Re: Wednesday Triage Report (2021-07-14)
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 1:00 PM Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > The full list of bugs subscribed by ~ubuntu-server is larger than > > seems useful, currently 815, so is that list being used for active > > work? If so, can you go into some detail on what work is done to bugs > > in that list? > > This is also a good question, but I'll let another team member address > it. This is very true and the team is aware. We're currently looking at approaches to help us make the server-next queue more realistic, make sure we're able to provide a meaningful amount of time and effort to those server-next bugs, and, while we're subscribed to bugs, help make it more clear that there are some things that are unlikely to get any attention in any timeline as they stand. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Wednesday Triage Report (2021-07-14)
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:14:14PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sergio Durigan Junior > wrote: > > > > ustriage found 9 bugs. Nothing worthwhile to report; everything is > > being properly handled by the team. > > Could you expand on this a bit? It's not exactly clear what it means. > > For example from the links on the server team wiki page > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam) I see the 'Top 20 Bugs' (which > are all the ones tagged 'server-next' right?) which includes bugs > where there's been no update in over a year (e.g. LP:#1860997, > LP:#1872145) and others where the bug appears to be already fixed > (e.g. LP:#1916485). Hi Dan, Sorry if our workflow is a bit confusing, and thanks for the question. I think I can clarify. You've likely noticed these $DAY Triage Report emails each day. This is part of a specific workflow we follow that looks at just bug reports that changed the preceeding day (or weekend). This triage process also only focuses on situations that require 1st-level attention, such as new bugs, comments from new users, etc. It is intended to be a short and quick look, and not attempt to fix the bugs or continue work on bugs that someone else is already working on. It's more of just a "check the inbox" and "check that things haven't fallen through the cracks". One of the reasons we try to keep the workload of this small, is so that time can be reserved to focus on items of priority - such as the server-next queue you linked to, or distro maintenance work, or other customer-driven tasks and projects. > The full list of bugs subscribed by ~ubuntu-server is larger than > seems useful, currently 815, so is that list being used for active > work? If so, can you go into some detail on what work is done to bugs > in that list? This is also a good question, but I'll let another team member address it. Bryce > > -- > > Sergio > > GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 > > -- > > ubuntu-server mailing list > > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam > > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: Wednesday Triage Report (2021-07-14)
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > ustriage found 9 bugs. Nothing worthwhile to report; everything is > being properly handled by the team. Could you expand on this a bit? It's not exactly clear what it means. For example from the links on the server team wiki page (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam) I see the 'Top 20 Bugs' (which are all the ones tagged 'server-next' right?) which includes bugs where there's been no update in over a year (e.g. LP:#1860997, LP:#1872145) and others where the bug appears to be already fixed (e.g. LP:#1916485). The full list of bugs subscribed by ~ubuntu-server is larger than seems useful, currently 815, so is that list being used for active work? If so, can you go into some detail on what work is done to bugs in that list? > > -- > Sergio > GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Wednesday Triage Report (2021-07-14)
ustriage found 9 bugs. Nothing worthwhile to report; everything is being properly handled by the team. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Tuesday bug triage report
Bugs last updated on 2021-07-12 (Monday) Date range identified as: "Tuesday triage" Found 9 bugs Nothing noteworthy to mention, some bugs have active people working on them and others are related to local configuration issues. Also no bugs in the backlog and tagged as server-next reported by ustriage. Lucas Kanashiro. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
