date:20100421


** Attachment added: "console log of tty linux based image showing failure"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44997795/tty-linux-recreate-console.txt

-- 
UEC guests sometimes fail on consuming user data (metadata service isn't ready)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 566792] Re: UEC guests sometimes fail on consuming user data (metadata service isn't ready)

I've recreated this with a ttylinux based image, with modifications to access 
metadata service early in boot.
I'm attaching that instance here.

this can be registered with 'uec-register-tarball 
ttylinux-11.0-fastboot-amd64-0.07.tar.gz mybucket'
it will also boot in smaller than m1.small (ie, you can shrink m1.small to 1G 
fs and 96 M mem)

** Attachment added: "ttylinux based image"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44997788/ttylinux-11.0-fastboot-amd64-0.07.tar.gz

-- 
UEC guests sometimes fail on consuming user data (metadata service isn't ready)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 550343] Re: openvpn crashed with SIGSEGV

2010-04-21 Thread Kees Cook

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: openvpn
  
  I was booting up my ubuntu 10.04 system.
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: openvpn 2.1.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  Date: Sun Mar 28 18:20:41 2010
  Disassembly: => 0x7f78b83fce94:   Cannot access memory at address 
0x7f78b83fce94
  ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/openvpn
  ProcCmdline: /usr/sbin/openvpn --writepid /var/run/openvpn.openvpn.pid 
--daemon ovpn-openvpn --status /var/run/openvpn.openvpn.status 10 --cd 
/etc/openvpn --config /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf --script-security 2
  ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user)
- SegvAnalysis:
-  Segfault happened at: 0x7f78b83fce94:Cannot access memory at address 
0x7f78b83fce94
-  PC (0x7f78b83fce94) ok
-  SP (0x7fffc5291cc0) ok
-  Reason could not be automatically determined.
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: openvpn
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
   ?? ()
  Title: openvpn crashed with SIGSEGV
  UserGroups:
+ SegvAnalysis:
+  Segfault happened at: 0x7f78b83fce94:Cannot access memory at address 
0x7f78b83fce94
+  PC (0x7f78b83fce94) ok
+  SP (0x7fffc5291cc0) ok
+  Reason could not be automatically determined.
+ SegvReason: Reason could not be automatically determined.

-- 
openvpn crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550343
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 566793] Re: euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent

I'm increasing the importance of this.  The reason is that after a
reboot, the 64k is almost certainly filled, even if nothing other than
kernel messages have been written there.  Thus, anything written after
that first reboot wont be seen by the user.


** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low => Medium

-- 
euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566793
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 43574] Re: Needs Ubuntu-style init script

Strictly speaking, converting it to an Upstart job would be better

** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
Needs Ubuntu-style init script
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 561475] Re: when sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only=1, xinetd can not bind to both IPv4 and IPv6 on same port

** Changed in: xinetd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
when sysctl net.ipv6.bindv6only=1, xinetd can not bind to both IPv4 and IPv6 on 
same port
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561475
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 253895] Re: upgrading to 8.10

I've no idea why this has been reassigned to hostname - dnshostname can
fail, it's a bug in the krb5-config package's postinst for not dealing
with that

** Package changed: hostname (Ubuntu) => kerberos-configs (Ubuntu)

-- 
upgrading to 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kerberos-configs in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 253895] [NEW] upgrading to 8.10

2010-04-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

You have been subscribed to a public bug:

errror given while trying to upgrade 8.06 to 8.10

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Aug  1 09:45:56 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Package: krb5-config 1.19
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: kerberos-configs
Title: package krb5-config 1.19 failed to install/upgrade: 
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-20-generic i686

** Affects: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: apport-package
-- 
upgrading to 8.10
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/253895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is subscribed to kerberos-configs in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 177195] Re: php5-cgi crashed with SIGSEGV in realpath@@GLIBC_2.3()

2010-04-21 Thread Kees Cook

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: php5
  
  Code that worked great on another server causes segfaults on a freshly
  installed Gutsy 64-bit server
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Dec 18 18:08:58 2007
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/php5-cgi
  Package: php5-cgi 5.2.3-1ubuntu6.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/php5-cgi
  ProcCwd: /var/www/virtual/demomusic.nu/htdocs/ver4
  ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: php5
  StacktraceTop:
   realpath@@GLIBC_2.3 () from /lib/libc.so.6
   virtual_file_ex ()
   expand_filepath ()
   php_check_specific_open_basedir ()
   php_check_open_basedir_ex ()
  Title: php5-cgi crashed with SIGSEGV in realpath@@GLIBC_2.3()
  Uname: Linux sumo.digitalsteam.net 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 
22:09:15 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  UserGroups:
+ 
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x2b7a8e4dfce4 :push   
%r15
   PC (0x2b7a8e4dfce4) ok
   source "%r15" ok
   destination "(%rsp)" (0x7fff1e301000) ok
+  SP (0x7fff1e301000) ok
   Reason could not be automatically determined.
  SegvReason: Reason could not be automatically determined.

-- 
php5-cgi crashed with SIGSEGV in realpath@@GLIBC_2.3()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177195
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 19797] Re: services restarted from anacron have nice level of 10

The "correct" fix for this is to migrate to Upstart, which always starts
services with the nice level defined in their conf file, not one
inherited from the environment

** Summary changed:

- apache is restarted with nice level of 10
+ services restarted from anacron have nice level of 10

** Changed in: anacron (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
services restarted from anacron have nice level of 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 544545] Re: rngd doesn't start automatically

2010-04-21 Thread Emmet Hikory

** Changed in: rng-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: rng-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: rng-tools
  
  rngd doesn't start automatically on lucid using tpm device
+ 
+ trousers would need to start first, but doesn't.

** Changed in: rng-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low => Wishlist

-- 
rngd doesn't start automatically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544545
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 568108] [NEW] getSecretKey() in euca_conf uses unanchored regex to find admin credentials

2010-04-21 Thread Piotr T Zbiegiel

Public bug reported:

When the function getSecretKey() in euca_conf tries to set SKEY and AKEY
it uses an unanchored regex with awk that can cause it to select the
credentials of any user with the word admin in their login name.  I
imagine the intent was to select the 'admin' user but the way the code
is written the regex could match 'sadminer' for instance, who may or may
not have admin credentials.

This problem manifested when we created some accounts named jdoe_admin.
Even through jdoe_admin was marked as an Administrator since there were
no credentials in the database (the user had not retrieved their
credentials.zip) euca_conf requests started to fail on the machine.

The offending lines seem to be:
SKEY=$(eval echo $(awk -v field=${FIELD} -F, '/INSERT INTO AUTH_USERS.*admin/ 
{print $field}' ${DBDIR}/*auth* | head -n 1))

AKEY=$(eval echo $(awk -v field=${FIELD} -F, '/INSERT INTO
AUTH_USERS.*admin/ {print $field}' ${DBDIR}/*auth* | head -n 1))

Since the usernames in the files are surrounded by single quotes the
following fix seemed to work for us:

Replace:  '/INSERT INTO AUTH_USERS.*admin/ {print $field}' 
With:  "/INSERT INTO AUTH_USERS.*'admin'/ {print \$field}"

Not sure if that is the best solution.

Thanks!

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
getSecretKey() in euca_conf uses unanchored regex to find admin credentials
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568108
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available

2010-04-21 Thread immortel

The problem is the following:

When I boot up my computer and CUPS starts after Samba, I cannot get the
list of my "shared" printer. I need CUPS to start first and then Samba.

Is it a CUPS bug or a Samba bug??? I have no clue. It is a bug.

As I stated, I found a workaround (sudo mv /etc/rc2.d/S50cups
/etc/rc2.d/S15cups) but it would be nice if it could be fixed in the
version 10.04 (I seriously doubt it). :)

-- 
CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 565380] Re: postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group

2010-04-21 Thread wfaulk

>From Merged bug #567927, the "missing" user still existed in the system,
but was not in /etc/passwd because it was in NIS.  This may be a
different enough edge case that it may need a different solution.

-- 
postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 565380] Re: postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group

Fix committed, in the UNAPPROVED queue for lucid, awaiting ubuntu-
release approval post RC.

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 562266] Re: Make virt-pki-validate usable on Ubuntu

Fix committed, in the UNAPPROVED queue for lucid, awaiting ubuntu-
release approval post RC.

Also, patch submitted to upstream mailing list.

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
Make virt-pki-validate usable on Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562266
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 567392] Re: __virExec:362 : cannot create pipe: Too many open files

I've tested Jamie's debs that he gave me access to. With the new debs in
place, an 'lsof -p $(pidof libvirtd) | wc -l' varies between 79 and 80
for me over the test of running several hundred instances.

-- 
__virExec:362 : cannot create pipe: Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 541520] Re: Using incorrect JVM Garbage Collector

2010-04-21 Thread Aaron J. Zirbes


I'm OK with moving the "-Xmx128M" parameter out onto one of the comment
lines as this is a commonly known and understood parameter.  Most google
(bing?) searches will advise you to adjusting this parameter when you
come upon memory problems.

If we want to ensure that we don't assign "UseConcMarkSweepGC" on
single-core processors, the installer script could check for this by
doing something sneaky like...

CORE_COUNT=`grep -E "^processor\s*:" /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l`
if ((( $CORE_COUNT > 1 ))) then
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC"
fi

As I've never written post-install scripts I'm not sure how hard this
would be, but it's a thought.

Theoretically it could be added to /etc/init.d/tomcat6...

(P.S. Don't trust my BASH syntax, I didn't test it.  Treat it as
pseudo-code.)

--
Aaron

Gabriel Nell wrote:
> The point that "we know something the JVM can't know", eg, that this JVM
> is running a web server, is fair. I'm still not convinced that
> specifying the CMS collector is the right application of this knowledge,
> and I'm new to Ubuntu (from a contributor standpoint, anyway) so I don't
> know what the project goals are for the default configuration. But for
> now let me move down what I hope is a fruitful path. It sounds like (and
> please correct me if I'm wrong) we want to choose settings that:
>
> 1) at a minimum, "work" (eg, after running apt-get, tomcat actually boots up 
> and serves requests)
> 2) has reasonable defaults to suit the sort of hardware we expect people to 
> run web servers on
>
> Currently our defaults are:
>
> -Xmx128M -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
>
> Which satisfies #1, but I still think is not great for #2. Maybe as you
> alluded we'd do better by not specifying the maximum heap size? The
> rationale was that 64MB is not usually enough, and that made sense under
> JDK1.4, when this was the default heap size. However it looks like in
> 1.5 and later, the heap selection was changed to be based on the amount
> of available RAM
>
> ***
> initial heap size:
> Larger of 1/64th of the machine's physical memory on the machine or some 
> reasonable minimum. Before J2SE 5.0, the default initial heap size was a 
> reasonable minimum, which varies by platform. You can override this default 
> using the -Xms command-line option.
>
> maximum heap size:
> Smaller of 1/4th of the physical memory or 1GB. Before J2SE 5.0, the default 
> maximum heap size was 64MB. You can override this default using the -Xmx 
> command-line option.
> ***
>
> So if we don't give any heap parameters to the JVM:
>
> - The heap will be at least 128MB (satisfy goal #1) on any machine with 512MB 
> or more of RAM
> - The JVM is free to choose a heap much larger than 128MB, based on the 
> available memory (satisfy goal #2)
>
> For this reason I'd suggest we remove the "-Xmx128M" portion from the
> command line.
>
> References:
> http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/gc/gc_tuning_6.html#par_gc.ergonomics.default_size
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/vm/gc-ergonomics.html
> http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc5.0/ergo5.html
>
>

-- 
Using incorrect JVM Garbage Collector
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541520
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

RE: [Bug 541563] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-04-21 Thread LCIS


Good Afternoon:


thanks for your emal, apologies for not responding.

Being a new person to ubuntu, I simply reloaded my computer from the
start.   I am still learning basics so I would not worry about it.
Apologies for the extra paperwork.


John


 
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:52:19 +
> From: chuck.sh...@canonical.com
> To: l...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 541563] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 failed to 
> install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
> exit status 1
> 
> We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
> heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
> information? Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
> installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541563
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
> 
> Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
> 
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: samba
> 
> Description: Ubuntu 9.10 Release: 9.10
> 
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Thu Mar 18 21:05:47 2010
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
> exit status 1
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
> Package: samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5
> PackageArchitecture: all
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic
> SourcePackage: samba
> Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 failed to install/upgrade: 
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686
> 
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/541563/+subscribe
  
_
Live connected. Get Hotmail & Messenger on your phone.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724462

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541563
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 562189] Re: AttributeError: 'Libvirt' object has no attribute 'vm'

2010-04-21 Thread Marcus Bointon

Still there with libvirt 0.7.5-5ubuntu25

-- 
AttributeError: 'Libvirt' object has no attribute 'vm'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562189
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 562575] Re: vm-builder fails to resolve package dependency in vanilla system

2010-04-21 Thread Marcus Bointon

Indeed - this went away when I removed the proxy option, thanks for the 
pointer. The proxy log shows timeouts from the repo.
Now I'm stuck with bug 562189 again.

-- 
vm-builder fails to resolve package dependency in vanilla system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 565380] Re: postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group

Easy to fix, will bundle with upload for Bug #562266.  Proposing for
Lucid as low-hanging, low-risk.

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Low
 Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
   Status: In Progress

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-10.04

-- 
postinst fails if missing user is in the admin group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 541520] Re: Using incorrect JVM Garbage Collector

2010-04-21 Thread Gabriel Nell

The point that "we know something the JVM can't know", eg, that this JVM
is running a web server, is fair. I'm still not convinced that
specifying the CMS collector is the right application of this knowledge,
and I'm new to Ubuntu (from a contributor standpoint, anyway) so I don't
know what the project goals are for the default configuration. But for
now let me move down what I hope is a fruitful path. It sounds like (and
please correct me if I'm wrong) we want to choose settings that:

1) at a minimum, "work" (eg, after running apt-get, tomcat actually boots up
and serves requests)
2) has reasonable defaults to suit the sort of hardware we expect people to run
web servers on

Currently our defaults are:

-Xmx128M -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

Which satisfies #1, but I still think is not great for #2. Maybe as you
alluded we'd do better by not specifying the maximum heap size? The
rationale was that 64MB is not usually enough, and that made sense under
JDK1.4, when this was the default heap size. However it looks like in
1.5 and later, the heap selection was changed to be based on the amount
of available RAM

***
initial heap size:
Larger of 1/64th of the machine's physical memory on the machine or some
reasonable minimum. Before J2SE 5.0, the default initial heap size was a
reasonable minimum, which varies by platform. You can override this default
using the -Xms command-line option.

maximum heap size:
Smaller of 1/4th of the physical memory or 1GB. Before J2SE 5.0, the default
maximum heap size was 64MB. You can override this default using the -Xmx
command-line option.
***

So if we don't give any heap parameters to the JVM:

- The heap will be at least 128MB (satisfy goal #1) on any machine with 512MB
or more of RAM
- The JVM is free to choose a heap much larger than 128MB, based on the
available memory (satisfy goal #2)

For this reason I'd suggest we remove the "-Xmx128M" portion from the
command line.

References:
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/gc/gc_tuning_6.html#par_gc.ergonomics.default_size
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/vm/gc-ergonomics.html
http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc5.0/ergo5.html

--
Using incorrect JVM Garbage Collector
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541520
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.

--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 562266] Re: Make virt-pki-validate usable on Ubuntu