[Bug 341817] Re: dhcpd wont start due to rndc.key permissions
After some extensive tinkering, I came up with this solution to the rndc.key
permissions issue:
As the root user (or sudo) do the following:
cp /etc/bind/rndc.key /etc/dhcp3/
chown dhcp:dhcp /etc/dhcp3/rndc.key
chmod 640 /etc/dhcp3/rndc.key
In "/etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf" add this line:
include "/etc/dhcp3/rndc.key";
chown root:bind /etc/bind/rndc.key
chmod 640 /etc/bind/rndc.key
In /etc/bind/named.conf add this line to the top of the file:
include "/etc/bind/rndc.key";
In /etc/bind/named.conf add this line to the bottom of the file:
controls {
inet 127.0.0.1 port 953
allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "rndc-key"; };
};
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341817
Title:
dhcpd wont start due to rndc.key permissions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772868] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Release- 11.04 Package- samba What I expected to happen- I expected samba to reinstall and not tell me it failed to install. What happened instead- I was in the middle of upgrading to v11.04, and it said that samba failed to install. I ignored the error (what else was I going to do? I was in the middle of the upgrade) and tried to reinstall samba after restarting my computer. It still failed to install. I currently only use it to share my printer on the network, so it's not a real big priority if I can't get samba working again, but I figure that a bug report can't hurt. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686 AptOrdering: samba: Install samba: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 28 22:17:12 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 gvfs 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-28 (0 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772868 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772868] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772868 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 394350] Re: RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache
The actual setrlimit is done by apr. Apache source ships with its own coyp of the apr source under srclib, but that does not get compiled (or used). Apache definately sees the RLimit_CPU configuration and sets internal variables accordingly. I've yet to instrument the libapr1-dev code itself to see why it is not calling setrlimit. ** Also affects: apr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apr (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394350 Title: RLimitCPU has no effect in Apache -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 717243] Re: vlan interface won't start with ifup, can be started manually
I have lost access to the hardware that this problem was happening on (I no longer work at the company that owns the hardware), so I will not be able to troubleshoot this further. You may want to close this bug as not reproducible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717243 Title: vlan interface won't start with ifup, can be started manually -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 771305] Re: smbd does not start on first boot with 20110426
Accepted samba into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771305 Title: smbd does not start on first boot with 20110426 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772327] Re: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772327 Title: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 684424] Re: Bridges are not transparent for packets
@Thomas, can you try 'brctl stp br0 on' in the VM? I reproduced your setup using an lxc container connected to a bridge, and a separate network namespace inside the container. With stp off, I could not ping the host or the outside world (without setting routes). With stp on, I could ping the host, ping google.com, and ssh to other laptops on the same subnet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684424 Title: Bridges are not transparent for packets -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 458521] Re: kvm crash when using virtio for network, hardy guest
@John, what is the status of this bug on Hardy/linux? ** Changed in: qemu Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458521 Title: kvm crash when using virtio for network, hardy guest -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692775] Re: linking two virtual machines does not work
These are the mac addresses for eth4 and eth0 respectively. Looks like I've taken a listing from before I changed mac addresses. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692775 Title: linking two virtual machines does not work -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 697592] Re: unable to create socket on eth0 (210) for ::ffff:192.168.1.4#123
Aaarr: has to read :::ip-v4-address and ::ip-v4-address, not ff:ff::ip-v4-address and 0::ip-v4-address! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697592 Title: unable to create socket on eth0 (210) for :::192.168.1.4#123 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 697592] Re: unable to create socket on eth0 (210) for ::ffff:192.168.1.4#123
Yes, both bugs are related. ntp assumes 0::ip-v4-address, ff:ff::ip-v4-address and ip-v4-address the same (they are not, but this is what ntpd thinks of). Since ip-v4-address is already opened, opening 0::ip-v4-address and ff:ff::ipv4-address will fail, because ntpd just strips off the higher bits and uses ip-v4-address instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697592 Title: unable to create socket on eth0 (210) for :::192.168.1.4#123 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692775] Re: linking two virtual machines does not work
@Thomas which NICs have the MAC addrs listed in comment #13? Note that the description shows both eth4 on the dhcp server VM and eth0 on the dhcp client VM has having MAC address 52:54:00:ae:6c:73. That is what Santiago was pointing out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692775 Title: linking two virtual machines does not work -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692775] Re: linking two virtual machines does not work
No, this is not the case. Both machines are assigned network unique MAC- Addresses. I've checked them: 1: 52:54:00:9a:a1:18 2: 52:54:00:9a:a1:20 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692775 Title: linking two virtual machines does not work -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 684424] Re: Bridges are not transparent for packets
If this is an "Opinion" please do not call the whole thing "bridge". Bridges are transparently connecting networks at layer 2. An non- transparent bridge can't be called a bridge. Whatever it is. It's not a bridge as bridge meant in networking terminology. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684424 Title: Bridges are not transparent for packets -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723871] Re: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl
Thanks for advice. My primary target was to make sure , that it's not libvirt 8.8.1 on Ubuntu 11.04 issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723871 Title: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 677153] Re: dhclient assigns all interfaces connected to a bridge addresses
To avoid this problem: I've switched to pump not having this bug. Only the interface given will be assigned an address. Not all connected interfaces! dhclient is broken if it assigns identical addresses to all connected interfaces. It only has to assign one address to the given interface! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677153 Title: dhclient assigns all interfaces connected to a bridge addresses -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 677153] Re: dhclient assigns all interfaces connected to a bridge addresses
This is a bug, not an "Opinion". Just configure your system this way, wait on dhcp assigning an address and then loose network connectivity. If it where an "Opinion" I'd suspect not to lose network connectivity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677153 Title: dhclient assigns all interfaces connected to a bridge addresses -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 676518] Re: configuration given in /etc/default/libvirt-bin ignored
/etc/default/libvirt-bin is now sourced. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676518 Title: configuration given in /etc/default/libvirt-bin ignored -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 675448] Re: ssh does not authenticate against kerberos
There was a fix for some other ssh related bug, but this fix seems to have fixed this bug too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675448 Title: ssh does not authenticate against kerberos -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 632696] Re: libvirt won't start a VM with serial or console when apparmor is enabled
Looks like it is fixed with libvirt 0.8.8. Unfortunately this package is only available from a testing ppa -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632696 Title: libvirt won't start a VM with serial or console when apparmor is enabled -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723871] Re: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl
Boris, you should not disable the profile but instead update it. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingApparmor and /usr/share/doc/libvirt- bin/README.Debian for details. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723871 Title: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 579857] Re: automount and auto.smb not working
Fix seems to work now out of the box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579857 Title: automount and auto.smb not working -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772327] Re: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service
I added this patch. Although It misses SIGQUIT, it solves the restart problem. Must we do it in the original way? ** Patch added: "Fix restart problem" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xinetd/+bug/772327/+attachment/2092935/+files/restart_fix.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772327 Title: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772327] Re: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service
My version is 2.3.14-7ubuntu4 in natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772327 Title: Upstart script "restart" won't restart service -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772327] [NEW] Upstart script "restart" won't restart service
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xinetd
# stop xinetd
xinetd stop/waiting
# start xinetd
xinetd start/running, process 9378
# restart xinetd
xinetd start/running, process 9378
I must stop(8) then start(8) it to restart.
I investigate the upstart script at /etc/init/xinetd.conf. The pre-stop
script is:
pre-stop script
xinetd_pid=$(status | awk '/stop\/pre-stop/ { print $NF }')
[ -n "${xinetd_pid}" ] || exit 0
kill -QUIT "${xinetd_pid}"
end script
The first line gets nothing when invoking restart. I think that's
because awk cannot match the pattern when invoing 'restart'. It matches
when invoking 'stop'. I think using /var/run/xinetd.pid is safe.
Changed it to this:
pre-stop script
xinetd_pid=$(cat /var/run/xinetd.pid)
[ -n "${xinetd_pid}" ] || exit 0
kill -QUIT "${xinetd_pid}"
end script
This will stop the service but won't start it when invoking 'restart'. I
do not know the internals of upstart. This may because the pre-stop exit
with a non-zero status and 'restart' just killed it and cannot start it?
To fix the problem in the bug summary , I have to comment out the pre-
stop script, and 'restart' works OK. I see bug 605007, the author need
SIGQUIT, but in my way SIGQUIT is not explicitly sent. I do not know why
SIGQUIT is needed.
IMHO, this script needs a fix. But I haven't figured out a good patch.
Thank you guys.
** Affects: xinetd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772327
Title:
Upstart script "restart" won't restart service
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723871] Re: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl
Just disabling libvirtd profile is enough as well :- # apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd # ln -s /etx/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd /etc/apparmor.d/disable/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723871 Title: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 771698] Re: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups
If I search ldap using "ldapsearch" I do get all defined groups and users. Accessing ldap via "getent (passwd|group)" I do again get all groups or users. using "id" does not give back all groups a user belongs to. The system behaves, as if there are only local groups available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771698 Title: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 582963] Re: SSL pass phrase dialog can't read input
** Tags added: server-nrs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582963 Title: SSL pass phrase dialog can't read input -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 771698] Re: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups
> The fact that id shows fewer groups is not a security issue > -- the user should have fewer privileges than with the > intended ldap groups. This is only correct as long as belonging to a group grants additional rights. It is not correct any more if belonging to a group revoked rights. The user this way has, since he isn't seen in this particular group any more, additional rights, he wouldn't have if he was part of the group in question. We're using such a scheme for trainees. They are part of the group, but being part of the group "trainee" revokes some rights they would have if they where not part of the group "trainee". In our special case this doesn't matter: both groups are derived by ldap. Since pam doesn't question ldap any more for groups the user is in, rights are not granted and not revoked --- most people do not have any rights to do anything ... :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771698 Title: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 771698] Re: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups
** Attachment added: "various configuration files used by pam and ldap" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/771698/+attachment/2092558/+files/config.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771698 Title: /usr/bin/id does not show ldap groups -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 723871] Re: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl
Disabling AppArmor really allows libvirt to go with no problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723871 Title: qemu-kvm-0.14.0 Aborts with -vga qxl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
