Re: [Bug 236830] Re: cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Steve, will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-) Maxim Burgerhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint 1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89 0AE8 B60A ACA3 4452 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 00:49, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: upstream has stabilized the name of the executable now, so providing an update that includes the cifs.upcall helper instead of cifs.spnego just waits on me having the cycles available to do it. -- cifs does not support kerberos authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- cifs does not support kerberos authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 236830] Re: cifs does not support kerberos authentication
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:29:39AM -, wzzrd wrote: will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-) The fix is already present in intrepid; this bug is open for tracking the issue for hardy specifically. -- cifs does not support kerberos authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 236830] Re: cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Ah, yes, I see, sorry thanks for fixing this Maxim -- cifs does not support kerberos authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 260687] Re: pam_smbpass.so segfaults
This is a nasty problem, because it makes login impossible (except in single-user mode) if libpam-smbpass is installed. We currently have three machines with Intrepid (latest updates); on two of them there's no problem, on the third pam_smbpass.so segfaults on every login attempt (and thus the login fails). Attached is the backtrace reported by the Samba 'panic action' script (/usr/share/samba/panic-action). libpam- smbpass version is 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: backtrace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17716720/backtrace -- pam_smbpass.so segfaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 270899] Re: /etc/init.d/apache2 restart fails on busy webservers
Sounds reasonable to me. Ill do some testing locally here before uploading to proposed. chuck ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- /etc/init.d/apache2 restart fails on busy webservers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271254] Re: drbd doesn't start: No response from the DRBD driver! Is the module loaded? but module is loaded
Can you try the version in my ppa when it is built? Thanks chuck ** Changed in: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- drbd doesn't start: No response from the DRBD driver! Is the module loaded? but module is loaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271254 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271777] [NEW] Exit status 127 when starting openvpn when its already started.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openvpn Using package openvpn/hardy uptodate 2.1~rc7-1ubuntu3.3 Line 57 is not a valid variable assignment as below. # Check to see if it's already started... if test -e /var/run/openvpn.$NAME.pid ; then 57 STATUS = FAILED - Already running (PID file exists). else $DAEMON --writepid /var/run/openvpn.$NAME.pid \ $DAEMONARG $STATUSARG --cd $CONFIG_DIR \ --config $CONFIG_DIR/$NAME.conf /dev/null || STATUS=FAILED fi log_action_msg $NAME ($STATUS) ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Exit status 127 when starting openvpn when its already started. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 263228] Re: problems with file-permissions using linux-cifs-client
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- problems with file-permissions using linux-cifs-client https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263228 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246578] Re: using net ads join with -S breaks if given the long domain name
No response from the user for over a month. Please re-open this bug if you are still having problems. Thanks chuck ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- using net ads join with -S breaks if given the long domain name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 270570] Re: cifs mounts and unmounts properly for a day or so, then hangs on future mounts
I have since added a 'sync' statement in my script before mounting and before unmounting the CIFS shares. Haven't had any issues since. So suggestion to anyone else who encounters this may be to sync before unmounting. -- cifs mounts and unmounts properly for a day or so, then hangs on future mounts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271254] Re: drbd doesn't start: No response from the DRBD driver! Is the module loaded? but module is loaded
Yes, I will try it tomorrow. Thank you. -- drbd doesn't start: No response from the DRBD driver! Is the module loaded? but module is loaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271254 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 241892] Re: [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get
Attaching debdiff ** Attachment added: net-snmp_5.4.1~dfsg-4ubuntu4.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17734032/net-snmp_5.4.1%7Edfsg-4ubuntu4.1.debdiff -- [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 239129] Re: [CVE-2008-0960] Multiple SNMP implementations HMAC authentication spoofing
Patch attached to Bug #241892 -- [CVE-2008-0960] Multiple SNMP implementations HMAC authentication spoofing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 241892] Re: [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get
Updating patch. ** Attachment added: net-snmp_5.4.1~dfsg-4ubuntu4.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17735005/net-snmp_5.4.1%7Edfsg-4ubuntu4.1.debdiff -- [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 241892] Re: [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 241892] Re: [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- [CVE-2008-2292] Buffer overflow in __snprint_value() in snmp_get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other
libvirt now depends on dnsmasq-base, which does not install any config files. After doing a default install dnsmasq starts with: dnsmasq --keep-in-foreground --strict-order --bind-interfaces --pid-file --conf-file --listen-address 192.168.122.1 --except-interface lo --dhcp-leasefile=/var/lib/libvirt/dhcp-default.leases --dhcp-range 192.168.122.2,192.168.122.254 I would guess this is a fix? -- packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271922] [NEW] Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: smbfs When creating files on a CIFS-mounted filesystem, default ACL are not inherited. However, directory created on same CIFS-mounted filesystem works just fine. Both server and client are Ubuntu 8.04. On the server, running samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.5, smb.conf is entirely distribution-default, except for the share definition: [share] path = /srv/share read only = No inherit acls = Yes Note that, in examples below, ubuntu is uid 1000 on both hardy-server and hardy-desktop. On the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /srv/share [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo mkdir test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo chown ubuntu:ubuntu test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ setfacl -m d:o:rwx test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ mkdir test-acl/dir-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ touch test-acl/file-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ getfacl -R test-acl # file: test-acl # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/dir-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/file-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::rw- So far so good. Now, on the client, which have smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.6 from hardy-proposed installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r 2.6.24-20-generic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modinfo -F version cifs 1.52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep hardy-server /etc/fstab //hardy-server.montreal.canonical.com/share /home/ubuntu/hardy-server cifsuser,username=ubuntu,password=whatever0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /home/ubuntu/hardy-server/test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ mkdir dir-cifs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ touch file-cifs Now, I cannot use getfacl to display the ACL from the client as the cifs module have not been compiled with CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR, but from the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share/test-acl$ getfacl *-cifs # file: dir-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: file-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::r-- We can see the directory inherited the default ACL, but the file created on the client over the CIFS-mounted file system do not appear to have got the w permission propagated from the parent directory as expected. Even more puzzling, it appear to work as expected when using smbclient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ touch file-smbclient [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient //hardy-server/share Password: Domain=[HARDY-SERVER] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.28a]t smb: \ cd test-acl smb: \test-acl\ mkdir dir-smbclient smb: \test-acl\ put file-smbclient putting file file-smbclient as \test-acl\file-smbclient (0.0 kb/s) (average 0.0 kb/s) smb: \test-acl\ quit Witness on the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ getfacl /srv/share/test-acl/*-smbclient getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: srv/share/test-acl/dir-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: srv/share/test-acl/file-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx I am puzzled. Could it relate to the umask? acl(5) seems to imply it could. But then, the umask is the same on both hardy-desktop and hardy-desktop (0022) and yet, the actual behavior differ depending on if the file is created locally or through a CIFS-mounted file system (it should not). Maybe I am just confused about what the correct behavior should be in the first place. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271922] Re: Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbfs When creating files on a CIFS-mounted filesystem, default ACL are not inherited. However, directory created on same CIFS-mounted filesystem works just fine. Both server and client are Ubuntu 8.04. On the server, running samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.5, smb.conf is entirely distribution-default, except for the share definition: [share] path = /srv/share read only = No inherit acls = Yes Note that, in examples below, ubuntu is uid 1000 on both hardy-server and hardy-desktop. On the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /srv/share [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo mkdir test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo chown ubuntu:ubuntu test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ setfacl -m d:o:rwx test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ mkdir test-acl/dir-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ touch test-acl/file-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ getfacl -R test-acl # file: test-acl # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/dir-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/file-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::rw- So far so good. Now, on the client, which have smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.6 from hardy-proposed installed: - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r + [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r 2.6.24-20-generic - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modinfo -F version cifs + [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modinfo -F version cifs 1.52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep hardy-server /etc/fstab //hardy-server.montreal.canonical.com/share /home/ubuntu/hardy-server cifsuser,username=ubuntu,password=whatever0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /home/ubuntu/hardy-server/test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ mkdir dir-cifs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ touch file-cifs Now, I cannot use getfacl to display the ACL from the client as the cifs module have not been compiled with CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR, but from the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share/test-acl$ getfacl *-cifs # file: dir-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: file-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::r-- We can see the directory inherited the default ACL, but the file created on the client over the CIFS-mounted file system do not appear to have got the w permission propagated from the parent directory as expected. Even more puzzling, it appear to work as expected when using smbclient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ touch file-smbclient [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient //hardy-server/share Password: Domain=[HARDY-SERVER] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.28a]t smb: \ cd test-acl smb: \test-acl\ mkdir dir-smbclient smb: \test-acl\ put file-smbclient putting file file-smbclient as \test-acl\file-smbclient (0.0 kb/s) (average 0.0 kb/s) smb: \test-acl\ quit Witness on the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ getfacl /srv/share/test-acl/*-smbclient getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: srv/share/test-acl/dir-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: srv/share/test-acl/file-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx I am puzzled. Could it relate to the umask? acl(5) seems to imply it could. But then, the umask is the same on both hardy-desktop and hardy-desktop (0022) and yet, the actual behavior differ depending on if the file is created locally or through a CIFS-mounted file system (it should not). Maybe I am just confused about what the correct behavior should be in the first place. -- Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271922] Re: Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbfs When creating files on a CIFS-mounted filesystem, default ACL are not inherited. However, directory created on same CIFS-mounted filesystem works just fine. Both server and client are Ubuntu 8.04. On the server, running samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.5, smb.conf is entirely distribution-default, except for the share definition: [share] path = /srv/share read only = No inherit acls = Yes Note that, in examples below, ubuntu is uid 1000 on both hardy-server and hardy-desktop. On the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /srv/share [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo mkdir test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ sudo chown ubuntu:ubuntu test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ setfacl -m d:o:rwx test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ mkdir test-acl/dir-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ touch test-acl/file-local [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share$ getfacl -R test-acl # file: test-acl # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/dir-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: test-acl/file-local # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::rw- So far so good. Now, on the client, which have smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.6 from hardy-proposed installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r 2.6.24-20-generic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modinfo -F version cifs 1.52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask 0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep hardy-server /etc/fstab //hardy-server.montreal.canonical.com/share /home/ubuntu/hardy-server cifsuser,username=ubuntu,password=whatever0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /home/ubuntu/hardy-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /home/ubuntu/hardy-server/test-acl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ mkdir dir-cifs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy-server/test-acl$ touch file-cifs Now, I cannot use getfacl to display the ACL from the client as the cifs module have not been compiled with CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR, but from the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/share/test-acl$ getfacl *-cifs # file: dir-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: file-cifs # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rw- group::r-- other::r-- We can see the directory inherited the default ACL, but the file created on the client over the CIFS-mounted file system do not appear to have got the w permission propagated from the parent directory as expected. Even more puzzling, it appear to work as expected when using smbclient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ touch file-smbclient [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient //hardy-server/share Password: Domain=[HARDY-SERVER] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.28a]t smb: \ cd test-acl smb: \test-acl\ mkdir dir-smbclient smb: \test-acl\ put file-smbclient putting file file-smbclient as \test-acl\file-smbclient (0.0 kb/s) (average 0.0 kb/s) smb: \test-acl\ quit Witness on the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ getfacl /srv/share/test-acl/*-smbclient getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: srv/share/test-acl/dir-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:other::rwx # file: srv/share/test-acl/file-smbclient # owner: ubuntu # group: ubuntu user::rwx group::r-x other::rwx - I am puzzled. Could it relate to the umask? acl(5) seems to imply it could. But then, the umask is the same on both hardy-desktop and hardy-desktop (0022) and yet, the actual behavior differ depending on if the file is created locally or through a CIFS-mounted file system (it should not). Maybe I am just confused about what the correct behavior should be in the first place. + I am puzzled. Could it relate to the umask? acl(5) seems to imply it could. But then, the umask is the same on both hardy-desktop and hardy-server (0022) and yet, the actual behavior differ depending on if the file is created locally or through a CIFS-mounted file system (it should not). Maybe I am just confused about what the correct behavior should be in the first place. -- Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271922] Re: Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs)
The problem could be on the server side. I just tested with Ubuntu 7.10, with the old smbmount and smb kernel module, and the behavior is the same as when using mount.cifs and the cifs kernel module: directory inherit ACL fine, but not files. -- Default ACL not applied on files created through CIFS filesystem (mount.cifs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 249881] Re: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
Got it working: ldapsearch -x -H ldaps:/// -b -LLL -s base supportedSASLMechanisms dn: supportedSASLMechanisms: CRAM-MD5 supportedSASLMechanisms: NTLM supportedSASLMechanisms: LOGIN supportedSASLMechanisms: DIGEST-MD5 supportedSASLMechanisms: PLAIN supportedSASLMechanisms: EXTERNAL Tks Mathias -- Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271942] [NEW] DBus Error samba
You have been subscribed to a public bug: good evening, i just dist-upgrade from hardy and i can't access via samba/nautilus the local network (xp) Désolé, impossible d'afficher tout le contenu de « Partages Windows sur zn23 » : DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. i just restarted intrepid afte the upgrade and then does not work as hardy did. i do not know if it's nautilus or samba or DBus or may be network-manager who are in fault thank you ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- DBus Error samba https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/271942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 271942] Re: DBus Error samba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = samba -- DBus Error samba https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 261809] Re: [ffe]freeradius listen on random port
FFe approved, please upload. -- [ffe]freeradius listen on random port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
