[Bug 870448] Re: check_http fails to decode chunked encoding before performing string checks

2011-10-11 Thread Peter Valdemar Mørch
There is this upstream bugreport, open since 2009-05-04:
check_http asks for HTTP/1.1, but doesn't understand chunked - ID: 2786808
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2786808&group_id=29880&atid=397597

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870448

Title:
  check_http fails to decode chunked encoding before performing string
  checks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/870448/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872553] Re: upon creating a node via juju & orchestra, etckeeper hangs

2011-10-11 Thread Clint Byrum
To be clear, it was 100% repeatable by simply deploying 11.10 with any
charm using juju + orchestra.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872553

Title:
  upon creating a node via juju & orchestra, etckeeper hangs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/orchestra/+bug/872553/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872553] Re: upon creating a node via juju & orchestra, etckeeper hangs

2011-10-11 Thread Clint Byrum
I believe this is likely an issue with etckeeper, not orchestra itself,
so adding it as an affected package. When I experienced the issue, I had
to stop the 'tty1' upstart job and confirm etckeeper's error that it had
problems committing. I believe the issue may be related to files with
names or contents that don't agree with the locale of the box.

** Changed in: orchestra
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: orchestra
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: orchestra (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: orchestra (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: orchestra (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: orchestra (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: High
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872553

Title:
  upon creating a node via juju & orchestra, etckeeper hangs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/orchestra/+bug/872553/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer

2011-10-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags removed: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854946

Title:
  [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a
  default ClockSkewBuffer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/854946/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 391874] Re: “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

2011-10-11 Thread Māris Fogels
Installing the FoxProxy Firefox extension allowed the Firefox SOCKS
proxy connection to start working.  According to the SSH output the
browser now sets up proxy connections just like curl does.


debug1: Connection to port 12345 forwarding to socks port 0 requested.
debug2: fd 7 setting TCP_NODELAY
debug2: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug3: fd 7 is O_NONBLOCK
debug1: channel 2: new [dynamic-tcpip]
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 3
debug2: channel 2: decode socks5
debug2: channel 2: socks5 auth done
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: need more
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 27
debug2: channel 2: decode socks5
debug2: channel 2: socks5 post auth
debug2: channel 2: dynamic request: socks5 host 91.189.89.100 port 443 command 1
debug2: channel 2: open confirm rwindow 2097152 rmax 32768
debug1: Connection to port 12345 forwarding to socks port 0 requested.
debug2: fd 8 setting TCP_NODELAY
debug2: fd 8 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug3: fd 8 is O_NONBLOCK
debug1: channel 3: new [dynamic-tcpip]
debug2: channel 3: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 3: pre_dynamic: have 3
debug2: channel 3: decode socks5
debug2: channel 3: socks5 auth done
debug2: channel 3: pre_dynamic: need more
debug2: channel 3: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 3: pre_dynamic: have 27
debug2: channel 3: decode socks5
debug2: channel 3: socks5 post auth
debug2: channel 3: dynamic request: socks5 host 91.189.89.100 port 443 command 1
debug2: channel 3: open confirm rwindow 2097152 rmax 32768
debug2: channel 3: read<=0 rfd 8 len -1
debug2: channel 3: read failed
debug2: channel 3: close_read
debug2: channel 3: input open -> drain
debug2: channel 3: ibuf empty
debug2: channel 3: send eof
debug2: channel 3: input drain -> closed
debug2: channel 3: rcvd eof
debug2: channel 3: output open -> drain
debug2: channel 3: obuf empty
debug2: channel 3: close_write
debug2: channel 3: chan_shutdown_write: shutdown() failed for fd 8: Transport 
endpoint is not connected
debug2: channel 3: output drain -> closed
debug2: channel 3: rcvd close
debug3: channel 3: will not send data after close
debug2: channel 3: send close
debug2: channel 3: is dead
debug2: channel 3: garbage collecting
debug1: channel 3: free: direct-tcpip: listening port 12345 for 91.189.89.100 
port 443, connect from 127.0.0.1 port 32956, nchannels 4
debug3: channel 3: status: The following connections are open:
  #2 direct-tcpip: listening port 12345 for 91.189.89.100 port 443, connect 
from 127.0.0.1 port 32955 (t4 r0 i0/0 o0/0 fd 7/7 cc -1)
  #3 direct-tcpip: listening port 12345 for 91.189.89.100 port 443, connect 
from 127.0.0.1 port 32956 (t4 r1 i3/0 o3/0 fd 8/8 cc -1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391874

Title:
  “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/391874/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 391874] Re: “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

2011-10-11 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
Thanks mars for making feel a little less crazy :-) I don't have a
remote host any more, so I won't be able to do further testing on this
issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391874

Title:
  “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/391874/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 391874] Re: “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

2011-10-11 Thread Māris Fogels
I encountered a very similar problem running a development version of
Oneiric, openssh-client 1:5.8p1-7ubuntu1.

Michael, try using 'curl -I --socks5 127.0.0.1:1080 http://thesite'.  I
find that curl connects perfectly through the SOCKS SSH tunnel and that
Firefox 7.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 fails with almost exactly the
log messages you pasted.

Here is a successful connection I recorded using 'curl -I
https://thewebhost --socks5 localhost:12345' and 'ssh -vvv -ND 12345
thesshhost':

debug1: Connection to port 12345 forwarding to socks port 0 requested.
debug2: fd 7 setting TCP_NODELAY
debug2: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug3: fd 7 is O_NONBLOCK
debug1: channel 2: new [dynamic-tcpip]
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 4
debug2: channel 2: decode socks5
debug2: channel 2: socks5 auth done
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: need more
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 10
debug2: channel 2: decode socks5
debug2: channel 2: socks5 post auth
debug2: channel 2: dynamic request: socks5 host 91.189.89.100 port 443 command 1
debug2: channel 2: open confirm rwindow 2097152 rmax 32768
debug2: channel 2: read<=0 rfd 7 len 0
debug2: channel 2: read failed
debug2: channel 2: close_read
debug2: channel 2: input open -> drain
debug2: channel 2: ibuf empty
debug2: channel 2: send eof
debug2: channel 2: input drain -> closed
debug2: channel 2: rcvd eof
debug2: channel 2: output open -> drain
debug2: channel 2: obuf empty
debug2: channel 2: close_write
debug2: channel 2: chan_shutdown_write: shutdown() failed for fd 7: Transport 
endpoint is not connected
debug2: channel 2: output drain -> closed
debug2: channel 2: send close
debug3: channel 2: will not send data after close
debug2: channel 2: rcvd close
debug3: channel 2: will not send data after close
debug2: channel 2: is dead
debug2: channel 2: garbage collecting
debug1: channel 2: free: direct-tcpip: listening port 12345 for 91.189.89.100 
port 443, connect from 127.0.0.1 port 60535, nchannels 3
debug3: channel 2: status: The following connections are open:
  #2 direct-tcpip: listening port 12345 for 91.189.89.100 port 443, connect 
from 127.0.0.1 port 60535 (t4 r0 i3/0 o3/0 fd 7/7 cc -1)

Here is a failed connection, same https:// address, same ssh tunnel,
using Firefox 7.0.1.  Firefox is configured with all traffic proxied to
127.0.0.1 port 12345:

debug1: Connection to port 12345 forwarding to socks port 0 requested.
debug2: fd 7 setting TCP_NODELAY
debug2: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug3: fd 7 is O_NONBLOCK
debug1: channel 2: new [dynamic-tcpip]
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 0
debug2: channel 2: pre_dynamic: have 424
debug2: channel 2: zombie
debug2: channel 2: garbage collecting
debug1: channel 2: free: dynamic-tcpip, nchannels 3
debug3: channel 2: status: The following connections are open:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391874

Title:
  “dynamic” application-level port forwarding non-functional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/391874/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 859679] A change has been merged to openstack/nova

2011-10-11 Thread Openstack Gerrit
Reviewed:  https://review.openstack.org/651
Committed: 
http://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/114ca0b2dc090270d8d20bd10b6e1e7a0b451db2
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch:master

 status fixcommitted
 done

commit 114ca0b2dc090270d8d20bd10b6e1e7a0b451db2
Author: Vishvananda Ishaya 
Date:   Mon Sep 26 08:34:14 2011 -0700

Fix the grantee group loading for source groups

Fixes bug 859679.

Change-Id: Ia0b90b8373a02955f23b6dda0495f01511762822

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859679

Title:
  using source groups (-o) with security groups causes a lazy load
  exception

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/859679/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 831886] Re: Dovecot regression: Evolution quick sync (QRESYNC) not working anymore

2011-10-11 Thread Jeff Waugh
It is a bug in both dovecot and Evolution. Remember, dovecot shouldn't
fail even if the client does something silly. This patch should totally
go in updates for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and supported releases beyond. The
fix was shipped in Fedora 12 and 13.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/50841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625207

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #625207
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625207

** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831886

Title:
  Dovecot regression: Evolution quick sync (QRESYNC) not working anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/831886/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872443] Re: package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-10-11 Thread Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  Reviewing your log files attached to this bug report it
seems that a package failed to install due to a segmentation fault in
application being used by the package installation process.
Unfortunately, this bug report isn't very useful in its current state
and a crash report would be much more useful.  Could you try recreating
this issue by enabling apport to catch the crash report 'sudo service
apport start force_start=1' and then trying to install the same package
again?  This process will create a new bug report so I am marking this
one as Invalid.  Thanks again for helping out!

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: package-install-segfault

** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872443

Title:
  package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess
  installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/872443/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread Clint Byrum
After discussing with Scott Moser, its agreed that this may cause
issues, but not necessarily that it is a "bug" as much as a change in
behavior that needs documenting. Adding a ubuntu-release-notes task with
suggested release note.

** Changed in: cassandra (juju Charms Collection)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: cassandra (juju Charms Collection)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => James Page (james-page)

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Description changed:

- By writing the FQDN to /etc/hosts as resolving to 127.0.1.1, systems
- like Cassandra have a much harder time determining their address to
- communicate to other cluster members.
+ *** Ubuntu 11.10 Release Note ***
+ 
+ Cloud instances and servers pre-seeded with cloud-init will have their
+ FQDN written to /etc/hosts and pointed to the IP 127.0.1.1. This may
+ cause issues for daemons which try to listen on their hostname, rather
+ than 0.0.0.0, as they will now only be reachable locally, rather than on
+ the network address that their FQDN resolves to.
+ 
+ ***
+ 
+ 
+ By writing the FQDN to /etc/hosts as resolving to 127.0.1.1, systems like 
Cassandra have a much harder time determining their address to communicate to 
other cluster members.
  
  While some might see communicating your IP to others as  a bug, being
  able to use gethostname() and then resolving it to get the actual IP
  address of one's machine is fairly important.
  
  Its my understanding that in resolving bug #802637 , the Debian
  networking docs were used as a guide:
  
  http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html
  Point 5.1.2 specifically.
  
  It does suggest that one needs an FQDN in /etc/hosts.
  
  However cloud-init should only set the addresss if it cannot be
  determined.
  
  cloud-init should first try gethostbyname() on the FQDN. If it resolves,
  *do not write FQDN to /etc/hosts*. This assures that if it has been
  configured to be resolvable by some method in nsswitch.conf such as DNS
  or NIS or etc., it will not be overidden by /etc/hosts.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872443] Re: package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-10-11 Thread Phil V
As English is the most commonly used language by developers and bug
triagers, could you please translate your bug report completely?
Particularly the error messages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872443

Title:
  package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess
  installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/872443/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872443] Re: package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-10-11 Thread Viking
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872443

Title:
  package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess
  installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/872443/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872443] [NEW] package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-10-11 Thread Viking
Public bug reported:

After de-installation for reinstall with web-server integration
(apache2) backuppc failed to isntall, even the manual deletion of all
installed files and folders did not succeed in correct installation.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: backuppc (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 11 20:17:00 2011
ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den 
Fehlerwert 1 zurück
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
SourcePackage: backuppc
Title: package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess 
installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872443

Title:
  package backuppc (not installed) failed to install/Unterprozess
  installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/872443/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872437] [NEW] the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

2011-10-11 Thread Peter Matulis
Public bug reported:

The live slapd-config database currently reside under /etc/ldap/slapd.d .  Can 
we change it to something like /var/lib/slapd ?
Although it *does* consist of configuration material it is also a live database 
that people always think they can hand-edit due to it being under /etc.

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437

Title:
  the slapd-config database should not be under /etc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of Tue Oct 11 16:57:27 UTC 2011:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Clint Byrum wrote:
> 
> > Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of Tue Oct 11 00:18:27 UTC 2011:
> > > gethostbyname(hostname) is non-determinable.
> > > there could be multiple responses.  and indeterminable order.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed, which is precisely why I believe cloud-init must leave the FQDN
> > out of /etc/hosts if there is any response to this call.
> 
> That doesn't make any sense.  Its non-determinable, its non-determinable
> when cloud-init runs as well as later on.
> When cloud-init ran to decide if there was a response to this call, it may
> give a single value, or may give 4 values, or may give no response.  That
> may change later on when some other utility was asking.
> 

The number and content of responses is irrelevant, only that the count
of positive responses is at least one.

The idea isn't to cover the case for all time, its to cover the case
where users have not asked to have fqdn "fixed", yet we need to make a
best effort attempt to make sure it is resolvable during bootup.

If it can be resolved through the normal means, what reason do we have
to override that with a value like 127.0.1.1?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread Scott Moser
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Clint Byrum wrote:

> Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of Tue Oct 11 00:18:27 UTC 2011:
> > gethostbyname(hostname) is non-determinable.
> > there could be multiple responses.  and indeterminable order.
> >
>
> Agreed, which is precisely why I believe cloud-init must leave the FQDN
> out of /etc/hosts if there is any response to this call.

That doesn't make any sense.  Its non-determinable, its non-determinable
when cloud-init runs as well as later on.
When cloud-init ran to decide if there was a response to this call, it may
give a single value, or may give 4 values, or may give no response.  That
may change later on when some other utility was asking.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 645082] Re: bacula misses requirement of gawk

2011-10-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
@Fred,

I'm sorry, I don't know what i was thinking with comments #3 and #5.
I'll get a debdiff sponsored as soon as precise opens up, switching the
awk call to gawk in bacula-dir.conf (in addition to adding gawk as a
dependency as before).

Thanks for catching that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645082

Title:
  bacula misses requirement of gawk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/645082/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 863629] Re: libvirt-lxc: virFileOpenTtyAt can't be called on /some/other/dev/pts

2011-10-11 Thread Scott Moser
I now know how I I was hitting this.
On my local system, I would log, open a terminal and and then run a bip proxy 
with:
 ssh -o ControlPath=none -C -L 7778:localhost:7778 -f -N ${HOST}

I can replicate that same behavior by ssh'ing to a system, then doing:
  sleep 30m & disown; exit
After that, 'sleep 30m' will be alive and holding the /dev/pts/0 so nothing 
will get that any more, but the entry is deleted.

I couldn't seem to get that to work through ssh running the command ie, the 
following kills the sleep and frees the /dev/pts/0:
  ssh $HOST -t 'sleep 30m & disown; exit 0;'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863629

Title:
  libvirt-lxc: virFileOpenTtyAt can't be called on /some/other/dev/pts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/863629/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of Tue Oct 11 00:18:27 UTC 2011:
> gethostbyname(hostname) is non-determinable.
> there could be multiple responses.  and indeterminable order.
> 

Agreed, which is precisely why I believe cloud-init must leave the FQDN
out of /etc/hosts if there is any response to this call.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 868753] Re: qemu+ssh connections to a remote libvirt fail

2011-10-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting C de-Avillez (hgg...@ubuntu.com):
> My laptop is a 64-bit core-i7; aldebaran is a 64-bit, probably Xeon-
> based.
> 
> Also, running visrh -c qemu+ssh//localhost/system works on my laptop.

Hi,

I've failed to reproduce this.  Is there any chance you would have time
to take these two exact same systems, re-install uptodate natty and
oneiric on them, and re-test?  Or, could I get access to them  (pls
feel free to ping me in irc) if they are still set up?  If the oneiric
one is your laptop, I can try setting up a new oneiric client in the
lab.

thanks,
-serge

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868753

Title:
  qemu+ssh connections to a remote libvirt fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/868753/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.

2011-10-11 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Tags added: rls-mgr-p-tracking

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072

Title:
  The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to
  work correctly.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/735072/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 862129] Re: samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured

2011-10-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129

Title:
  samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/862129/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 843701] Re: CVE-2011-3190 Apache Tomcat Authentication bypass and information disclosure

2011-10-11 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843701

Title:
  CVE-2011-3190 Apache Tomcat Authentication bypass and information
  disclosure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat5.5/+bug/843701/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872261] Re: "service autofs " fails with "Rejected send message"

2011-10-11 Thread Hariharan Iyer
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872261

Title:
  "service autofs " fails with "Rejected send message"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/872261/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872261] [NEW] "service autofs " fails with "Rejected send message"

2011-10-11 Thread Hariharan Iyer
Public bug reported:

Most upstart commands fail for autofs. Examples:
hiyer1-lxp:/home/hiyer% service autofs restart
restart: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", 
sender=":1.66" (uid=7530 pid=6087 comm="restart autofs ") 
interface="com.ubuntu.Upstart0_6.Job" member="Restart" error name="(unset)" 
requested_reply="0" destination="com.ubuntu.Upstart" (uid=0 pid=1 
comm="/sbin/init")
hiyer1-lxp:/home/hiyer% ubuntu-bug autofs
hiyer1-lxp:/home/hiyer% service autofs stop   
stop: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", 
sender=":1.67" (uid=7530 pid=7064 comm="stop autofs ") 
interface="com.ubuntu.Upstart0_6.Job" member="Stop" error name="(unset)" 
requested_reply="0" destination="com.ubuntu.Upstart" (uid=0 pid=1 
comm="/sbin/init")

Version Information:
hiyer1-lxp:/home/hiyer% lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.10
Release:11.10

autofs: 5.0.6-0ubuntu2

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: autofs 5.0.6-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 11 18:21:36 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Alpha amd64 (20110803.1)
SourcePackage: autofs5
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-09-06 (35 days ago)

** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872261

Title:
  "service autofs " fails with "Rejected send message"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/872261/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872210] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

2011-10-11 Thread Reinhard Tartler
This is very likely the cause for bugs such as

 - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330587 or 
 - http://www.jfix.com/news/?p=92

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #330587
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330587

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872210

Title:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/872210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread James Page
A bit more testing reveals that this solution does not work so well in a
local juju environment; adapting with a check to see if an IP address is
returned from private-address before trying to resolve using dig

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 868538] Re: /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xinetd

2011-10-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xinetd (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to xinetd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868538

Title:
   /etc/init.d/xinetd kills LXC container's xinetd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxc/+bug/868538/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872217] Re: diskstats plugin: error "Byte order is not compatible"

2011-10-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: munin
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872217

Title:
  diskstats plugin: error "Byte order is not compatible"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/munin/+bug/872217/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872217] [NEW] diskstats plugin: error "Byte order is not compatible"

2011-10-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
Public bug reported:

The diskstats plugin fails to provide any data since a while:

% sudo munin-run diskstats  

Byte order is not compatible at ../../lib/Storable.pm (autosplit into 
../../lib/auto/Storable/thaw.al) line 415, at /etc/munin/plugins/diskstats line 
120

Line 120 mentioned in the error is the second line of the following
return value in the function choose_old_state:

return $return_timestamp,
  %{ thaw decode_base64 $states{$return_timestamp} };

I assume that upgrading from Ubuntu Natty to Oneiric might have caused
this?!

I am using munin 1.4.6-1ubuntu1 currently, which has not made it into
Ubuntu though yet (merged from Debian by myself).

** Affects: munin
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: munin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: munin-monitoring.org/ #1148
   http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/1148

** Also affects: munin via
   http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/1148
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872217

Title:
  diskstats plugin: error "Byte order is not compatible"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/munin/+bug/872217/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872210] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

2011-10-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ntp

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872210

Title:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/872210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872210] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

2011-10-11 Thread Reinhard Tartler
** Also affects: ntp (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: ntp (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872210

Title:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/872210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 872210] [NEW] /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

2011-10-11 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Public bug reported:

>From /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate:


invoke-rc.d --quiet ntp stop >/dev/null 2>&1 || true

/usr/sbin/ntpdate-debian -s $OPTS 2>/dev/null || :

invoke-rc.d --quiet ntp start >/dev/null 2>&1 || true


This code is supposed to stop the running ntpd. However, this fails if openntpd 
is installed.

** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872210

Title:
  /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate: Fails to stop openntp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/872210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 871966] Re: FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

2011-10-11 Thread James Page
As a work-around until this is resolved in one way or another in juju
I'm using:

  dig +short `unit-get private-address`

dig deals with being passed an IP address nicely and will resolve a
hostname correctly to the internal IP address of the instance in ec2 and
openstack environments.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871966

Title:
  FQDN written to /etc/hosts causes problems for clustering systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/871966/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 862129] Re: samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured

2011-10-11 Thread Robie Basak
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #644963
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963

** Also affects: samba via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129

Title:
  samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/862129/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 517574] Re: Please backport agent/mibgroup/host/hr_swrun.c to 5.4.1

2011-10-11 Thread pdf
A proposed solution is to simply backport hr_swrun.c from 5.4.4, tested
and problem resolved here using this patch.

** Patch added: "hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/517574/+attachment/2536023/+files/hr_swrun-5.4.4-backport.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517574

Title:
  Please backport agent/mibgroup/host/hr_swrun.c to 5.4.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+bug/517574/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs