[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-18 Thread Christian Parpart
> Could this be more safely worked-around in openstack?

forgot to comment on this one, well, I am no OpenStack expert, however,
OpenStack nova-network relies on dnsmasq for propagating IP addresses
via DHCP to their (KVM/...) instances, and OpenStack supports simple
networking (w/o VLAN) and VLAN-networking, and thus, I don't see how
OpenStack could work around this except using a different software than
dnsmasq (something that actually works) - or don't use VLAN at all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-18 Thread Christian Parpart
Hey,

sorry, with "most" I meant "the documentation recommends using
VlanManager" (that is, VLAN mode) for networking.

Although, you cannot "rely" on such a behaviour, IMHO, because it
absolutely makes no sense to let hosts (that send a DHCPREQUEST) not
receive their DHCPACK.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 416313] Re: [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for samba (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313

Title:
  [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/416313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 980189] Re: [SRU] Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/bacula

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980189

Title:
  [SRU] Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/980189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 980189] Re: [SRU] Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula

2012-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted bacula into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please help us by testing this new package.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.  If this package fixes the bug for you
please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done.
If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed.  In either case
details of your testing will help us make a better decision.  Further
information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980189

Title:
  [SRU] Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/980189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 986314] Re: squid3 missing pie and bind-now hardening options

2012-06-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: squid3 (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986314

Title:
  squid3 missing pie and bind-now hardening options

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/986314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2012-06-18 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
This seems like an important bug to fix, but I have reservations about
changing dnsmasq's behaviour in a stable update. When you say ‘most
installations don't use this type of networking’, what do you mean by
‘most’, is it plausible that someone has relied on this behaviour, and
if someone had relied on this behaviour how would this change affect
them?

Could this be more safely worked-around in openstack?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898

Title:
  [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 791944] Re: [SRU] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: broken permissions/configuration cause daemons not to start correctly

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3

---
samba (2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3) precise-proposed; urgency=low

  * d/samba.nmbd.upstart: Ignore the return code of testparm in pre-start;
it's used to query the configuration NOT to validate it in this context
which generates alot of bug reports for unrelated configuration issues
(LP: #791944).
 -- James PageFri, 08 Jun 2012 14:31:57 +0100

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791944

Title:
  [SRU] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  broken permissions/configuration cause daemons not to start correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/791944/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-18 Thread Gary Poster
** Description changed:

  We are gathering more data, but it feels like we have enough to start a
  bug report.
  
  On Precise, on a 16 core/32 thread EC2 machine (instance type
  cc2.8xlarge), when starting approximately eight or more Lucid containers
- simultaneously, after the first seven or so connect to dnsmasq within
- just a few seconds, the next group takes just under three minutes to
- connect.  We will provide short steps to duplicate this.
+ simultaneously: after the first seven or so connect to dnsmasq within
+ just a few seconds, the next group waits just under three minutes before
+ they start to connect.
  
- We also have past experience indicating that more grouping occurs,
- because simultaneously starting 32 containers occasionally (about once
- in 15 attempts) will result in one container that still has not
- connected to dnsmasq after ten minutes.  We have not tried to duplicate
- this, because we hope that tackling the smaller issue will also address
- the larger one.
+ This affects our ability to ssh into the containers and do work.
  
- I have not yet had enough disk space on this machine to duplicate this
- without lxc-start-ephemeral.  I intend to do so.
- 
- I have tried with a precise container.  *Precise containers do not
- exhibit this bug* in the experiment I performed, at least up to 16
- containers.  I plan to duplicate this at least a couple more times to
- verify, but I'm comfortable saying initially that I believe this is
- specific to Lucid containers.  I'll report back.
+ We will provide short steps to duplicate this.  Please note also the
+ extra data we include at the end of this report, showing experiments we
+ have run to rule out certain causes and scenarios.
  
  To duplicate (again, I am doing this on a specific EC2 machine with a
  lot of cores, but I believe you can see something similar to this even
  on a 4 core/8 hyperthread machine):
  
  sudo apt-get install moreutils
  sudo lxc-create -t ubuntu -n lucid -- -r lucid -a i386 -b ubuntu
  parallel -j 16 bash -c "lxc-start-ephemeral -d -o lucid" -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
  
  Now look at /var/log/syslog at the most recent dnsmasq entries.  You
- will see about seven containers get DHCPACK from dnsmasq within about 20
- seconds; then you will see a pause of about three minutes; then you will
- see more containers report to dnsmasq.  Here's an excerpt (the
- approximate three minute jump happens between lines 5 and 6):
+ will see that about seven containers get DHCPACK from dnsmasq within
+ about 20 seconds; then you will see a pause of about three minutes; then
+ you will see more containers report to dnsmasq.  Here's an excerpt (the
+ approximate three minute jump happens between lines 5 and 6, and then I
+ include all lines up to the next ACK):
  
  ...
  Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.161 00:16:3e:38:9f:e2 lptests-temp-5uKcEua
- Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.37 00:16:3e:9c:ae:16 
+ Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.37 00:16:3e:9c:ae:16
  Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.37 
00:16:3e:9c:ae:16 lptests-temp-1HxiwbU
- Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.62 00:16:3e:69:83:2b 
+ Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.62 00:16:3e:69:83:2b
  Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.62 
00:16:3e:69:83:2b lptests-temp-6o30rvH
- Jun 18 20:43:05 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 
- Jun 18 20:43:05 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.203 00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 
- Jun 18 20:43:08 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:32:5b:99 
- Jun 18 20:43:08 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.68 00:16:3e:32:5b:99 
- Jun 18 20:43:11 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:7c:21:38 
- Jun 18 20:43:11 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.35 00:16:3e:7c:21:38 
- Jun 18 20:43:14 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:72:0c:64 
- Jun 18 20:43:14 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.208 00:16:3e:72:0c:64 
- Jun 18 20:43:17 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
- Jun 18 20:43:17 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.82 00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
- Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:e3:8f:1a 
- Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.247 00:16:3e:e3:8f:1a 
- Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:5c:99:20 
- Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[

[Bug 1014916] [NEW] simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-18 Thread Gary Poster
Public bug reported:

We are gathering more data, but it feels like we have enough to start a
bug report.

On Precise, on a 16 core/32 thread EC2 machine (instance type
cc2.8xlarge), when starting approximately eight or more Lucid containers
simultaneously, after the first seven or so connect to dnsmasq within
just a few seconds, the next group takes just under three minutes to
connect.  We will provide short steps to duplicate this.

We also have past experience indicating that more grouping occurs,
because simultaneously starting 32 containers occasionally (about once
in 15 attempts) will result in one container that still has not
connected to dnsmasq after ten minutes.  We have not tried to duplicate
this, because we hope that tackling the smaller issue will also address
the larger one.

I have not yet had enough disk space on this machine to duplicate this
without lxc-start-ephemeral.  I intend to do so.

I have tried with a precise container.  *Precise containers do not
exhibit this bug* in the experiment I performed, at least up to 16
containers.  I plan to duplicate this at least a couple more times to
verify, but I'm comfortable saying initially that I believe this is
specific to Lucid containers.  I'll report back.

To duplicate (again, I am doing this on a specific EC2 machine with a
lot of cores, but I believe you can see something similar to this even
on a 4 core/8 hyperthread machine):

sudo apt-get install moreutils
sudo lxc-create -t ubuntu -n lucid -- -r lucid -a i386 -b ubuntu
parallel -j 16 bash -c "lxc-start-ephemeral -d -o lucid" -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Now look at /var/log/syslog at the most recent dnsmasq entries.  You
will see about seven containers get DHCPACK from dnsmasq within about 20
seconds; then you will see a pause of about three minutes; then you will
see more containers report to dnsmasq.  Here's an excerpt (the
approximate three minute jump happens between lines 5 and 6):

...
Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.161 
00:16:3e:38:9f:e2 lptests-temp-5uKcEua
Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.37 00:16:3e:9c:ae:16 
Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.37 
00:16:3e:9c:ae:16 lptests-temp-1HxiwbU
Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.62 00:16:3e:69:83:2b 
Jun 18 20:40:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.62 
00:16:3e:69:83:2b lptests-temp-6o30rvH
Jun 18 20:43:05 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 
Jun 18 20:43:05 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.203 00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 
Jun 18 20:43:08 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:32:5b:99 
Jun 18 20:43:08 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.68 
00:16:3e:32:5b:99 
Jun 18 20:43:11 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:7c:21:38 
Jun 18 20:43:11 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.35 
00:16:3e:7c:21:38 
Jun 18 20:43:14 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:72:0c:64 
Jun 18 20:43:14 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.208 00:16:3e:72:0c:64 
Jun 18 20:43:17 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
Jun 18 20:43:17 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.82 
00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:e3:8f:1a 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.247 00:16:3e:e3:8f:1a 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:5c:99:20 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.225 00:16:3e:5c:99:20 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.123 00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.82 
00:16:3e:ed:b3:a0 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPREQUEST(lxcbr0) 
10.0.3.203 00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 
Jun 18 20:43:20 ip-10-58-49-120 dnsmasq-dhcp[7546]: DHCPACK(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.203 
00:16:3e:0d:7b:65 lptests-temp-C5po26y
...

What I expect to see is all of the containers reporting without a three
minute break, so that all containers are ready for work much sooner.

I looked in the syslogs of the started containers.  The first one to
connect to dnsmasq *after* the three minute pause showed a three minute
pause in its own syslog.  This is an excerpt from the syslog of that
machine (notice the jump between 20:40 to 20:43).  The "udevtrigger
post-stop process" lines and following dhclient startup lines, down
through the "plymouth-splash" line, are not found in the two fast
machine syslogs that I looked at.

Jun 18 20:40:10 lptests

[Bug 829944] Re: stopping freshclam doesn't remove pidfile

2012-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
This was fixed in clamav 0.97.3.

** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829944

Title:
  stopping freshclam doesn't remove pidfile

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/clamav/+bug/829944/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1001725] Re: (could not find var/log/clamav DIR to create file in; did not autocreate directory) package clamav-daemon 0.97.3+dfsg-1ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed

2012-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
No.  That's not the correct diagnosis.  You're right it's not created in
the postinst.  It's shipped directly in the clamav-base package.  I
think it's /var/log/clamav/clamav.log itself that's missing.  I don't
know how that can happen, however.

** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001725

Title:
  (could not find var/log/clamav DIR to create file in; did not
  autocreate directory) package clamav-daemon 0.97.3+dfsg-
  1ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-
  installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1001725/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014044] Re: PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

2012-06-18 Thread ks07
The missing errors are specifically php centric (e.g. PHP Fatal error:
Call to undefined function). Nginx's standard HTTP errors are logged as
normal (such as 404 not found).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044

Title:
  PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/php/+bug/1014044/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines

2012-06-18 Thread Asif
same problem in 12.04. unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK worked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786

Title:
  ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian
  machines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/seahorse/+bug/201786/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996692] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Marcin Matras
A few minutes ago I tried to update my Ubuntu via Update Manager but I got this 
error (translated by myself):

Dependencies for the following packages were not met:

samba: Depends: samba-common (= 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 .1) but 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 .2 
installed
    Depends: libwbclient0 (= 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 .1) but 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 .2 
installed
    Depends: upstart-job is a virtual package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996692

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/996692/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-lxc] Lxc work for Q

2012-06-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Blueprint changed by Serge Hallyn:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain 
the right list for each release: DONE
  [cooloney] check that all new cgroups are enabled in quantal kernel: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] pre-mount cgroups during container startup: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] send attach patch sets to kernel-team ASAP: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] convert lxc-apparmor patchset to generic lsm set: DONE
- [serge-hallyn] send generic lsm patchset upstream: TODO
+ [serge-hallyn] add smack and/or selinux support to lsm set: TODO
  [kees] package libsecomp to aid bpf creation 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libseccomp/: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] exploit libseccomp in lxc-start: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] come up with default secomp containers profile: BLOCKED
  [apw] expect SECCOMP to drop in v3.5 replacing our patches: TODO
  [ebiederm] fix lxc-attach upstream to use the new setns syntax: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] write a patch for lxc to use user namespaces: TODO
  [ebiederm] patch adduser: TODO
  [ebiederm] get user namespaces upstream: INPROGRESS
  [ebiederm] get setns(mnt) upstream: DONE
  [ebiederm] get setns(pid) upstream: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] extend lxc-attach to support attaching only to specific 
namespaces (done by community): DONE
  [stgraber] add the lxc-nesting apparmor profile to the package in quantal: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] send usernamespace patchset ASAP to kernel team (link to git 
repo for review): DONE
  [stgraber] write the hookpoints and send to the lxc-devel list for review: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] Post POC patchset implementing hookpoints to lxc-devel: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] implement configuration file #includes (stretch goal): TODO
  [serge-hallyn] example for encrypted root in the example guide (blocked 
awaiting hooks): BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] investigate post commit hook to email out changes: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] document mounts sharing through /shared using hooks: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] apport hook for lxc bugs: DONE
  [stgraber] where do crashes in the container go: TODO
  [james-page] hook testing up to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] convert the test suite to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] fedora 16 and 17 and open-suse templates need to be made to 
work (stretch goal): TODO
  [stgraber] make an liblxc API definition and publicise (+ serge-hallyn): 
INPROGRESS
  [stgraber] Create python module using the API: INPROGRESS

-- 
Lxc work for Q
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-lxc

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996692] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Marcin Matras
Please find attached files with results of suggested commands.

** Attachment added: "output of: sudo tesparm && echo $?"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/996692/+attachment/3195157/+files/testparm.txt

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996692

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/996692/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007657] Re: proposed origin does not work with local provider

2012-06-18 Thread Clint Byrum
r542 has been uploaded to Debian unstable. Just awaiting sync.

** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007657

Title:
  proposed origin does not work with local provider

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1007657/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-lxc] Lxc work for Q

2012-06-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Blueprint changed by Serge Hallyn:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain 
the right list for each release: DONE
  [cooloney] check that all new cgroups are enabled in quantal kernel: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] pre-mount cgroups during container startup: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] send attach patch sets to kernel-team ASAP: DONE
- [serge-hallyn] convert lxc-apparmor patchset to generic lsm set: INPROGRESS
+ [serge-hallyn] convert lxc-apparmor patchset to generic lsm set: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] send generic lsm patchset upstream: TODO
  [kees] package libsecomp to aid bpf creation 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libseccomp/: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] exploit libseccomp in lxc-start: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] come up with default secomp containers profile: BLOCKED
  [apw] expect SECCOMP to drop in v3.5 replacing our patches: TODO
  [ebiederm] fix lxc-attach upstream to use the new setns syntax: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] write a patch for lxc to use user namespaces: TODO
  [ebiederm] patch adduser: TODO
  [ebiederm] get user namespaces upstream: INPROGRESS
  [ebiederm] get setns(mnt) upstream: DONE
  [ebiederm] get setns(pid) upstream: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] extend lxc-attach to support attaching only to specific 
namespaces (done by community): DONE
  [stgraber] add the lxc-nesting apparmor profile to the package in quantal: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] send usernamespace patchset ASAP to kernel team (link to git 
repo for review): DONE
  [stgraber] write the hookpoints and send to the lxc-devel list for review: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] Post POC patchset implementing hookpoints to lxc-devel: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] implement configuration file #includes (stretch goal): TODO
  [serge-hallyn] example for encrypted root in the example guide (blocked 
awaiting hooks): BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] investigate post commit hook to email out changes: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] document mounts sharing through /shared using hooks: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] apport hook for lxc bugs: DONE
  [stgraber] where do crashes in the container go: TODO
  [james-page] hook testing up to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] convert the test suite to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] fedora 16 and 17 and open-suse templates need to be made to 
work (stretch goal): TODO
  [stgraber] make an liblxc API definition and publicise (+ serge-hallyn): 
INPROGRESS
  [stgraber] Create python module using the API: INPROGRESS

-- 
Lxc work for Q
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-lxc

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

2012-06-18 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/06/12 21:08, Thomas Hood wrote:
> @Simon: This is pretty much what I had in mind (comment #88) as a long-
> term solution.  How difficult do you think that this would be?

Don't know. I'm working on it now: seems to be behaving:

dnsmasq: new IPv4: 192.168.3.1
dnsmasq: new IPv6: fe80::f0f6:48ff:fe15:70b0

>
> (Moving nm-dnsmasq listening to another port than 53 is at best a veeery
> long-term solution since it requires first getting glibc enhanced, then
> getting all other resolver libraries enhanced, then waiting for third-
> party static binaries to be replaced by new versions built against
> enhanced libraries.  That's a ten-year project.)
>
> If "bind-interfaces-dynamically" works well then I see no reason why it
> shouldn't be the default mode of operation.  Indeed, I see no reason why
> it shouldn't be the *only* mode on OSs with support for it.
I see reasons: I've been burned by releasing changes that "won;t affect 
anything" too many times, I like the idea of making the new behaviour 
opt-in.

Simon.

>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

2012-06-18 Thread Thomas Hood
@Simon: This is pretty much what I had in mind (comment #88) as a long-
term solution.  How difficult do you think that this would be?

(Moving nm-dnsmasq listening to another port than 53 is at best a veeery
long-term solution since it requires first getting glibc enhanced, then
getting all other resolver libraries enhanced, then waiting for third-
party static binaries to be replaced by new versions built against
enhanced libraries.  That's a ten-year project.)

If "bind-interfaces-dynamically" works well then I see no reason why it
shouldn't be the default mode of operation.  Indeed, I see no reason why
it shouldn't be the *only* mode on OSs with support for it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

2012-06-18 Thread Thomas Hood
Relevant to my question above:
>   What would be the best way to implement this, Simon?

is what Simon wrote in #928524 comment #12:
--- BEGIN QUOTATION ---
I'm wondering about adding a _third_ mode, which is has a desirable
mixture of the properties of the current two (--bind-interfaces and NOT
--bind-interfaces). Essentially, dnsmasq would bind the addresses of
individual interfaces rather than the wildcard address, making it less
of a bully for other dnsmasq instances or DNS servers, but it would use
netlink to track the creation of new interfaces or the addition of new
addresses to existing interfaces, and automatically bind them as
required. This mode is inherently Linux-specific, since it needs netlink
to work.

You could either just use it as the default, or as a less problematic
alternative to --bind-interfaces to be dropped into the system dnsmasq
by networkmanager.
--- END QUOTATION ---

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037

Title:
  NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 928524] Re: lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

2012-06-18 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/06/12 18:11, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Hi Stéphane,
>
> Changing the default of dnsmasq to bind-interfaces wouldn't have been a
> very good solution because some people run dnsmasq without installing
> those other packages and rely upon the "unbound" mode.  The implemented
> solution is  better because the cases of dnsmasq being forced into bind-
> interfaces mode will be fewer. I guess the only risk of breakage is in
> cases like the following. Someone is using dnsmasq and requires unbound
> mode, has installed lxc but disabled it. She upgrades (getting a new lxc
> in the process) and finds that dnsmasq no longer works as expected. I'm
> certainly not saying that this is a showstopper, just that risk of
> malheur isn't nonexistent.
>

I'm wondering about adding a _third_ mode, which is has a desirable 
mixture of the properties of the current two (--bind-interfaces and NOT 
--bind-interfaces). Essentially, dnsmasq would bind the addresses of 
individual interfaces rather than the wildcard address, making it less 
of a bully for other dnsmasq instances or DNS servers, but it would use 
netlink to track the creation of new interfaces or the addition  of new 
addresses to existing interfaces, and automatically bind them as 
required. This mode is inherently Linux-specific, since it needs netlink 
to work.

You could either just use it as the default, or as a less problematic 
alternative to --bind-interfaces to be dropped into the system dnsmasq 
by networkmanager.


Simon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928524

Title:
  lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/928524/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007657] Re: proposed origin does not work with local provider

2012-06-18 Thread Clint Byrum
Whoops, r542 has the actual fix.

** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007657

Title:
  proposed origin does not work with local provider

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1007657/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 989241] Re: Give nova group read permissions nova files / directories

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom-
proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989241

Title:
  Give nova group read permissions nova files / directories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989241/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 989242] Re: Add adm group to /var/log/nova

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom-
proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989242

Title:
  Add adm group to /var/log/nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989242/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014773] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 5

2012-06-18 Thread Vikram Vijayant Rana
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014773

Title:
  package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1014773/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014773] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 5

2012-06-18 Thread Vikram Vijayant Rana
Public bug reported:

I was installing Wine By ubuntu software center. but at last massage
flash that . software not sucessfully installed.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-15.60-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-15-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jun 18 23:16:44 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 5
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1)
NmbdLog:
 
SambaServerRegression: No
SmbConfIncluded: Yes
SmbLog:
 
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 5
UbuntuFailedConnect: Yes
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2012-05-01 (48 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014773

Title:
  package winbind 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1014773/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 947617] Re: After update, lxc does not start

2012-06-18 Thread Alan Boudreault
@Serge, thanks a lot it worked!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947617

Title:
  After update, lxc does not start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/947617/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 928524] Re: lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

2012-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
Indeed, that's the only scenario that'd be a problem, but to workaround
that issue, I added a mention of /etc/dnsmasq.d/ in /etc/default/lxc
which is where you'd disable lxc's own dnsmasq.

So in theory anyone disabling LXC's own dnsmasq daemon will see the note
that they should also update dnsmasq.d

It'd certainly have been better to get that change done pre-release but
considering the number of people hitting it, I still think it's worth
the risk as an SRU.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928524

Title:
  lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/928524/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007657] Re: proposed origin does not work with local provider

2012-06-18 Thread Clint Byrum
** Description changed:

+ [Test Case]
+ 1. install juju from precise-proposed
+ 2. create a local environment in ~/.juju/environments.yaml, with juju-origin: 
proposed
+ 3. juju bootstrap -e local-env-name
+ 4. juju deploy -e local-env-name wordpress
+- broken version will fail during the master customize step because of 
invalid origin
+- fixed will succeed and produce a container with proposed enabled.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ This code is only used in conjunction with setting alternative origins in the 
local provider, so the others (distro, ppa, and a bzr branch) should be tested.
+ 
+ ---
+ 
  The recent changed to add 'juju-origin: proposed' works fine for ec2,
  but with the local provider there is a syntax error in the 'juju-create'
  script:
  
- 
-  elif [ $JUJU_ORIGIN = "proposed"]; then
+  elif [ $JUJU_ORIGIN = "proposed"]; then
  
  Shell silently skips this and the origin is rejected as invalid. There
  should be a space between " and ]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007657

Title:
  proposed origin does not work with local provider

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1007657/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 947617] Re: After update, lxc does not start

2012-06-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
@Alan,

your container is not allowed to mount /proc because of the apparmor
profile.  The easiest way around this is to disable apparmor for that
container, by edigint /var/lib/lxc/(containername)/config and
uncommenting the line:

#lxc.aa_profile = unconfined

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947617

Title:
  After update, lxc does not start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/947617/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 879560] Re: Logrotate conf file for mysql-server and my.cnf disagree

2012-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mysql-5.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879560

Title:
  Logrotate conf file for mysql-server and my.cnf disagree

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/879560/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 928524] Re: lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

2012-06-18 Thread Thomas Hood
Hi Stéphane,

Changing the default of dnsmasq to bind-interfaces wouldn't have been a
very good solution because some people run dnsmasq without installing
those other packages and rely upon the "unbound" mode.  The implemented
solution is  better because the cases of dnsmasq being forced into bind-
interfaces mode will be fewer. I guess the only risk of breakage is in
cases like the following. Someone is using dnsmasq and requires unbound
mode, has installed lxc but disabled it. She upgrades (getting a new lxc
in the process) and finds that dnsmasq no longer works as expected. I'm
certainly not saying that this is a showstopper, just that risk of
malheur isn't nonexistent.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928524

Title:
  lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/928524/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 879560] Re: Logrotate conf file for mysql-server and my.cnf disagree

2012-06-18 Thread Clint Byrum
Nathan, you must have a modified /etc/mysql/my.cnf then. log_error is
not set in any of the 5.5 packages for precise or quantal, so there
should actually be no error log being written. I have a fix committed to
the packaging branch for that (bug #1014732) .. and this log rotate will
also be fixed.

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879560

Title:
  Logrotate conf file for mysql-server and my.cnf disagree

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/879560/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 962189] Re: dkms module is not automatically rebuild when installing new linux-image package

2012-06-18 Thread Kirill Kabardin
Ben, thank you for help. I just really didn't know where I should send
this. I glad I could help a little.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962189

Title:
  dkms module is not automatically rebuild when installing new linux-
  image package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/962189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-kvm] Kvm work for Q

2012-06-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Blueprint changed by Serge Hallyn:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [smoser] jump for joy: DONE
  [rbasak] follow up on console log size limit implementation (ringbuffer): TODO
  [stefan-bader-canonical] confirm the xen and qemu prom naming is correct 
after the debian merge back (look ok): DONE
  [serge-hallyn] follow up on spice upstream (stretch goal): POSTPONED
- [serge-hallyn] sync qemu-kvm from debian: INPROGRESS
+ [serge-hallyn] merge qemu-kvm from debian: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] push any appropriate qemu-kvm delta back to debian: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] sync seabios from debian: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] sync ipxe from upstream: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] verify or find solution for bug 921230: DONE

-- 
Kvm work for Q
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-kvm

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014044] Re: PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

2012-06-18 Thread Thomas Ward
** Tags added: precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044

Title:
  PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/php/+bug/1014044/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014044] Re: PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

2012-06-18 Thread Thomas Ward
Can you do me a favor and define what errors you're talking about?  Are
you talking specifically about php-level errors, and not HTTP status
code errors (403, 404, 500, 502, etc.)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044

Title:
  PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/php/+bug/1014044/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 962189] Re: dkms module is not automatically rebuild when installing new linux-image package

2012-06-18 Thread Ben Pfaff
> It seems I found a fix for this.

Thanks, I sent out a patch to ovs-dev:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-June/018075.html

With luck, it will be committed to the OVS repository today and then go
into Debian in a day or two.

Thank you very much!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962189

Title:
  dkms module is not automatically rebuild when installing new linux-
  image package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/962189/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014698] Re: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-06-18 Thread Angel Abad
** Changed in: squid3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014698

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1014698/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 947617] Re: After update, lxc does not start

2012-06-18 Thread Alan Boudreault
Not sure if my issue is related to this. I migrate a container to a new 
machine. I have been able to start it... but inside it, I can't use pbuilder, 
which is used to create multiple environments to build debian packages. Getting 
this message:
aboudreault@packages:~$ pbuilder-dist precise amd64 login
I: Building the build Environment
I: extracting base tarball [/mnt/pbuilder-dist/precise-amd64-base.tgz]
I: creating local configuration
I: copying local configuration
I: Installing apt-lines
I: mounting /proc filesystem
mount: block device /proc is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: cannot mount block device /proc read-only


Tried the workaround with no luck.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947617

Title:
  After update, lxc does not start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/947617/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014695] Re: need some mechanism to support /boot/grub/menu.lst and pv-grub

2012-06-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: grub (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014695

Title:
  need some mechanism to support /boot/grub/menu.lst and pv-grub

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1014695/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010602] Re: samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: logwatch via
   http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3536008
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010602

Title:
  samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/logwatch/+bug/1010602/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Natty)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Lucid)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Oneiric)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Precise)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Oneiric)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Precise)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Quantal)

** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu Lucid)

** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu Natty)

** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu Oneiric)

** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu Precise)

** No longer affects: rsync (Ubuntu Quantal)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Quantal)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Lucid)

** No longer affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Natty)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** No longer affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Quantal)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Lucid)

** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Natty)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Oneiric)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Natty)

** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Oneiric)

** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Precise)

** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Quantal)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04.1

** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Natty)

** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Oneiric)

** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise)

** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Quantal)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Lucid)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu Quantal)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.1 => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** No longer affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Lucid)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lsb (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lsb (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Natty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lsb (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: lsb (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: lsb (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Medium
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: openbsd-inetd (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: openvpn (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683640] Re: status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683640

Title:
  status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/683640/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010602] Re: samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

2012-06-18 Thread Jacob Smith
Just for the record and if anyone wants to check on it.

Upstream bug submitted:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3536008&group_id=312875&atid=1316824#

** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3536008
   http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3536008

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010602

Title:
  samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1010602/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010625] Re: named logs are not being reported in logwatch

2012-06-18 Thread Jacob Smith
I will look into it this week and respond accordingly

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010625

Title:
  named logs are not being reported in logwatch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1010625/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

2012-06-18 Thread Adam Stokes
Michael,

You could alter your previous query to resemble something like the
following:

zef@lucid:/tmp$ snmpget -v1 -c  stokescanonical localhost 
'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendResult."top_lists"'
NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendResult."top_lists" = INTEGER: 9

Thanks,
Adam

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922

Title:
  Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014698] Re: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-06-18 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014698

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1014698/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 967931] Re: [SRU] killfilter should handle updated/deleted executables

2012-06-18 Thread Chuck Short
Updated ** Test Case **

Run the following tests

./run_tests nova.tests.test_nova_rootwrap

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967931

Title:
  [SRU] killfilter should handle updated/deleted executables

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/967931/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014695] Re: need some mechanism to support /boot/grub/menu.lst and pv-grub

2012-06-18 Thread Scott Moser
Long term, this would be a better path as the maintenance of menu.lst
does not really make sense in cloud-init, and debian has packaged cloud-
init without the grub-legacy-ec2 code.

Also, note in debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672104 the discussion there.


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #672104
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672104

** Also affects: grub (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672104
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014695

Title:
  need some mechanism to support /boot/grub/menu.lst and pv-grub

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1014695/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014698] Re: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-06-18 Thread nidhinps
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014698

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1014698/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014698] [NEW] package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-06-18 Thread nidhinps
Public bug reported:

 Errors were encountered while processing:
 squid3
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
AptOrdering:
 squid3: Install
 squid: Install
 squid3: Configure
 squid: Configure
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jun 18 20:13:48 2012
DuplicateSignature:
 Setting up squid3 (3.1.19-1ubuntu3) ...
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/squid3.postinst: 1: /var/lib/dpkg/info/squid3.postinst: 
cannot open /etc/squid3/squid.conf: No such file
 dpkg: error processing squid3 (--configure):
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423)
SourcePackage: squid3
Title: package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.squid3.errorpage.css: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.squid3.msntauth.conf: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.squid3.squid.conf: [deleted]

** Affects: squid3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014698

Title:
  package squid3 3.1.19-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1014698/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1007657] Re: proposed origin does not work with local provider

2012-06-18 Thread Clint Byrum
r541 released to Quantal, marking Fix Released

** Changed in: juju (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007657

Title:
  proposed origin does not work with local provider

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1007657/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 791944] Re: [SRU] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: broken permissions/configuration cause daemons not to start correctly

2012-06-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The error is indeed fixed with the proposed version, setting as
verification-done.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791944

Title:
  [SRU] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  broken permissions/configuration cause daemons not to start correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/791944/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014673] Re: package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server, p

2012-06-18 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014673

Title:
  package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server, php5 and
  phpmyadmin. PHP didn't work so I tried installing apache2-mod-php5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1014673/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014673] Re: package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server, p

2012-06-18 Thread smacintyre
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014673

Title:
  package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server, php5 and
  phpmyadmin. PHP didn't work so I tried installing apache2-mod-php5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1014673/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014673] [NEW] package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server,

2012-06-18 Thread smacintyre
Public bug reported:

I installed Apache2 then mysql-server then php5 and phpmyadmin.
Localhost shows apache installed, but php is not functioning. I then
tried installing apache2-mod-php5 and install failed.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
AptOrdering:
 libapache2-mod-php5: Install
 libapache2-mod-php5: Configure
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 18 10:11:47 2012
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Unpacking libapache2-mod-php5 (from 
.../libapache2-mod-php5_5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1_amd64.deb) ...
 Setting up libapache2-mod-php5 (5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1) ...
 Error: The new file /usr/share/php5/php.ini-production does not exist!
 dpkg: error processing libapache2-mod-php5 (--configure):
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
DuplicateSignature:
 Setting up libapache2-mod-php5 (5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1) ...
 Error: The new file /usr/share/php5/php.ini-production does not exist!
 dpkg: error processing libapache2-mod-php5 (--configure):
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
SourcePackage: php5
Title: package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-06-16 (2 days ago)

** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014673

Title:
  package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1 Installed Apache2, mysql-server, php5 and
  phpmyadmin. PHP didn't work so I tried installing apache2-mod-php5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1014673/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010602] Re: samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
Jacob,

You've got the steps right.

The latest development version of Ubuntu (currently Quantal) must be
fixed before considering an SRU.

But how the development version is fixed is a little subjective. There
isn't a specific rule; just the goal of minimising present and future
work. The least ideal situation is for Ubuntu to be carrying a patch
that neither upstream nor Debian carries. This is possible, but we want
to keep the Ubuntu delta small to make future merges easier so we try
and avoid it. And sometimes upstream or Debian fixes a problem
differently, which causes additional work for us when we switch from our
fix to their fix to minimise our delta.

Ideally, upstream will fix it, Debian will pick up the fix and we will
merge it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010602

Title:
  samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1010602/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-lxc] Lxc work for Q

2012-06-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Blueprint changed by Serge Hallyn:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain 
the right list for each release: DONE
  [cooloney] check that all new cgroups are enabled in quantal kernel: TODO
- [serge-hallyn] pre-mount cgroups during container startup: TODO
+ [serge-hallyn] pre-mount cgroups during container startup: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] send attach patch sets to kernel-team ASAP: DONE
- [serge-hallyn] convert lxc-apparmor patchset to generic lsm set: TODO
+ [serge-hallyn] convert lxc-apparmor patchset to generic lsm set: INPROGRESS
  [serge-hallyn] send generic lsm patchset upstream: TODO
  [kees] package libsecomp to aid bpf creation 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libseccomp/: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] exploit libseccomp in lxc-start: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] come up with default secomp containers profile: BLOCKED
  [apw] expect SECCOMP to drop in v3.5 replacing our patches: TODO
  [ebiederm] fix lxc-attach upstream to use the new setns syntax: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] write a patch for lxc to use user namespaces: TODO
  [ebiederm] patch adduser: TODO
  [ebiederm] get user namespaces upstream: INPROGRESS
  [ebiederm] get setns(mnt) upstream: DONE
  [ebiederm] get setns(pid) upstream: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] extend lxc-attach to support attaching only to specific 
namespaces (done by community): DONE
  [stgraber] add the lxc-nesting apparmor profile to the package in quantal: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] send usernamespace patchset ASAP to kernel team (link to git 
repo for review): DONE
  [stgraber] write the hookpoints and send to the lxc-devel list for review: 
DONE
  [serge-hallyn] Post POC patchset implementing hookpoints to lxc-devel: DONE
  [serge-hallyn] implement configuration file #includes (stretch goal): TODO
  [serge-hallyn] example for encrypted root in the example guide (blocked 
awaiting hooks): BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] investigate post commit hook to email out changes: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] document mounts sharing through /shared using hooks: BLOCKED
  [serge-hallyn] apport hook for lxc bugs: DONE
  [stgraber] where do crashes in the container go: TODO
  [james-page] hook testing up to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] convert the test suite to jenkins: TODO
  [serge-hallyn] fedora 16 and 17 and open-suse templates need to be made to 
work (stretch goal): TODO
  [stgraber] make an liblxc API definition and publicise (+ serge-hallyn): 
INPROGRESS
  [stgraber] Create python module using the API: INPROGRESS

-- 
Lxc work for Q
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-lxc

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
s/lxc/libvirt-bin/ (copy/pasted the reply from an identical comment in
bug 928524)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

2012-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
That's correct, though currently when installing dnsmasq with lxc, it
has a 50% chance of not starting at all (the other 50% being lxc not
starting at all).

My initial idea was to set bind-interfaces by default in dnsmasq and SRU
that as it's default behaviour is breaking many setups and is extremely
annoying.

Although I can see some people complaining about bind-interfaces, it's
going to improve reliability for currently broken setups and not affect
non-broken setups (as we're pushing this change as part of the lxc
package, not dnsmasq).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060

Title:
  packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 928524] Re: lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

2012-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
That's correct, though currently when installing dnsmasq with lxc, it
has a 50% chance of not starting at all (the other 50% being lxc not
starting at all).

My initial idea was to set bind-interfaces by default in dnsmasq and SRU
that as it's default behaviour is breaking many setups and is extremely
annoying.

Although I can see some people complaining about bind-interfaces, it's
going to improve reliability for currently broken setups and not affect
non-broken setups (as we're pushing this change as part of the lxc
package, not dnsmasq).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928524

Title:
  lxcbr0 fails to come up when dnsmasq is installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/928524/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1010602] Re: samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

2012-06-18 Thread Jacob Smith
I will give it a whirl... not sure the exact (best) steps but I assume:

Submit a bug against Logwatch at SourceForge.net
Follow/answer questions there as needed.

If it gets patched then would I need to try to get Debian to pickup the
patch before Ubuntu would consider an SRU to 12.04?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010602

Title:
  samba logs are not being reported in logwatch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1010602/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
Heimdal MIR was bug 800853

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82853

Title:
  Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/82853/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 82853] Re: Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
So it appears that:

Ubuntu is up to date against the corresponding Debian package, and the
12.04 release is also reasonably close.

The smbk5pwd overlay is specifically disabled in the Ubuntu build. This
is from the changelog:

+ Don't build smbk5pwd overlay since it uses heimdal instead of krb5:
- debian/control:
  - remove build-dependency on heimdal-dev.
  - remove slapd-smbk5pwd binary package.
- debian/rules: don't build smbk5pwd slapd module.

In the past (natty and earlier), heimdal was not in main and openldap
was, so this would have required this. I'm not sure what the reason is
now, since heimdal-dev is in main since oneiric.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82853

Title:
  Add support for the smbk5pwd overlay

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/82853/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014389] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Oddgeir Kvien
getent passwd root
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash

 getent group adm

(No reply)

getent group admin
admin:x:4:oddgeir

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014389

Title:
  package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1014389/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 977458] Re: Version skew with glance in Precise

2012-06-18 Thread Chuck Short
This has been fixed in precise

** Changed in: swift (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to swift in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977458

Title:
  Version skew  with glance in Precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swift/+bug/977458/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 978033] Re: FFE for swift 1.4.8

2012-06-18 Thread Chuck Short
This has been fixed in precise

** Changed in: swift (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to swift in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978033

Title:
  FFE for swift 1.4.8

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swift/+bug/978033/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014389] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry, that should be:

getent passwd root
getent group adm

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014389

Title:
  package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1014389/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014565] Re: Sync nagios3 3.4.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-06-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Sponsor ack, synced.

** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014565

Title:
  Sync nagios3 3.4.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1014565/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013719] Re: package php5-cgi 5.3.5-1ubuntu7.8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
>From log:

Setting up php5-cli (5.3.5-1ubuntu7.8) ...
dpkg: error processing php5-cli (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Setting up php5-cgi (5.3.5-1ubuntu7.8) ...
dpkg: error processing php5-cgi (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013719

Title:
  package php5-cgi 5.3.5-1ubuntu7.8 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1013719/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013724] Re: Setting "prio const" in multipath.conf has no effect

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013724

Title:
  Setting "prio const" in multipath.conf has no effect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1013724/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988819] Re: [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries

2012-06-18 Thread James Page
The specific issue this fix resolves tested OK - but as Clint states
this probably needs more thorough testing before acceptance into
-updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988819

Title:
  [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch
  enabled libraries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/988819/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988819] Re: [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries

2012-06-18 Thread James Page
sudo apt-get install apache2 libapache2-modsecurity
[]
Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.22-1ubuntu1.1) ...
Enabling site default.
Enabling module alias.
Enabling module autoindex.
Enabling module dir.
Enabling module env.
Enabling module mime.
Enabling module negotiation.
Enabling module setenvif.
Enabling module status.
Enabling module auth_basic.
Enabling module deflate.
Enabling module authz_default.
Enabling module authz_user.
Enabling module authz_groupfile.
Enabling module authn_file.
Enabling module authz_host.
Enabling module reqtimeout.
Setting up apache2-mpm-worker (2.2.22-1ubuntu1.1) ...
 * Starting web server apache2  
  [ OK ] 
Setting up apache2 (2.2.22-1ubuntu1.1) ...
Setting up libapache2-modsecurity (2.6.3-1ubuntu0.1) ...
 * Restarting web server apache2
  ... waiting . 

   [ OK ]
Setting up ssl-cert (1.0.28ubuntu0.1) ...
Setting up modsecurity-crs (2.2.0-1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place

/var/log/apache2# cat error.log 
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:42 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) configured -- 
resuming normal operations
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:43 2012] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:45 2012] [notice] ModSecurity for Apache/2.6.3 
(http://www.modsecurity.org/) configured.
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:45 2012] [notice] ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.4.6"; 
loaded version="1.4.6"
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:45 2012] [notice] ModSecurity: PCRE compiled version="8.12"; 
loaded version="8.12 2011-01-15"
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:45 2012] [notice] ModSecurity: LUA compiled version="Lua 5.1"
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:45 2012] [notice] ModSecurity: LIBXML compiled version="2.7.8"
[Mon Jun 18 12:15:46 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) configured -- 
resuming normal operations

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988819

Title:
  [SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch
  enabled libraries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/988819/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014044] Re: PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #61045
   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61045

** Also affects: php via
   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61045
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014044

Title:
  PHP5-FPM not reporting errors to web server (nginx)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/php/+bug/1014044/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014088] Re: package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

This looks like a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in
Ubuntu. As such, I'm marking this bug as Invalid.

Specifically, you have incorrect permissions on /etc/bind/named.conf,
causing the bind9 postinst to fail.

You can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community

If you believe that this is really a bug, then you may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful
if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem,
and then change the bug status back to New.

Thanks!

** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014088

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1014088/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014360] Re: package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

This looks like a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in
Ubuntu. As such, I'm marking this bug as Invalid.

Specifically, your system hostname is set incorrectly, thus making the
postfix postinst script fail.

You can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community

If you believe that this is really a bug, then you may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful
if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem,
and then change the bug status back to New.

Thanks!

** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014360

Title:
  package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1014360/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014088] Re: package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
>From log:

un 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: starting BIND 9.7.3 -u bind -t 
/var/lib/named
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: built with '--prefix=/usr' 
'--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' 
'--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads' '--enable-largefile' '--with-libtool' 
'--enable-shared' '--enable-static' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-gssapi=/usr' 
'--with-gnu-ld' '--with-dlz-postgres=no' '--with-dlz-mysql=no' 
'--with-dlz-bdb=yes' '--with-dlz-filesystem=yes' '--with-dlz-ldap=yes' 
'--with-dlz-stub=yes' '--with-geoip=/usr' '--enable-ipv6' 
'CFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing -DDIG_SIGCHASE -O2' 
'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' 'CPPFLAGS='
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: adjusted limit on open files from 4096 
to 1048576
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: found 2 CPUs, using 2 worker threads
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: using up to 4096 sockets
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: loading configuration from 
'/etc/bind/named.conf'
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: none:0: open: /etc/bind/named.conf: 
permission denied
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: loading configuration: permission denied
Jun 16 20:36:47 cybercity named[1736]: exiting (due to fatal error)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014088

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1014088/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014360] Re: package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
>From log:

Setting up postfix (2.9.1-5) ...

Postfix configuration was not changed.  If you need to make changes, edit
/etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed.  To view Postfix configuration
values, see postconf(1).

After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'.

Running newaliases
newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 40(decimal): 
ubunturocks.(null)
newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter myhostname: bad 
parameter value: ubunturocks.(null)
dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014360

Title:
  package postfix 2.9.1-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1014360/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014389] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-18 Thread Robie Basak
>From log:

Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.22-1ubuntu1) ...
Enabling site default.
chown: invalid group: `root:adm'
dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014389

Title:
  package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1014389/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


  1   2   >