[Bug 1011089] [NEW] package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread M. Vbm
Public bug reported:

After automatic update to ubuntu 12.4 this error came up.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: postfix 2.9.1-5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Jun 10 01:11:00 2012
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1)
SourcePackage: postfix
Title: package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-06-10 (0 days ago)

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011089

Title:
  package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1011089/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011089] Re: package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread M. Vbm
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011089

Title:
  package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1011089/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-10 Thread Thomas Hood
I meantioned Wicd and Netconf above.  While investigating another
problem I stumbled across Connman

 http://connman.net

which appears to be another alternative to NetworkManager worth
watching.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010772] Re: E: changelog for this version is not (yet) available;

2012-06-10 Thread Doug
I run update manager and get this error message

** Package changed: ubuntu = amavisd-new (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010772

Title:
  E: changelog for this version is not (yet) available;

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1010772/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010772] Re: E: changelog for this version is not (yet) available;

2012-06-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Package changed: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) = update-manager (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010772

Title:
  E: changelog for this version is not (yet) available;

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1010772/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011184] [NEW] package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread JerryMac
Public bug reported:

Errors during package installation, unable to be more specific.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jun 10 10:59:41 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 
(20111011)
SourcePackage: nagios3
Title: package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-31 (9 days ago)

** Affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011184

Title:
  package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1011184/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011184] Re: package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread JerryMac
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011184

Title:
  package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1011184/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011184] Re: package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011184

Title:
  package nagios3-cgi 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1011184/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011206] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread sphunter
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 990759 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990759

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011206

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1011206/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011206] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread sphunter
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 990759 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990759

Public bug reported:

Since upgrde tp ununtu 12.04

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jun  8 21:07:33 2012
DpkgHistoryLog:
 Start-Date: 2012-06-08  21:07:13
 Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.106'
 Install: libhal-storage1:amd64 (0.5.14-8, automatic), usb-imagewriter:amd64 
(0.1.3-0ubuntu5), libhal1:amd64 (0.5.14-8, automatic), hal:amd64 (0.5.14-8, 
automatic), hal-info:amd64 (20091130-1, automatic)
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
SourcePackage: openldap
Title: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-03 (37 days ago)

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011206

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1011206/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011206] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 990759 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990759

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #990759, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 990759
   package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011206

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1011206/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 948156] Re: Please merge PHP 5.4 from Debian

2012-06-10 Thread Daniel Milde
Developers in Archlinux where solving the same problem with Suhosin and
decided to stop using it. https://pierre-schmitz.com/php-5-4-1-in-
suhosin-out/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156

Title:
  Please merge PHP 5.4 from Debian

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/948156/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011227] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread Enzo
Public bug reported:

Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04


apt-cache policy slapd
slapd:
  Installed: 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
  Candidate: 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Jun 10 18:02:57 2012
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012)
SourcePackage: openldap
Title: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-06-10 (0 days ago)

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011227

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1011227/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011227] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-10 Thread Enzo
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011227

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1011227/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-10 Thread Florian Haas
@mdieder, you do realize that qemu+tcp://%s-x/system will only work in
a situation like the one I originally described? I.e. you have to have a
second IP address on that box, which is resolvable as hostname-x from
the other host. Also, that whitespace before your VIR_MIGRATE_TUNNELLED
would likely cause that option to be ignored.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011307] [NEW] dig(1) says that dig queries servers listed in resolv.conf, but this is not always the case

2012-06-10 Thread Thomas Hood
Public bug reported:

Arises from #1010724.

dig(1) says: If no server argument is provided, dig consults
/etc/resolv.conf and queries the name servers listed there.

However, if /etc/resolv.conf contains nameserver 127.0.0.1 and the
command is dig  -6 google.com then, as seen in wireshark, dig
doesn't query 127.0.0.1 but ::1.

** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011307

Title:
  dig(1) says that dig queries servers listed in resolv.conf, but this
  is not always the case

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011307/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 922232] Re: Volumes fail to attach without discovery using tgt

2012-06-10 Thread Vish Ishaya
Do you have iscsi_ip_address set on the volume host? It needs to be an
ip that the compute hosts can hit. When the volume is created this ip is
stored for connection information in the database, so if you don't have
it set, you will probably need to set it, restart nova-volume and
recreate volumes before attaching.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922232

Title:
  Volumes fail to attach without discovery using tgt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/922232/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 181510] Re: freeradius: perl symbol lookup error

2012-06-10 Thread Emmett Keyser
on 12.04 perform

`LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libperl.so.5.14.2 freeradius -X`


on 11.10 perform

`LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libperl.so.5.12.4 freeradius -X`


it's what ever is install in /usr/lib/ for libperl.

This is from the command line. I'm not sure what happens when run from a
startup script.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181510

Title:
  freeradius: perl symbol lookup error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/181510/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-10 Thread Florian Haas
http://review.openstack.org/8383 submitted to the openstack-manuals
repo.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-10 Thread Florian Haas
** Changed in: openstack-manuals
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-10 Thread Thomas Hood
Another idea:

* Change NM such that it causes its slave dnsmasq to listen on ::1
instead of 127.0.0.1

But I guess the problem will just arise again if the standalone dnsmasq
is changed to listen on the wildcard IPv6 address.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006715] [NEW] [MIR] python-pika

2012-06-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Dave Walker (davewalker) has assigned this bug to you for python-pika in Ubuntu:

The new kombu package that was autosynced from Debian now needs python-
pika, which implements the AMQP protocol. It is pure python.

Things to watch out for:
  - Very new (not even in testing yet)
  - Tests pass, but are not run during package build.
  - Does not support Python 3.

So that might require some work to make suitable for main.

** Affects: python-pika (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Ubuntu Server Team (ubuntu-server)
 Status: Incomplete

-- 
[MIR] python-pika
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006715
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-10 Thread Lorin Hochstein
** Changed in: openstack-manuals
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Florian Haas (fghaas)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-10 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
 * Change NM such that it causes its slave dnsmasq to listen on ::1
instead of 127.0.0.1

Personally, when I install dnsmasq, I *don't want* to use the NM-spawned
dnsmasq, because it disables caching etc etc. So it wouldn't matter if
it listened on another address, on a socket or wherever else; I wouldn't
want it as my default resolver.

I still think that the best idea is to make the local resolver a separate 
package that conflicts with all DNS servers, so that it's automatically 
uninstalled when one of them gets installed,
until the problem is solved within libc. There are a lot of methods for 
interprocess communication, I'm sure some of them can solve the problem 
properly. That way all people would benefit, now the solution is only for those 
using Ubuntu+Network manager+resolvconf.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-10 Thread Thomas Hood
Alkis wrote:
 I wouldn't want it as my default resolver.

But some people might.  It's better to eliminate the behavioral
conflict, if we can, than to formalize that conflict as a packaging
dependency.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-06-10 Thread Reggie McMurtrey
Thomas,
I'm not sure if an update has been pushed that has fixed my problem,
but I'm not seeing the issue at the moment,  I was going to work on the
issue earlier this weekend, but some events come up.  I have rebooted
several of my systems and I'm just not seeing the issue right now.  I'll
make sure to follow your directions below if my system gets in this
state again and report back.

--Reggie

On 06/08/2012 04:44 AM, Thomas Hood wrote:
 Reggie: First of all, thanks for providing information about the
 malfunction on your system.  We will get to the bottom of this!

 To get very clear on what's happening I will summarize.  Let me know if
 any of the following is wrong.

 With the following resolv.conf (omitting comments)

 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 search home.lan

 libc resolution of lenin repeatedly fails but lenin.home.lan
 repeatedly succeeds, whereas with

 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 nameserver 192.168.99.2
 search home.lan

 both of them repeatedly succeed.

 Dnsmasq listens at 127.0.0.1, configured with the following.

 server=192.168.99.2
 server=24.177.176.38
 server=97.81.22.195

 Only 192.168.99.2 can resolve the name lenin.home.lan; the others
 cannot.

 Now, what's going on here?

 First I'd like to rule out the possibility of side-effects of #1003842.
 Please eliminate the lines

 server=24.177.176.38
 server=97.81.22.195

 from /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf and run all your tests again.  That is,
 repeatedly (at least twice) try ping lenin and ping lenin.home.lan
 both with only nameserver 127.0.0.1 listed in /etc/resolv.conf, and with
 nameserver 127.0.0.1 and nameserver 192.168.99.2 listed in
 /etc/resolv.conf.  Report the results  back here.

 In the case where you add nameserver 192.168.99.2 to /etc/resolv.conf
 and name resolution subsequently succeeds, is there a noticeable delay?

 After you have edited /etc/resolv.conf, is /etc/resolv.conf still a
 symbolic link to /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf?  That is, did you in fact
 edit /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf as I am assuming you did?

 According to resolv.conf(5) the following environment variables can
 affect the behavior of the resolver: LOCALDOMAIN, RES_OPTIONS.  Is
 either of these set in your environment?  (Run, e.g., the

 env |grep '\(DOMAIN\|RES\)'

 command to check this.)


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011362] [NEW] Groovy crashes at startup on Quantal

2012-06-10 Thread Martin Jackson
Public bug reported:

Attempting to run groovysh results in the following stack trace:

java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.GroovyStarter.rootLoader(GroovyStarter.java:108)
at org.codehaus.groovy.tools.GroovyStarter.main(GroovyStarter.java:130)
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: jline/History : Unsupported 
major.minor version 51.0
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)
at 
java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.RootLoader.oldFindClass(RootLoader.java:152)
at org.codehaus.groovy.tools.RootLoader.loadClass(RootLoader.java:124)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266)
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2444)
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods(Class.java:1808)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass$3$1.run(CachedClass.java:84)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass$3.initValue(CachedClass.java:81)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass$3.initValue(CachedClass.java:79)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.util.LazyReference.getLocked(LazyReference.java:46)
at org.codehaus.groovy.util.LazyReference.get(LazyReference.java:33)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedClass.getMethods(CachedClass.java:250)
at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.populateMethods(MetaClassImpl.java:334)
at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.fillMethodIndex(MetaClassImpl.java:284)
at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.initialize(MetaClassImpl.java:2904)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ClassInfo.getMetaClassUnderLock(ClassInfo.java:166)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.ClassInfo.getMetaClass(ClassInfo.java:182)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.MetaClassRegistryImpl.getMetaClass(MetaClassRegistryImpl.java:227)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerHelper.getMetaClass(InvokerHelper.java:751)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.createCallConstructorSite(CallSiteArray.java:71)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallConstructor(CallSiteArray.java:54)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callConstructor(AbstractCallSite.java:182)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callConstructor(AbstractCallSite.java:190)
at org.codehaus.groovy.tools.shell.Main.main(Main.groovy:125)
... 6 more

Exception in thread Thread-1 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerInvocationException: 
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: jline/Terminal : Unsupported 
major.minor version 51.0
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:97)
at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272)
at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:877)
at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:412)
at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:406)
at groovy.lang.Closure.run(Closure.java:490)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: jline/Terminal : Unsupported 
major.minor version 51.0
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)
at 
java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205)
at 
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.RootLoader.oldFindClass(RootLoader.java:152)
at org.codehaus.groovy.tools.RootLoader.loadClass(RootLoader.java:124)
at 

[Bug 1011362] Re: Groovy crashes at startup on Quantal

2012-06-10 Thread Martin Jackson
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to groovy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011362

Title:
  Groovy crashes at startup on Quantal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groovy/+bug/1011362/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1009974] Re: nova live-migration fails silently

2012-06-10 Thread Tom Fifield
** Changed in: openstack-manuals
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009974

Title:
  nova live-migration fails silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1009974/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011371] [NEW] mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

2012-06-10 Thread Marc Deslauriers
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

5.5.24:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/news-5-5-24.html

Security Fix: Bug #64884 was fixed.

5.1.63:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/news-5-1-63.html
Security Fix: Bug #64884 was fixed.
Security Fix: Bug #59387 was fixed.

5.0.x:
Most likely also affected by #64884, but no longer supported by Oracle, needs a 
backported patch.

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Natty)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Natty)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Quantal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Quantal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Quantal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2122

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371

Title:
  mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

To manage notifications about this bug go 

[Bug 1011371] Re: mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

2012-06-10 Thread Marc Deslauriers
bug #64884 is CVE-2012-2122

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu Quantal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Natty)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011371

Title:
  mysql 5.5.24, 5.1.63, 5.0.x security update tracking bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1011371/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1011307] Re: dig(1) says that dig queries servers listed in resolv.conf, but this is not always the case

2012-06-10 Thread strainu
I consider this as being a decent behavior, as dig does not find any
IPv6 servers in /etc/resolv.conf and it has to use IPv6 only to connect.
Using 127.0.0.1 as nameserver would mean ignoring the -6 option.

If not too difficult, it would make sense not to query any servers and
just throw a more self-explanatory response, but the current behavior is
acceptable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011307

Title:
  dig(1) says that dig queries servers listed in resolv.conf, but this
  is not always the case

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1011307/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

2012-06-10 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
 It's better to eliminate the behavioral conflict, if we can, than to
formalize that conflict as a packaging dependency.

I was about to say this:
But then the main problem which caused me to report this bug would remain:
When I install the dnsmasq package, it wouldn't work.
I'd configure my dnsmasq, then put 127.0.0.1 as the DNS server for my LTSP 
client sessions on the server, and another dnsmasq would answer which wouldn't 
contain my configuration, my A or MX records or whatever else I'd put in my 
configuration file.

...but then I thought of this, which if it worked, I wouldn't have problems:
If nm + resolvconf managed to properly chain the 2 dnsmasq instances,
so that the NM-spawned dnsmasq was contacted first in another address or port 
or IPv6 or whatever,
and then the NM-spawned dnsmasq contacted my real dnsmasq at 127.0.0.1, since 
it's the DNS server I declared at my connection properties,
then it would at least work as expected, with just a small additional overhead. 
I wouldn't mind about that. And it would work with any DNS server too, not with 
just dnsmasq.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet
  network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs