[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
I am unable to duplicate this here in a Jaunty (rc) virtual machine. The default /etc/postfix/main.cf file does not seem to contain an entry for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers when I install postfix. I also unpacked the postfix 2.5.5-1.1 source package and do not see any obvious sign of this in there. Please provide full details on exactly how you installed postfix, and if you were asked any configurations questions by debconf when installing, how you answered them. I suspect that the problem here may lie in another package, not postfix itself? In particular, did you install the dovecot-postfix package? Jonathan ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
bug only seen when dovecot-postfix is installed, not when installing just postfix. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = dovecot (Ubuntu) -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
unable to set package name to dovecot-postfix ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
Fix created, will upload debdiff soon. ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
Debdiff attached. Note that this is hand edited to remove over 5MB of cruft generated because the dovecot build regenerates a lot of autotools files that are in the original source tarball and does not take care of replacing them in its clean target. But that's (I think!) a totally separate packaging bug. Jonathan ** Attachment added: dovecot_1.1.11-0ubuntu5.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25872190/dovecot_1.1.11-0ubuntu5.debdiff -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365390] Re: postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- postfix: invalid value for smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers in main.cf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 364616] Re: Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 364616] Re: Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook
Release notes text added:
== iSCSI upgrades fail to generate initramfs ==
Upgrades of systems using iSCSI will fail to generate the initramfs. As a
workaround, edit `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/iscsi` and change this line:
{{{
copy_exec /usr/sbin/iscsistart /sbin
}}} to this: {{{
copy_exec /sbin/iscsistart /sbin
}}} This will be fixed in a post-release update. (Bug:364616)
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Wrong iscsistart path in iscsi hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365259] Re: on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde
Do you remember what kind of questions ? Could you provide relevant /var/log/apt/* and /var/log/dist-upgrade/* logs ? ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 217159] Re: slapd + gnutls fails
FYI I've compiled up 2.4.16 (took 2.4.15 from debian and updated source), added a patch from http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:idWE3JHeQOUJ:www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%2520Bugs%3Fid%3D6053%3Bpage%3D1+main:+TLS+init+def+ctx+failed:+-50cd=1hl=enct=clnkgl=uklr=lang_en (Subject: gnutls doen't initialize gnutls_x509_privkey_t structure, leading to TLS init def ctx failed: -50) and it still does the same thing. tcpdump shows SSL client hello being sent, then the ldap server just closes the connection on it :-( (slapd logs saying Could not negotiate a supported cipher suite) -- slapd + gnutls fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 363083] Re: [samba] tree connect failed
Must be something else I miss. Like I said, I can successfully create shares with your configuration under Intrepid. If you plan to upgrade to Jaunty, keep us posted if the problem persists. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [samba] tree connect failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 363576] Re: problem accessing shared folders
No. It just means your call to smbclient won't result in any information being cached systemwide for the other users, which is normal when calling smbclient as a normal user. -- problem accessing shared folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365500] Re: package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25880006/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365500] [NEW] package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix installArchives() failed ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic x86_64 ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package postfix None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 217159] Re: slapd + gnutls fails
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software Bugs?id=6053;expression=gnutls is a better link to that patch compiled with openssl rather than gnutls and it's happier.. Aha!!! Found it :-) openssl client then complained that the ceritficate was not suitable for the purpose. In short, I had put a client cert on, not a server set.I use easy-rsa2 from openvpn package to build certs and I had ran it with ./build-key not ./build-key-server.Once the ldap keypair was rebuilt with -extensions server everthing was happy (even on the older version of software). Naturally it would be nice if openldap checked this and produced a helpful error :-) many thanks for your help and prompt replies. -- slapd + gnutls fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server
Blueprint changed by Patrick Cantu: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of these solutions and have some professional experience in it. 2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork called bongo project. However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution for SmallBusinessServer. 2008-06-08 (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice. IT offers many features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed. The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet) 2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel. Ubuntu packages are already being maintained, and the project would be delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues. 2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel. They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as an Exchange replacement if you have clients using Outlook. I have run it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06. It's head and shoulders above the rest at the moment.. and it is easy to setup, update, and maintain. 2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure. 2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook, support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact. 2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware AFAIK, it does not have a web interface. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox- platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware server like the commercial one. 2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird 2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its infancy. It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install and use 2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too. It was AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the upcoming 6.30 release. 2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality, reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic developer/user community that is supportive and communicative. 2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart Cianos Actually most of it seems to be in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage. Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also pay for the connector... I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration. 2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to authenticate against any service which support the underlying authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap; additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with information from its global address book for use with external clients. 2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it? 2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart: I tried PAM based authentication on Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me. Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa. Zimbra is nice, but it really needs a dedicated server to run properly. @Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to other servers. 2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli) @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too expensive, not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu. However Zimbra has too many
[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server
Blueprint changed by Guy Van Sanden: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of these solutions and have some professional experience in it. 2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork called bongo project. However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution for SmallBusinessServer. 2008-06-08 (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice. IT offers many features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed. The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet) 2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel. Ubuntu packages are already being maintained, and the project would be delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues. 2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel. They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as an Exchange replacement if you have clients using Outlook. I have run it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06. It's head and shoulders above the rest at the moment.. and it is easy to setup, update, and maintain. 2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure. 2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook, support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact. 2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware AFAIK, it does not have a web interface. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox- platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware server like the commercial one. 2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird 2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its infancy. It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install and use 2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too. It was AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the upcoming 6.30 release. 2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality, reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic developer/user community that is supportive and communicative. 2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart Cianos Actually most of it seems to be in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage. Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also pay for the connector... I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration. 2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to authenticate against any service which support the underlying authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap; additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with information from its global address book for use with external clients. 2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it? 2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart: I tried PAM based authentication on Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me. Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa. Zimbra is nice, but it really needs a dedicated server to run properly. @Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to other servers. 2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli) @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too expensive, not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu. However Zimbra has too many
[Blueprint groupware-server] Groupware Server
Blueprint changed by Patrick Cantu: Whiteboard changed to: 2006-12+21 khaeru: might this be handled by the ubuntu-server-tasks spec? é 21/12/2006 - I think we should pick an existing suite, i.e. hula and then create the ubiquitous middleware to achieve what we want 13/07/2007 (stephan-impilinux) - We have recently evaluated a load of these solutions and have some professional experience in it. 2008-06-07 (pixelpapst) - Just a quick reminder that the hula project ist effectively dead since late 2006, and the community created a fork called bongo project. However, by now they ripped out all of Hula's LDAP connectivity, which makes this a very pretty but useless solution for SmallBusinessServer. 2008-06-08 (Guy Van Sanden) Citadel seems a very good choice. IT offers many features (including a Jabber server) and is completely GPL'ed. The only caveat is that it does not have LDAP support (yet) 2008-06-19 (Art Cancro) -- yes, definitely go with Citadel. Ubuntu packages are already being maintained, and the project would be delighted to cooperate with the Ubuntu team on integration issues. 2008-06-19 (Todd Hanna) I would also like to give a big +1 to Citadel. They already have the .debs and there is even a connector to use it as an Exchange replacement if you have clients using Outlook. I have run it without issue on Ubuntu server since version 6.06. It's head and shoulders above the rest at the moment.. and it is easy to setup, update, and maintain. 2008-07-08 (Stuart Cianos) - I'll also give major points to Citadel, and have been a longtime user of it. It is the only open-source groupware package that is self maintaining and straightforward to configure. 2008-07-09 (Stephan Buys) - Please also dont forget Kolab (Citadel implements the Kolab v1 format). Kolab has 3 plugins for Outlook, support Horde Webmail, Thunderbird/Lightning and Kontact. 2008-07-09 (Guy Van Sanden) RE Kolab - Kolab is not a full groupware AFAIK, it does not have a web interface. Correct me if I'm wrong. 2008-07-09 (Christian Merlin) Remember also SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org/) it use LDAP for users and PostgreSQL for database. So It could be easy to integrate with Ebox (http://ebox- platform.com/). So Ubuntu can became an'easy and powerfull groupware server like the commercial one. 2008-07-10 (Stephan Buys) Kolab does have a web interface (for admin and email) through Horde (www.horde.org). Calendars, Contacts and Tasks can be shared between Outlook/Kontact/Horde/Thunderbird 2008-07-10 - Personally I prefer bongo, however it is still in its infancy. It has a great UI, and is targeted at being simple to install and use 2008-11-14 - (Guy Van Sanden) Zarafa is becoming an option too. It was AGPL'd recently and offers many features including CalDAV in the upcoming 6.30 release. 2008-11-14 - (Stuart Cianos) Only the server-side components of Zarafa were opened up... There are still numerous proprietary functions that are unavailable in the AGPL version. There are plenty of completely open solutions out there (Horde, Citadel, Kolab, etc.) Personally, I use Citadel (with Funambol for push e-mail) due to its funtionality, reliability, speed and flexibility... They also have a fantastic developer/user community that is supportive and communicative. 2008-11-15 - (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart Cianos Actually most of it seems to be in the AGPL version except for the client license required for Outlook usage. Which is logical, if you are paying for closed source outlook you should also pay for the connector... I know about citadel, have been running it for 2 years but it does have some issues and lacks certain features like LDAP integration. 2008-11-16 (Stuart Cianos) @Guy Van Sanden: Citadel will allow you to authenticate against any service which support the underlying authentication of the operating system (in this case, PAM). I have used this to authenticate users against PAM using modules such as pam_ldap; additionally, it can automatically populate an LDAP directory with information from its global address book for use with external clients. 2008-11-29 (Giorgio Zarrelli) I do not see eGroupware, what about it? 2008-12-01 (Guy Van Sanden) @Stuart: I tried PAM based authentication on Ubuntu, but it only works with pam_unix and not pam_krb5 or pam_ldap for me. Though I really like Citadel in many ways, it has too many limitations to use it as a full-blown groupware server like Zimbra or Zarafa. Zimbra is nice, but it really needs a dedicated server to run properly. @Giorgio: eGroupWare is not a groupware server but rather a Web frontend to other servers. 2008-12-01 (Giorgio Zarrelli) @Guy. I agree on Zimbra. It's too expensive, not all people can afford a dedicated server just for a groupware. Zarafa looks nice, but never tried it Zimbra or potentially bongo are the prettiest of the groupware products available which would make them great marketing tools for ubuntu. However Zimbra has too many
[Bug 365259] Re: on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde
the question asked in the terminal window was do you want to keep your smb.conf or install the one provided in the package below are some excerpts from /var/log/dist-upgrade/term.log (which is in German, but you will identify what happens) for other packages where the questions were asked correctly in a kde debconf window, the questions also appear in the term.log but in a different format. As an example I show the output for dnsmasq at the bottom === [...] Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5 (durch .../samba-common_2%3a3.3.2-1ubuntu3_i386.deb) ... b) ... Entpacke Ersatz für samba-common ... [...] Richte samba-common ein (2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) ... momentanen Version. Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba ... Paket-Konfiguration ┌──┤ Samba Server ├──┐ ││ │ Eine neue Version der │ │ Konfigurationsdatei│ │ /etc/samba/smb.conf ist│ │ verfügbar, aber die installierte │ │ Version wurde verändert. │ ││ │ Ok │ ││ └┘ ─┤ Samba Server ├ mit smb.conf Version des Paket-Betreuers ins ↑ aktuell installierte Version be ▮ Ok ─ Richte samba-common ein (2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) ... Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba ... Replacing config file /etc/samba/smb.conf with new version === [...] Richte dnsmasq ein (2.47-3) ... Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/init.d/dnsmasq ... Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/default/dnsmasq ... e Version herausgegeben. Was möchten Sie damit machen? Ihre Wahlmöglichkeiten sind: Y oder I : Die Version des Paket-Betreuers installieren N oder O : Die momentan installierte Version beibehalten D : Die Unterschiede zwischen den Versionen anzeigen Z : Prozess in den Hintergrund, um die Situation zu begutachten Der Standardweg ist das Beibehalten der momentanen Version. *** dnsmasq.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [Vorgabe=N] ? *** dnsmasq.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [Vorgabe=N] ? y Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/dnsmasq.conf ... [...] === -- on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 365625] [NEW] package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix Installed ubuntu 9.04 final release April 23rd, 2009. Installing KDE3.5 from http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net and the failure occurred. Hope this helps. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75 Package: postfix 2.5.5-1.1 SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- package postfix 2.5.5-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 75 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
