Re: Instructions needed for samba vfs module for gluster
Hi Sergio, Thanks for the ppa and for raising this topic to the team. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Fri, May 28, 2021, 23:15 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, May 28 2021, hunter86bg wrote: > > > Hello All, > > Hello hunter86bg, > > > It seems that we do not have Samba's VFS module for Gluster due to > > dependency issues (see > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618 for > details). > > > > It seems that Andreas built some packages for Groovy ( > > https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/samba-gluster ), yet I > > would like to build them for Ubuntu 20.04 . > > > > Can someone provide basic instructions for the built, as the instructions > > in https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-December/219821.html fail > ? > > I did provide a PPA for Focal two days ago here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618/comments/12 > > Thanks, > > -- > Sergio > GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 > -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Instructions needed for samba vfs module for gluster
On Friday, May 28 2021, hunter86bg wrote: > Hello All, Hello hunter86bg, > It seems that we do not have Samba's VFS module for Gluster due to > dependency issues (see > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618 for details). > > It seems that Andreas built some packages for Groovy ( > https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/samba-gluster ), yet I > would like to build them for Ubuntu 20.04 . > > Can someone provide basic instructions for the built, as the instructions > in https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-December/219821.html fail ? I did provide a PPA for Focal two days ago here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618/comments/12 Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Instructions needed for samba vfs module for gluster
Hello All, It seems that we do not have Samba's VFS module for Gluster due to dependency issues (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618 for details). It seems that Andreas built some packages for Groovy ( https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/samba-gluster ), yet I would like to build them for Ubuntu 20.04 . Can someone provide basic instructions for the built, as the instructions in https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-December/219821.html fail ? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Friday bug triage
Hi Robie, On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 5:06 PM Robie Basak wrote: > I don't know if it's related, but there has always been a slow but > steady stream of reports where users have misconfigured their system > hostname and this causing postfix to explode. Aah, I see! However, I could reproduce the first half of the bug in a fresh LXD VM so I believe this could be a valid bug, provided the reporter gives some more information on this. - u -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Friday bug triage
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 04:52:51PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Interesting bug. I can partly reproduce this (that is, > there are 2 dots indeed added to the hostname) but it > doesn't fail to upgrade, et al, as the user claims. > I've further asked for a reproducer but I guess it does > seem to be an actual bug. Furthermore, I've asked the > reporter to forward this bug to Debian since we're in > sync and might SRU depending upon the patch, risks, etc. I don't know if it's related, but there has always been a slow but steady stream of reports where users have misconfigured their system hostname and this causing postfix to explode. signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Friday bug triage
Bugs last updated on 2021-05-27 (Thursday) Date range identified as: "Friday triage" Found 10 bugs Whist most of them seem to be under control, the only one worth mentioning is: LP: #1929786 - (New) [postfix] - Postfix Local only configuration adds 2 dots on hostname , blocking package upgrades Interesting bug. I can partly reproduce this (that is, there are 2 dots indeed added to the hostname) but it doesn't fail to upgrade, et al, as the user claims. I've further asked for a reproducer but I guess it does seem to be an actual bug. Furthermore, I've asked the reporter to forward this bug to Debian since we're in sync and might SRU depending upon the patch, risks, etc. - u -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: dh-php 3.1
Hello, On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 4:03 AM Bryce Harrington wrote: > To keep the page clean I'm deleting details once packages transition, but > if you're interested in those details they are in the page history. For > the most part, solutions are generally "pull from Debian experimental" > (like I said you've done most of the groundwork already!) But beyond > that some other notes: > > - php-apcu-bc appears to be getting dropped with php8. We've had to > adjust a few things that still depended on it, and then will drop it > from the archive. > > - php-doctrine-cache needed some adjustments to get it happy with > php8 (See 1.10.2-2ubuntu1.) A few more things need some patches to get everything working, I'll submit them to Debian once it's all settled here. > Remaining work items still TBD: > > - owfs feels like it's not gotten its php8 updates yet? I've been looking at owfs (w/ William). owfs uses swig to build the PHP extension. So if you notice, there's swig -php7 being called and if PHP7 isn't available, it falls back to -php (which is aliasing for php5). Olly (upsteram of swig) has written a patch for supporting PHP8 in swig and it's merged but the release is due. Once that happens, getting to build owfs shouldn't be very hard, since I've looked into the patch and it makes sense, et al. Another nice thing is that the newer swig (whenever it's released) also maps known PHP interfaces to zend_class_entry*, this should also help with the owfs build, I believe. MapServer also suffers through the same issue, so probably both should be fixed (along the same lines, hopefully) whenever a newer swig is out. I've also asked swig to do a release, too :) Hope that helps. - u -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
