[Bug 857294] Re: Creating hotspot leads to endless connect/disconnect loop
I found a workaround to this issue: - kill any running dnsmasq process. (or restart computer afterwards) - Disable IPv6 in the Hotspot settings. (IPv6: Ignore) - restart the Hotspot --- The default settings of the Hotspot in Oneiric are: - IPv4: Shared with other Computers - IPv6: Automatic When selecting IPv6: Ignore everything works as expected. Suggesting to change the default settings of the Hotspot-feature, because I think IPv6 is not really necessary for Ad-Hoc Networks in order to work around this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857294 Title: Creating hotspot leads to endless connect/disconnect loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/857294/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858102] [NEW] cgroup service prevents VMWare services stopping
Public bug reported: I recently discovered that I could not update VMWare Player - the phase of the uninstall that stops the existing services would hang and eventually the whole system would require a power reset. System would also hang on shutdown under normal operation. Uninstalling cgroup-bin libcgroup1 fixes both these issues. I have set up cgroups on my 10.04 system as per: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/alternative-to-200-lines-kernel- patch.html and this seemed to be working fine until I discovered this issue recently when the 2.6.32-34 kernel was made available. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: cgroup-bin (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 212f016c580cd6ab8528ceeed43cfd4f CheckboxSystem: 4ed15c40009aa6f7770f606350a390a2 Date: Sat Sep 24 19:02:48 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20110720.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_AU:en LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libcgroup ** Affects: libcgroup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858102 Title: cgroup service prevents VMWare services stopping To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgroup/+bug/858102/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858247] [NEW] Mounting SMB:// shares from a Mac, via GVFS, doesn't allow copying of data in either direction
Public bug reported: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) changed Samba for Apple's proprietary SMB stack. This stack has incompatibilities with the default smb:// mount modes supported by Samba and Gnome VFS. If I mount the system via Nautilus, opening the location smb://computer/share, I can see the file list and navigate it, but I can neither copy to nor from the machine (error is NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED, reflected in an error dialog with the message Function not implemented. If I mount the filesystem using mount.cifs, adding the options noserverino,nounix,sec=ntlmssp, then I can access all of the information fine on the far end. It is possible that this bug could go away if using Samba 3.6 - which fully supports SMB2 - but I've not been able to verify it because there are no Samba 3.6 packages for Natty or Oneric yet, and because I've been reluctant to roll my own Samba packages. Is there a way to configure GVFS to use a set of mounting options when connecting to a specific resource? I.e. when connecting to this server, use these options (like the ones mentioned above)? ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858247 Title: Mounting SMB:// shares from a Mac, via GVFS, doesn't allow copying of data in either direction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/858247/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 784252] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
It is a permissions problem. The quick manual fix for this is to change the user and group of the files /var/lib/backuppc/pc and /var/lib/backuppc/cpool to 'backuppc'. I'm working on a packaging fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784252 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/784252/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858247] Re: Mounting SMB:// shares from a Mac, via GVFS, doesn't allow copying of data in either direction
I've just tried Samba 3.6.0 from Debian experimental, and the problem persists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858247 Title: Mounting SMB:// shares from a Mac, via GVFS, doesn't allow copying of data in either direction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/858247/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 841672] Re: ssh-add does not unlock ssh keys
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841672 Title: ssh-add does not unlock ssh keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/841672/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858493] [NEW] By default ntpd listens on all interfaces
Public bug reported: The default ntp configuration that ships with ubuntu has ntp listening on all interfaces when in most instances that's not needed. Adding the line: interface ignore wildcard to ntp.conf disables this and makes ntp only listen to localhost, which is enough for things like ntpq to still work. It would probably be even safer for it not to listen on any interfaces but that doesn't seem to be possible as interface ignore all seems to be completely ignored and interface ignore lo only disables localhost on ipv6. It seems listening to localhost on ipv4 is hardcoded into ntpd. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ntp 1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1ubuntu5.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Sep 24 20:04:13 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 SourcePackage: ntp UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-07 (140 days ago) ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858493 Title: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/858493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858493] Re: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858493 Title: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/858493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858493] Re: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces
It seems interface ignore wildcard doesn't actually work as ntpd needs those listening interfaces to get packets back. openntpd seems to do without these though so it would be good if ntpd was also able to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858493 Title: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/858493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858493] Re: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces
Pedro, I fail to see how this is a bug at all. ntpd is a network service, and while it would be a nice enhancement to the packaging to have a low priority debconf question to ask if the user would like to disable network capabilities, there are plenty of users who will want it to listen on the network and respond to time requests. Also you may be surprised to see that ntpd doesn't actually *respond* to requests from ip's other than 127.0.0.1 or ::1 clint@clint-MacBookPro:~$ ntpq 192.168.1.105 ntpq peers 192.168.1.105: timed out, nothing received ***Request timed out ntpq ^D clint@clint-MacBookPro:~$ ntpq 127.0.0.1 ntpq peers remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == +host2.kingrst.c 204.9.54.119 2 u 261 1024 377 84.351 -7.327 9.672 -vf1.bbnx.net128.4.1.12 u 223 1024 377 155.919 14.811 9.898 *ntp.yoinks.net 198.153.152.52 2 u 802 1024 377 50.601 -12.461 14.969 +ticker.pascogov 128.4.1.12 u 339 1024 377 78.144 -4.778 6.295 +europium.canoni 193.79.237.142 u 263 1024 377 165.478 -12.394 8.661 ntpq So its not actually all that important at all. I'll mark this as Opinion, so others can find it and weigh in on it. For now though, I don't see a compelling argument for changing the way it works right now. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858493 Title: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/858493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858493] Re: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces
What I was pointing out is that ntp listens to *:* when that's not actually needed to function as an ntp client. Here's an example from a server I was just setting up. With ntpd: $ sudo netstat -atpun | grep ntp udp0 0 myIP:123 0.0.0.0:* 31805/ntpd udp0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:* 31805/ntpd udp0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:* 31805/ntpd udp6 0 0 ::1:123 :::* 31805/ntpd udp6 0 0 myIP :::*31805/ntpd udp6 0 0 :::123 :::* 31805/ntpd with openntpd: $ sudo netstat -atpun | grep ntp udp0 0 myIP:5770688.190.225.228:123 ESTABLISHED 32455/ntpd udp0 0 myIP:46760188.40.33.81:123ESTABLISHED 32455/ntpd udp0 0 myIP:3374288.190.225.228:123 ESTABLISHED 32455/ntpd udp0 0 myIP:3462585.10.199.217:123 ESTABLISHED 32455/ntpd so it seems to be possible to have working NTP communication without opening up port 123 on all interfaces for everyone to connect. I assume that's why /etc/ntp.conf has all those restrict lines by default, whereas /etc/openntp/ntpd.conf only has server lines. I know ntp restricts responses to localhost by default so someone that wants to actually run an ntp server needs to change ntp.conf anyway. It might as well take the next step and not bind to the interfaces at all so as to not be a potential security risk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858493 Title: By default ntpd listens on all interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/858493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858554] [NEW] keypairs missing following upgrade
Public bug reported: Following upgrade post Beta 2 of Oneiric, the existing keypairs are missing. euca-add-keypair succeeds in adding keypairs of the same name. On inspection, keypairs created at Beta 2 are: +-++---+-+-+ | created_at | id | name | user_id | fingerprint | +-++---+-+-+ | 2011-09-24 21:56:17 | 5 | foo | admin | ae:06:8e:9b:73:90:66:c4:11:a4:e7:e0:0c:6f:a6:dc | +-++---+-+-+ Following, there are such: +-++---+--+-+ | created_at | id | name | user_id | fingerprint | +-++---+--+-+ | 2011-09-22 16:25:31 | 3 | foo | 155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc | 97:21:4f:93:cd:c6:8c:f8:f4:34:ad:26:90:b1:4f:25 | +-++---+--+-+ The provided novarc differs between old - new such: 4c4 export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc:novaproject --- export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=admin:novaproject 15c15 export NOVA_API_KEY=155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc --- export NOVA_API_KEY=admin The freshly retrieved nova.zip fails to work against the existing configuration returning: $ euca-describe-instances Warning: failed to parse error message from AWS: unknown:1:0: syntax error None: None ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858554 Title: keypairs missing following upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/858554/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 42947] Re: postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory
I just ran into this on a fresh install of 11.04. I think it may be because in the installation of postfix I selected No configuration from the configuration menu. Previously, doing the identical installation and selecting Local only I didn't get the error. And after removing and reinstalling postfix (as shown above), but this time selecting Local only, I no longer get the error. I think No configuration is just not a good choice, because then the lack of a configuration produces errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42947 Title: postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/42947/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858554] Re: keypairs missing following upgrade
** Description changed: Following upgrade post Beta 2 of Oneiric, the existing keypairs are missing. euca-add-keypair succeeds in adding keypairs of the same name. On inspection, keypairs created at Beta 2 are: +-++---+-+-+ | created_at | id | name | user_id | fingerprint | +-++---+-+-+ | 2011-09-24 21:56:17 | 5 | foo | admin | ae:06:8e:9b:73:90:66:c4:11:a4:e7:e0:0c:6f:a6:dc | +-++---+-+-+ Following, there are such: +-++---+--+-+ | created_at | id | name | user_id | fingerprint | +-++---+--+-+ | 2011-09-22 16:25:31 | 3 | foo | 155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc | 97:21:4f:93:cd:c6:8c:f8:f4:34:ad:26:90:b1:4f:25 | +-++---+--+-+ - The generated novarc prior contained: - export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc:novaproject + The provided novarc differs between old - new such: + 4c4 + export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc:novaproject + --- + export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=admin:novaproject + 15c15 + export NOVA_API_KEY=155d0887-b222-4975-8e06-3c2de4a7ebcc + --- + export NOVA_API_KEY=admin - And following contains: - export EC2_ACCESS_KEY=admin:novaproject + + The freshly retrieved nova.zip fails to work against the existing configuration returning: + $ euca-describe-instances + Warning: failed to parse error message from AWS: unknown:1:0: syntax error + None: None ** Tags added: server-o-rs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858554 Title: keypairs missing following upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/858554/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 799660] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.13 failed to install/upgrade
[Expired for libvirt (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799660 Title: package libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.13 failed to install/upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/799660/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 858644] [NEW] DRBD Linux Headers Required
Public bug reported: When installing drbd8-utils on a clean Ubuntu Server installation, linux-headers-server is not listed as a required/dependency package. Without linux-server-headers, the drbd module will not be built by dkms and attempting to /etc/init.d/drbd start would result in a Can not load the drbd module. Should the linux-headers-(server/generic/virtual) be included as a dependency? ** Affects: drbd8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858644 Title: DRBD Linux Headers Required To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/drbd8/+bug/858644/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
