-server if the hostname is not resolvable (or not present in /etc/hosts) the package will hang fover waiting on the hostname to resolve to an IP address. This is a very common scenario in cloud instances (both EC2 and UEC) ** Affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723483 Title: Package fails to configure and hangs if hostname not resolvable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723480] Re: php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default
I think 4 is alittle low, depending on what your doing, but 8-10 would be ok. I agree, 50 is pretty high number to be using though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723480 Title: php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723480] Re: php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default
I am thinking that there will be many more virtual servers running in the wild very soon rather than physical servers, and I have a hunch that a lot of them are configured as 1Gb or even 512Mb -- if the defaults are too high, it results in a server that crashes after some time (it took mine about a day to crash) and at least for me it was not apparent where to find the error. I know, I should have done the math, but I somehow thought the defaults would be pre-calculated to fit a really small machine. In fact, one of my first errors I did, was to increase the limit to 100 children under that very assumption, and it definitely maxed my server out. It might even have been so that if I hadn't done that error I would have rebooted the server once a week and never found the problem. I could blame this on php too: before 5.2.0 max_memory was 8Mb default, 5.2.0 it became 16Mb and then recently it jumped to 128Mb. That's a large step to take. Now, I'm not sure if 128Mb for a php process is really necessary (although I know that wordpress loves memory), but in any case, I rather have a underutilized server by default than a server that slowly dives into dementia by default. I even think 4 might be too many as the max_children if the minimum requirements for ubuntu server is listed at 256Mb. That number pretty much says you can run most stuff comfortably with 512Mb As for if it's better to have many concurrent serving php instances vs a lot of memory allocated to each instance is probably depending an the application. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723480 Title: php5-fpm uses too high value for pm.max_children by default -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723312] Re: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723312 Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723312] Re: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This bug was fixed in the package postfix - 2.8.0-1~ubuntu1 --- postfix (2.8.0-1~ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * debian/init.d: fix relative path problem in CA bundle chroot copying (LP: #723312). -- Kees Cook k...@ubuntu.com Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:00:17 -0800 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723312 Title: package postfix 2.8.0-1~build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723483] Re: Package fails to configure and hangs if hostname not resolvable
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 653405 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653405 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 653405 rabbitmq-server fails to start if hostname is unresolvable or has changed since first starting * You can subscribe to bug 653405 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/653405/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723483 Title: Package fails to configure and hangs if hostname not resolvable -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687535] Re: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh
I just updated to the openssh-server_5.3p1-3ubuntu5 package for a Lucid instance, and now I can't get SSH to start. Or, rather, I'm running into what Jan mentioned above, with the respawning/terminating loop that eventually results in init deciding that SSH isn't going to start, and giving up. Something like: init: ssh main process (430) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning init: ssh main process (449) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning init: ssh main process (456) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning ... init: ssh main process (468) terminated with status 255 init: ssh respawning too fast, stopped The real trouble here is, this is an EC2 instance that was just restarted, so now I have no means by which I can get on that machine to do any additional troubleshooting or ultimately fix this. But this was not caused by me executing an /etc/init.d/ssh stop, so I don't think this is bug #531912. So my question would be what now? Downgrade upstart (I just upgraded to 0.6.5-8)? Downgrade openssh-server (I just upgraded to openssh- server_5.3.01-3ubuntu5? Is there something I can do to workaround this? My existing instance my be lost, but what will keep me from running into this again if I build a new EC2 instance with the same package versions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687535 Title: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 531912] Re: /etc/init.d/ssh seems to work, but actually upstart is used.
OK, if /etc/init/ssh doesn't fully replicate the functionality of the /etc/init.d/ssh script to include properly setting up chrooted environments and properly handling libc6 updates then what benefit does it provide users? Why, if you can't get Upstart to provide the same functionality as the /etc/init.d startup script, move control of sshd over to Upstart anyways? Again, what does it do for the users? At least the fix for this bit of Upstart badness is easy enough, just remove /etc/init/ssh and start sshd with the script in init.d. Perhaps it's not as architecturally elegant as Upstart is supposed to be, but at least we all know that it works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531912 Title: /etc/init.d/ssh seems to work, but actually upstart is used. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687985] Re: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty
** Changed in: nut (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687985 Title: [FTBFS] package 'nut' (2.4.3-1ubuntu5) failed to build on natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 483928] Re: ssh-keyscan(1) exits prematurely on some non-fatal errors
I'm still seeing this with openssh-client 1:5.5p1-4ubuntu5. From a makefile that invokes ssh-keyscan -v: [...] debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 pat OpenSSH_3.* # A.B.C.D SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent Connection closed by A.B.C.D make: *** [ssh_known_hosts.new] Error 255 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483928 Title: ssh-keyscan(1) exits prematurely on some non-fatal errors -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 483928] Re: ssh-keyscan(1) exits prematurely on some non-fatal errors
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #1213 https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 ** Also affects: openssh via https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483928 Title: ssh-keyscan(1) exits prematurely on some non-fatal errors -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 687535] Re: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 05:19 +, gorism wrote: I just updated to the openssh-server_5.3p1-3ubuntu5 package for a Lucid instance, and now I can't get SSH to start. Or, rather, I'm running into what Jan mentioned above, with the respawning/terminating loop that eventually results in init deciding that SSH isn't going to start, and giving up. Something like: init: ssh main process (430) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning init: ssh main process (449) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning init: ssh main process (456) terminated with status 255 init: ssh main process ended, respawning ... init: ssh main process (468) terminated with status 255 init: ssh respawning too fast, stopped The real trouble here is, this is an EC2 instance that was just restarted, so now I have no means by which I can get on that machine to do any additional troubleshooting or ultimately fix this. But this was not caused by me executing an /etc/init.d/ssh stop, so I don't think this is bug #531912. If you restarted the instance and this is happening, its definitely not bug #531912, as that one still results in an sshd that works on bootup. If this is an EBS root instance, can you snapshot it and mount it from another instance? If so, you should be able to view the contents of /var/log and paste any errors from sshd. If you can't find anything there, you can mount the volume r/w and add 'console output' to /etc/init/ssh.conf and then check the console output when it fails to start up. If its fully instance store, I'm not sure there's much you can do though EC2 experts may have some tricks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687535 Title: upstart loses track of ssh daemon after reload ssh -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: where to drop war files in tomcat6
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Michael Zoet michael.z...@zoet.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 22.02.2011 03:50, schrieb Tapas Mishra: I installed on a VM tomcat6 (apt-get install tomcat6) as far as I understand if I need to install or deply a .war file in tomcat6 I should put it in webapps folder I did a find then find / -name 'tomcat*' but I do not see any folder webapps here ... So does apt-get install of tomcat not have webapps directory and here the method of deploying applications different? No! For my Tomcat6 the webapp dir is in /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps/ If someone puts a .war file in it, it gets deployed. If it is not there just create it. Michael Thanks Michael for this message. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
