[Bug 1007273] Re: autofs does not start automatically after reboot

2012-11-01 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
several people have commented that they have the same or similar
problems

** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007273

Title:
  autofs does not start automatically after reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/1007273/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1068036] Re: postfix (precise) has lost the ability to lookup aliases in NIS

2012-10-24 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
on the system where I had the problem I did this to verify the fix
- removed workarounds in main.cf
- sent emails and verified that they trigger the error and remain in the queue
- installed 2.9.3-2~12.04.4
- bug is gone, mail works normally

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068036

Title:
  postfix (precise) has lost the ability to lookup aliases in NIS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1068036/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1068036] [NEW] postfix (precise) has lost the ability to lookup aliases in NIS

2012-10-18 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported:

on a (freshly installed) system with nis authentication, postfix is no longer 
able to read aliases from the nis table mail.aliases.
in 10.04 it worked

symptoms are:
- errors in /var/log/mail.log:
warning: nis:mail.aliases is unavailable. unsupported dictionary type: nis
- and mail is not forwarded

Obviously some build switch was changed between 10.04 and 12.04.
In 10.04:
$ postconf -m | grep nis
nis

In 12.04 the output is empty.

But still in 12.04 the postfix.postinst skript looks for nis and creates
an appropriate mail.cf entry for lookup in nis:mail.aliases


$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04

$ apt-cache policy postfix
postfix:
  Installiert: 2.9.3-2~12.04.3

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068036

Title:
  postfix (precise) has lost the ability to lookup aliases in NIS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1068036/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993259] Re: ypbind does not start on boot

2012-10-17 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
it is an error for ypbind to not start correctly when the network
interface is managed by network-manager and thus comes up a bit slowly

of course, changing the configuration to not rely on network-manager, as
explained in comment #3 is a workaround

still i would consider this a bug: the management of the dependency of
nis on a working network interface is not correctly done

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993259

Title:
  ypbind does not start on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/993259/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-07-24 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
just to add a data point: starting 2012-04-19 my lucid machine is
working with 3.17-31ubuntu0.10.04.3 from proposed with. A few nis
accounts are being used regularly. There have been a large number of
suspend resume cycles and various reboots without any nis related
problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

2012-04-19 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
I have installed 3.17-31ubuntu0.10.04.3 on lucid after purging the previous 
version including our hand crafted upstart configuration.
- Installation went fine
- I have tested the function as a NIS client successfully
- starting after reboot works, it also survives a suspend/resume cycle

But I noticed that there isn't any log output, neither in the console
messages at boot time nor in the syslog.

I injected an error by misspecifying the nis domain. This also did not
produce any output anywhere that might help to debug.

I think (but I am no sure) that you would see more output with the
current stock nis package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757

Title:
  NIS upstart dependency broken for lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/569757/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)

2011-10-30 Thread Ernst
This bug is disappeared for me (it started reapppearing a week ago), with
the changes in /etc/init/dbus.conf still in effect.

Maybe this has to do with my reinstall of grub2; after that, my computer
shuts again. This possinly indicates it has to do with certain boot options?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631

Title:
  Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS
  timeout at shutdown)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/211631/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)

2011-10-26 Thread Ernst
Since a week or so, the shutdown is delayed again (on Ubuntu 11.10), despite
the script in dbus.conf. Does anyone has a solution for this?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 16:03, Gonzals, S.
211...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:

 i'll try that,
 but,
 i have never putted trailing slashes in the mointpoints,
 and the double moutings only occus for the cifs ro mounts

 mvg,
 G

 On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 12:50 +, Steve Sutton wrote:
  Off topic, but the multiple mount can be caused if you miss trailing
  slashes off the mountpoint in fstab
 
  /media/myfsbad
  /media/myfs/  good
 

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
 duplicate bug report (768506).
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631

 Title:
  Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS
  timeout at shutdown)

 To manage notifications about this bug go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/211631/+subscriptions


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631

Title:
  Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS
  timeout at shutdown)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/211631/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2011-08-31 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
tested with lucid 10.04.3 - OK

procedure:

with old package
- access the web through squid
- init 1
- init 2
- ps aux | grep squid # - squid not running
with proposed package
- access the web through squid
- init 1
- init 2
- ps aux | grep squid # - squid IS running
- access the web through squid - works

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561779

Title:
  squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/561779/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2011-08-31 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
tested with an up-to-date maverick system

same procedure as above - OK

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561779

Title:
  squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/561779/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 835829] Re: package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-08-27 Thread Heinz Ernst
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835829

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert
  1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/835829/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 835829] [NEW] package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2011-08-27 Thread Heinz Ernst
Public bug reported:

This behavior faced up during normal Patch-Update. I can't give you
closer informations.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Aug 28 06:43:33 2011
ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den 
Fehlerwert 1 zurück
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 bind9utils 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
 apparmor   2.6.1-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: bind9
SyslogBind9:
 
Title: package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-15 (104 days ago)
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.db.0: 2011-02-28T06:23:36.422062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.db.127: 2011-02-28T06:24:36.530061
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.db.255: 2011-02-28T06:24:16.998062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.db.local: 2011-02-28T06:24:09.258062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf: 2011-03-27T14:42:18.054062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.default.zones: 2011-02-28T06:16:07.818062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.local: 2011-03-28T20:43:22.810062
mtime.conffile..etc.bind.named.conf.options: 2011-03-28T06:58:34.222062

** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835829

Title:
  package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert
  1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/835829/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 782890] Re: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade

2011-08-05 Thread Jonathan Ernst
** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782890

Title:
  no ping response on all hosts after upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/782890/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 809526] Re: squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

2011-07-19 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809526

Title:
  squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in
  /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/809526/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 809526] Re: squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

2011-07-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
this is an issue in maverick only
- lucid already uses 'restart squid' - ok
- natty uses 'reload squid' and this works fine due to some other changes - ok
- I do not know about oneiric but I guess it works like natty

yes, the fix is indeed as you describe it in comment #1.
I applied that fix by hand months ago and it was used daily.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809526

Title:
  squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in
  /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/809526/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 809526] [NEW] squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

2011-07-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported:

this is a leftover issue from bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/561750
I am creating a new bug report to leave complicated history behind.

The maverick squid package 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1 calls 'reload squid' in 
/etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid
This kills squid.

The syslog shows squid main process (nnn) killed by HUP signal

I freshly installed squid and squid-common after purging them, nothing
was changed after installation, system was rebooted before test

** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809526

Title:
  squid 2.7.STABLE9-2ubuntu5.1, reload kills squid, called in
  /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/809526/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2011-07-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
well, i guess originally this bug had been about 'reload' not working
correctly (#7), but focus has shifted over time.

To keeps things simple I have created a new bug report for the remaining
maverick problem at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/809526

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750

Title:
  squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to
  lucid)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/561750/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2011-05-22 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
I tested the package from maverick-proposed against the current package
from maverick: both of the problems that were discussed in this bug
report are now gone (squid starts sucessfully with network not being
available yet, resolvconf script reloads the squid configuration and
does not kill squid)

Thanks Clint for finally fixing this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750

Title:
  squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to
  lucid)

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 768506] Re: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

2011-04-23 Thread Ernst
The CIFS share is mounted in fstab. If I do sudo umount /mnt/share,
the computer will turn off normally.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506

Title:
  CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 768506] [NEW] CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

2011-04-21 Thread Ernst
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Since I upgraded to Natty, the computer takes a very long time to shut
down (approximately 5 minutes). I made a movie from the shutdown
messages and I think the CIFS server is not stopped correctly. I see the
following message (for a split second):

CIFS VFS: Server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx has not responded in 300 seconds.
Reconnecting...

So, I guess the CIFS server does not quit and therefore the computer is
not turned off. Can I do anything to stop CIFS server?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CIFSMounts: Error: command ['mount', '|', 'grep', 'cifs'] failed with exit code 
1: mount: only root can do that
Date: Thu Apr 21 20:17:04 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100122)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-26 (26 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty ubuntu-une unity-2d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506

Title:
  CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 768506] Re: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

2011-04-21 Thread Ernst
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506

Title:
  CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-07-17 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
In my setup this bug causes excessive boot delays. I want to question
the wishlist importance.

-- 
NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-17 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Runlevel changes have been an essential functionality of unix / linux
for a long time. You could use them for regular administration tasks.

Now this stopped to work. This bug is a regression.

-- 
squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561779
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
I have an ethernet interface with a static IP address, there is no
traffic routed to the internet over this interface.

Secondly there is a dsl-connection (pppoe) that provides the route to
the internet.

See also attached file /etc/network/interfaces

But I also have changed /etc/default/squid to prevent squid from doing
the DNS tests during start (there are no error messages in
/var/log/squid attached earlier).


** Attachment added: /etc/network/interfaces
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44118835/interfaces

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg

** Attachment added: /etc/default/squid
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44118845/squid

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
$ grep squid /var/log/syslog
Apr 14 07:38:33 rechner6 init: squid main process (1086) killed by HUP signal


$ grep init: /var/log/syslog
Apr 14 07:38:33 rechner6 init: squid main process (1086) killed by HUP signal
Apr 14 07:38:33 rechner6 init: ssh main process (1095) terminated with status 
255
Apr 14 07:38:35 rechner6 init: anacron main process (1296) killed by TERM signal
Apr 14 07:38:35 rechner6 init: plymouth-stop pre-start process (2288) 
terminated with status 1

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
- there is no respawn option in /etc/init/squid.conf (but I think this
wouldn't normally be a problem, except when squid crashed by itself)

- there is exactly one thing that does something to squid when the dsl-
interface is brought up (I have resolvconf installed which is suggested
by the squid package)

  /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid

which contains the command
  'invoke-rc.d squid reload'

This command does the wrong thing, it stops squid:

r...@rechner6:~# start squid
squid start/running, process 3328

(now squid is usable)

r...@rechner6:~# /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid
Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service(8)
[...]

r...@rechner6:~# status squid
squid stop/waiting

(the squid/cache.log shows the normal shutdown sequence)


 

** Attachment added: /var/log/squid/cache.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44224116/cache.log

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] [NEW] squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: squid

after booting, squid starts normally, and then stops again immediately.
There is no error (see logfile).

After that i can start squid with 'sudo start squid' and it works
flawlessly (this bug report is made through it).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu11
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Apr 12 21:12:34 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: squid

** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg

** Attachment added: squid log file
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43955964/cache.log

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43955337/Dependencies.txt

-- 
squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561779] [NEW] squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: squid

when you go to runlevel 1 for maintenance with 'telinit 1', squid is
stopped correctly

when you go back to runlevel 2 with 'telinit 2' squid is not started 
because /etc/init/squid.conf does not contain a condition for that.

in karmic, squid would stop on entering runlevel 1 and be started again
on entering runlevel 2

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu11
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Apr 12 21:48:49 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: squid

** Affects: squid (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561779
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 561779] Re: squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2

2010-04-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43958720/Dependencies.txt

-- 
squid is not started on runlevel transition 1 - 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561779
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 369682] Re: AutoFS direct maps not working with NFSv4 exports

2010-03-11 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Indeed, a default install of karmic-autofs has 
DISABLE_DIRECT=1 
in /etc/default/autofs
This is also documented in /usr/share/doc/autofs/README.direct

A workaround might be to use autofs5.

According to the original poster the behaviour changed at some point in
time. The reason remains unclear to me after having looked at the last 4
package versions.

This bug should be closed as invalid.

-- 
AutoFS direct maps not working with NFSv4 exports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369682
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 491288] Re: File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2010-01-25 Thread Ernst
On Lucid Alpha 2, it looks like the bug is fixed: I cannot reproduce it like
I did it before.

$ apt-cache policy samba
samba:
  Installed: 2:3.4.3-2ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2:3.4.3-2ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2:3.4.3-2ubuntu2 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status


On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 23:25, Raptor 2101 raptor2...@gmx.de wrote:

 Since smbfs (2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5) i experience same problems. I've
 mounted my homedirs via CIFS. All works fine (servernio to get KDE-apps
 working). After this update i noticed some extrem file errors while
 using Opera (HD-Cache enabled) and Firefox. Trying to download something
 always causes a damaged file. Every large file ( 500kb) results in a
 damaged file.

 If i switch from servernio to directio. Firefox and Opera works fine,
 now javaws, skype and some other apps craches cause of file corruption.

 But copying files from or to some normal mounts works perfectly.

 smb.conf
 [homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
available = yes
guest ok = no
 
  [Media]
path = /storage/Media
comment = Mediensammlung
nt acl support = yes
browsable = yes
writeable = yes
available = yes
guest ok = no
inherit permissions = yes
hide dot files = yes

 mounting via pam_mount

 volume user=* fstype=cifs server=serverip path=%(USER)
 mountpoint=/home/%(USER)  options=rw,hard,iocharset=utf8,serverino/
 volume user=* fstype=cifs server=serverip path=media
 mountpoint=/mnt/Media options=rw,hard,iocharset=utf8/

 /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData
 Display Internal CIFS Data Structures for Debugging
 ---
 CIFS Version 1.60
 Active VFS Requests: 790
 Servers:
 1) Name: 192.168.99.2  Domain: WORKGROUP Uses: 5 OS: Unix
 NOS: Samba 3.4.0Capability: 0x80f3fd
SMB session status: 1   TCP status: 1
 Local Users To Server: 1 SecMode: 0x3 Req On Wire: 0
 Shares:
 1) Mount1 Mounts: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x1002f
 PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 0x1 type: 0
 2) Mount2 Mounts: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x1002f
 PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 0x1 type: 0
 3) Mount3 Mounts: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x1002f
 PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 0x1 type: 0
 4) Mount4 Mounts: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x1002f
 PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 0x1 type: 0
 5) Mount5 Mounts: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x1002f
 PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 0x1 type: 0
 
 MIDs:

 dmesg and /var/log/syslog shows nothing interesting even with “echo 3 
 /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI”

 --
 File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 491288] Re: File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2009-12-10 Thread Ernst
I think this bug deserves a higher priority, because it seems the copy
process finishes successfully, but people end up in having corrupted
files. I think this behavior is easily repeated by other people and
could do a lot of harm.

So please, set the priority to 'critical' (or high). For example, bug
#453579 which also involves data loss has status critical! So this bug
deserves such priority too.

-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 491288] Re: File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2009-12-07 Thread Ernst
Does 'Fix Released' means this is fixed in an Ubuntu package (I would like to 
test!) or does it mean the bug is fixed upstream?
I don't know how to apply the patch of the upstream bug report, so with only 
that patch, I will not be able to test this.

-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 491288] Re: File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2009-12-05 Thread Ernst
I have some more information:
- this does not happen if the desktop computer is running Windows 7 (So I'm 
copying from my latop with Karmic 2.6.31.15 to the Windows computer).

- Currently, the share is mounted via /etc/fstab. If I mount the share
using the Gnome interface (Places  Connect to server), the corruption
does not happen. (It doesn't matter if I run Win7 or Linux)

I mount the share with the following entry in /etc/fstab:

//172.19.3.4/Media/home/ernstblaauw/mediacifs
comment=sshfs,username=user,password=pass,noauto,nounix,users,exec,uid=1000,gid=1000,domain=domain,iocharset=utf8
00

The comment is used to unmount the share if the network goes down and
remount it if the network comes up.

Do I have weird options in my fstab entry? I think this bug is quite
severe, I hope it attracts some attention.

-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 491288] [NEW] File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2009-12-02 Thread Ernst
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Yesterday, I tried to copy flac files from my laptop (Ubuntu Karmic,
32-bit, running ext4 but source files are on ntfs) to my desktop (Ubuntu
Karmic, 32-bit, running ext4 but destination was on ntfs) via samba. I
mounted the samba share of my desktop on my latop and started the copy
process on the laptop.

After this, I tried to play the files on my desktop. However, I got
errors from Exaile: the stream was not correct. So, I used foobar to
test the File integrity of the files, and in almost all files, it found
errors. I checked on my laptop, and those errors did not exist on the
files on the laptop.

So, I tried to copy them again using samba, but with the same result.
foobar's File Integrity test even give exactly the same errors for the
files (see the attached error log).

Then, I copied the files using a USB stick and this time, foobar
reported al was ok.

So, I think this is a bug in the samba package, as copying over samba did not 
work and an USB stick worked fine.
I think I should give more info, but I don't know what to report.

$ apt-cache policy samba
samba:
  Installed: 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1
  Candidate: 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.2
  Version table:
 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.2 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com karmic-proposed/main Packages
 *** 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages


$ apt-cache policy ntfs-3g
ntfs-3g:
  Installed: 1:2009.4.4-1ubuntu4
  Candidate: 1:2009.4.4-1ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 1:2009.4.4-1ubuntu4 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 491288] Re: File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic

2009-12-02 Thread Ernst

** Attachment added: foobar File Integrity Check.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36328212/foobar%20File%20Integrity%20Check.txt

-- 
File corruption after copying files via samba from Karmic to Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 369682] Re: AutoFS direct maps not working with NFSv4 exports

2009-11-20 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
this bug is still present in karmic
lines in auto.master starting with /- seem to be just ignored

** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix = Confirmed

-- 
AutoFS direct maps not working with NFSv4 exports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369682
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449323] Re: openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-15 Thread Jonathan Ernst
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 449326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326

@Kamus
Yes, this bug has been fixed with latest updates, thanks (the other 
duplicate-marked bug I opened about openvpn has thus been marked fixed).

-- 
openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-14 Thread Jonathan Ernst
@small_frenchy,
I found out that openssh, openvpn and cups don't start automatically on this 
machine, do cups start on your system (or ssh if you have it installed) ?

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-13 Thread Jonathan Ernst
@Mathias Gug
Yes that's on the same system. I will post the requested informations as soon 
as I get a hand on this machine again. Networking works (after login as it's 
using wireless/Network Manager to connect).

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-13 Thread Jonathan Ernst
@Thierry Carrez
Nope this is not checked. But I can tell you that I have more than 50 jaunty 
users where I only apt-get install openssh-server and openvpn where most of 
those users are using laptops and Network Manager in its default configuration 
and both ssh server and vpn client handle the fact that the network is brought 
up later fine.

I'll be able to send the requested files tomorrow I think

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] [NEW] openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openvpn

On a fresh Karmic beta installation I installed openvpn but it doesn't
autostart at boot. Machines upgraded from jaunty to karmic don't exhibit
this issue.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Oct 12 10:06:03 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Alpha i386 (20091009)
Package: openvpn 2.1~rc19-1ubuntu1 [modified: usr/sbin/openvpn]
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_CH.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.41-generic
SourcePackage: openvpn
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:2721): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:3744): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:3769): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33483354/Dependencies.txt

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449323] [NEW] openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Public bug reported:

On a fresh Karmic beta installation I installed openssh-server but it
doesn't autostart at boot. Machines upgraded from jaunty to karmic don't
exhibit this issue.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Oct 12 10:01:43 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Alpha i386 (20091009)
Package: openssh-server 1:5.1p1-6ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_CH.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.41-generic
SourcePackage: openssh
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:2721): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:3744): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:3769): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449323] Re: openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33483304/Dependencies.txt

-- 
openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449323] Re: openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst
** Tags added: regression-potential

-- 
openssh-server doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst
** Tags added: regression-potential

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 449326] Re: openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time

2009-10-12 Thread Jonathan Ernst
I'm using the same configuration and the vpn is started successfully if
I start it using /etc/init.d/openvpn start in both cases.

I guess something is up with the init.d-upstart transition but I'm not
sure.

-- 
openvpn doesn't start automatically at boot time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 365259] Re: on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde

2009-04-23 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
the question asked in the terminal window was do you want to keep your
smb.conf or install the one provided in the package

below are some excerpts from /var/log/dist-upgrade/term.log (which is in
German, but you will identify what happens)

for other packages where the questions were asked correctly in a kde
debconf window, the questions also appear in the term.log but in a
different format. As an example I show the output for dnsmasq at the
bottom

===
[...]
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5 (durch 
.../samba-common_2%3a3.3.2-1ubuntu3_i386.deb) ...
b) ...
Entpacke Ersatz für samba-common ...
[...]
Richte samba-common ein (2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) ...
momentanen Version.
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei 
/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba ...
Paket-Konfiguration
 ┌──┤ Samba Server ├──┐
 ││ 
 │ Eine neue Version der  │ 
 │ Konfigurationsdatei│ 
 │ /etc/samba/smb.conf ist│ 
 │ verfügbar, aber die installierte   │ 
 │ Version wurde verändert.   │ 
 ││ 
 │   Ok │ 
 ││ 
 └┘ 

─┤ Samba Server ├
 mit smb.conf
 Version des Paket-Betreuers ins  ↑
 aktuell installierte Version be  ▮
  Ok
─
Richte samba-common ein (2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) ...
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei 
/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba ...
Replacing config file /etc/samba/smb.conf with new version

===
[...]
Richte dnsmasq ein (2.47-3) ...
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/init.d/dnsmasq ...
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/default/dnsmasq ...
e Version herausgegeben.
   Was möchten Sie damit machen? Ihre Wahlmöglichkeiten sind:
Y oder I : Die Version des Paket-Betreuers installieren
N oder O : Die momentan installierte Version beibehalten
   D : Die Unterschiede zwischen den Versionen anzeigen
   Z : Prozess in den Hintergrund, um die Situation zu begutachten
 Der Standardweg ist das Beibehalten der momentanen Version.
*** dnsmasq.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [Vorgabe=N] ? 
*** dnsmasq.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [Vorgabe=N] ? y
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/dnsmasq.conf ...
[...]
===

-- 
on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but 
debconf is configured to use kde
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365259
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 365259] [NEW] on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but debconf is configured to use kde

2009-04-22 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba-common

on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog
inside the terminal-window of the update manager.

But debconf is configured to use kde, and questions for other packages
actually have been asked with kde dialogs

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
on update to jaunty, configuration questions are asked in curses dialog but 
debconf is configured to use kde
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365259
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 305454] Re: 'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)

2008-12-06 Thread Ernst
In this bug report, I used anonymous (guest) access to the share. I
changed the login policy and now I have to specify a username and
password. In contrary to the above bug report, a user is able to mount
the new configuration without problems. It seems the bug is related to
guest access.

-- 
'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 305454] [NEW] 'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)

2008-12-05 Thread Ernst
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

I'm using samba to share files between my home computer (dual boot
Windows/Ubuntu 8.10) and my laptop (Ubuntu 8.10). Most of the time,
Windows is running at the home computer. Sharing goes fine with the
following fstab entry:

//172.19.3.4/Media  /home/user/media  cifs
noauto,users,exec,uid=1000,gid=1000,password=,iocharset=utf80
0

With this command line, a user can mount it (if Windows shares the
directory!).

Yesterday I booted again to Ubuntu on my home computer and there were a
lot of updates, I also think Samba got updated. I noticed that all my
shares were unshared, so I had to share my folders again. I did so,
using the 'Share' tab of the folder and I gave access to guests.

Now, on my laptop I can only mount the share as super user (sudo mount
~/media). If I mount the share as normal user, I get the following
message:

mount error 13 = Permission denied
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)

This used to work, but now it doesn't. So, I think this justifies a bug report. 
Hopefully, this makes Ubuntu better :-).
(Again: If I share a map on Windows (Desktop) and access this map with Ubuntu 
(Laptop), a user can mount it. If I share a map on Ubuntu (Desktop) and access 
this map with Ubuntu (Laptop), a user cannot mount the share.)

Some more info:
Both computers are running the following version of Samba:
apt-cache policy samba
samba:
  Installed: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3
  Candidate: 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3
  Version table:
 *** 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages

The laptop has proposed enabled.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down

2008-10-29 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Do people who were experiencing this bug with a wired connexion still
have this issue in Intrepid fully up to date ? I had this issue on my
desktop computer but it seems fixed now ?

-- 
CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs