[Bug 589611] Re: [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-09-28 Thread Joe McDonagh
Awesome, I thought I had fixed it previously but have noticed it's still
happening and causing some failed puppet runs.

-- 
[SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-29 Thread Joe McDonagh
Just to chime in, this is affecting my 10.04 LTS nodes talking to my
recently upgraded 10.04 LTS puppet master. Puppet sits behind Apache
with mod_proxy_balancer and mod_ssl. I disabled reqtimeout and have yet
to see this re-appear.

-- 
client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2010-01-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last
week right?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-11-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
> @Joe,
>
> have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested?
>
> Thanks
> chuck
>
>   
Hey Chuck, yea to the extreme I think it's at maybe 1 or 100 for 
MaxRequestsPerChild, but it seems to resemble the old bug on the 
surface. Either way it's quieted down for me, thanks for your attention 
to the issue.

-- 
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
Silent Penguin Services
AIM: YoosingYoonickz 
IRC: joe-mac on freenode
www.colonfail.com

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
> @Joe:
>
> Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this
> again after karmic has been released.
>
> Regards
> chuck
>
>   
Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-07 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
> ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Low
>
>   

Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it 
hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone?

-- 
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-28 Thread Joe McDonagh
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had
forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll
probably help workaround momentarily.

Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I
recall messing with it when I first started seeing this problem, but had
removed the configuration options since it didn't seem to help much.

I would just like to see some other pair of eyes confirm that a default
install with SSL still leaks. This is apparent because when I run the
same tests against the HTTP only port things look normal.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-24 Thread Joe McDonagh
Hi Stefan, thanks for the response. My responses are in-line.
> Is the parameter -f TLS1 necessary to reproduce the problem?
>   
No, same behavior. Long-running children just never free up the memory 
as long as I am hitting the SSL port, seemingly regardless if I pass an 
algorithm to AB or not. I see radically different (as in this time, 
normal) behavior if I hit the non-SSL port.
> Is the URL / of your webserver a php page? If yes, why is the content
> length of the page 0, what does the php script do? If not php, what is
> it? A simple redirect?
>   
It is the index.php for the CodeIgniter framework, the redirect is 
somewhat contrived, as it's handled by some internal CodeIgniter stuff 
that I am not very familiar with. I don't think PHP is involved at all 
in the leak, since the non-HTTPS port works fine.
> A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower
> value) to your configuration.
>
>   
That wouldn't really help since long-running children just hold onto 
memory no matter what it seems.


I feel like this issue would be huge and brought up by someone else by 
now if it's an actual regression. Does the package information I put in 
the beginning look right?


-- 
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-23 Thread Joe McDonagh
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any
more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-20 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from
incomplete?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Joe McDonagh
Sorry forgot to attach the output of AB after I killed it:

ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://scan-stag.osdc/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

Benchmarking scan-stag.osdc (be patient)
^C

Server Software:Apache
Server Hostname:scan-stag.osdc
Server Port:443
SSL/TLS Protocol:   TLSv1/SSLv3,DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA,4096,256

Document Path:  /
Document Length:0 bytes

Concurrency Level:  100
Time taken for tests:   185.122 seconds
Complete requests:  9751
Failed requests:0
Write errors:   0
Non-2xx responses:  9751
Total transferred:  7906663 bytes
HTML transferred:   0 bytes
Requests per second:52.67 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:   1898.496 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:   18.985 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:  41.71 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
  min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:   88  319 487.61563229
Processing:20 1571 446.0   17002235
Waiting:   20 1570 445.9   16992235
Total:140 1889 202.1   18745089

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%   1874
  66%   1916
  75%   1948
  80%   1972
  90%   2050
  95%   2144
  98%   2293
  99%   2408
 100%   5089 (longest request)

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Joe McDonagh
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is:

ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/

At ten seconds:

30253 www-data  20   0  254m  75m 4432 S   31  0.5   0:03.50 apache2
30252 www-data  20   0  251m  72m 4464 S   30  0.4   0:03.34 apache2
30250 www-data  20   0  250m  70m 4420 S   29  0.4   0:03.26 apache2
30251 www-data  20   0  250m  70m 4448 S   29  0.4   0:03.28 apache2
30249 www-data  20   0  249m  70m  S   28  0.4   0:03.20 apache2
30331 www-data  20   0  244m  65m 4404 R   30  0.4   0:02.96 apache2
30369 www-data  20   0  233m  53m 4432 R   24  0.3   0:02.36 apache2
30410 www-data  20   0  231m  51m 4348 S   22  0.3   0:02.18 apache2
30458 www-data  20   0  224m  45m 4372 S   19  0.3   0:01.86 apache2
30506 www-data  20   0  217m  38m 4324 R   15  0.2   0:01.50 apache2
30557 www-data  20   0  212m  32m 4356 R   12  0.2   0:01.20 apache2
30620 www-data  20   0  207m  27m 4356 S9  0.2   0:00.92 apache2

This is a significant jump in memory allocation, and children get
spawned. I expect the children per my configuration, but the memory use
is obscene. At three minutes (stopped ab at this point)

30253 www-data  20   0  366m 187m 4636 S3  1.2   0:09.52 apache2
30252 www-data  20   0  364m 185m 4656 S3  1.2   0:09.46 apache2
30251 www-data  20   0  363m 184m 4668 S3  1.1   0:09.40 apache2
30250 www-data  20   0  361m 182m 4632 S3  1.1   0:09.30 apache2
30249 www-data  20   0  359m 179m 4676 S3  1.1   0:09.14 apache2
30331 www-data  20   0  355m 176m 4668 S3  1.1   0:08.94 apache2
30369 www-data  20   0  343m 164m 4636 S3  1.0   0:08.34 apache2
30410 www-data  20   0  343m 163m 4628 S3  1.0   0:08.26 apache2
30458 www-data  20   0  337m 158m 4684 S3  1.0   0:07.96 apache2
30557 www-data  20   0  320m 141m 4608 R3  0.9   0:07.08 apache2
30620 www-data  20   0  320m 140m 4676 S3  0.9   0:07.06 apache2
30675 www-data  20   0  315m 135m 4620 S3  0.8   0:06.74 apache2
30731 www-data  20   0  311m 131m 4624 S3  0.8   0:06.54 apache2
30841 www-data  20   0  300m 121m 4656 S3  0.8   0:05.96 apache2
30901 www-data  20   0  295m 116m 4608 S3  0.7   0:05.70 apache2
30957 www-data  20   0  294m 114m 4624 S3  0.7   0:05.62 apache2

Now ab is not running, but my stopwatch program is. Now at 5 minutes:

30458 www-data  20   0  341m 162m 4692 S0  1.0   0:08.16 apache2
31126 www-data  20   0  290m 111m 4596 S0  0.7   0:05.42 apache2
31112 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.30 apache2
31210 www-data  20   0  287m 108m 4612 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31257 www-data  20   0  287m 107m 4600 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31222 www-data  20   0  286m 107m 4636 S0  0.7   0:05.20 apache2
31410 www-data  20   0  285m 105m 4588 S0  0.7   0:05.10 apache2
31412 www-data  20   0  284m 105m 4656 S0  0.7   0:05.12 apache2
31396 www-data  20   0  284m 105m 4632 S0  0.7   0:05.12 apache2

Note that although some threads do disappear (normal, expect) the ones
that stay never free up any RAM. If I were to let this just chill by
itself for a few days, res would be a gig or so and virt would be up
there.

And for good measure, ten minutes:

30458 www-data  20   0  341m 162m 4692 S0  1.0   0:08.22 apache2
31126 www-data  20   0  291m 111m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.48 apache2
31112 www-data  20   0  290m 110m 4620 S0  0.7   0:05.42 apache2
31222 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4652 S0  0.7   0:05.34 apache2
31210 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4616 S0  0.7   0:05.36 apache2
31257 www-data  20   0  287m 108m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.30 apache2
31410 www-data  20   0  286m 107m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.22 apache2
31396 www-data  20   0  286m 106m 4636 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31384 www-data  20   0  286m 106m 4616 S0  0.7   0:05.22 apache2
31412 www-data  20   0  285m 106m 4660 S0  0.7   0:05.18 apache2 

The server isn't being used much right now, but as you can see, no
memory has really been free'd. Right now I am working around this by
reloading apache at 11:59 every night (the saddest cron job on earth),
which appears to bring memory usage back down.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-ser

[Bug 422138] [NEW] Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-08-31 Thread Joe McDonagh
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apache2

1. Ubuntu Release Info:

Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
Release:8.04

2. Package Information:

apache2-mpm-prefork:
  Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11
  Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11
  Version table:
 *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 0
500 http://aptproxy hardy-security/main Packages
500 http://aptproxy hardy-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2.2.8-1 0
500 http://aptproxy hardy/main Packages

3. I expect apache to not chew up to a couple gigs per process when it
runs for a long time.

4. Apache chews threw a couple gigs per process when it runs for a long
time

Enabled modules:

alias.conf
alias.load
auth_basic.load
authn_file.load
authz_default.load
authz_groupfile.load
authz_host.load
authz_user.load
autoindex.conf
autoindex.load
cgi.load
deflate.conf
deflate.load
dir.conf
dir.load
env.load
mime.conf
mime.load
negotiation.conf
negotiation.load
php5.conf
php5.load
rewrite.load
setenvif.conf
setenvif.load
ssl.conf
ssl.load
status.conf
status.load

This DOES appear to be a dupe of 224945 (reproducible with ab), however
as you can see I am on the hardy-updates version. Is there something
obvious I am missing here?

** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs