Tuesday triage report (2023-06-26)

2023-06-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
# Bug triage

Nothing noteworthy to mention here.

# Discourse comments triage

Showing comments belonging to the Server category on
https://discourse.ubuntu.com, updated on 2023-06-26 (Monday)
Automated Server install … [Michael Hudson Doyle] (
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/16614)
└─ +91323 [Nobuto Murata, 2023-06-26] (
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/16614/50)

There are some suggestions to improve the Automated Server install
quickstart, I believe the Foundations team will follow-up on that since
they own subiquity.

Lucas Kanashiro.
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Monday Triage Report (2023-06-26)

2023-06-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 3:24 AM Christian Ehrhardt
 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:20 PM Sergio Durigan Junior
>  wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, June 26 2023, I wrote:
> >
> > > Bug Triage
> > > ==
> > >
> > > ### https://pad.lv/1991441 | Confirmed | glusterfs | glusterd and
> > > glusterfs crashes after dist-upgrade from foca… |
> > >
> > > armhf + illegal instruction = fun.  I subscribed ubuntu-server, but I
> > > don't have an armhf system available to test the problem.  I'll see if I
> > > can reserve one.
> >
> > I looked into this one and posted my findings there.
>
> Interesting Sergio,
> I wonder if
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1991441/comments/5
> into
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3911
> into
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/702
>
> Doesn't this sort of imply we should remove armhf binaries from
> glusterfs going forward.
> If there can be a fix for the problem that is there in the existing
> versions affected (jammy AFAICS) great, we'll serve it.
> But going forward more of that is gonna happen.
>
> WDY(all)T of removing armhf in glusterfs in >Mantic and asking Debian
> if they want to do the same?

+1, I had an encounter with armhf incompatibility before[1] in
glusterfs, which was fixed, but at that time upstream already said
that it was pure luck it was fixed, because they don't care about
32bits.


1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1951408

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam