Re: OT: Reply-to settings of this mailing list

2011-11-01 Thread Soren Hansen 
2011/11/1 Hakan Koseoglu :
> It defaults to the user, or it's the Google Mail I'm using but that's
> unlikely.. It's an unusual setting for such a list server.

It's not unusual at all. I'm subscribed to dozens of mailing lists
(all free software related ones), and all of them are configured this
way. It's entirely intentional:

   http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-- 
Soren Hansen        | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer    | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: OT: Reply-to settings of this mailing list

2011-11-01 Thread Steven Miano 
This issue has been brought up before. Ubuntu is the only mailing list that
I've seen it done, but it is done on several of the lists within the group.

Remember to "Reply to all" when it comes to this one.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Michael Zoet  wrote:

>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 01.11.2011 08:08, schrieb Hakan Koseoglu:
> > It defaults to the user, or it's the Google Mail I'm using but that's
> > unlikely.. It's an unusual setting for such a list server.
> > Was it intentional? Other Ubuntu lists I've been using don't have this
> > peculiarity and answer to the list by default.
>
> It really depends on which Ubuntu mailinglist you use. Some have it
> this way others have it the other way. Mostly it depends on the list
> moderators and the user demands. And it is always a discussion of some
> sort, where I hope this will not happen on this list. (Always the same
> pro and cons...)
>
> Most mailers have a button (or command) to answer to the mailing list
> directly. As long as I am reading the 100s of Ubuntu mailinglists I
> learned to like this a lot ;-).
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6vpTAACgkQBvfZ5167qr/xIQCfY4vsgXmmMc1eCxfuW7ptDtpQ
> wokAoIJVfNbZ/PsYCC/ypFVAzp/DV89v
> =9bgH
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
Rev. Miano, Steven M.
  727.244.9990

  

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: OT: Reply-to settings of this mailing list

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Zoet 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Am 01.11.2011 08:08, schrieb Hakan Koseoglu:
> It defaults to the user, or it's the Google Mail I'm using but that's
> unlikely.. It's an unusual setting for such a list server.
> Was it intentional? Other Ubuntu lists I've been using don't have this
> peculiarity and answer to the list by default.

It really depends on which Ubuntu mailinglist you use. Some have it
this way others have it the other way. Mostly it depends on the list
moderators and the user demands. And it is always a discussion of some
sort, where I hope this will not happen on this list. (Always the same
pro and cons...)

Most mailers have a button (or command) to answer to the mailing list
directly. As long as I am reading the 100s of Ubuntu mailinglists I
learned to like this a lot ;-).

Michael





-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6vpTAACgkQBvfZ5167qr/xIQCfY4vsgXmmMc1eCxfuW7ptDtpQ
wokAoIJVfNbZ/PsYCC/ypFVAzp/DV89v
=9bgH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

OT: Reply-to settings of this mailing list

2011-11-01 Thread Hakan Koseoglu 
It defaults to the user, or it's the Google Mail I'm using but that's
unlikely.. It's an unusual setting for such a list server.
Was it intentional? Other Ubuntu lists I've been using don't have this
peculiarity and answer to the list by default.

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: ethernet bonding between several machines

2011-11-01 Thread Hakan Koseoglu 
Sorry Jesus, you're going to get this mail twice.

On 31 October 2011 23:01, Jesus arteche  wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Do you know if it is possible to make Ethernet bonding between several
> machines?
> are there some way the create a high availability load balancer with several
> machines whit a bandwidth equal the sum of all the bandwidths ??
Your question is too vague. A network bonding across multiple network
devices or a load-balancer for an application across multiple nodes?
Exactly what are you after and for what software (database, Web server
or some other application server)?

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: ethernet bonding between several machines

2011-11-01 Thread Hakan Koseoglu 
On 1 November 2011 01:00, Luciano Facchinelli
 wrote:
> Do you mean two machines with two bandwiths, and then bonding those
> conections ?.
> You can do that, but you always need a third machine wich in fact is who
> does the real bonding.
There's always round robin dns but you can count the DNS server as the
third machine :)

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam