[Bug 713704] Re: etckeeper is not run on apt-get remove or apt-get purge
[Expired for etckeeper (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713704 Title: etckeeper is not run on apt-get remove or apt-get purge -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program
[Expired for nut (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583 Title: Excessive logging by apcsmart program -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 673313] Re: ssh does not honor -i switch with config file
This should never have been marked Incomplete in the first place. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673313 Title: ssh does not honor -i switch with config file -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program
Hi Lupe,
since we now have an apcsmart maintainer, I'm forwarding this issue to
him.
@Michal: could you please have a look at this issue [1], and give us your
feeling?
cheers,
Arnaud
--
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583
2011/2/15 Lupe Christoph l...@lupe-christoph.de
On Tuesday, 2011-02-15 at 13:16:58 -, Arnaud Quette wrote:
this is not the problem. This code is in the smartmode() function of
apcsmart.c:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/nut/trunk/drivers/apcsmart.c
we see the 5 attempts to go to smart mode ('Y' command), but my aim is to
understand why it is failing, and how to cleanly solve this without
impacting support for other units.
I found no code that does five attempts. But this code in main.c,
starting on Line 618:
while (!exit_flag) {
struct timeval timeout;
gettimeofday(timeout, NULL);
timeout.tv_sec += poll_interval;
upsdrv_updateinfo();
while (!dstate_poll_fds(timeout, extrafd) !exit_flag) {
/* repeat until time is up or extrafd has data */
upsdrv_updateinfo() calls smartmode().
dstate_poll_fds() checks if there is any file descriptor that is
available. In our case:
select(7, [4 5 6], NULL, NULL, {1, 999837}) = 1 (in [4], left {1, 999835})
FD 4 is the serial line, which is passed to dstate_poll_fds() as
extrafd.
When there is data that can be read from the UPS no code in
dstate_poll_fds() reads from extrafd, there is only code that reads
from the other input FDs. The outer loop above also ignores extrafd.
exit_flag is never set, so it continues. And because there is an active
file descriptor, the select returns immediately (actually it takes two
microseconds).
The solution is to add code that reads all data from extrafd and discards
it because nobody asked for it. I would also close and reopen the serial
line in smartmode(). I would prepare a patch if I knew more about the
I/O abstractions used in the nut driver code. Sorry.
HTH,
Lupe Christoph
--
| It is a well-known fact in any organisation that, if you want a job|
| done, you should give it to someone who is already very busy. |
| Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals |
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583
Title:
Excessive logging by apcsmart program
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 767450] Re: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately there is not much information to help diagnose what went wrong in the attached logs. Please could you run the following commands in a terminal and attach the output of each to this bug report: apt-cache policy ntp ps -aef | grep ntp ntpq -p Thanks ** Summary changed: - package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error al escribir en `salida estándar': No existe el fichero o el directorio + package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767450 Title: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Error from log: Setting up eucalyptus-java-common (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4) ... stop: Unknown instance: eucalyptus stop/waiting # UPGRADE INFORMATION # # Old Version: 1.6.2 # New Version: 2.0.2 # Upgrade keys: false using: # Upgrade configuration:false using: # Upgrade database: true using: upgrade_db # Same version: false using: # Start upgrading: db Cannot locate previous database files in /var/backups/eucalyptus/UPGRADE_IN_PROGRESS.eucalyptus-java-common//var/lib/eucalyptus/db! Skipping DB upgrade. dpkg: error processing eucalyptus-java-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It would appear that something went wrong when you upgraded to the latest development release; as a result the eucalyptus-java-common package is not installed correctly and hence you keep getting this error message. Please could you attach any log files from /var/log/dist-upgrade to this bug report. Thanks ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766833] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 75
Error from log: Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: numeric hostname: 2 newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter myhostname: bad parameter value: 2 dpkg: error al procesar postfix (--configure): el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 75 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766833 Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 75 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766833] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 75
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It would appear that you installation is not configured with a valid hostname (see error message in comment #2). You will need to resolve this issue before postfix will startup correctly. You can do this by editing /etc/hostname to contain a valid hostname OR you can set the myhostname configuration parameter in /etc/postfix/main/cf. Please update this bug report if this resolves your issue. Thanks ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766833 Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 75 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766177] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75
Error from log: Setting up postfix (2.6.5-3ubuntu0.1) ... Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: numeric hostname: 02-15-10 newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter myhostname: bad parameter value: 02-15-10 dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766177 Title: package postfix 2.6.5-3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: apt.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/766983/+attachment/2078966/+files/apt.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: history.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/766983/+attachment/2078972/+files/history.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: main.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/766983/+attachment/2078973/+files/main.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: term.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/766983/+attachment/2078974/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: xorg_fixup.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/766983/+attachment/2078975/+files/xorg_fixup.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
There is also apt-term.log but it is 3.7mb seems a bit large to be uploading here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766407] Re: package smbclient 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2
Error from log: Preparing to replace smbclient 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 (using .../smbclient_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement smbclient ... dpkg-deb (subprocess): data: internal gzip read error: 'fd:0: data error' dpkg-deb: error: subprocess decompress returned error exit status 2 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/smbclient_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766407 Title: package smbclient 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766407] Re: package smbclient 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error caused by a corrupted archive. Please execute the following commands, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal ( Applications - Accessories - Terminal ) : sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get update Then try performing the update again. This will likely resolve your issue. If so please set the bug's status to Invalid. Thanks in advance! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766407 Title: package smbclient 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765249] Re: tarmode exclude no longer working
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #373850 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373850 ** Also affects: samba (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373850 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #4734 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 ** Also affects: samba via https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765249 Title: tarmode exclude no longer working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765249] Re: tarmode exclude no longer working
I was able to confirm the same behaviour in smbclient on lucid, maverick and natty installations. Inclusion seems to work OK - exclusion does not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765249 Title: tarmode exclude no longer working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765249] Re: tarmode exclude no longer working
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765249 Title: tarmode exclude no longer working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765249] Re: tarmode exclude no longer working
** Changed in: samba (Debian) Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765249 Title: tarmode exclude no longer working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765249] Re: tarmode exclude no longer working
Setting importance to medium as this as a moderate impact on a core application with no easy workaround. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765249 Title: tarmode exclude no longer working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 753330] Re: The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for PID 1783 (/usr/sbin/winbindd).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736757 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736757 Marking as duplicate of bug 736757 after feedback on lucid -proposed package indicated that issue was resolved. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 736757 [SRU] PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd * You can subscribe to bug 736757 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/736757/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753330 Title: The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for PID 1783 (/usr/sbin/winbindd). -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi Ben Did you upgrade to natty from lucid of maverick? Its not clear from the logs and the error messages relate to upgrading of the database that supports eucalyptus which should only occur when upgrading from lucid. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
it would be useful to understand whether the eucalyptus components that you have installed on the system where functional before you upgraded. Please could you also validate whether eucalyptus-common is installed with the following command: apt-cache policy eucalyptus-common Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 735239] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 installed post-installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75
Thank your information~ 2011/4/20 Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com This is not a package bug. The invalid hostname checks are there by design and will stay. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735239 Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 installed post- installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75 Status in “postfix” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Binary package hint: postfix Can't Upgrade this package, and this bug information will happen in any time I want to upgrade my program/system. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix 2.7.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 15 09:25:40 2011 ErrorMessage: 子程序 installed post-installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100816.1) SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 installed post-installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/735239/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735239 Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 installed post- installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 757258] Re: Unable to reach instances from their public IP address
Hi Carlos Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. As per Torsten's comment it would be great to see the output of euca- describe-groups for the security group associated with the instances you are trying to access. Thanks ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757258 Title: Unable to reach instances from their public IP address -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766983] Re: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi Guys. I updated from Maverick, I believe it was working beforehand. But there is a chance I had chosen to ignore the error before this recent upgrade. The results of running apt-cache policy eucalyptus-common: eucalyptus-common: Installed: 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766983 Title: package eucalyptus-java-common 2.0.1 bzr1256-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 757258] Re: Unable to reach instances from their public IP address
Sorry, I was out of the office for a while and was not able to handle this request I used elasticfox, and yes added ssh port: sysadmin@europe:~$ euca-describe-groups GROUP build build Build group PERMISSION build build ALLOWS icmp-1 -1 FROMCIDR 0.0.0.0/32 PERMISSION build build ALLOWS tcp 22 22 FROMCIDR 0.0.0.0/32 GROUP build default default group Obviously, the instance is launched using the 'build' security group Cheers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757258 Title: Unable to reach instances from their public IP address -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 667269] Re: winbind crashes
It's been 36 hours, and have not got the rpc_pipe_np_smb_conn crash on any of the 3 machines that I installed the 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6 package. This particular rpc_pipe_np_smb_conn crash, as I call it, is covered here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/753330. So once this ~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6 package package is made generally available and I install it on my 80 machines, then I will go back to the original problem that I initiated here and try to get more information for you all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667269 Title: winbind crashes -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 753330] Re: The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for PID 1783 (/usr/sbin/winbindd).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736757 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736757 It's been 36 hours, and have not got the rpc_pipe_np_smb_conn crash on any of the 3 machines that I installed the 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6 package. Will still be monitoring this, and may even install it on a few more machines, today. Any date on when this proposed version will be generally available? Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753330 Title: The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for PID 1783 (/usr/sbin/winbindd). -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 736757] Re: [SRU] PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd
It's been 36 hours, and have not got the rpc_pipe_np_smb_conn crash, as I call it, on any of the 3 machines that I installed the 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6 package. Will still be monitoring this, and may even install it on a few more machines, today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736757 Title: [SRU] PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 766242] Re: Launchpad bzr builder can't build from some ubuntu source branches
This is a problem with the content of the branch, as created by a person, not anything Launchpad did. ** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: bzr-builder Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: launchpad Status: New = Invalid ** Summary changed: - Launchpad bzr builder can't build from some ubuntu source branches + lp:ubuntu/cloud-init is not buildable by bzr-builder -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766242 Title: lp:ubuntu/cloud-init is not buildable by bzr-builder -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
If I specify a os-version it imports the distro and adds distro and profiles to cobbler correctly, however I get a nice traceback. There must be some code expecting the dists dir somewhere that relies on this for a repo? Installing after is just fine, although you need to link your profile to a seed file. $ cobbler import --name=natty-i386 --path=/tmp/tmp.Fk9UxW4Yrv --breed=ubuntu --os-version=natty task started: 2011-04-21_111651_import task started (id=Media import, time=Thu Apr 21 11:16:51 2011) Warning: No distro signature for kernel at /tmp/tmp.Fk9UxW4Yrv, using value from command line running: rsync -a '/tmp/tmp.Fk9UxW4Yrv/' /var/www/cobbler/ks_mirror/natty-i386/ --exclude-from=/etc/cobbler/rsync.exclude --quiet received on stdout: received on stderr: adding distros creating new distro: natty-i386 creating new profile: natty-i386 associating repos traversing distro natty-i386 descent into /tmp/tmp.Fk9UxW4Yrv Exception occured: type 'exceptions.TypeError' Exception value: process_repos() takes exactly 3 arguments (1 given) Exception Info: File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler/remote.py, line 93, in run rc = self._run(self) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler/remote.py, line 227, in runner self.logger File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler/api.py, line 756, in import_tree return manager.run(pkgdir,mirror_url,mirror_name,network_root,kickstart_file,rsync_flags,arch,breed,os_version) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler/modules/manage_import_debian_ubuntu.py, line 249, in run self.repo_finder(distros_added) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cobbler/modules/manage_import_debian_ubuntu.py, line 334, in repo_finder self.process_repos() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
In fact, it's exactly that. from: cobbler/modules/manage_import_debian_ubuntu.py def repo_finder(self, distros_added): for distro in distros_added: self.logger.info(traversing distro %s % distro.name) # FIXME : Shouldn't decide this the value of self.network_root ? if distro.kernel.find(ks_mirror) != -1: basepath = os.path.dirname(distro.kernel) top = self.get_rootdir() self.logger.info(descent into %s % top) dists_path = os.path.join(self.path, dists) if not os.path.isdir(dists_path): self.process_repos() else: self.logger.info(this distro isn't mirrored) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 767450] Re: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory
Do not worry I provide the output of the commands: # apt-cache policy ntp ntp: Instalados: 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 Candidato: 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 Tabla de versión: *** 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 0 500 http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status For the second command: #ps -aef | grep ntp ntp 4982 1 0 10:38 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -g -u 113:124 user 5443 5362 0 10:45 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto ntp #ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == +cronos.uanl.mx 65.212.71.1032 u 46 64 377 38.7648.460 76.972 *europium.canoni 193.79.237.142 u 48 64 377 162.327 -6.815 3.084 Is the information I can give. Apparently the problem was that some packages were not updated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767450 Title: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
What appears to be is that the import expects the .disk folder regardless of whether you are specifying the distro or not. Since bug #765254 won't be fixed, I guess that the best approach would be to patch the current code to ignore the check of the .disk folder (or try to obtain the information from there) if we are specifying the distro in the import command. Does this sound sane? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 767450] Re: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory
Hmmm - not sure what happened during the installation but your system appears to be running the most up-to-date version of ntp and is correctly sync'ed with two time servers. Its possible that we might find more information in /var/log/apt/term.log; please could you attach this file to this bug report. You may also find some archived versions of this file (named term.log.X.gz) in the same directory - please could you attach the most recent one of these as well if it exists. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767450 Title: package ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: error writing standard output: No such file or directory -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
Sounds good, for d-i not having the repo present is non-fatal (it'll just grab packages from the internet), for Anaconda based distros (RH, Fedora etc) I think it requires the complete tree. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 768506] [NEW] CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Since I upgraded to Natty, the computer takes a very long time to shut down (approximately 5 minutes). I made a movie from the shutdown messages and I think the CIFS server is not stopped correctly. I see the following message (for a split second): CIFS VFS: Server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx has not responded in 300 seconds. Reconnecting... So, I guess the CIFS server does not quit and therefore the computer is not turned off. Can I do anything to stop CIFS server? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CIFSMounts: Error: command ['mount', '|', 'grep', 'cifs'] failed with exit code 1: mount: only root can do that Date: Thu Apr 21 20:17:04 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100122) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-26 (26 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty ubuntu-une unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506 Title: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 768506] Re: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506 Title: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 191251] Re: [needs-packaging] php5-embed
*sigh* Three years after this was first reported, another round of
server installs, and still no package.
Ondrej, There are applications that use php embed other than phc -- I
need it for plphp -- php for postgresql databases.
Out of curiousity... since I'm not a package maintainer, how much extra
time would maintaining a package for this really entail? Are we talking
an hour or two a year? Or an extra 100 hours a year? Once you've got the
PHP source code unpacked and configured for any of the other SAPIs, it
only takes two or three extra commands ('./configure --enable-embed',
'make', 'make install') to actually get the embed library installed on
the system. Is it that much more to package that up along with all the
other SAPI packages? I'm not asking to be facetious, I'm just curious if
it really is a ton of extra time to maintain an extra package like this
or not.
---Lawrence
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191251
Title:
[needs-packaging] php5-embed
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765224] Re: import from mini.iso fails
Ok so after looking at it now, it seems that the issue is self.process_repos() when issuing the following command: cobbler import --name=natty-i386 --path=/mnt --breed=ubuntu --os- version=natty Apparently there's some kind of incompatibilities as there are two functions with the same name. One does nothing, the other creates repositories for the newly added distros and is hardcoded to: repo.set_mirror( http://ftp.%s.debian.org/debian/dists/%s; % ( 'us' , '@@suite@@' ) ) and security_repo.set_mirror( http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/%s/updates; % '@@suite@@' ) However, this function doesn't in fact seem to be used at all and I believe it might not even be necessary. or, it was some left over from unfinished code. I'd say that for now, the safest bet would be to not call the function in question to avoid the failure. When doing so, the mini ISO imports correctly and as mentioned, but it does not point to any preseed (and the ISO doesn't come with any either). I'll keep investigating but for now It will just be enough to patch that out (ignore the call to the function). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765224 Title: import from mini.iso fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 768707] [NEW] cyrus-sasl2-heimdal uninstallable and ftbfs
Public bug reported: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal 2.1.23.dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1 is uninstallable with cyrus- sasl2 2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu3, and ftbfs due to heimdal changes, from what I can see. I suspect the only way forward on this is to get cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23.dfsg1-6 (or, likely, newer) into natty which merges in the heimdal source and fixes the compilation problems. ** Affects: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Package changed: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) = cyrus-sasl2-heimdal (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768707 Title: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal uninstallable and ftbfs -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 706038] Re: 251397 is the bug number for last bug samba failed again after updates
this is no longer an issue i notice samba was working about 2 weeks ago when i thought I was checking it in vain guess this must have been resolved by an update On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions: 1. Is this reproducible? 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. This will help us to find and resolve the problem. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706038 Title: 251397 is the bug number for last bug samba failed again after updates Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Binary package hint: samba 251397 was the last bug number for samba in that case it was found invalid due to the fact that some updates corrected the problem. recently I received some new updates which made samba unusable again. Unlike the first time I am able to get into the Windows Shares and the local network folder however I cannot open the shared folder at all. I have tried deleting all folders that are to be shared and making new ones and sharing those however I still cannot mount them I have changed their permissions and so on still to no avail still after several reboots and shutting down my firewall settings and deleting the firewall configurations all together. While doing the updates I do recall being asked if I wanted to keep the current or replace them looking back i may have opted wrong this time. I have never had an issue by opting for the maintainers version before bug # 251397 produced no samba shares on record and I this time do not have the intended shared files under encryption folders. last time I brought up samba issues i was asked to attach a file however i forgot currently which file I am to attach to help in viewing this bug currenly ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 21 13:07:02 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba WindowsFailedConnect: Yes To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/706038/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706038 Title: 251397 is the bug number for last bug samba failed again after updates -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 768753] [NEW] package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When installing on my system ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 22 00:04:52 2011 DpkgTerminalLog: Desempacotando cifs-utils (de .../cifs-utils_2%3a4.5-2_i386.deb) ... Selecionando pacote previamente não selecionado samba. Desempacotando samba (de .../samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: erro processando /var/cache/apt/archives/samba_2%3a3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido ErrorMessage: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-13 (8 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768753 Title: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 768753] Re: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768753 Title: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: arquivo tar do sistema de arquivos corrompido - arquivo de pacote corrompido -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 732953] Re: can_connect function inside ec2.rb always return false
This bug was not fixed, the part that needs fixing is the 'can_connect' function Patch attached. ** Attachment added: repatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/facter/+bug/732953/+attachment/2081311/+files/repatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to facter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732953 Title: can_connect function inside ec2.rb always return false -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
