[Bug 1057098] Re: [FFe] Please update to 1.4.3

2012-10-02 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Branch linked: lp:~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/openvswitch/1.4.3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057098

Title:
  [FFe] Please update to 1.4.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1057098/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1060336] [NEW] nova-novncproxy does not install binaries or any running services

2012-10-02 Thread Adam Gandelman
Public bug reported:

Installing nova-novncproxy 2012.2-0ubuntu2:

$ sudo apt-get install nova-novncproxy
$ service nova-novncproxy status
nova-novncproxy: unrecognized service
$ which nova-novncproxy

In addition to this affecting Nova, the novnc package's init scripts
requires the presence of /usr/bin/nova-novncproxy before it will start
the novnc process.

** Affects: nova (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060336

Title:
  nova-novncproxy does not install binaries or any running services

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1060336/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1060422] [NEW] nova-volume volume creation fails, tgt config not loaded

2012-10-02 Thread Adam Gandelman
Public bug reported:


Commit @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13633/ removes the explicit 
specification of volume config files to tgt-admin, and instead relies in tgt's 
configuration being set to find those config files in the appropriate place 
(nova's volumes directory).  We've been shipping a file in /etc/tgt/nova_tgt to 
specify this directory and import all configs there, but it appears that it is 
not actually picking them up.  With the --conf flag now removed, volume 
creation fails with tracebacks such as:


2012-10-02 15:23:07 CRITICAL nova [-] Resource could not be found.
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File /usr/bin/nova-volume, line 48, in 
module
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova service.wait()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/service.py, line 659, in wait
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova _launcher.wait()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/service.py, line 192, in wait
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova super(ServiceLauncher, self).wait()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/service.py, line 162, in wait
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova service.wait()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/greenthread.py, line 166, in wait
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova return self._exit_event.wait()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/event.py, line 116, in wait
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova return hubs.get_hub().switch()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/hubs/hub.py, line 177, in switch
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova return self.greenlet.switch()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/greenthread.py, line 192, in main
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova result = function(*args, **kwargs)
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/service.py, line 132, in run_server
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova server.start()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/service.py, line 398, in start
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova self.manager.init_host()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/volume/manager.py, line 105, in 
init_host
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova self.driver.ensure_export(ctxt, volume)
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/volume/driver.py, line 337, in 
ensure_export
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova check_exit_code=False)
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova   File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/volume/iscsi.py, line 148, in 
create_iscsi_target
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova raise exception.NotFound()
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova NotFound: Resource could not be found.
2012-10-02 15:23:07 TRACE nova

** Affects: nova (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Adam Gandelman (gandelman-a)
 Status: In Progress

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Gandelman (gandelman-a)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060422

Title:
  nova-volume volume creation fails, tgt config not loaded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1060422/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1057098] [NEW] [FFe] Please update to 1.4.3

2012-09-26 Thread Adam Gandelman
Public bug reported:

Developers from OpenVswitch have requested we update to the current
stable release, 1.4.3.   This version is a bug-fix only release for the
1.4 branch that contains the following changes:

8249ccc Declare the version as 1.4.3.
02978b5 datapath: Fix FLOW_BUFSIZE definition.
6467e95 datapath: Reset upper layer protocol info on internal devices.
196ba34 stp: port_no counter is off by one 
865f22b bond: Tag flows according to their hash bucket, not just their slave.
8b74c55 ovs-ctl: Add support for newer name for Open vSwitch kernel module.
631ccac datapath: Relax set header validation.
e49ea3c flow: Correctly consider nw_frag_mask in some flow_wildcards_*() 
functions.
d6af664 Avoid implementation-defined strerror behaviour
21c9a7e ovs-ctl: Start the rest of Open vSwitch if loading brcompat module 
fails.
437f968 Fix race condition in parallel execution of make install.
903c82f debian: Remove controller keys on openvswitch-controller package purge.
3d52c48 debian: Do not change iptables rules by default.
302a5e9 cfm: Always initialize CCM internal_ms_x extension field.
fdd80c3 datapath: Check gso_type for correct sk_buff in queue_gso_packets().
f266b3d debian: Remove obsolete advice to edit /etc/default/openvswitch-switch.
0f02cf2 debian: Add netbase dependency for /etc/protocols.
ef6f453 python: Call 'wait' methods correctly in jsonrpc and stream code.
b4c2d88 ovs-vswitchd: Call mlockall() from the daemon, not the parent or 
monitor.
cc8ccb5 lib: Do not assume sig_atomic_t is int.
7ea32ef debian: Make DKMS automatically build for running kernel.
fcb51b0 vlog: Avoid use-after-free in corner case.
0ada27a datapath: Check currect return value from skb_gso_segment()
b42c6f6 ofproto: Fix use after free in ofoperation_complete().

Debian will remain at 1.4.2 until they are out of freeze, so we'll be
packaging the new upstream version in Ubuntu first.  I've coordinated
with the Debain maintainer and this seems sane .  In addition to the
upstream bugs this fixes, the current package carries  a few patches
that could be dropped by a 1.4.3 upload. Some Ubuntu packaging bugs
would be squashed as well.

** Affects: openvswitch (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057098

Title:
  [FFe] Please update to 1.4.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1057098/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029430] Re: KVM guests networking issues with no virbr0 and with vhost_net kernel modules loaded

2012-09-24 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029430

Title:
  KVM guests networking issues with no virbr0 and with vhost_net kernel
  modules loaded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1029430/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029430] Re: KVM guests networking issues with no virbr0 and with vhost_net kernel modules loaded

2012-09-24 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Tags added: folsom-rc-potential

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029430

Title:
  KVM guests networking issues with no virbr0 and with vhost_net kernel
  modules loaded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1029430/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-openstack-charms] Openstack Juju Charms Next Steps

2012-09-17 Thread Adam Gandelman
Blueprint changed by Adam Gandelman:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [gandelman-a] swift (storage + proxy) charm overhaul: INPROGRESS
- [gandelman-a] keystone database reconfiguration support: TODO
+ [gandelman-a] keystone database reconfiguration support: INPROGRESS
  [gandelman-a] Investigate condensing charms into one, devstack alterrnative: 
POSTPONED
  [gandelman-a] Discussion about growing a charm-spliced deployment to a 
multi-machine deployment: BLOCKED
  NFS/DRBD/etc shared storage support for glance, nova: TODO
  [gandelman-a] Move CI Lab specific charm changes to subordinate charms: 
POSTPONED

-- 
Openstack Juju Charms Next Steps
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-charms

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1049915] Re: Logrotate.d files do not have the compress option enabled

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049915

Title:
  Logrotate.d files do not have the compress option enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1049915/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1049309] Re: keystone package: logrotate should have compress option

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Also affects: keystone (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049309

Title:
  keystone package: logrotate should have compress option

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/1049309/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1049915] Re: Logrotate.d files do not have the compress option enabled

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Branch unlinked: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/quantal-folsom

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049915

Title:
  Logrotate.d files do not have the compress option enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1049915/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045064] Re: Impossible to run quantum-server from testing/archives packages

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Changed in: quantum (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quantum in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045064

Title:
  Impossible to run quantum-server from testing/archives packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/+bug/1045064/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1049986] [NEW] Openstack dashboard's Ubuntu theme needs to be re-enabled and refreshed.

2012-09-12 Thread Adam Gandelman
Public bug reported:

During the Folsom dev cycle, the patches to Horizon that enabled the
Ubuntu theme were disabled.  Now that its Folsom is hitting RC1, the
theme should be re-enabled and refreshed against the current dashboard.

Now that python-compressor is in use, I believe it is no longer
necessary to patch the horizon code base to allow the alternate CSS and
images, so we can probably drop those packages and handle it all with
configuration changes.

** Affects: horizon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Adam Gandelman (gandelman-a)
 Status: In Progress

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Gandelman (gandelman-a)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049986

Title:
  Openstack dashboard's Ubuntu theme needs to be re-enabled and
  refreshed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1049986/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1048677] Re: UncompressableFileError: 'horizon/js/horizon.js' isn't accesible via COMPRESS_URL

2012-09-11 Thread Adam Gandelman
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1024326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024326

Marking a duplicate.  Once the dependency on node-less is gone, this
should not be an issue in Ubuntu.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1024326
   node.js is required for access to the dashboard

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048677

Title:
  UncompressableFileError: 'horizon/js/horizon.js' isn't accesible via
  COMPRESS_URL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1048677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1048668] Re: OVS Agent Packaging Issue

2012-09-10 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Changed in: quantum
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quantum in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048668

Title:
  OVS Agent Packaging Issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1048668/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1024326] Re: node.js is required for access to the dashboard

2012-09-10 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Branch unlinked: lp:~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/horizon/1024326

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024326

Title:
  node.js is required for access to the dashboard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1024326/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1044318] Re: pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the same box

2012-09-07 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Description changed:

  Note: OVS from before 1.5, which includes the default versions shipped
  with 12.04 and Fedora 17, has a bug that causes it not to work correctly
  with floating IPs when the person contacting the floating IP is on the
  same box as quantum-l3-agent.
  
  While not very likely to happen in a production setup, this is fairly
  common in simple development environments.  For example, let's say you
  create an external network 40.0.0.0/24 for floating IPs.  If you then
  assign br-ex the IP 40.0.0.1, you should be able to reach all of your
  VMs with floating IPs, but it won't work because of this bug.  Oddly, it
  will often appear to work if you use ping, but in reality you are pining
  the IP address in the router namespace, not the VM.
  
  We believe the following OVS commit it required for this to work
  properly:
  
  http://openvswitch.org/cgi-
  
bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openvswitch;a=commitdiff;h=53e6421bc83918ac2d00ba5516f205fa7e394140
  
  We are looking at creating a new stable release on the 1.4.x branch to
  include this change and plan to work with distros to get it pulled into
  their packages.
+ 
+ [IMPACT]
+ The connection tracking logic using by IPtables gets confused if a packet 
passes through multiple linux network namespaces on the same host. The reason 
for this confusion is that OVS is not properly clearing some of the fields in 
the skb header, meaning the connection tracking ignores this packet, so 
iptables functionality that relies on this (in particular DNAT and SNAT) do not 
work.
+ 
+ In particular, the use of OVS by OpenStack Quantum is critically
+ affected by this bug.
+ 
+ [FIX]
+ The issue has been fixed upstream as of 1.4.3. A minimal 5-liner that clears 
the appropriate metadata from the skb header.   The patch has been 
cherry-picked and fix released in the current Ubuntu dev. release (12.10).
+ 
+ [REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
+ Minimal.  Simple patch that has been cherry-picked from the currentl upstream 
stable release of Openvswitch (1.4.3).

** Summary changed:

- pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the same box
+ [SRU] pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the same box

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044318

Title:
  [SRU] pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the
  same box

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1044318/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1044318] Re: [SRU] pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the same box

2012-09-07 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Changed in: openvswitch (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044318

Title:
  [SRU] pre-1.5 OVS has trouble with floating ips when pinging from the
  same box

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1044318/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045064] Re: Impossible to run quantum-server from testing/archives packages

2012-09-07 Thread Adam Gandelman
Reopening as last upload does not fix these issues.

** Changed in: quantum (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to quantum in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045064

Title:
  Impossible to run quantum-server from testing/archives packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/+bug/1045064/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1024326] Re: node.js is required for access to the dashboard

2012-09-05 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Summary changed:

- django_compressor is required for access to the dashboard
+ node.js is required for access to the dashboard

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024326

Title:
  node.js is required for access to the dashboard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1024326/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1035594] Re: Floating IP addresses leak if you delete an instance with one assigned

2012-09-04 Thread Adam Gandelman
Having trouble reproducing using the following steps with stable/essex
on Ubuntu 12.04 (via 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1
package):

nova floating-ip-create
nova add-floating-ip b8e0295d-e515-4838-b91a-eb3c4b1beebe 192.168.25.237
nova delete b8e0295d-e515-4838-b91a-eb3c4b1beebe
nova floating-ip-delete 192.168.25.237

Watching the database (floating_ips), the floating ip to fixed_ip_id
mapping is appropriately removed on instance deletion, as is the
floating ip - project_id mapping on floating-ip-delete.

Curious to know which network manager you're using.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035594

Title:
  Floating IP addresses leak if you delete an instance with one assigned

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1035594/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-q-openstack-charms] Openstack Juju Charms Next Steps

2012-09-04 Thread Adam Gandelman
Blueprint changed by Adam Gandelman:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  [gandelman-a] swift (storage + proxy) charm overhaul: INPROGRESS
  [gandelman-a] keystone database reconfiguration support: TODO
- Investigate condensing charms into one, devstack alterrnative: TODO
- Discussion about growing a charm-spliced deployment to a multi-machine 
deployment: TODO
+ [gandelman-a] Investigate condensing charms into one, devstack alterrnative: 
POSTPONED
+ [gandelman-a] Discussion about growing a charm-spliced deployment to a 
multi-machine deployment: BLOCKED
  NFS/DRBD/etc shared storage support for glance, nova: TODO
- Move CI Lab specific charm changes to subordinate charms: TODO
+ [gandelman-a] Move CI Lab specific charm changes to subordinate charms: 
POSTPONED

-- 
Openstack Juju Charms Next Steps
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-charms

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1024281] Re: Bug during installation. conflicts: python-glanceclient + glance-client

2012-09-04 Thread Adam Gandelman
Marking 'Fix Released' .  The uploads of python-glanceclient
(1:0.4.1-0ubuntu1) and glance (2012.2~f3-0ubuntu1) included changes that
describe the conflicting relationship between glance-client and python-
glanceclient.  Only one client package may be installed.

** Changed in: python-glanceclient (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to python-glanceclient in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024281

Title:
  Bug during installation. conflicts: python-glanceclient + glance-
  client

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-glanceclient/+bug/1024281/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1041120] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2012-08-31 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure. As part of the verification process for this bug, the
OpenStack components have been deployed and configured across multiple
nodes using precise-proposed as an installation source. After successful
bring-up and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and
smoke tests have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not
introduce any regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out
to catch any possible transient errors.

Please note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
individual bug reports.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041120

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1041120/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1041120] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2012-08-31 Thread Adam Gandelman
** Attachment added: 1041120_verification.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1041120/+attachment/3286614/+files/1041120_verification.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041120

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1041120/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1035428] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11776
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11777

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035428

Title:
  authenticate in ldap backend doesn't return a list of roles

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1035428/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1035428] Re: authenticate in ldap backend doesn't return a list of roles

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035428/+attachment/3283181/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035428

Title:
  authenticate in ldap backend doesn't return a list of roles

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1035428/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997700] Re: LDAP should not check username on sn field

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997700/+attachment/3283182/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997700

Title:
  LDAP should not check username on sn field

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/997700/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997700] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10544
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11737

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997700

Title:
  LDAP should not check username on sn field

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/997700/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1016056] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8802
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10533

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016056

Title:
  EC2 credentials not migrated from legacy (diablo) database

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1016056/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1016056] Re: EC2 credentials not migrated from legacy (diablo) database

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016056/+attachment/3283186/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016056

Title:
  EC2 credentials not migrated from legacy (diablo) database

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1016056/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012381] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8707
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9011

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012381

Title:
  Memcache token backend eventually stops working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1012381/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1012381] Re: Memcache token backend eventually stops working

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012381/+attachment/3283185/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012381

Title:
  Memcache token backend eventually stops working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1012381/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006822] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8104
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9014

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006822

Title:
  API(v2.0/OS-KSADM/services,v2.0/OS-KSADM/services/{service_id})doesn't
  validate token

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1006822/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006822] Re: API(v2.0/OS-KSADM/services,v2.0/OS-KSADM/services/{service_id})doesn't validate token

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006822/+attachment/3283184/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006822

Title:
  API(v2.0/OS-KSADM/services,v2.0/OS-KSADM/services/{service_id})doesn't
  validate token

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1006822/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006815] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8105
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9015

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006815

Title:
  Admin API /v2.0/tenants/{tenant_id}/users/{user_id}/roles doesn't
  validate token

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1006815/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1006815] Re: Admin API /v2.0/tenants/{tenant_id}/users/{user_id}/roles doesn't validate token

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006815/+attachment/3283183/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006815

Title:
  Admin API /v2.0/tenants/{tenant_id}/users/{user_id}/roles doesn't
  validate token

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1006815/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997194] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7344
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/8456

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997194

Title:
  Tokens remain valid after a user account is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/997194/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997194] Re: Tokens remain valid after a user account is disabled

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997194/+attachment/3283193/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997194

Title:
  Tokens remain valid after a user account is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/997194/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996595] Re: Following a password compromise and subsequent password change, tokens remain valid.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996595/+attachment/3283192/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996595

Title:
  Following a password compromise and subsequent password change, tokens
  remain valid.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/996595/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994936] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7147
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/8404

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994936

Title:
  export_legacy_catalog doesn't convert url names correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/994936/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996595] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7276
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/8454

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996595

Title:
  Following a password compromise and subsequent password change, tokens
  remain valid.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/996595/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994936] Re: export_legacy_catalog doesn't convert url names correctly

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994936/+attachment/3283191/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994936

Title:
  export_legacy_catalog doesn't convert url names correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/994936/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988920] Re: Token authentication for a user in a disabled tenant does not raise Unauthorized error

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988920/+attachment/3283190/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988920

Title:
  Token authentication for a user in a disabled tenant does not raise
  Unauthorized error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/988920/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 988920] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9862
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10534

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988920

Title:
  Token authentication for a user in a disabled tenant does not raise
  Unauthorized error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/988920/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 983800] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/6403
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/7481

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983800

Title:
  TokenNotFound not raised in testsuite because of timezone issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/983800/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 983800] Re: TokenNotFound not raised in testsuite because of timezone issues

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983800/+attachment/3283189/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983800

Title:
  TokenNotFound not raised in testsuite because of timezone issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/983800/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 974199] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/6216
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/7482

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974199

Title:
  deleting a tenant does not cleanup its user associations

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/974199/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 974199] Re: deleting a tenant does not cleanup its user associations

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974199/+attachment/3283188/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974199

Title:
  deleting a tenant does not cleanup its user associations

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/974199/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 973243] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/6216
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/7482

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973243

Title:
  deleting tenants or users does not clean up metadata

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/973243/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 973243] Re: deleting tenants or users does not clean up metadata

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1+stable~20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973243/+attachment/3283187/+files/2012.1%2Bstable%7E20120824-a16a0ab9-0ubuntu2.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973243

Title:
  deleting tenants or users does not clean up metadata

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/973243/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1038266] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11596
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11597

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038266

Title:
  Deleted floating ips can cause instance delete to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1038266/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1038266] Re: Deleted floating ips can cause instance delete to fail

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038266/+attachment/3283210/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038266

Title:
  Deleted floating ips can cause instance delete to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1038266/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1036902] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11375
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11387

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036902

Title:
  Block storage connections are NOT restored on system reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1036902/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1036902] Re: Block storage connections are NOT restored on system reboot

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036902/+attachment/3283213/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036902

Title:
  Block storage connections are NOT restored on system reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1036902/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1033178] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10848

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033178

Title:
  pycrypto is unused and the existing code is potentially insecure to
  use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1033178/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1033178] Re: pycrypto is unused and the existing code is potentially insecure to use

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033178/+attachment/3283215/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033178

Title:
  pycrypto is unused and the existing code is potentially insecure to
  use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1033178/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031311] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10951
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10952

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031311

Title:
  CVE-2012-3361 not fully addressed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031311/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031311] Re: CVE-2012-3361 not fully addressed

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031311/+attachment/3283214/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031311

Title:
  CVE-2012-3361 not fully addressed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031311/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1030430] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10509

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030430

Title:
  qpid_heartbeat setting in ineffective

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1030430/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1030430] Re: qpid_heartbeat setting in ineffective

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030430/+attachment/3283217/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030430

Title:
  qpid_heartbeat setting in ineffective

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1030430/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029463] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10283
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11833

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029463

Title:
  Libvirt driver reports incorrect error when volume-detach fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1029463/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029463] Re: Libvirt driver reports incorrect error when volume-detach fails

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029463/+attachment/3283211/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029463

Title:
  Libvirt driver reports incorrect error when volume-detach fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1029463/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021352] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10404
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10499

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021352

Title:
  Deallocation of fixed IP occurs before security group refresh –
  leading to potential security issue in error / race conditions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021352/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021352] Re: Deallocation of fixed IP occurs before security group refresh – leading to potential security issue in error / race conditions

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021352/+attachment/3283218/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021352

Title:
  Deallocation of fixed IP occurs before security group refresh –
  leading to potential security issue in error / race conditions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021352/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021340] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9630
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10387

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021340

Title:
  Race condition in network/deallocate_for_instance() leads to security
  issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021340/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021340] Re: Race condition in network/deallocate_for_instance() leads to security issue

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021340/+attachment/3283219/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021340

Title:
  Race condition in network/deallocate_for_instance() leads to security
  issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021340/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013689] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9470
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10510

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013689

Title:
  cannot umount guestfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1013689/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1013689] Re: cannot umount guestfs

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013689/+attachment/3283216/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013689

Title:
  cannot umount guestfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1013689/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 971621] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10655
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10962

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971621

Title:
  nova delete lxc-instance umounts the wrong rootfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/971621/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 971621] Re: nova delete lxc-instance umounts the wrong rootfs

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971621/+attachment/3283212/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971621

Title:
  nova delete lxc-instance umounts the wrong rootfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/971621/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 917615] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/3134
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11813

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917615

Title:
  Inappropriate exception handling on kvm live/block migration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/917615/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 917615] Re: Inappropriate exception handling on kvm live/block migration

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917615/+attachment/3283209/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917615

Title:
  Inappropriate exception handling on kvm live/block migration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/917615/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027984] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10132
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10209

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027984

Title:
  nova testsuite errors on newer versions of python-boto (e.g. 2.5.2)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1027984/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027984] Re: nova testsuite errors on newer versions of python-boto (e.g. 2.5.2)

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027984/+attachment/3283222/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027984

Title:
  nova testsuite errors on newer versions of python-boto (e.g. 2.5.2)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1027984/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027105] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10123
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10155

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027105

Title:
  Restarting nova-compute removes ip packet filters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1027105/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027105] Re: Restarting nova-compute removes ip packet filters

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027105/+attachment/3283226/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027105

Title:
  Restarting nova-compute removes ip packet filters

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1027105/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021373] Re: [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips quotas returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373/+attachment/3283228/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips  quotas
  returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021373] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9445
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9534

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips  quotas
  returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021373] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9445
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9534

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips  quotas
  returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1021373] Re: [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips quotas returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373/+attachment/3283229/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021373

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes, gigabytes and floating_ips  quotas
  returns general uninformative HTTP 500 error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1021373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1018721] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9642

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018721

Title:
  Launching with source groups under load produces lazy load error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1018721/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1018721] Re: Launching with source groups under load produces lazy load error

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018721/+attachment/3283224/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018721

Title:
  Launching with source groups under load produces lazy load error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1018721/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1018586] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/10095
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10321

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018586

Title:
  cleanup_file_locks does not remove stale sentinel files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1018586/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1018586] Re: cleanup_file_locks does not remove stale sentinel files

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018586/+attachment/3283220/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018586

Title:
  cleanup_file_locks does not remove stale sentinel files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1018586/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017418] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9040
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9041

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017418

Title:
  NoMoreFloatingIps: Zero floating ips available after repeatedly
  creating and destroying instances over time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017418/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017418] Re: NoMoreFloatingIps: Zero floating ips available after repeatedly creating and destroying instances over time

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017418/+attachment/3283223/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017418

Title:
  NoMoreFloatingIps: Zero floating ips available after repeatedly
  creating and destroying instances over time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017418/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014925] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8682
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10168

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014925

Title:
  API 'v1.1/{tenant_id}/os-hosts' does not return a list of hosts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1014925/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014925] Re: API 'v1.1/{tenant_id}/os-hosts' does not return a list of hosts

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014925/+attachment/3283225/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014925

Title:
  API 'v1.1/{tenant_id}/os-hosts' does not return a list of hosts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1014925/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994935] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7712
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9710

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994935

Title:
  Deleting Flavor currently in use by instance creates error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/994935/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 994935] Re: Deleting Flavor currently in use by instance creates error

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994935/+attachment/3283221/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994935

Title:
  Deleting Flavor currently in use by instance creates error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/994935/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 977007] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7281
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10079

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977007

Title:
  instance live migration should create virtual_size disk image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/977007/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 977007] Re: instance live migration should create virtual_size disk image

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977007/+attachment/3283227/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977007

Title:
  instance live migration should create virtual_size disk image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/977007/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1033920] Re: Dashboard raises a ServiceCatalogException when attempting to download juju settings

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Andrew or anyone else affected-

Horizon 2012.1.3+stable~20120815-691dd2-0ubuntu1 was accepted into
precise-proposed and contains a fix for this. Its progress  through SRU
is being tracked as part of a batch update of the Openstack components.
Please see Bug #1041120.

In the meantime, can you or anyone else affected please manually verify
the issue is resolved and post back here?   See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033920

Title:
  Dashboard raises a ServiceCatalogException when attempting to download
  juju settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1033920/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1022036] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9474
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9475

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022036

Title:
  metadata injection is broken in xen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1022036/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1022036] Re: metadata injection is broken in xen

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022036/+attachment/3283233/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022036

Title:
  metadata injection is broken in xen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1022036/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1020634] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9317
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9371

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020634

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes quotas logs VolumeSizeTooLarge
  instead of VolumeLimitExceeded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1020634/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1020634] Re: [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes quotas logs VolumeSizeTooLarge instead of VolumeLimitExceeded

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020634/+attachment/3283237/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020634

Title:
  [nova][volumes] Exceeding volumes quotas logs VolumeSizeTooLarge
  instead of VolumeLimitExceeded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1020634/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017795] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9637
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/9639

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017795

Title:
  scheduler hang (DOS) possible with DifferentHostFilter/SameHostFilter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017795/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017795] Re: scheduler hang (DOS) possible with DifferentHostFilter/SameHostFilter

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017795/+attachment/3283234/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20120827-4d2a4afe-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017795

Title:
  scheduler hang (DOS) possible with DifferentHostFilter/SameHostFilter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017795/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1016273] Verification report.

2012-08-30 Thread Adam Gandelman
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8830
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/8954

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016273

Title:
  ram_allocation_ratio does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1016273/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >