[Bug 1627768] Re: multipath silently crashes with general protection
@rackspace.matt: Are you able to test either 16.04.2 or (even better) in 17.04 to see if it also happens there? Just lets us narrow down whether the bug is already fixed upstream/in the package version there (0.6.4 is the upstream version). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627768 Title: multipath silently crashes with general protection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1627768/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1627768] Re: multipath silently crashes with general protection
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627768 Title: multipath silently crashes with general protection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1627768/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1641124] Re: Default failback value is badly chosen
Hello and thank you for reporting this bug! Changing default values is a
scary proposition (to me), because we have to think about every possible
environment.
What are the implications of failback=immediate over failback=manual?
Also, the base configuration for multipath "works" for all cases (I
guess unless you are installing during a failover?); if you know your
setup for multipath should use a different setting, you are able to
manage that easily (as you noted) by changing the configuration file.
The concerning part from the manpage is:
Tell multipathd how to manage path group failback.
To select \fIimmediate\fR or a \fIvalue\fR, it's mandatory that the device
has support for a working prioritizer.
We do not know that every device of every Ubuntu Server instance already
using multipath-tools has a "working prioritizer", do we? I'm not sure
what that even is, but I can guess from context in multipath :)
I'm also going to unsubscribe Ubuntu Server, as right now there is not
(in my opinion) anything for the Server Team to change -- multipath
policy is fraught with danger :) Honestly, we take the default from
upstream, because it 'just works'. If you want to see that change, I
would work with the upstream community (maybe 'immediate to manual',
which uses 'immediate' if it is detected that it can be used ('working
prioritizer') or somesuch), but that's outside the scope of the package
in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641124
Title:
Default failback value is badly chosen
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1641124/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1357880] Re: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhclient needs updated regex
The upstream fix is https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/logcheck/logcheck.git/commit/?id=bacf43b2b706b8f91ffc34d8c983c8d7c4f3efe6 Based upon duping other bugs here, tracking where that might need backporting. ** Also affects: logcheck (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: logcheck (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: logcheck (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: New => Triaged ** Also affects: logcheck (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to logcheck in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357880 Title: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhclient needs updated regex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logcheck/+bug/1357880/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1134592] Re: isc-dhcp 4.2.4-5's DHCPREQUEST messages no longer match ignore regex
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1357880 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357880 This was fixed upstream/Debian/Ubuntu via Bug #1357880 -- so I'm duping this over there and adding tasks there for SRU'ing the fix back. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1357880 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhclient needs updated regex -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134592 Title: isc-dhcp 4.2.4-5's DHCPREQUEST messages no longer match ignore regex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logcheck/+bug/1134592/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1058760] Re: unmatched entries for dovecot login
Thank you everyone for filing bug reports for this issue. Now that 12.04 has gone EOL without a resolution for this, is it possible to re-test with 14.04 or 16.04 (or ideally 17.10 daily) to see if it still occurs? This helps us track where it is occurring and decide if it has been fixed upstream. In my analysis, I believe the patch (or its equivalent) in c#1 has been merged upstream. The patch from c#5 also appears partially applied upstream, but not necessarily the hostname bit. ** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058760 Title: unmatched entries for dovecot login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1058760/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696735] Re: package libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu. Could you please try the following: sudo apt -f install It's a bit odd that you have a 64bit system but have the 32bit version of the libgssapi-krb5-2 package, something else must have pulled that in explicitly. ** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696735 Title: package libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1696735/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696026] Re: package samba 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu. You have an invalid configuration parameter in your /etc/samba/smb.conf that is causing the service to fail to start: security = share For this version of samba, "security = share" is no longer a valid configuration in smb.conf. Valid values for the "security" parameter are auto, user, domain or ads. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696026 Title: package samba 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1696026/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1058760] Re: unmatched entries for dovecot login
** Tags added: needs-upstream-report -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058760 Title: unmatched entries for dovecot login To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1058760/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696735] Re: package libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Could you show the output you go? Or was it silent? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696735 Title: package libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1696735/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1695920] Re: package samba-common 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.7 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 10
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu. >From the dpkg terminal log: Paramétrage de grub-pc (2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9) ... dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet grub-pc (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 10 Paramétrage de samba-common (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.7) ... dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet samba-common (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 10 It's not clear why it failed, and the other logs also don't have helpful information. Could you please try this command and see if it completes without errors: sudo apt -f install If the error happens again, then please set a debugging option before: sudo su - export DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_DEBUG=1 DPKG_DEBUG=1 apt -f install And attach your /boot/grub/grub.cfg file, since you said you ran a grub customizer and it might have generated an invalid config. Thanks! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695920 Title: package samba-common 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.7 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1695920/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1583705] Re: unmatched entries for postfix
** Tags added: upstream-report-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583705 Title: unmatched entries for postfix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1583705/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696823] [NEW] samba: extra dep8 tests
Public bug reported: The samba package could benefit from extra more through dep8 tests. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Package changed: ubuntu => samba (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696823 Title: samba: extra dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1696823/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696823] Re: samba: extra dep8 tests
** Description changed: - The samba package could benefit from extra more through dep8 tests. + The samba package could benefit from extra through dep8 tests. ** Description changed: - The samba package could benefit from extra through dep8 tests. + The samba package could benefit from extra dep8 tests. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696823 Title: samba: extra dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1696823/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696823] Re: samba: extra dep8 tests
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba/+git/samba/+merge/325329 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696823 Title: samba: extra dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1696823/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1578004] Re: unmatched entries for courier
As far as I can tell, nothing from couriertls: connect is actually
logwatch'd upstream.
I believe the original bug report's entry is unmatched because it is not
under:
# ESMTP, including all delivery
elsif ( $service =~
/^(courierd|courieresmtpd|courieresmtp|courierlocal|courieruucp|courierfax|courierdsn)$/
){
-Nish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1578004
Title:
unmatched entries for courier
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1578004/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1696823] Re: samba: extra dep8 tests
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba/+git/samba/+merge/325337 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696823 Title: samba: extra dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1696823/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 962616] Re: mii-tool assumes NIC names of the form eth* when given no interface(s) as argument
** Also affects: net-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: net-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962616 Title: mii-tool assumes NIC names of the form eth* when given no interface(s) as argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-tools/+bug/962616/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1690688] Re: kombu in artful-proposed incompatible with celery in artful
** Also affects: celery (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to celery in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690688 Title: kombu in artful-proposed incompatible with celery in artful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/celery/+bug/1690688/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 820679] Re: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu. I tried this "runlevel" switch in our systemd releases, even though systemd doesn't have this same exact concept, and it worked as expected. "runlevel 1" stopped samba, and going back to "2" started it again. While trusty is still supported and is an upstart-based release, I don't believe this issue qualifies for an SRU as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820679 Title: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820679/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 820679] Re: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820679 Title: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820679/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 820679] Re: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820679 Title: nmbd and smbd will not be started again on transition from runlevel 1 to 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820679/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1630892] Re: Please add support for Multi-Arch in libaio-dev
Hello and thank you for filing this bug report. I believe in this case, it makes sense to request this of Debian. Can you file a Debian bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630892 Title: Please add support for Multi-Arch in libaio-dev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaio/+bug/1630892/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1610014] Re: /usr/sbin/apache2:11:poll:poll:php_pollfd_for:php_sock_stream_wait_for_data:php_sockop_read
There is insufficient information to resolve this -- additionally, we are now at php7.0 7.0.18 in 16.04, and the trace mentioned in the error tracker is for 7.0.15. At this point, we don't have sufficient information to resolve this bug. ** Changed in: php7.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1610014 Title: /usr/sbin/apache2:11:poll:poll:php_pollfd_for:php_sock_stream_wait_for_data:php_sockop_read To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0/+bug/1610014/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1617397] Re: Some php5 packages not upgraded to php7 from 14.04 to 16.04
@jlay: To be honest, I haven't had any time to work on this, and the migration to PHP7.0 was in the release notes. We also just did the PHP7.1 transition in 17.10 and that goes well forward. I think the divergence from the packaging of php5 to php7.0 is just too large to resolve. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1617397 Title: Some php5 packages not upgraded to php7 from 14.04 to 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1617397/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
