[Bug 743484] [NEW] libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
Hi,
While I was investigating a FTBFS in collectd:
...
configure:22249: checking for upscli_connect in -lupsclient
configure:22274: i686-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2
-I/build/fabrice-collectd_4.10.1-2.1build1-i386-7yH3eE/collectd-4.10.1/debian/include
-DLT_LAZY_OR_NOW='RTLD_LAZY|RTLD_GLOBAL' -UCONFIGFILE
-DCONFIGFILE='/etc/collectd/collectd.conf' -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
@LIBSSL_LDFLAGS@ -L/lib -lupsclient conftest.c -lupsclient -ldl 5
i686-linux-gnu-gcc: @LIBSSL_LDFLAGS@: No such file or directory
I discovered that this reference to LIBSSL_LDFLAGS comes from libupsclient.pc.
As you can see in actual .pc file, this reference has not been resolved at
compile time (content of more /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libupsclient.pc in a natty
schroot):
prefix=/usr
exec_prefix=/
libdir=/lib
includedir=/usr/include
sysconfdir=/etc/nut
statepath=/var/run/nut
nutuser=nut
Name: libupsclient
Description: UPS monitoring with Network UPS Tools
Version: 2.6.0
Libs: -L${libdir} -lupsclient @LIBSSL_LDFLAGS@
Cflags: -I${includedir}
This is because configure script and all makefile.in has been updated to use
and substitute LIBSSL_LIBS instead of LIBSSL_LDFLAGS, but libupsclient.pc.in
has not been updated.
By replacing LIBSSL_LDFLAGS with LIBSSL_LIBS in .in files, the generated .pc
file is correct.
Thanks,
Fabrice
** Affects: nut (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Fabrice Coutadeur (fabricesp)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743484
Title:
libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743484] Re: libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols
Patch that fix the error and make collectd more buildable (there is still an error because of gcc4.5 that I'll fix after the fix for nut is uploaded) ** Patch added: nut.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/743484/+attachment/1945330/+files/nut.debdiff ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Assignee: Fabrice Coutadeur (fabricesp) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743484 Title: libupsclient.pc contains unresolved symbols -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596041] Re: /var/tmp is not cleared after squid restart
Squid does not use /var/tmp. ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596041 Title: /var/tmp is not cleared after squid restart -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 16669] Re: Squid: Compile with --enable-ssl
** Bug watch added: Squid Bugzilla #2741 http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2741 ** Also affects: squid via http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2741 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16669 Title: Squid: Compile with --enable-ssl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742501] Re: Apparmor profile prevents read/write from /tmp
Regardless the apparmor profile for this package should include /tmp right? ** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742501 Title: Apparmor profile prevents read/write from /tmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 394350] Re: RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache
I was asked privately whether I found a solution. We wasted too much time trying to convince people that we had a credible problem report, and then it seemed that no one was prepared to actually do anything with the information. After that time waste, we decided to give up on RLimitCPU on Ubuntu, and focused our energies elsewhere. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394350 Title: RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 684816] Re: Node Controller (NC) fail to register
Actually I seemed to have asked about 10.10, but looking at the bug description again you already stated it was 10.10 that you were using, sorry about that. I have marked this bug as Triaged as there is quite a bit of information here and I believe there is enough information from yourself to pass this on to the developers. Eucalyptus uses Launchpad as its bug tracker, so there is no need to send this anywhere else, and a developer should be looking into this issue soon. If you get no response from a developer, nudge us at #ubuntu-bugs on irc.freenode.net and we can look into it further. Thank you again for reporting this to us, and please continue to report any other bugs you may find! ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684816 Title: Node Controller (NC) fail to register -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 738968] Re: Can't See Parts of DFS CIFS Share
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738968 Title: Can't See Parts of DFS CIFS Share -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743763] [NEW] package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: exim4 Try to install smokeping ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 26 19:17:47 2011 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: exim4-config (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-23.74-generic SourcePackage: exim4 Title: package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-23-generic i686 ** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743763 Title: package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743763] Re: package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743763 Title: package exim4-config (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
Still happening in natty amd64 I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and access)... using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064 Title: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:23 +, Cypher2 wrote: Still happening in natty amd64 I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and access)... using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve... I suspect you're hitting a different issue, please file a separate bug report. Cheers, Jelmer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064 Title: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
actually no.. same issue: when i start the system, only smbd is loaded as process. when looking at /var/run/samba it is active and populated with no nmbd PID file. only when I switch to console and run 'sudo start nmbd' that it loads a process and assigns PID to it. when I restart or shutdown system and boot again.. nmbd isn't there anymore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064 Title: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423910] Re: openbios-sparc has no installation candidate
** Changed in: openbios-sparc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423910 Title: openbios-sparc has no installation candidate -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743821] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba just after updgrade 10.10 to 11.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 27 21:40:50 2011 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu11 gvfs 1.7.3-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-27 (0 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743821 Title: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743821] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743821 Title: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743858] [NEW] sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: $ ssh badname@localhost # hit 'enter' three times to fail logging in. $ sudo lastb Expected outcome: lastb reports something similar to: badnamessh:pts/1localhostSun Mar 27 17:01 - 17:01 (04:00) just as it does when a bad login attempt is made using /bin/login, or when using sshd on other distributions of linux (CentOS, Fedora, Arch, SUSE, ...etc) Actual outcome No mention of a bad login attempt in lastb output; /var/log/btmp modify time and byte size is unchanged. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: openssh-server 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu6 Uname: Linux 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.028stab064.7 x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 27 16:40:55 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=C LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openssh ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743858] Re: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743858] Re: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
A known quirk of sshd in other distros is that sshd will refuse to write to world- or group-readable /var/log/btmp. The fix for this is 'chmod 0600 /var/log/btmp'. Ubuntu Linux installs /var/log/btmp with permissions 0660 (aka -rw- rw). I already changed permissions to 0600 (aka -rw---) and /var/log/btmp is still unaffected by bad login attempts via sshd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743883] [NEW] cannot load packages. Broken packages
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba rjohansen@rjohansen-Satellite-L305:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 rjohansen@rjohansen-Satellite-L305:~$ apt-cache policy pkgname N: Unable to locate package pkgname ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743883 Title: cannot load packages. Broken packages -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743883] Re: cannot load packages. Broken packages
Re: Question #150625 Trying to add sharing to directory and errors out: Could not apply changes! Fix broken packages first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743883 Title: cannot load packages. Broken packages -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 683591] Re: sensors-applet randomly picks up duplicates
With what little knowledge of Linux that I have I'd say you are correct because when the new sensors appear they do so with default colors as opposed to the customized ones which are checked off in the box to run. So does that mean it must be reported as a libsensors bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683591 Title: sensors-applet randomly picks up duplicates -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743920] [NEW] package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tftp-hpa I was upgranding from ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Mar 27 19:46:45 2011 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 71 Package: tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-19.66-generic SourcePackage: tftp-hpa Title: package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade: Uname: Linux 2.6.28-19-generic i686 ** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743920 Title: package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade: -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743920] Re: package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade:
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743920 Title: package tftpd-hpa 0.49-1 failed to install/upgrade: -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
I also tested a patched libgcrypt11 package according to comment #73. I can now su from a local user to a non-local user and have a non-local user use sudo (sudo-ldap). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Hi Wes, thanks a ton for your work here! * You seem to have configure checked in to the hg repo, since it's generated it shouldn't be (and it's not in mozilla-central) Actually I'm getting a build error on RHEL6 I need to debug before I do further checking. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source tarball (which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate autoconf-2.13 as a dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and building from (or incorporating) the source tarball. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
A couple more things: * The js-config script will conflict. Not quite sure what to do with it; most distros ship pkg-config, which is really better in all conceivable ways. * Speaking of pkg-config, this does *not* ship a .pc file (it lives in mozilla-central/xulrunner/installer). Would you take a patch to add one, say spidermonkey-185.pc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #21) Would you take a patch to add one, say spidermonkey-185.pc? Can you add this to the tracemonkey repo too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #20) Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source tarball (which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate autoconf-2.13 as a dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and building from (or incorporating) the source tarball. Normal practice is to only ship generated files in the foo.tar.gz, not in revision control. In the same way that firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2 includes configure, but mozilla-central doesn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
I've actually packaged this in Ubuntu now, but I hit a couple of unexpected issues: 1) js-config --libs doesn't return the right linker flags (-lmozjs) 2) Even though it builds an ABI versioned so, the soname of the resulting ELF binary is still unversioned (ie, libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs185.so.1.0). This would mean we couldn't support multiple ABI's, which would make it difficult to do an ABI transition in the future. I have patches for both of these problems, although the patch for 2) is a bit hacky. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Created attachment 521592 Fix js-config --libs This makes js-config --libs return the right linker flags -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Created attachment 521593 Fix SONAME This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname (libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing this, so I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
If you're doing official releases, you also want to address bug 554088 at some point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #26) Created attachment 521593 [details] Fix SONAME This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname (libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing this, so I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas Why does it need to be libmozjs185.so.something instead of libmozjs.so.something? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Chris -- argh, thanks for catching the js-config bug. I'll be cutting a new release to address that specific issue RSN. Thanks also for your SONAME patch: that's something I don't have a lot of experience with. Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so specifically because it doesn't work as a drop-in for any previously- released libmozjs.so (not even close -- see the release notes). Versioning the spidermonkey library based on the JavaScript version it implements (1.8.5) doesn't make much sense to me; I prefer to think of this as version 1.0.0 of the library which implements JavaScript 1.8.5. Trying to connect solib versioning with language versioning has, at least in the past, been completely and utterly futile. Thanks for pointing out the header bug, BTW. I agree that it should be fixed, and in fact tried to fix it in the past. Maybe now that I know my way around better I can try again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion) (In reply to comment #29) Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so specifically because it doesn't work as a drop-in for any previously-released libmozjs.so (not even close -- see the release notes). Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to 1.9.0, would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right. Versioning the spidermonkey library based on the JavaScript version it implements (1.8.5) doesn't make much sense to me; I prefer to think of this as version 1.0.0 of the library which implements JavaScript 1.8.5. Trying to connect solib versioning with language versioning has, at least in the past, been completely and utterly futile. I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox version number or the Gecko one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Created attachment 521641 add pkg-config file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #30) Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to 1.9.0, would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right. I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I really would rather we ship. libspidermonkey does make more sense to me though if someone cares to rework the tree though, so we're *very* clearly distinguished from --enable-shared-js from mozilla-central. I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox version number or the Gecko one. So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #31)
Created attachment 521641 [details]
add pkg-config file
We probably don't care, but you can make the pkg-config file
relative/relocatable by using the ${pcfiledir} expansion: see
https://github.com/Flusspferd/flusspferd/blob/master/libflusspferd/flusspferd.pc.in
(@ REL_PC_PATH_TO_ROOT@ is replaced in this case by CMake to be
something like '/../..' or similar)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox version number or the Gecko one. So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ? As someone else mentioned, there is also the version numbers from the moz central tree - for instance FF4 was 2.0: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-2.0/tags But i would also rather we ship with what we have now than get bogged down in deciding something else if there isn't a clear consensus. Personally the 'JS version' has always seemed fairly arbitrary, and also I don't imagine there will change very fast - so using FF or moz versions would be far superior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #30) (Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion) (Well-aimed kick to the shins) I don't think anything has changed since comment 5. See the last three paragraphs there. Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to 1.9.0, would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right. It isn't ideal, but it reflects reality. I would be thrilled to ship a SM with no stupid version number in its name. We should totally do that, as soon as have a sane upgrade story. First things first. Fixing SM versioning was a non-goal for this release. Help us get it right in the next one. (In reply to comment #32) I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I really would rather we ship. This, with a bullet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744006] [NEW] package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: backuppc backuppc has been showing up as an error for a couple of days now, particularly during downloads/installs. However, I do not know what this program is supposed to do---it is submitted for correction. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic-pae 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic-pae i686 AptOrdering: broffice.org: Remove backuppc: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Mar 27 23:18:19 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-27 (0 days ago) ** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744006 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744006] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744006 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744019] [NEW] mountall errors on boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cloud-init My Setup -- I am using the official Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meekat EBS AMIs (ami-ccf405a5,ami-cef405a7) on 64bit t1.micro and 32bit m1.small instances. Both instances have: cloud-init v 0.5.15-0ubuntu3 Nothing additional besides the defaults set of tools available on these AMIs was installed. Problems --- On every boot i get: cloud-init start-local running: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:33:16 +. up 2.40 seconds no instance data found in start-local init: cloud-init-local main process (374) terminated with status 1 cloud-init start running: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:33:17 +. up 2.75 seconds found data source: DataSourceEc2 mountall: Event failed * Starting AppArmor profiles [80G 2011-03-28 04:00:52,257 - DataSourceEc2.py[WARNING]: unable to convert swap to a device 2011-03-28 04:00:52,268 - cc_mounts.py[WARNING]: 'mount -a' failed Lastly even though the t1.micro instance type has only one drive attached to it, e.g. /dev/sda1 the /. It appends /dev/sdb to be mounted over /mnt in fstab as well as swap. According to Amazon's Instance Guide with t1.micro instance there is neither swap nor /mnt drive. How to reproduce the errors? - Use same AMIs and launch an instance, get system log from aws console of /var/log. ** Affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744019 Title: mountall errors on boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
