[Bug 1176548] [NEW] nut-server collides with modemmanager

2013-05-05 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Similar to whatPaavo Leinonen reported in
031601ce2a49$20b2efe0$6218cfa0$@leinonen.fi on the NUT mailing list. See
also my mail in reply.

Ubuntu runs modemmanager as a native upstart service. nut-server ends up
running in parallel (on my system, probably a matter of timing). When
modemmanager scans the serial ports for modems, upsd is unable to open
the port configured for an UPS. (It might be possible to exclude some
ports from the scan, I didn't check because I have no modem it could
configure, I just kicked the package.

Please convert nut-server to a native upstart service to be able to have
it wait for modemmanager. (I hope upstart is clever enough to have a
service wait for an optional package and let it proceed if not
installed.)

** Affects: nut (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176548

Title:
  nut-server collides with modemmanager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1176548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-15 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Monday, 2011-02-14 at 21:54:20 -, Arnaud Quette wrote:
 I definitely need more info!
 please reply to ALL:

 - what is the exact model and date of manufacturing?

SmartUPS 300I NET. I have the serial number (GS9809283199) but no date.

 - are you sure this unit is ok?

You can't prove the absence of faults.

 - have you really checked the cabling or made the whole (cable + UPS) work
 somehow (using APC's software or apcupsd)?

Well, as I said this is working OK for days or weeks. Then something
happens that triggers a bug in apcsmart.

 - what is the meantime between occurrences of these issues?

I don;t have enough data. It's in the range of weeks or months.

 - is the device reachable (using upsc for example) between issues?

Sure, everything works fine.

 A driver debug output is really needed!

I'm running it again, but no promises. Reboots are much more frequent
than this misbehaviour.

 Note that I'm not the developer of this driver, nor have any acquaintance
 with APC.

Same here. Though I will probably try to locate this bug if we don;t
make progress with the debugging output, either because it does not tell
us enough or because I don't manage to capture it.

I would have thought finding the place in the code where it is trying to
reset the UPS connection wouldn't be this hard.

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| It is a well-known fact in any organisation that, if you want a job|
| done, you should give it to someone who is already very busy.  |
| Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals  |

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-15 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Tuesday, 2011-02-15 at 14:16:58 +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:

  I would have thought finding the place in the code where it is trying to
  reset the UPS connection wouldn't be this hard.

 this is not the problem. This code is in the smartmode() function of
 apcsmart.c:
 http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/nut/trunk/drivers/apcsmart.c

I'll have a look at that code.

 we see the 5 attempts to go to smart mode ('Y' command), but my aim is to
 understand why it is failing, and how to cleanly solve this without
 impacting support for other units.

Of course. The problem is that the program is sending the command
infinitely, probably because of the EIO.

 Some more questions:
 - how are you handling the device's permissions?
 Refer to ยง II, section 3:
 http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/nut.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/nut.README.Debian;hb=HEAD

/etc/udev/rules.d/zzzlpc.rules:
KERNEL==ttyS2,   OWNER=nut,  GROUP=nut,   MODE=0660

The serial line is on a PCI board. It may be a problem of that board,
not the UPS. Which is cleared by closing the device.

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| It is a well-known fact in any organisation that, if you want a job|
| done, you should give it to someone who is already very busy.  |
| Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals  |

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 535583] Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-15 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Tuesday, 2011-02-15 at 13:16:58 -, Arnaud Quette wrote:

 this is not the problem. This code is in the smartmode() function of
 apcsmart.c:
 http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/nut/trunk/drivers/apcsmart.c

 we see the 5 attempts to go to smart mode ('Y' command), but my aim is to
 understand why it is failing, and how to cleanly solve this without
 impacting support for other units.

I found no code that does five attempts. But this code in main.c,
starting on Line 618:

while (!exit_flag) {

struct timeval  timeout;

gettimeofday(timeout, NULL);
timeout.tv_sec += poll_interval;

upsdrv_updateinfo();

while (!dstate_poll_fds(timeout, extrafd)  !exit_flag) {
/* repeat until time is up or extrafd has data */


upsdrv_updateinfo() calls smartmode().

dstate_poll_fds() checks if there is any file descriptor that is
available. In our case:

select(7, [4 5 6], NULL, NULL, {1, 999837}) = 1 (in [4], left {1,
999835})

FD 4 is the serial line, which is passed to dstate_poll_fds() as
extrafd.

When there is data that can be read from the UPS no code in
dstate_poll_fds() reads from extrafd, there is only code that reads
from the other input FDs. The outer loop above also ignores extrafd.
exit_flag is never set, so it continues. And because there is an active
file descriptor, the select returns immediately (actually it takes two
microseconds).

The solution is to add code that reads all data from extrafd and discards
it because nobody asked for it. I would also close and reopen the serial
line in smartmode(). I would prepare a patch if I knew more about the
I/O abstractions used in the nut driver code. Sorry.

HTH,
Lupe Christoph
-- 
| It is a well-known fact in any organisation that, if you want a job|
| done, you should give it to someone who is already very busy.  |
| Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals  |

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-12 Thread Lupe Christoph 
(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({1, 0}, 0x7fff2890ea60)   = 0
write(4, \33, 1)  = 1
nanosleep({0, 0}, NULL) = 0
select(5, [4], NULL, NULL, {3, 0})  = 0 (Timeout)

HTH,
Lupe Christoph

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-10 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Since the supposed fix, I have had several ne incidents of this bug.

I'm now running Maverick Meerkat, and the log shows this:

Feb 10 14:10:14 alanya apcsmart[3238]: Communications with UPS lost: 
Communications with UPS lost - check cabling
Feb 10 14:10:14 alanya apcsmart[3238]: smartmode: ser_send_char failed: 
Input/output error
Feb 10 14:10:14 alanya apcsmart[3238]: last message repeated 9 times

... and nauseam, or until the /var/log partition fills up. The nut
package is up to data (2.4.3-1ubuntu5). Please reopen this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 535583] Re: Excessive logging by apcsmart program

2011-02-10 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Thursday, 2011-02-10 at 14:54:34 -, Arnaud Quette wrote:
 2011/2/10 Lupe Christoph

 could you please send us a driver debug output for investigation purpose.
 Ie, after having stopped the running NUT instance, launch:
 $ sudo /lib/nut/apcsmart -D -a device-id-from-ups.conf

 let it run for a few seconds / minutes (at least, have a couple of issue
 reproduction), then break using Ctrl+C. Don't forget to relaunch NUT then...

Will do, but this can take a few days or even weeks.

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| It is a well-known fact in any organisation that, if you want a job|
| done, you should give it to someone who is already very busy.  |
| Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals  |

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535583

Title:
  Excessive logging by apcsmart program

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 571416] Re: chkutmp failure

2010-05-03 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Monday, 2010-05-03 at 13:17:25 -, Chuck Short wrote:
 Which version are you using?

As you can see above, chkrootkit 0.49-3.

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design.   |
| /me  |

-- 
chkutmp failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571416
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-04-28 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Wednesday, 2010-04-28 at 18:09:39 -, Chuck Short wrote:
 can you try to reproduce this on lucid please?

Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found

I believe the false positive was gone for quite a while, probably due to
changes in init.

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design.   |
| /me  |

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 571416] [NEW] chkutmp failure

2010-04-28 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: chkrootkit

# /usr/lib/chkrootkit/chkutmp
 The tty of the following user process(es) were not found
 in /var/run/utmp !
! RUID  PID TTYCMD
! lupe13395 pts/0  /usr/bin/mutt
! lupe13266 pts/0  /bin/bash -i /home/lupe/scripts/muttloop
! lupe13398 pts/3  /usr/bin/mutt -f Incoming/Spam
! lupe13270 pts/3  /bin/bash -i /home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f 
Incoming/Spam
! lupe13396 pts/4  /usr/bin/mutt -f Incoming/Spam.sure
! lupe13271 pts/4  /bin/bash -i /home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f 
Incoming/Spam.sure
! lupe 2673 pts/5  /usr/bin/mutt -y
! lupe13272 pts/5  /bin/bash -i /home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -y
# ls -l /dev/pts/0
crw--w 1 lupe tty 136, 0 2010-04-28 21:45 /dev/pts/0

Only processes started from a launcher are affected. The command is
gnome-terminal --geometry=197x66+0+27 --tab-with-profile=mutt:INBOX 
--tab-with-profile=mutt:Octogon --tab-with-profile=mutt:Spam.perhaps 
--tab-with-profile=mutt:Spam --tab-with-profile=mutt:Spam.sure 
--tab-with-profile=mutt:Misc --tab-with-profile=Default

And only some of those. Here is the process tree:

lupe 13252 1  0 Apr27 ?00:01:39 gnome-terminal 
--geometry=197x66+0+27 --tab-with-profile=mutt:INBOX 
--tab-with-profile=mutt:Octogon --tab-with-profile=mutt:Spam.perhaps --tab-with
lupe 13266 13252  0 Apr27 pts/000:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop
lupe 13395 13266  0 Apr27 pts/000:00:01  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt
lupe 13268 13252  0 Apr27 pts/100:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f imap://l...@www.octogon.de/INBOX
lupe 13530 13268  0 Apr27 pts/100:00:01  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt -f 
imap://l...@www.octogon.de/INBOX
lupe 13269 13252  0 Apr27 pts/200:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f Incoming/Spam.perhaps
lupe 13400 13269  0 Apr27 pts/200:00:00  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt -f 
Incoming/Spam.perhaps
lupe 13270 13252  0 Apr27 pts/300:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f Incoming/Spam
lupe 13398 13270  0 Apr27 pts/300:00:00  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt -f 
Incoming/Spam
lupe 13271 13252  0 Apr27 pts/400:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -f Incoming/Spam.sure
lupe 13396 13271  0 Apr27 pts/400:00:02  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt -f 
Incoming/Spam.sure
lupe 13272 13252  0 Apr27 pts/500:00:00  \_ /bin/bash -i 
/home/lupe/scripts/muttloop -y
lupe  2673 13272  0 21:41 pts/500:00:00  |   \_ /usr/bin/mutt -y

You can see that pts/1 and pts/2 are missing.

So this is really strange. I have no idea what is happening here. The
effect is new with Lucid.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: chkrootkit 0.49-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Apr 28 21:51:21 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: chkrootkit

** Affects: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
chkutmp failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571416
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 571416] Re: chkutmp failure

2010-04-28 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46042949/Dependencies.txt

-- 
chkutmp failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571416
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442575] Re: munin-node is not started during system boot

2010-02-23 Thread Lupe Christoph 
As I said previously ... was fixed somehow before release of Karmic.

-- 
munin-node is not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-11 Thread Lupe Christoph 
I'm pretty sure I saw the string HOME in /sbin/init, but I can't prove
it anymore.

BTW, expertmode_output is just debugging:

expertmode_output() {
echo ###
echo ### Output of: $1
echo ###
eval $1 21
#cat EOF
#`$1 21`
#EOF
return 0
}

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-10 Thread Lupe Christoph 
I have seen this problem pop up a few times since I reported it and
vanish again. Must be related to Phase of Moon. Right now it has
disappeared:

Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing
found

chkrootkit:
  Installed: 0.48-10

The version of chkrootkit is still the same, only /sbin/init and
/sbin/telinit have changed.

# ls -li /sbin/init /sbin/telinit
172201 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 199472 2009-12-10 18:00 /sbin/init
172637 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  96568 2009-12-10 18:00 /sbin/telinit

Looking at the code in chkrootkit, the difference is that /sbin/init
does no longer contain the string HOME. The changelog of the upstart
package does not mentionHOME, so I can't tell if they fixed this
intentionally. The only update since I created the bug report is
0.6.3-11, so this must have fixed it. The strange thing is that I see
nothing in that update that would have deleted HOME.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36606433/upstart_0.6.3-10_0.6.3-11.diff.gz

I'd rather not rely on upstart taking care of problems in chkrootkit...

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-19 Thread Lupe Christoph 
On Monday, 2009-10-19 at 13:18:45 -, Chuck Short wrote:
 Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to
 improve it.

Well, as there are some finer tests on the page I mentioned, what about
implementing them in chkrootkit?

Lupe Christoph
-- 
| There is no substitute for bad design except worse design.   |
| /me  |

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 454566] [NEW] False positive for SucKit

2009-10-18 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: chkrootkit

Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning:
/sbin/init INFECTED

According to http://cc.jlab.org/docs/security/alerts/ this is an
indicator for a SucKit infection:

# ls -li /sbin/init /sbin/telinit
172240 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 199472 2009-10-15 21:19 /sbin/init
172791 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  96568 2009-10-15 21:19 /sbin/telinit

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-326062-highlight-suckit.html gives
some hints how to verify an infection. As I expected, they show no sign
of SucKit.

This false positive seems to be popping up since a few years. So I guess
the check for SucKit needs improvement...

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Oct 18 12:42:45 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: chkrootkit 0.48-10
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic
SourcePackage: chkrootkit
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64

** Affects: chkrootkit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-18 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872395/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872396/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
False positive for SucKit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442125] [NEW] Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bacula

Since my upgrade to Karmic Beta, the bacula daemons are not started
automatically during system boot. I can start them when the system is
running with no problems.

Since I don't understand upstart yet, I would like to ask for advice how
one debugs upstart problems. For now I will assume that something in the
bacula init scripts prevents them from running correctly.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Oct  4 13:05:22 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: bacula (not installed)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic
SourcePackage: bacula
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64

** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
Bacula daemons are not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32973152/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
Bacula daemons are not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 
1. Is this reproducible?
Yes, it is.

2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as 
detailed as possible.
Well, this machine has been running Ubuntu and bacula for quite some time, so I 
can't be really sure that I'm not missing something.

I can tell you that I deinstalled bacula-director-mysql bacula-director-
common bacula-fd bacula-sd bacula-sd-mysql and removed the init scripts.
Dunno why these were not deinstalled. They are considered part of the
configuration, and I did not use --purge.

Then, I installed those packages again and rebooted. No bacula process
was started, but I must admit that bacula-sd and bacula-fd had no chance
of being started because the installation did not install the start
scripts. Probably again because I did not use --purge when I removed the
packages.

I'm sorry that I don't have the time to experiment some more. And I
don't want to lose my bacula configuration.

-- 
Bacula daemons are not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 
I just realized that because the init scripts are part of the
configuration, they will probably not be replaced by an upgrade, so I'm
still running init scripts from Intrepid or even earlier.

-- 
Bacula daemons are not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442575] [NEW] munin-node is not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: munin

Speculating: /etc/init.d/munin-node is a conffile, so it is not replaced
with an upstart-compatible version during an upgrade to Karmic.

In any case, munin-node is not started during system boot. And so
/var/run/munin is not created, and the munin cronjob falls on it's nose:

Creating lock /var/run/munin/munin-update.lock failed: No such file or directory
Creating lock /var/run/munin/munin-graph.lock failed: No such file or directory
Creating lock /var/run/munin/munin-html.lock failed: No such file or directory

I'm having a smiliar problem with bacula. See Bug #442125.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Oct  4 22:56:02 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: munin-node 1.2.6-13ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic
SourcePackage: munin
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:3319): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:3433): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:3472): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (gnome-panel:3432): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to 
allocate widget with width -12 and height 24
 (gnome-panel:3432): Gdk-WARNING **: 
/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.1/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a 
pixmap or window

** Affects: munin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
munin-node is not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 442575] Re: munin-node is not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32997939/Dependencies.txt

-- 
munin-node is not started during system boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 423579] [NEW] Spam hangs amavisd

2009-09-03 Thread Lupe Christoph 
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: amavisd-new

Each time this Spam is run through Amavis, it hangs one process until
all are used up.

** Affects: amavisd-new (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Spam hangs amavisd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 423579] Re: Spam hangs amavisd

2009-09-03 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: postcat dump of Spam hanging amavisd
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31267863/amavisd-problem.mail

-- 
Spam hangs amavisd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 423579] Re: Spam hangs amavisd

2009-09-03 Thread Lupe Christoph 

** Attachment added: Output from ubuntu-bug for a hanging amavisd process
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31267875/amavis-hang

-- 
Spam hangs amavisd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs