[Bug 251377] Re: Problems with amavisd-new: cannot start the service

2009-03-11 Thread FransAlmere
Is this problem solved, since this morning out of the blue I have the
same problem.

I do not understand the mesage

Error in config file /etc/amavis/conf.d/05-domain_id: Insecure
directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at
/etc/amavis/conf.d/05-domain_id line 7.


I am using intrepid amavis 2.6.1.

in mailname is only the name of my server

Like to hear

-- 
Problems with amavisd-new: cannot start the service
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 306293] Re: Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU

2009-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 251377] Re: Problems with amavisd-new: cannot start the service

2009-03-11 Thread FransAlmere
Oh and before I forget I do not understand running with -T switch. What
is trying to run with -T switch

-- 
Problems with amavisd-new: cannot start the service
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-03-11 Thread Simon Kelley
Simon Kelley here: I'm the principal author of dnsmasq.

I have a couple of questions for FactTech:

1) Was the text message in the DHCPNAK log entry the same as the initial 
reporter's (address reserved)?
2) Is there any other dhcp-host line in the dnsmasq configuration which might 
apply to the host in question?

If you can reproduce the bug easily, I'd really like to see the result
of turning on log-dhcp in dnsmasq.conf


Cheers,

Simon.

-- 
DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327703
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-03-11 Thread Simon Kelley
I think I've deduced what is happening here. The combination of the
dhcp-host line and the /etc/hosts entry generates the equivalent of

dhcp-host=name,192.168.X.X

When you run Ubuntu, the DHCP requests send the name, so dnsmasq find
and uses this line, and all is good.

When the machine was rebooted with the install disk, the name is not
sent. At DISCOVER time, the 192.168.X.X address gets offered, because
that machine (based on MAC address) already has a lease on the that
address. At REQUEST time, the address is disallowed, becasue it's been
set as a static address for another machine (remember, no name to match
the dhcp-host line.)

This hasn't been seen often, because most people nail down static
addresses using the MAC address.

Given that, this should be fairly easy to fix: I believe that

http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/test-
releases/dnsmasq-2.48test6.tar.gz

will do the trick.

Cheers,

Simon.

-- 
DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327703
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down

2009-03-11 Thread Thierry Carrez
Filed bug 341084 to discuss usage of umount -i rather than umount in
umountnfs.sh. Please followup there.

Updating other status: Nothing to fix in samba or dhcdbd, something to
fix in network-manager, and maybe something to fix in wpasupplicant.

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

** Changed in: dhcdbd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = New

** Summary changed:

- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
+ Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted

** Summary changed:

- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted
+ Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS 
timeout at shutdown)

-- 
Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout 
at shutdown)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down

2009-03-11 Thread Thierry Carrez
@toobuntu:
The _netdev option tells the system (if it doesn't already knows it from the 
fstype) that the filesystem should be considered mounted on network (and 
therefore be unmounted in umountnfs.sh rather than umountfs).

@Steve Greci (Seems when tracking down the cause of one bug, I encounter 3 
more to that need to be fixed in order to solve it.):
I understand the feeling. That's part of why I said this bug is not so easy to 
fix. Looks like your bug is solved in Jaunty though... so let's try if we can 
completely fix it for that release :)

@Steve French:
Yes, there seems to be a major inconsistency between the way Gnome handles 
files on network mounts vs. how NetworkManager handles the network. Thanks for 
your analysis :) To mitigate the effects I agree we should hack umountnfs.sh so 
that it always uses umount -i. Since that script is always run as root I 
suppose there wouldn't be any wrong side-effects ?

@Bart:
I agree that the different network modes are poorly documented (and checkbox 
behavior in n-m-applet to switch between them used to be very buggy). I am 
still not sure I got them right. I guess Alexander could confirm if what I said 
in comment 88 is indeed how it works.

@Alexander:
I think most of the users with wireless reporting failure are in use case (3) 
described in comment 88, since it's the default N-M mode of operation. However 
I agree wpasupplicant needs to be fixed as well, for the case where you would 
run on wireless with a system connection (is that even possible ?). Looking at 
wpa-ifdown though, it appears it already has some support for sendsigs omission 
(at least in Jaunty), so that might not be needed. I need more time on this.

-- 
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

2009-03-11 Thread Ian McMichael
I've only just noticed this bug report.  For the last couple of Ubuntu
releases I've been patching and re-compiling the openldap (previously
openldap2.3) packages in my PPA as I use the smbk5pwd overlay.

If you'd like to make use of my work, add the following to apt's
sources.list for Intrepid:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ian-sigma-uk/ppa/ubuntu intrepid main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/ian-sigma-uk/ppa/ubuntu intrepid main

or for Hardy:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ian-sigma-uk/ppa/ubuntu hardy main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/ian-sigma-uk/ppa/ubuntu hardy main

Then import my PPA key with:

sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com
a94c744b25d20c39c0918ff595d65a6ae51162d2

To avoid any odd dependencies the overlay is in a new package called
slapd-smbk5pwd, which depends on the heimdal libraries.  Hence you will
need to have the universe repositories enabled for it to install.  When
you're ready:

sudo apt-get install slapd-smbk5pwd

You should now be ready to use the overlay.

Hope this helps someone save the time it took me to work it all out.
Maybe one day we could find a way of getting the slapd-smbk5pwd package
in universe so that it's available to all?

-- 
Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82853
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 323601] Re: Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty

2009-03-11 Thread Thierry Carrez
I'm on it.
It will be a new separate source package though, since there is no way of 
properly updating from likewise-open 4.1 to likewise-open5 (and the packages 
are very different).

** Changed in: likewise-open (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Thierry Carrez (ttx)
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
Upgrade to likewise-open 5 for Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323601
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 332521] Re: [jaunty] no internet connection: dhclient-script cannot be execve'd

2009-03-11 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Seems to have been recently fixed in Jaunty PPC. Don't know exactly with
which package, but now it works.

** Changed in: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
[jaunty] no internet connection: dhclient-script cannot be execve'd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 341278] [NEW] CVE-2009-0781: XSS in tomcat6 and tomcat5.5

2009-03-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Binary package hint: tomcat6

PublicDate: 2009-03-09
References:
 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0781
Description:
 Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsp/cal/cal2.jsp in the
 calendar application in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0
 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18 allows
 remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time
 parameter, related to invalid HTML.

** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Jaunty)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Jaunty)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Jaunty)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** This bug has been flagged as a security issue

** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Jaunty)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
CVE-2009-0781: XSS in tomcat6 and tomcat5.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 292548] Re: nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Hodgens
I seem to repeatedly trigger this bug, just in my house (laptop w/
wifi/ethernet, on Ubuntu 8.10, samba package 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4). It
happens if the interface itself is lost, and it -may- also happen if the
IP is unassociated - I believe it depends on how your samba is
configured (subnet vs. interface name for interfaces = directive),
though I've not tested this 'solution'.

In my configuration (which Ubuntu was so kind to set up for me), that
configuration line looks like: interfaces = 127.0.0.1/8
192.168.0.0/24

I believe it might be possible to avoid this problem by changing that to
interfaces = lo eth0 (or what have you), provided your eth0 is always
assigned. Alternatively, I believe that if you were to simply comment
out, remove, or set the interfaces option null (just 'interfaces =').

Here is log outout from when this happens (nmbd.log) if anyone cares:

  create_subnets: Unable to create any subnet from given interfaces. Is your 
interface line in smb.conf correct ?
[2009/03/10 17:09:33,  0] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(277)
  create_subnets: Unable to create any subnet from given interfaces. Is your 
interface line in smb.conf correct ?
[2009/03/10 17:40:13,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/10 19:10:04,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/10 20:16:04,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/10 22:01:04,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/10 23:58:04,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/10 23:58:04,  0] nmbd/nmbd.c:reload_interfaces(285)
  reload_interfaces: No subnets to listen to. Waiting..
[2009/03/11 00:21:13,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/11 00:21:13,  0] nmbd/nmbd.c:reload_interfaces(285)
  reload_interfaces: No subnets to listen to. Waiting..
[2009/03/11 00:26:44,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/11 03:22:44,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/11 03:24:45,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/11 03:25:44,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(138) ERRNO=Invalid argument
[2009/03/11 03:25:44,  0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(839)
  Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(137) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2009/03/11 03:25:44,  0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(160)
  send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.255 port 137 failed
[2009/03/11 03:25:44,  0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name(244)
  query_name: Failed to send packet trying to query name GEEK1d
[2009/03/11 03:25:44,  0] nmbd/nmbd.c:reload_interfaces(285)
  reload_interfaces: No subnets to listen to. Waiting..

I am uncertain at which stage in that error log it the nmbd starts to
peg CPU. It's much less noticeable with anticipatory scheduler than with
cfq.

-- 
nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292548
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 292548] Re: nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Hodgens
This bug is easily reproducible with a fairly stock Ubuntu install of
Samba if one switches networks.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292548
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 292548] Re: nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Hodgens
Janaka - I would suggest going into /etc/rc#.d and moving the S20samba
to K20samba, if you have not done so already. This should stop samba
from starting on boot.

-- 
nmbd -D uses 95% processor when there is not lan conection.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292548
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 341432] [NEW] package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system

2009-03-11 Thread bijwaard
Public bug reported:

libkrb5-dev:
  Installed: 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3
  Candidate: 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3
  Version table:
 *** 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10

I expected successful installation, but got this error.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only 
file system
Package: libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3
SourcePackage: krb5
Title: package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed 
to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-13-generic i686

** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to 
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 341432] Re: package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system

2009-03-11 Thread bijwaard

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23765450/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23765451/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to 
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 341432] [NEW] package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system

2009-03-11 Thread Mathias Gug

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:49:07PM -, bijwaard wrote:
 ErrorMessage: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': 
 Read-only file system

A few lines above:

pkg: error processing libcupsys2-dev (--remove): failed to delete 
`/usr/share/doc/libcupsys2-dev/changelog.Debian.gz.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file 
system
Removing libcups2-dev ...
dpkg: error processing libcups2-dev (--remove): failed to delete 
`/usr/lib/libcups.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system


You probably have a bigger problem in your system if /usr/ was turned into
a read-only file system. What's the ouput of the mount command? Do you
see any error messages in /var/log/kern.log?

  status incomplete


-- 
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer  http://www.ubuntu.com


** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to 
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 341432] [NEW] package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system

2009-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
bijwaard bijwa...@gmail.com writes:

 Title: package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to
install/upgrade: failed to delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp':
Read-only file system

That sounds like a problem with the file system on your local machine
rather than a problem with the package.  Is /usr really read-only?  If it
is read-only by policy, you will need to mount it read-write before
upgrading packages.  If it is read-only due to file system errors, you
should investigate possible hardware failure on your system.

If it's not read-only, then something even more weird is going on, but
probably at the dpkg layer rather than at the level of the krb5 package.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/

-- 
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to 
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 338556] Re: [jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)

2009-03-11 Thread Alessio Treglia
Bugfix uploaded.

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Alessio Treglia (quadrispro)
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

-- 
[jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 338556] Re: [jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)

2009-03-11 Thread Alessio Treglia

** Attachment added: net-snmp_5.4.1~dfsg-12ubuntu2.contents
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2374/net-snmp_5.4.1%7Edfsg-12ubuntu2.contents

-- 
[jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 338556] Re: [jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)

2009-03-11 Thread Alessio Treglia
I'm sorry, the package is in main.

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Alessio Treglia (quadrispro) = (unassigned)
   Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed

-- 
[jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 338556] Re: [jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)

2009-03-11 Thread Alessio Treglia

** Attachment added: net-snmp_5.4.1~dfsg-12ubuntu2.debdiff
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23766628/net-snmp_5.4.1%7Edfsg-12ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
[jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 338556] Re: [jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)

2009-03-11 Thread Alessio Treglia

** Attachment added: net-snmp_5.4.1~dfsg-12ubuntu2.buildlog
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2370/net-snmp_5.4.1%7Edfsg-12ubuntu2.buildlog

-- 
[jaunty] libsnmp-python: Depends: python ( 2.6)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 341526] [NEW] Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk

2009-03-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a private bug by Mario Limonciello (superm1):

Upcoming Dell servers will be supporting a new technology called Driver
Injection Disks.  These are essentially read only flash drives that are
connected internally on the USB bus containing drivers preloaded from
the factory.

They are intended to be used during OS installation for an OS release
that doesn't yet include support for the drivers in a server natively.
RHEL and SLES have both adopted it already into their installers.

Here are the key points about it:
1) It will show up as a VFAT disk with the label OEMDRV
2) Drivers from many OSes may be contained on the VFAT disk at any given time.  
This means that if a server is certified against Ubuntu 8.04, RHEL 5.3, Windows 
Server 2008, and Ubuntu 10.04, that drivers will be on for each of these OSes.  
Because of this, it's important to account for possible collisions.  For Ubuntu 
releases, this is solved by shipping Ubuntu drivers in:
$mnt/ubuntu/$(lsb_release -r -s).  Drivers for Ubuntu 8.04 will not be offered 
with Ubuntu 10.04 installs then.
3) This VFAT disk will always be exposed as read only to the user during 
installation.  Using Dell supported tools however, it can be injected with 
updated drivers if the customer would like.
4) This option should be preseedable, so in the event that Dell was to ship an 
Ubuntu server with Ubuntu preloaded, the drivers should be able to be installed 
from the Driver Injection Disk in the factory.
5) When not preseeded, the customer should be offered the option to use the 
drivers on the Driver Injection Disk, with the default choice being No.

** Affects: dell
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: hw-detect (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: mountmedia (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/341526
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 341526] Re: Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk

2009-03-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Also affects: hw-detect (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mountmedia (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341526
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs