[Bug 1528069] [NEW] corosync usage of start-stop-daemon prevents it from running when the corosync is also running in lxc
Public bug reported: package: Version: 2.3.3-1ubuntu1 Ubuntu release: 14.04 The current package does not use upstart (even though upstream has an upstart corosync.conf and I suspect the bug would not reproduce) and has the sysv init service file like so: start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec $DAEMON --test > /dev/null \ || return 1 start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_ARGS \ || return 2 # Add code here, if necessary, that waits for the process to be ready # to handle requests from services started subsequently which depend # on this one. As a last resort, sleep for some time. pidof corosync > $PIDFILE As you can see above, the check it performs to see if it is running is whether there is a process instance of $DAEMON. If the lxc OS is also ubuntu and also running corosync, obviously it will be detected as well and thus, the service will not start. The second problem is that naive pidof will create a $PIDFILE that includes all the corosync processes in all the lxc containers as well. I recommend checking the pidfile in start-stop-daemon like so: start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON \ --test > /dev/null || return 1 start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON \ -- $DAEMON_ARGS || return 2 As for storing the pid, since corosync forks, we can't possibly use the --make-pidfile directive of start-stop-daemon. Something like the following could be used: cgroup_path() { cat "/proc/$1/cgroup" | head -1 | cut -f3 -d: } local pids own_path proc_path pids="" own_path=$(cgroup_path $$) for i in $(pgrep corosync); do proc_path=$(cgroup_path "$i") if [ "$own_path" = "$proc_path" ]; then # Only keep the last one. If there is more than one, the former # would be the parent that exits pids="$i" fi done echo "${pids}" > $PIDFILE The present bug is specially damning in juju deployments if you have a lot of services in a node in lxc and one outside. Note that there was a similar report for debian[1] for the snmpd package. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=31;bug=718702 ** Affects: corosync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to corosync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528069 Title: corosync usage of start-stop-daemon prevents it from running when the corosync is also running in lxc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1528069/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1447404] Re: nginx fails to detect end of a seemingly valid fastcgi session
** Changed in: nginx Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nginx in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447404 Title: nginx fails to detect end of a seemingly valid fastcgi session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nginx/+bug/1447404/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1446906] Re: lxc container with postfix, permission denied on mailq
@jjohansen, I've tested your build and can confirm it fixes the issue. root@host:~# uname -a Linux host 3.19.0-31-generic #36+lp1446906v3 SMP Fri Dec 18 08:37:50 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@lxc:~# mailq Mail queue is empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446906 Title: lxc container with postfix, permission denied on mailq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1446906/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1508470] Re: sshd wont start for 15.10
[Expired for openssh (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508470 Title: sshd wont start for 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1508470/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1504720] Re: double cpu make Virtual machineCPU use rate is too high
[Expired for qemu (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504720 Title: double cpu make Virtual machineCPU use rate is too high To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1504720/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1527974] [NEW] package gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1
Public bug reported: I don't have any details about the issue. System automatically has pushed this bug report ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-31.36~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-31-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 AptOrdering: gdisk: Install gdisk: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Dec 17 13:35:24 2015 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to unpack .../gdisk_0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking gdisk (0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1) ... dpkg: error al procesar el archivo /var/cache/apt/archives/gdisk_0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb (--unpack): intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 DuplicateSignature: package:gdisk:0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1:intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 ErrorMessage: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-10-31 (49 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 14.04.3 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20150805) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5 apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.10 SourcePackage: gdisk Title: package gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gdisk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gdisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527974 Title: package gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdisk/+bug/1527974/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1527974] Re: package gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gdisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527974 Title: package gdisk 0.8.8-1ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/man8/fixparts.8.gz', que está también en el paquete fixparts 1.0.1-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdisk/+bug/1527974/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1523970] Re: [needs-packaging] boto3 package
Thanks for reporting. >From what I can see from the changelog [1], python3 support was added in version 2.32.1-1.1 and python3-boto is available in Ubuntu 15.04 and later releases [2]. Are you perhaps running an older Ubuntu release, like the 14.04 LTS? When a bug has been fixed in the development (or a newer release) of Ubuntu, the bug is usually considered fixed. In some cases, it is relevant to get the fix into older, supported releases though. I am not sure how much work adding python3-support would mean for older releases, whether it is simply a matter of building the packages or if it would require lots of changes. [1] http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/python-boto/python-boto_2.34.0-2ubuntu1/changelog [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/python3-boto -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-boto in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 Title: [needs-packaging] boto3 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1486865] Re: [FFE] Sync rrdtool 1.5.4-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: rrdtool (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486865 Title: [FFE] Sync rrdtool 1.5.4-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rrdtool/+bug/1486865/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1523970] Re: [needs-packaging] boto3 package
I was actually referring to boto version 3 in addition to Python version 3. Regardless, I have learned that it has recently been added to Debian unstable https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/python3-boto3 On Sunday, December 20, 2015, Hans Joachim Desserud < 1523...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thanks for reporting. > > >From what I can see from the changelog [1], python3 support was added in > version 2.32.1-1.1 and python3-boto is available in Ubuntu 15.04 and > later releases [2]. > > Are you perhaps running an older Ubuntu release, like the 14.04 LTS? > When a bug has been fixed in the development (or a newer release) of > Ubuntu, the bug is usually considered fixed. In some cases, it is > relevant to get the fix into older, supported releases though. I am not > sure how much work adding python3-support would mean for older releases, > whether it is simply a matter of building the packages or if it would > require lots of changes. > > [1] > http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/python-boto/python-boto_2.34.0-2ubuntu1/changelog > [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/python3-boto > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] boto3 package > > Status in python-boto package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > URL: https://github.com/boto/boto3 > License: Apache > Notes: boto3 is now stable and the recommended boto major version. > > Would it be possible to have python-boto3 and python3-boto3 packages? > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-boto in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 Title: [needs-packaging] boto3 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1235143] Re: libcommons-lang-java is incorrectly marked as a dependency of libcommons-cli-java
The dependency was removed in 1.3.1-3 which has landed in Debian unstable. Since this package carries some Ubuntu-specific changes, it looks like it will need a merge to get the fix into Ubuntu as well though. ** Tags added: need-debian-merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libcommons-cli-java in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235143 Title: libcommons-lang-java is incorrectly marked as a dependency of libcommons-cli-java To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcommons-cli-java/+bug/1235143/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1523970] Re: [needs-packaging] boto3 package
>I was actually referring to boto version 3 in addition to Python version 3. Oh, I wasn't aware of that. >Regardless, I have learned that it has recently been added to Debian unstable It has also been synced to Ubuntu Xenial, so it will be in the next release. I believe this can be closed as Fix Released then, what do you think? ** Also affects: python-boto3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-boto in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 Title: [needs-packaging] boto3 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1525457] Re: QEMU seccomp_sandbox prevents local SDL graphic from working
Thanks, the error message shows shmctl was rejected. qemu in 14.04 needs the patch: e3f9bb011ae24a594310fa4917754945dc832f8f: seccomp: add shmctl(), mlock(), and munlock() to the syscall whitelist ** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525457 Title: QEMU seccomp_sandbox prevents local SDL graphic from working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1525457/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1523970] Re: [needs-packaging] boto3 package
** Changed in: python-boto (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: python-boto3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-boto in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 Title: [needs-packaging] boto3 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1440381] Re: please build bindings for Python3
as it is stated in the http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781913 it would be enough to move the libsamba-net out of the samba-libs into a separate package libsamba-net. Then samba-libs would not dependent on python at all. In turn gvfs-backends would be free of python too which would make it possible to have python2 free desktop starting with the 16.04 lts. The dependency to that new libsamba-net package should be added in the samba package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440381 Title: please build bindings for Python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1440381/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1523970] Re: [needs-packaging] boto3 package
Sounds good to me. On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM Hans Joachim Desserud < 1523...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > >I was actually referring to boto version 3 in addition to Python > version 3. > > Oh, I wasn't aware of that. > > >Regardless, I have learned that it has recently been added to Debian > unstable > > It has also been synced to Ubuntu Xenial, so it will be in the next > release. I believe this can be closed as Fix Released then, what do you > think? > > ** Also affects: python-boto3 (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided >Status: New > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 > > Title: > [needs-packaging] boto3 package > > Status in python-boto package in Ubuntu: > New > Status in python-boto3 package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > URL: https://github.com/boto/boto3 > License: Apache > Notes: boto3 is now stable and the recommended boto major version. > > Would it be possible to have python-boto3 and python3-boto3 packages? > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to python-boto in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523970 Title: [needs-packaging] boto3 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto/+bug/1523970/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1455818] Re: mysql-server-5.6.postrm fails when /usr/share/mysql-common/configure-symlinks doesn't exist
I just ran into this issue on my new install of Ubuntu Server 15.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1455818 Title: mysql-server-5.6.postrm fails when /usr/share/mysql-common/configure- symlinks doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.6/+bug/1455818/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1455818] Re: mysql-server-5.6.postrm fails when /usr/share/mysql-common/configure-symlinks doesn't exist
Thank you for the report! We'll update 15.10 then. ** Changed in: mysql-5.6 (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Low => High ** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1455818 Title: mysql-server-5.6.postrm fails when /usr/share/mysql-common/configure- symlinks doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.6/+bug/1455818/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1460164] Re: restart of openvswitch-switch causes instance network down when l2population enabled
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to neutron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460164 Title: restart of openvswitch-switch causes instance network down when l2population enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1460164/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs