[Bug 363576] Re: problem accessing shared folders
Thanks for the extra info. I think there is no bug here. When you use libsmbclient (by smbclient or nautilus) to access //nasdrive/public it must first resolve nasdrive to an IP address. It does so by several methods, trying by default in that order: lmhosts, host, wins, bcast. In your case it first tries to find nasdrive in /etc/samba/lmhosts but it's not there. Then it tries classic name resolution... and there it finds a match: nasdrive = 206.112.100.151. So it means something in your name resolution (/etc/hosts file, DNS...) resolves nasdrive as 206.112.100.151. For example you're using OpenDNS and it is kind enough to answer something completely wrong based on its search engine. In all cases, it's not a bug in samba. Solutions to fixing it include: - rename nasdrive to something your name resolution won't find - fix your name resolution so that ping nasdrive doesn't go to 206.112.100.151 - add nasdrive to your lmhosts file - changing name resolve order in /etc/samba/smb.conf so that bcast appears before host and the nasdrive name is found by broadcast rather than host resolution (noisy and wrong, like what Windows does) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- problem accessing shared folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 350291] Re: Samba cannot resolv ip
Also - Does using -R bcast option in smbclient help ? - Please send the output of the smbclient failure with -d4 debug level. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Samba cannot resolv ip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 363083] Re: [samba] tree connect failed
Eh, thanks :) I've tried unsuccessfully to reproduce the setup, works for me under Intrepid. Just to be sure, could you please give me the output of the following command: testparm -v -s | grep usershare Then you can uncomment (by removing leading ;) the following line in /etc/samba/smb.conf: ; usershare max shares = 100 and try smbclient //nkbp/public again... -- [samba] tree connect failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 348126] Re: ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key
I have not read all post, but I think I have found the reason of this. I have two keys. One works without problems, the other don't work. The correct working key is a dsa key. The rsa key don't work. I hope this will help a little bit. -- ssh are using ssh-userauth but ignores private key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 191251] Re: [needs-packaging] php5-embed
Is this package/feature available somewhere? -- [needs-packaging] php5-embed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 217159] Re: slapd + gnutls fails
FWIW I've got the same on a debian box I've just upgraded from etch to lenny: slapd 2.4.11-1 libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-1 libgnutls26 2.4.2-6+lenny1 certs are not blacklisted (checked ca and server), gnutls-serv works fine. tracign with openssl shows a very quick reply: openssl s_client -connect localhost:636 -debug CONNECTED(0003) write to 0x68d7c0 [0x68e390] (118 bytes = 118 (0x76)) - 80 74 01 03 01 00 4b 00-00 00 20 00 00 39 00 00 .tK... ..9.. 0010 - 38 00 00 35 00 00 16 00-00 13 00 00 0a 07 00 c0 8..5 0020 - 00 00 33 00 00 32 00 00-2f 03 00 80 00 00 05 00 ..3..2../... 0030 - 00 04 01 00 80 00 00 15-00 00 12 00 00 09 06 00 0040 - 40 00 00 14 00 00 11 00-00 08 00 00 06 04 00 80 @... 0050 - 00 00 03 02 00 80 88 ce-a0 bb 73 ed f1 ba 4a 72 ..s...Jr 0060 - de c5 25 dc 88 8d b5 8a-d7 15 10 17 68 46 a7 23 ..%.hF.# 0070 - 94 41 2e 07 92 aa .A read from 0x68d7c0 [0x6938f0] (7 bytes = 0 (0x0)) 8434:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:188: gnutls-cli -l shows a huge list too. permissions all seem fine (and readable) -- slapd + gnutls fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 217159] Re: slapd + gnutls fails
Could you please include the information requested at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingOpenldap#ssl-client-failure? Thank you, -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- slapd + gnutls fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 317564] Re: upgrade to Subversion 1.5.5 for jaunty
How about 1.6.1 - at work, on windows, I always have the latest slik-svn and tortoissvn with easy popup update notification. Now I have upgraded to 1.6.1 all my repos and can't use them on linux any more... But 1.6.1 is so cool - it can pack every slice (usually 1000 revisions) of a repo into just one optimised file with the svnadmin pack command. And its _WAY_ faster because they keep a lot of stuff no more in XML format, so says the subversion book... If git were not behind also, svn for the main repo and git-svn for an offline copy would be fine. OK - there's also bazaar and mercural and ... but still, svn is enough for most scenarios and I would like to work with the most recent version to profit from innovation - if it were in jaunty proposed that would be enough OR some info how to get a ppa for .debs... -- upgrade to Subversion 1.5.5 for jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317564 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 217159] Re: slapd + gnutls fails
sure: /etc/ldap/ldap.conf: BASE dc=opsera,dc=com URI ldap://foo.opsera.com TLS_CACERT /etc/ssl/certs/ca.opsera.com.crt TLS_REQCERT demand TLS_CACERT file: -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- MIIEUTCCAzmgAwIBAgIJAI+dj7GhDEy1MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHgxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkdCMRIwEAYDVQQIEwlCZXJrc2hpcmUxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1JlYWRpbmcxDzAN BgNVBAoTBk9wc2VyYTESMBAGA1UEAxMJT3BzZXJhIENBMR4wHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkB Fg9yb290QG9wc2VyYS5jb20wHhcNMDgwNTE0MTEyNDAxWhcNMTgwNTEyMTEyNDAx WjB4MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjESMBAGA1UECBMJQmVya3NoaXJlMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdS ZWFkaW5nMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZPcHNlcmExEjAQBgNVBAMTCU9wc2VyYSBDQTEeMBwG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYPcm9vdEBvcHNlcmEuY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOC AQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA5NBn4qZQmpNSfAZGicY11YoRbG2ZW+IMNd6P0t3uqbqlS/xd toLXiLQOKcm0k1FdBXgeredDAd7Lm0KOvXOu85oDcSB4Y+8Xny0ug/oyw5HhrvaT ACP4DdFkVK0rOncpgqjUoPPlHpAtRE+vruxgYqG4WHRZQv2aIfDCLP1vorLNLl68 JoPsTfP8O4ISOHVY5KlmngOjBeU0JuFP7luFoPshXbxpQ8VL2frTNLV3SKpU7zMe QGkUh+86HSCKxk3ahq5grZIYLm+RlOXORTisT8xK6VWTDO1O0DF1HnVN/pkx6AwN HyC4sveyYzm4f+nwVTFd/vKXVRHWJoKLltSUkwIDAQABo4HdMIHaMB0GA1UdDgQW BBQ7ztgRvxawSnughvTiN0BuzzrOMDCBqgYDVR0jBIGiMIGfgBQ7ztgRvxawSnug hvTiN0BuzzrOMKF8pHoweDELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxEjAQBgNVBAgTCUJlcmtzaGly ZTEQMA4GA1UEBxMHUmVhZGluZzEPMA0GA1UEChMGT3BzZXJhMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlP cHNlcmEgQ0ExHjAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWD3Jvb3RAb3BzZXJhLmNvbYIJAI+dj7Gh DEy1MAwGA1UdEwQFMAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAKtJww1eJjGtr3c4 xrvRfNlS5FJphmh6xqIyTJf7cglcOziob/FtPD7HJ3FLq2dj1uwRlbreTzTmpajl hr4h/2gxjLTjrMSriLbHjuBhuotHa8/NsuFm3USWZyca0zASOQV4+yGu4AydUmo5 vcOymiVZ4JWprPC4bmALti8ykqejDjhydcl8Vd9nLKz8KuU1EwBMWHtBjSfkuAao IxJZHNTpi+iBXRFguola0aTX3K0g1+IABaYKb1MUerszmvXdqaJ0KnszT79d9R2u XavJFc33egXQUO7K/Vm0tg2+phP7QbRwix95pNP8jkalWbCuXMDbMqLNBN28+u3V w4gO30E= -END CERTIFICATE- gnutls-cli output: Connecting to '127.0.1.1:636'... *** Fatal error: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. *** Handshake has failed GNUTLS ERROR: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. package versions: gnutls-bin 2.4.2-6+lenny1 gnutls26 install ok installed ldap-utils 2.4.11-1 openldap install ok installed libgnutls26 2.4.2-6+lenny1 gnutls26 install ok installed libldap-2.4-2 2.4.11-1 openldap install ok installed libnss-ldap 261-2.1 install ok installed libpam-ldap 184-4.2 install ok installed slapd 2.4.11-1 openldap install ok installed sudo-ldap 1.6.9p17-2.1 sudo install ok installed ldapsearch: ldap_url_parse_ext(ldaps://foo.opsera.com/) ldap_create ldap_url_parse_ext(ldaps://foo.opsera.com:636/??base) ldap_sasl_bind ldap_send_initial_request ldap_new_connection 1 1 0 ldap_int_open_connection ldap_connect_to_host: TCP foo.opsera.com:636 ldap_new_socket: 3 ldap_prepare_socket: 3 ldap_connect_to_host: Trying 127.0.1.1:636 ldap_pvt_connect: fd: 3 tm: -1 async: 0 tls_write: want=93, written=93 : 16 03 02 00 58 01 00 00 54 03 02 49 ef 6d 28 ac X...T..I.m(. 0010: b6 ff 62 fd 12 78 93 a8 58 cb f7 39 a6 b7 61 59 ..b..x..X..9..aY 0020: 1e 8f f4 5a 5d 4c a6 83 b5 73 d0 00 00 24 00 33 ...Z]L...s...$.3 0030: 00 45 00 39 00 88 00 16 00 32 00 44 00 38 00 87 .E.9.2.D.8.. 0040: 00 13 00 66 00 2f 00 41 00 35 00 84 00 0a 00 05 ...f./.A.5.. 0050: 00 04 01 00 00 07 00 09 00 03 02 00 01. tls_read: want=5, got=0 TLS: can't connect: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received.. ldap_err2string ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1) -- slapd + gnutls fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365259] [NEW] on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba-common on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog inside the terminal-window of the update manager. But debconf is configured to use kde, and questions for other packages actually have been asked with kde dialogs ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 363083] Re: [samba] tree connect failed
Hi, This is the command you request me : rem...@nkbp:~$ testparm -v -s | grep usershare Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [printers] Processing section [print$] Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE usershare allow guests = Yes usershare max shares = 100 usershare owner only = Yes usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershares usershare prefix allow list = usershare prefix deny list = usershare template share = I uncomment the line in smb.conf and restart samba, but it doesn't work. -- [samba] tree connect failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 358612] Re: X11 forwarding fails (Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE)
Bernie, thanks. You are correct, XAuthLocation wasn't correctly set, and this was the cause of the problem. I didn't set XAuthLocation at all, so ssh used the default value, which ssh_config(5) says is /usr/bin/X11/xauth. But in Ubuntu xauth is /usr/bin/xauth. Setting XAuthLocation /usr/bin/xauth in my ssh config solved the problem. Since xauth is /usr/bin/xauth and not /usr/bin/X11/xauth in Ubuntu, it seems that Ubuntu's openssh-client should change its default value of XAuthLocation. Debian solves this by making /usr/bin/X11 a symlink to . , but that seems like an overbroad solution for just this problem. Thanks, Andrew. -- X11 forwarding fails (Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 363576] Re: problem accessing shared folders
Thanks, that was very helpful. I changed /etc/samba/smb.conf to include: name resolve order = lmhosts bcast host wins and it works now. One more question: in the response above to smbclient -d4 there is a line that says: tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: could not open file /var/run/samba/gencache.tdb: Permission denied This looks like a bad thing. Is this bad? -- problem accessing shared folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 364616] [NEW] Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools Problem came up after upgrade to jaunty where iscsi root support was added. Path to the iscsistart binary is /sbin/iscsistart not /usr/sbin/iscsistart as used in the copy_exec call of /usr/share /initramfs-tools/hook/iscsi. Changing it to copy_exec /sbin/iscsistart /sbin fixes the error. ** Affects: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged -- Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/364616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 364616] Re: Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook
** Package changed: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) = open-iscsi (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Blueprint server-karmic-update-motd-inotify] Enhance update-motd to use inotify
Blueprint changed by Dustin Kirkland: Whiteboard changed to: With contribution from Jon Bernard, this feature has been mostly implemented in upstream update-motd. We need to do a few more, minor things to complete the feature. Mainly, we need an init script, or some other sticky mechanism for launching the inotify portion of the daemon. Scott James Remnant suggested that upstart could be used to do this. This blueprint suggests that we complete this functionality and use inotify for some update-motd events. Additionally, we should discuss the types of applications that perhaps should be hooked to add useful information in the /etc/motd. :-Dustin -- Enhance update-motd to use inotify https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-karmic-update-motd-inotify -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] [NEW] postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix postfix-2.5.5-1.1 (jaunty release candidate) The default /etc/postfix/main.cf file contains the line: smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high This is an invalid value; it must be either 'medium' or 'high', not 'medium, high'. With it set to 'medium, high', sending mail via the submission port (uncommented in master.cf) results in the following error message in /var/log/mail.log: Apr 23 00:20:06 socket postfix/smtpd[28385]: warning: localhost[127.0.0.1]: invalid TLS cipher grade: medium, high: aborting TLS session The documentation (man 5 postconf) says this: smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers (default: medium). The minimum TLS cipher grade that the Postfix SMTP server will use with mandatory TLS encryption. Cipher types listed in smtpd_tls_mandatory_exclude_ciphers or smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers are excluded from the base definition of the selected cipher grade. With opportunistic TLS encryption, the export grade is used unconditionally with exclusions specified only via smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs