Re: How to install or mount an appliance?

[Benjamin Griese]

Hello guys,
just fyi, there is a Virtualbox 4.0 Headless solution with a WebGUI on
10.04.1.

http://code.google.com/p/phpvirtualbox/

Bye.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:31, matthew byers wrote:

> sorry pandu for sending that last email to you only, i meant to post
> here...anyways, jfyi to op, you can run virtualbox from command line.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Pandu Poluan  wrote:
>
>> (sorry for top-posting; the Gmail mobile client can only reply by
>> top-posting)
>>
>> Well, if you want to run that appliance on the file sever, you still
>> have to install a hypervisor on the file server (e.g., VMware or Xen
>> or Linux KVM).
>>
>> I'd recommend setting aside another server box and install a baremetal
>> hypervisor on it (e.g., VMware ESXi or Citrix XenServer).
>>
>> Rgds,
>>
>>
>> On 2011-02-11, dxiri...@gmail.com  wrote:
>> > Thats exactly why, me neither have never configured either, and the
>> > appliance provides web chat, registration, domain configuration with the
>> > domain name of my choice, security fixes, etc. In short it provides a
>> better
>> > configuration that configuring it myself. Only thing missing would be
>> the AD
>> > replication.
>> >
>> > Another advantage is that the files on this file server are VERY
>> critical to
>> > my company and having a virtual machine separates roles, so if for some
>> > reason I screw up I can just delete the VM instead of doing a painfull
>> > system troubleshoot.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > --Original Message--
>> > From: Pandu Poluan
>> > To: Diego Xirinachs
>> > Subject: Re: How to install or mount an appliance?
>> > Sent: Feb 10, 2011 18:44
>> >
>> > (sorry for top posting. the Gmail mobile app insists on top posting)
>> >
>> > Um, why would you want a virtual appliance when Maverick has ejabberd
>> > package? See http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=ejabberd
>> >
>> > Do a sudo apt-get install ejabberd (or use sudo aptitude), and follow
>> > ejabberd's documentation on how to configure
>> > http://www.process-one.net/docs/ejabberd/guide_en.html
>> >
>> > If you want ejabberd to auth against Active Directory, you'll have to
>> > go the LDAP route, and (probably) need to learn how to have OpenLDAP
>> > replicate from AD.
>> >
>> http://www.google.com/m?q=openldap+replicate+active+directory&client=ms-opera-mobile&channel=new
>> >
>> > Note: I've never done either (use ejabberd or OpenLDAP), so I can't
>> > guide you further. Sorry.
>> >
>> > Rgds,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2011-02-11, Diego Xirinachs  wrote:
>> >> Dear List,
>> >>
>> >> I have a File server running ubuntu server 10.04 LTS, and I was running
>> >> and
>> >> OpenFire server (jabber messenger service) on top of a windows server
>> >> machine. Openfire is crashing a lot so I decided to go a different way
>> and
>> >> try a new software, then I found an appliance called ejabberd (you can
>> >> find
>> >> it HERE )
>> >>
>> >> What I want to do is to mount that virtual appliance on my file server,
>> so
>> >> I
>> >> dont have to mess around installing everything needed to run the jabber
>> >> messenger.
>> >>
>> >> How can I mount the appliance if the server is command line only?
>> >>
>> >> I have never done this kind of stuff so I am a little lost.
>> >>
>> >> I guess I would have to install a virtual machine that can handle the
>> >> appliance of course, but the one I know (VirtualBox) I think its GUI
>> only.
>> >>
>> >> One last thing: Can I make ejabberd users to authenticate against
>> Active
>> >> Directory?
>> >>
>> >> Any light on this will be greatly appreciated
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> X1R1
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
>> > My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
>> >
>> >
>> > Enviado desde un dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
>> My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-server mailing list
>> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
>> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>>
>
>
>
> --
> God Bless
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Not able to boot a software raid installation - Ubuntu 10.04.1 i386

[Benjamin Griese]

Hello,

there seems to be a problem with your grub configuration.

It looks like grub has problems to load the /boot related files which are
misconfigured to be located on fd0.
Please boot into a live environment and check your grub.cfg and post the
approriate lines.

Something you should also check is:

Did you try to create a seperate boot partition on each disk which you may
want to mirror?
Are there any other disks installed besides your two IDEs?
And is the BIOS trying to load the MBR off of these disks which hold a
faulty config?

Summary: Please give us some more information.

Bye, benjamin

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 01:16, Andres Tarallo  wrote:

> H!!! Happy new year !!!
>
> I'm setting a software raid in a small home server, with an old dell
> optiplex GX110.The installation goes smoothly,but I can't boot into
> the system.
>
>  I've installed two identical Hard Drives, both as primary drives in
> the respective IDE controllers. There I've created identical partions
> in each disk. One partition for /, the other for swap. After the
> partitions were created I've made the MD devices, /dev/md0 is / and
> /dev/md1 is swap. The installation continued loaded all packages then
> installed grub. No errors till there. When I take out the installation
> CD and go to boot the newly installed system I get:
>
> Booting from local disk...
> error: fd0 read error.
> error: no such disk
> grub rescue>
>
> Any help will be appreciated, apologise poor English
>
> Andrés Tarallo
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Hardware Raid Controller Card.

[Benjamin Griese]

Hello,

I'd recommend the HP own smart array raid controller cards.

Bye.

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:58, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have loaded Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server on HP DL 360 G6.
> Can someone please recommend good Hardware RAID Controller Card for this
> specific HP Server.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kaushal
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: weekly report for server setup

[Benjamin Griese]

Hello,

you may ask that guy what kind of reporting he would like to thave. :)

Maybe you're already monitoring the machines on a regular basis, thats
some source you can collect and pack that into some pdf.
I think of memory, cpu, network bandwidth, hdd space (mostly
increasing) and so on.

good luck and bye.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 09:59, Tapas Mishra  wrote:
> I have setup a cluster for some one.Which is basically a few Virtual
> Machines running and the applications running in them which are
> accessible on internet.
> The host os is Ubuntu and  Vms are some ubuntu/debian and some
> Fedora/Redhat based servers.
> He has asked me to send him a weekly report of this work.
> I am sys admin guy who understands ssh,telnet,ftp,tftp,TCP
> I am not able to understand what should I write in report.Because all
> the servers are perfectly running and applications are also running on
> top of them and I am done with this.So basically from my part I do not
> have any ssh or ftp to write in a report like this.Can some one give
> me a link if there is some sample report that I should send.I am not
> able to understand what do I need to Google for the same.
> Are there any tools for doing such stuff?
>
> --
> http://mightydreams.blogspot.com
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To
be is to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: uptime

[Benjamin Griese]

Vers funny :-)
Just write the subject onto your Terminal.

Bye.

Am 25.07.2010 16:43 schrieb "Kaushal Shriyan" :

Hi,

is there a way to know what time is the system is up and running in
hrs:mm:secs

Thanks

Kaushal

--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Directory Server on Ubuntu?

[Benjamin Griese]

Hello,

I recommend and personally use OpenLDAP.
The packages in repo are easy to use and install and there is plenty of
documentation in the server guide (atleast when I installed back on 9.10).

Bye.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:43, Oliver Brakmann  wrote:

> Hello Devs,
>
> I'd like to ask about the current state of the directory server project
> for Ubuntu.  The 389 directory server PPA hasn't seen any activity for
> the last year, but there has been some activity on blueprints for Lucid
> relating to the FreeIPA project.
>
> So, what is the current state?
> What is the current recommendation if one were to build a directory
> server on Ubuntu?
>
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: high iowait

[Benjamin Griese]

For documentation purpose please just post your found solution.

Thanks! :)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:17, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Dirk Deimeke  wrote:
> > Answering Kaushal Shriyan 
> > (Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:03:19 +0530):
> >
> >> I have installed iotop already on my server. The issue is that i need
> >> to closely watch it regularly, is there a way i get notified when
> >> there is a high IO activity using iotop. I searched the web and saw
> >> sar utility too. Hence the question.
> >
> > Community is "give and take". I never see a message from your side,
> > that an advise helped you and I can't even find any experiences you
> > make with the tools suggested. Why?
> >
> > Paul suggested to use Munin.
> >
> >> Please suggest further.
> >
> > Give and take ...
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Dirk
>
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Did some web search again and made it worked this time. Thanks for all
> the help. And appreciate all the help and suggestions. Its a good
> learning experience.
>
> Thanks Sander,Paul
>
> Apologies again.
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Kaushal
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: disk usage

[Benjamin Griese]

That could help you if there are open files which are not deleted.
I had that sometimes in the past, where a ugly-written script for logration
moved away some logfiles and created a new one at the same place with the
old name.
In this case the old file was in use by the process which writes to this
process while moving and the filesystem for the logfile slowly grew up for
no appearent reason.

Good luck! :)

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-lsof.html

*Listing 5. Using lsof on Linux to look for a deleted file*

# lsof | grep error_log
httpd  2452 root2w  REG   33,2  4993090660
/var/log/httpd/error_log (deleted)
httpd  2452 root7w  REG   33,2  4993090660
/var/log/httpd/error_log (deleted)
... more httpd processes ...


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 15:08, Dirk Deimeke  wrote:

> Answering Kaushal Shriyan 
> (Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:43:52 +0530):
>
> Hi,
>
> are you sure, no one (program, daemon, human being) is using any
> deleted files?
>
> If you are not sure consider a shutdown of all services or eventually
> a complete reboot.
>
> > Please suggest further
>
> Your blocksize is 4096, so regardless of the size of the file it will
> use at minimum 4k.
>
> If you want to take the effort you can check for wasted space.
>
> For example
> find /home /usr  -size -4096c | wc -l
> shows you a count of files which are smaller than 4096 bytes.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> Kontakt: http://d5e.org/contact
> Blog:http://dirk.deimeke.net/
> Podcast: http://deimhart.net/
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: disk usage

[Benjamin Griese]

Ah well, /dev should be avoided too.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33, Benjamin Griese  wrote:

> Hi,
> please be aware of /proc and its functionality.
> Your RAM is represented in /proc and I think it's counted within when you
> apply "du" on it.
> You really should atleast exclude /proc from doing "du". :)
>
> http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/126718
>
> Bye.
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:13, Kaushal Shriyan 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see df -h and du -hs difference.
>>
>> r...@test:/# du -hs * | grep G
>> 2.4Ghome
>> du: cannot access `proc/1027/task/1027/fd/4': No such file or directory
>> du: cannot access `proc/1027/task/1027/fdinfo/4': No such file or
>> directory
>> du: cannot access `proc/1027/fd/4': No such file or directory
>> du: cannot access `proc/1027/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
>> 9.5Gusr
>> r...@test:~# df -h
>> FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda1  70G   55G   15G  79% /
>> varrun3.6G   88K  3.6G   1% /var/run
>> udev  3.6G   32K  3.6G   1% /dev
>> /dev/sda5 464M   28M  412M   7% /boot
>> r...@test:~#
>>
>> Please suggest whats eating up 43.1 GB disk space
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kaushal
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-server mailing list
>> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
>> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>>
>
>
>
> --
> To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
> to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
>
>


-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: disk usage

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi,
please be aware of /proc and its functionality.
Your RAM is represented in /proc and I think it's counted within when you
apply "du" on it.
You really should atleast exclude /proc from doing "du". :)

http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/126718

Bye.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:13, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see df -h and du -hs difference.
>
> r...@test:/# du -hs * | grep G
> 2.4Ghome
> du: cannot access `proc/1027/task/1027/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `proc/1027/task/1027/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `proc/1027/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `proc/1027/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
> 9.5Gusr
> r...@test:~# df -h
> FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1  70G   55G   15G  79% /
> varrun3.6G   88K  3.6G   1% /var/run
> udev  3.6G   32K  3.6G   1% /dev
> /dev/sda5 464M   28M  412M   7% /boot
> r...@test:~#
>
> Please suggest whats eating up 43.1 GB disk space
>
> Thanks
>
> Kaushal
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Boot problem

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi,

so the initial problem had nothing to do with your currently solved problem?
Well, a real disk is always faster than a file on disk due to I/O problems.
I recommend to use Logical Volumes (LVM) for usage in virtual machines.
You're much more flexible in resizing the disks than using static
partitions, where you really run in trouble if u want to increase the disk
size or partition.

Good luck with your VMs.

Bye, Benjamin.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:04, Gilberto Nunes <
gilberto.nu...@selbetti.com.br> wrote:

> Hi again...
>
> I change the device to /dev/sda8 instead a qcow2 file... now is more
> faster
>
> thanks
>
> Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 15:56 +0200, Benjamin Griese escreveu:
> > Hi,
> > I don't understand the question.
> >
> >
> > Do you use the generic kernel inside of virtual machine and may think
> > its more slowly than the virtual kernel?
> >
> >
> > Bye.
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 15:54, Gilberto Nunes
> >  wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Yeah... This is it!...
> >
> > I install linux-image-generic and all is working now...
> >
> > But I have doubt if this kernel has the same performance that
> > other
> > kernel, the virtual server...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 15:52 +0200, Benjamin Griese escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi Gilberto,
> > >
> > >
> > > thats the problem, the "Virtual Server" Profile is used to
> > install for
> > > Virtual Guests, it has just basic device drivers, to be
> > small and
> > > fast, only the neccessary stuff to start virtual machine to
> > be honest.
> > >
> > >
> > > The "Virtual Host"-Profile is chosen in the further
> > installation
> > > process, next to the end of it
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope that solves your problem.
> > > Bye.
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 15:12, Gilberto Nunes
> > >  wrote:
> > > NO...
> > >
> > > But I see now that I install virtual server...
> > > Now I install linux-image-generic and works...
> > > But I need kernel with KVM suport...
> > >
> > > BTW, I'll compile kernel from sources...
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 10:08 -0300, Isaque Alves
> > escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Did you use LVM for that instalation?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Gilberto Nunes
> > > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello everybody
> > > >
> > > > I installed Ubuntu Server Edition 10.04 on
> > a Dell
> > > R210 but I
> > > > can not
> > > > start the system once installed.
> > > > He says he can not find the root device.
> > > > I have already put rootdelay = 200 and did
> > not work.
> > > > Even removed the grub-pc grub and
> > installed old
> > > version but i
> > > > did not.
> > > >
> > > > If anyone can help me thank.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> > > > TI
> > > > Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> > > > Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> > > > Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ubuntu-server mailing list
> > > > ubuntu-server@lists.ubun

Re: Boot problem

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi,
I don't understand the question.

Do you use the generic kernel inside of virtual machine and may think its
more slowly than the virtual kernel?

Bye.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 15:54, Gilberto Nunes <
gilberto.nu...@selbetti.com.br> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Yeah... This is it!...
>
> I install linux-image-generic and all is working now...
>
> But I have doubt if this kernel has the same performance that other
> kernel, the virtual server...
>
> Thanks
>
> Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 15:52 +0200, Benjamin Griese escreveu:
> > Hi Gilberto,
> >
> >
> > thats the problem, the "Virtual Server" Profile is used to install for
> > Virtual Guests, it has just basic device drivers, to be small and
> > fast, only the neccessary stuff to start virtual machine to be honest.
> >
> >
> > The "Virtual Host"-Profile is chosen in the further installation
> > process, next to the end of it
> >
> >
> > Hope that solves your problem.
> > Bye.
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 15:12, Gilberto Nunes
> >  wrote:
> > NO...
> >
> > But I see now that I install virtual server...
> > Now I install linux-image-generic and works...
> > But I need kernel with KVM suport...
> >
> > BTW, I'll compile kernel from sources...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 10:08 -0300, Isaque Alves escreveu:
> >
> > > Did you use LVM for that instalation?
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Gilberto Nunes
> > >  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello everybody
> > >
> > > I installed Ubuntu Server Edition 10.04 on a Dell
> > R210 but I
> > > can not
> > > start the system once installed.
> > > He says he can not find the root device.
> > > I have already put rootdelay = 200 and did not work.
> > > Even removed the grub-pc grub and installed old
> > version but i
> > > did not.
> > >
> > > If anyone can help me thank.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> > > TI
> > > Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> > > Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> > > Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ubuntu-server mailing list
> > > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> > >
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> > > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Isaque Vieira de Sousa Alves
> > > Informations' Systems bachelors' graduation student at
> > FAP-Parnaíba
> > > GNU/Linux User
> > > Ubuntero
> > > OSUM Member
> > > Ubuntu Server Team Member
> > > Web Developer experienced in PHP/Javascript
> > > Self-educated in Theology, philosophy and Electronics
> > > Java Technology Enthusiast and Developer
> > > Symbian developer
> > > http://www.isaquealves.com
> > > http://kenai.com/people/2047-isaquealves
> > > http://osum.sun.com/profile/IsaqueAlves
> > > http://twitter.com/isaquealves
> > > http://www.go4expert.com/
> > > http://www.jamendo.com/br/user/isaquealves
> >
> > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> > TI
> > Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> > Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> > Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-server mailing list
> > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To
> > be is to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
> >
> >
>
> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> TI
> Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
>
>
>
>


-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Boot problem

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Gilberto,

thats the problem, the "Virtual Server" Profile is used to install for
Virtual Guests, it has just basic device drivers, to be small and
fast, only the neccessary stuff to start virtual machine to be honest.

The "Virtual Host"-Profile is chosen in the further installation process,
next to the end of it

Hope that solves your problem.
Bye.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 15:12, Gilberto Nunes <
gilberto.nu...@selbetti.com.br> wrote:

> NO...
>
> But I see now that I install virtual server...
> Now I install linux-image-generic and works...
> But I need kernel with KVM suport...
>
> BTW, I'll compile kernel from sources...
>
> Thanks
>
> Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 10:08 -0300, Isaque Alves escreveu:
> > Did you use LVM for that instalation?
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Gilberto Nunes
> >  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello everybody
> >
> > I installed Ubuntu Server Edition 10.04 on a Dell R210 but I
> > can not
> > start the system once installed.
> > He says he can not find the root device.
> > I have already put rootdelay = 200 and did not work.
> > Even removed the grub-pc grub and installed old version but i
> > did not.
> >
> > If anyone can help me thank.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> > TI
> > Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> > Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> > Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-server mailing list
> > ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Isaque Vieira de Sousa Alves
> > Informations' Systems bachelors' graduation student at FAP-Parnaíba
> > GNU/Linux User
> > Ubuntero
> > OSUM Member
> > Ubuntu Server Team Member
> > Web Developer experienced in PHP/Javascript
> > Self-educated in Theology, philosophy and Electronics
> > Java Technology Enthusiast and Developer
> > Symbian developer
> > http://www.isaquealves.com
> > http://kenai.com/people/2047-isaquealves
> > http://osum.sun.com/profile/IsaqueAlves
> > http://twitter.com/isaquealves
> > http://www.go4expert.com/
> > http://www.jamendo.com/br/user/isaquealves
>
> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> TI
> Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
> Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
> Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672
>
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Help needed! Raid5 inactive

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Laurent,

could you please check the output of your assembled devices:
mdadm --detail /dev/md0

Additionally check the S.M.A.R.T status of your disks, maybe the disk should
be replaced by a new one.
In the past I had some strange issues with a USB-Storage RAID1 on the root
device (yeah no good idea, but nice for collecting experience :) )
mdadm regulary degraded the raid1 due to a lot of problems with the
USB-Stick (shown in dmesg), but the sticks are running fine when used as
single disks.
Check dmesg and your syslog for further messages.

Bye.


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:27, Laurent Dinclaux  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> After a reboot, my raid5 array fails. I cannot boot the system at all
> and only have the initramfs command line.
>
> Here is what cat proc/mdstat gives me about my raid5 partition:
>
> md0: inactive sdc[3](S) sdb5[1](S) sda5[0](S)
>
> When I do
>
> mdadm --assemble --scan --force
>
> I get mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives (out of 3) and 1
> spare.
>
> Here is what cat proc/mdstat gives me
> md0 : active raid5 sda5[0] sdc5[3] sdb5[1]
> ... 2[3/2] [UU_]
>
> And it shows me the recovery progress bar.
>
> After a while, I get:
> raid5 : Disk failure on sdb5, disabling device.
> raid5: Operation continuing on 1 devices.
>
> Here is what cat proc/mdstat gives me:
> md0 : active raid5 sda5[0] sdc[3](S) sdb5[4](F)
>
> I am stuck there. How can I reassemble the raid5 array with sda and sdc ?
>
> --
> Laurent Dinclaux
> Gérant - Gecka SARL
> laur...@gecka.nc
> Tel: +687 78 77 24
> http://www.gecka.com
>
> Préservez nos forêts, n’imprimez vos mails que si nécessaire.
> Preserve our forests, only print your emails if necessary.
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: Logrotate Utility

[Benjamin Griese]

Yes, thats plausible
Another solution would be, do not compress and do not hold back log files
for too long or do if you have enough free space :>


Bye.


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:52, Andy Rabagliati  wrote:

> On Thu, 06 May 2010, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a weird issue about logrotate utility slowing down the server
> > running ubuntu linux 8.04 hardy server. My logrotate runs at around
> > 12:30 pm everyday and during this time it slows down. The load is high
> > on the box.
> >
> > There is no error in dmesg and as well as syslog service.
> >
> > Please suggest/guide me how do i go about in fixing this issue.
>
> How big are your logfiles ?
>
> logrotate often compresses old logs - if you have huge logfiles that
> could slow things down.
>
> Log less stuff.
>
> Cheers,  Andy!
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: ext2 for /boot ?

[Benjamin Griese]

Think about a power off/surge while you're install a new kernel :)

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 16:27, Sander van Vugt  wrote:

> Any particular reason why you would want a journaling file system on a
> small directory that has no important changes?
>
> I guess that's why.
>
> Regards,
> Sander
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:03 +0100, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just completed our first automatic preseeded build of 10.04 using
> > the same preseed script used for previous releases. Strangely, the
> > installer is now using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3 as used
> > previously. For info we're using automatic partitioning with LVM. Is
> > this a concious change in policy for /boot or a regression?
> >
> > --
> > Paul Elliott, UNIX Systems Administrator
> > Computing Service, University of York
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: UDS Maverick: Call for Blueprints for Ubuntu Server

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Mark,

thats a quite good idea, at the moment I prefer Apache Directory Studio.
When you have got a client system to manage the server, its imo the better
solution to administer your DIT.
Its available for lnx, win and mac. Therefore it covers the most platforms.
:)

Bye.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 19:16, Mark Foster  wrote:

> On 04/28/2010 09:45 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > with reasonable default ACLs, on which new LDAP
> > administrators could build on and have a starting place for whatever
> > setup they wanted
> Do you or will you consider having phpldapadmin as part of this
> "starting place"
> Because, administering LDAP from the command line can have quite steep
> learning curve vs. using the (web) gui once the dir servers is ready for
> that.
>
> Also, if LDAP is to be integrated for the DNS, powerdns
> (pdns-backend-ldap) does pretty well.
>
> --
> I hate racists.  Mark D. Foster
> http://mark.foster.cc/ |  http://www.freegeekseattle.org/
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: UDS Maverick: Call for Blueprints for Ubuntu Server

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Andreas,

i just took a look on your your work and I agree to Mathia[sz] thats a good
start.
I think of a debconf menu similar to the nss_ldap and openldap-client one's,
that is asking you for your needs to build some ldifs from a base.
I havn't tested your script, maybe its already doing this in your scripting
way. That should be as system-compliant as possible, in the way it uses the
given tools.

Just my small opinion.

Anyway, you did good work by collecting the information and building the
different ldif's for the diferent purposes.
Sometime when I search for some Information about OpenLDAP, its major pain
in the ass to find anything useful on the net or on the mailing list that
fits your needs.

Hopefully, this is getting integrated to make the really interesting stuff
of ldap a really useful stuff, even in small networks where the admin hasn't
heard about central user/whatever management.

Glad that you made such a step on your own. :)

Bye, Benjamin.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 18:45, Andreas Hasenack wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/27/2010 04:47 PM, Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> > I second this.
> >
> > I am attempting (unsuccessfully) to get an Open LDAP setup so that I can
> > perform authentication across systems and services.
> >
> > It would be ideal if there were an easy way to setup LDAP and via some
> basic
> > questions, get you up an running.
> >
> > I'm all for helping out on such an endevour (from the "what I need it to
> do"
> > department and not the technical of LDAP.. which I am weak on).
>
> Hi, I created openldap-dit.
>
> The goal of the openldap-dit project was never to create a set of tools
> to create users and other objects in the directory, but rather setup a
> basic tree, with reasonable default ACLs, on which new LDAP
> administrators could build on and have a starting place for whatever
> setup they wanted. I know trees can take many shapes and forms.
>
> It can surely be simplified by removing dns and dhcp, which are the most
> complex branches in there I think, specially since bind in ubuntu
> doesn't work with ldap so well.
>
> I also think that the move to cn=config made it more difficult, if not
> impossible, for people not familiar with ldap to get to a starting
> point, at least without something like a default dit with an admin and
> some basic ACLs. The DIT I created I think helps, and I would love to
> hear some feedback about people who tried to use it. I know some of its
> pain points, but without people complaining or using it I don't have
> much motivation to fix it. And I'm at fault with that, because I never
> exactly made it very public.
>
> - --
> Andreas Hasenack
> andr...@canonical.com
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvYZjMACgkQeEJZs/PdwpCkpgCfeK46PCXwtBcax3bSJEIbsbO/
> tjIAoMim4vfjAuiIu97eOCKGChTktTZh
> =aJi9
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: UDS Maverick: Call for Blueprints for Ubuntu Server

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Andreas,

i just took a look on your your work and I agree to Mathia[sz] thats a good
start.
I think of a debconf menu similar to the nss_ldap and openldap-client one's,
that is asking you for your needs to build some ldifs from a base.
I havn't tested your script, maybe its already doing this in your scripting
way. That should be as system-compliant as possible, in the way it uses the
given tools.

Just my small opinion.

Anyway, you did good work by collecting the information and building the
different ldif's for the diferent purposes.
Sometime when I search for some Information about OpenLDAP, its major pain
in the ass to find anything useful on the net or on the mailing list that
fits your needs.

Hopefully, this is getting integrated to make the really interesting stuff
of ldap a really useful stuff, even in small networks where the admin hasn't
heard about central user/whatever management ever.

Glad to see you active here.

Bye, Benjamin.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 18:45, Andreas Hasenack wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/27/2010 04:47 PM, Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> > I second this.
> >
> > I am attempting (unsuccessfully) to get an Open LDAP setup so that I can
> > perform authentication across systems and services.
> >
> > It would be ideal if there were an easy way to setup LDAP and via some
> basic
> > questions, get you up an running.
> >
> > I'm all for helping out on such an endevour (from the "what I need it to
> do"
> > department and not the technical of LDAP.. which I am weak on).
>
> Hi, I created openldap-dit.
>
> The goal of the openldap-dit project was never to create a set of tools
> to create users and other objects in the directory, but rather setup a
> basic tree, with reasonable default ACLs, on which new LDAP
> administrators could build on and have a starting place for whatever
> setup they wanted. I know trees can take many shapes and forms.
>
> It can surely be simplified by removing dns and dhcp, which are the most
> complex branches in there I think, specially since bind in ubuntu
> doesn't work with ldap so well.
>
> I also think that the move to cn=config made it more difficult, if not
> impossible, for people not familiar with ldap to get to a starting
> point, at least without something like a default dit with an admin and
> some basic ACLs. The DIT I created I think helps, and I would love to
> hear some feedback about people who tried to use it. I know some of its
> pain points, but without people complaining or using it I don't have
> much motivation to fix it. And I'm at fault with that, because I never
> exactly made it very public.
>
> - --
> Andreas Hasenack
> andr...@canonical.com
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvYZjMACgkQeEJZs/PdwpCkpgCfeK46PCXwtBcax3bSJEIbsbO/
> tjIAoMim4vfjAuiIu97eOCKGChTktTZh
> =aJi9
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: this is mailing list

[Benjamin Griese]

Hmm, what are you trying to do or prove?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 15:04, Freedom Takarusenga <
freetarksbusin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is my mailing details belows
>
> Freedom Takarusenga
>
> 12 Yeatman Road
> P O Northend
> Bulawayo
> Zimbabwe
>
> +263913 456 637
> +263733 296 606
>
> God Bless U
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: KVM HA

[Benjamin Griese]

Hi Nikolai,

if you want an out-of-the-box solution with a GUI try proxmox-ve, in ubuntu
you could try the eucalyptus packages from the repositories.
Keep on using google. :)


Bye.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 17:36, Nikolai K. Bochev
wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> Can anyone point me to howto's/tutorials or at least references to how can
> i achieve a HA cluster with KVM guests on it ?
> I am talking about a node1 <-> node2 setup with shared storage and KVM
> guests need to be started on node2 when node1 fails etc.
> Any links or info going that way will be highly appreciated.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> --
>
> Nikolai K. Bochev
> System Administrator
>
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 
To be or not to be -- Shakespeare | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is
to do -- Sartre | Do be do be do -- Sinatra
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: KVM on a Cluster?

[Benjamin Griese]

KVM and Cluster? :)

Maybe you take a look at:

http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page

bye

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 16:31, Nikolai K. Bochev
wrote:

> Hey,
>
> The closest thing i found was :
>
> http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20090811.125913.6d26.en.html
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sander van Vugt" 
> To: "Mat" 
> Cc: ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:13:25 PM
> Subject: Re: KVM on a Cluster?
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, this is perfectly possible. I'm just finalizing a book on how to do
> that trick with Xen machines. But from cluster perspective, it
> absolutely doesn't matter which machine type to use. Look for the
> following:
>
> openais + pacemaker HA clustering
> shared storage on a SAN, based on OCFS2 so that it is accessible by
> multiple nodes simultaneously
> enough RAM in all the host machines
>
> HTH,
> Sander
>
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:09 -0800, Mat wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The cluster stack found in the wiki[1] looks very promising and I'm
> > looking forward to testing it out. One thing I've been thinking about
> > lately and looking for online is the possibility of running a virtual
> > machine with KVM on top of a cluster.
> >
> > Is it possible, or even practical to run an application like KVM on a
> > cluster? The reason driving me to think about this would be hardware
> > redundancy, and the ability to make "live" backups of a virtual machine
> > by isolating it from the others (a script that temporarily disables the
> > network?) and shutting it down for a snapshot.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have very little practical knowledge and experience
> > when it comes to clusters, so please feel free to enlighten me if I'm
> > proposing something crazy.
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting
> >
> > Thanks.
> > matoc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>
> --
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
>



-- 


Ted Turner   -
"Sports is like a war without the killing."
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam