[Bug 623144] Re: chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated
Confirmed on 11.10: Checking `chkutmp'... *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x45)[0x55d8d5] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0xe7887)[0x55d887] ./chkutmp[0x8048b15] ./chkutmp[0x8048ce2] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0x48f113] === Memory map: 00187000-00188000 r-xp 00:00 0 [vdso] 0032c000-00348000 r-xp 08:02 10862628 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 00348000-00349000 r--p 0001b000 08:02 10862628 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 00349000-0034a000 rw-p 0001c000 08:02 10862628 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 003be000-003dc000 r-xp 08:02 10862635 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so 003dc000-003dd000 r--p 0001d000 08:02 10862635 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so 003dd000-003de000 rw-p 0001e000 08:02 10862635 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so 00476000-005ec000 r-xp 08:02 10862906 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so 005ec000-005ee000 r--p 00176000 08:02 10862906 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so 005ee000-005ef000 rw-p 00178000 08:02 10862906 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so 005ef000-005f2000 rw-p 00:00 0 08048000-0804a000 r-xp 08:02 2637851/usr/lib/chkrootkit/chkutmp 0804a000-0804b000 r--p 1000 08:02 2637851/usr/lib/chkrootkit/chkutmp 0804b000-0804c000 rw-p 2000 08:02 2637851/usr/lib/chkrootkit/chkutmp 08e32000-08e53000 rw-p 00:00 0 [heap] b783a000-b783b000 rw-p 00:00 0 b7856000-b7858000 rw-p 00:00 0 bf71f000-bf897000 rw-p 00:00 0 [stack] Aborted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623144 Title: chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/623144/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 623144] Re: chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated
Valgrind output from 11.10. ** Attachment added: "chkutmp.valgrind.ubuntu.11.10.out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/623144/+attachment/2601905/+files/chkutmp.valgrind.ubuntu.11.10.out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623144 Title: chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/623144/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 283852] Re: tomcat6 does not include tomcat-dbcp.jar
Yes, that version does fix the problem for me. After installing it from your ppa, I was able to remove tomcat-dbcp.jar from my system. Thanks for all your hard work! -- tomcat6 does not include tomcat-dbcp.jar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 283852] Re: tomcat6 does not include tomcat-dbcp.jar
I'm afraid that I can't. I'm not a Java webapp developer and the application that I found the bug with is commercial. -- tomcat6 does not include tomcat-dbcp.jar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 318915] Re: max_connections fixed to 886
Thanks I managed to fix everything *** Kind regards, Muita Wangoko Tel: +254-(0)-724 159 723 +254-(0)-738 560 599 "Elementary sartorial techniques initially applied obviate the need for repetitive similar actions to the square of three" ** Marilyn Monroe - "It's not true that I had nothing on. I had the radio on." On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Andreas Olsson wrote: > Chuck: The report, among other things, says: "If i set the variable > inside my.cnf to a value higher than 886, it will be reduced to 886." > > -- > max_connections fixed to 886 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318915 > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to mysql- > dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. > > Status in "mysql-dfsg-5.0" source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > > Bug description: > On ubuntu 8.04 AMD64 the mysql-server-5.0 pkg > is not accepting a max_connections value higher than 886. > > No matter how big your iron is, how much ram you have. > > This bug didn't harm most mysql users cause who needs more than 886 > simultanous connections. > > If i set the variable inside my.cnf to a value higher than 886, > it will be reduced to 886. > > Entering mysql it is possibly to set the variable to every value. > > mysql> set global max_connections = '1'; > > will work but this get lost with your next reboot. > > Older version and even the 32bit version, > don't have that bug. > > It's crazy that just the 64bit pkg has this bug. > > > best regards > fridolin > -- max_connections fixed to 886 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 337534] [NEW] install fail my video player
Hi, it seems you were initially installing mysql but it was not properly or fully configured, so you need to run dpkg --configure -a and then aptitude -f install or apt-get -f install depending on the installer you used to install *** Kind regards, Muita Wangoko Tel: +254-(0)-724 159 723 +254-(0)-738 560 599 "Elementary sartorial techniques initially applied obviate the need for repetitive similar actions to the square of three" ** Dick Cavett - "If your parents never had children, chances are... neither will you." 2009/3/4 zoosong > Public bug reported: > > I do not know, sorry > > ProblemType: Package > Architecture: i386 > Dependencies: > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 > ErrorMessage: pre-installation script 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 > Package: mysql-server-5.0 None > SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.0 > Title: package mysql-server-5.0 None failed to install/upgrade: > pre-installation script 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 > Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 > > ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > > ** Tags: apport-package > > -- > install fail my video player > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337534 > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to mysql- > dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. > > Status in “mysql-dfsg-5.0” source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > I do not know, sorry > > ProblemType: Package > Architecture: i386 > Dependencies: > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 > ErrorMessage: pre-installation script 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 > Package: mysql-server-5.0 None > SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.0 > Title: package mysql-server-5.0 None failed to install/upgrade: > pre-installation script 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 > Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 > -- install fail my video player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 972829] Re: maas-server setting requires port even when using http default
+1 for this, I just spent ~8 hours variously trying to pin down the issue, up to and including reinstalling the entire MAAS environment a few times, before eventually coming across this bug and figuring out the issue. Please fix! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972829 Title: maas-server setting requires port even when using http default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/972829/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211335] [NEW] openvpn breaks wi-fi
Public bug reported: Checking checkbox "automatically connect to vpn" in network manager for wi-fi network makes this network to flap - disconnects every 30-40 seconds with the message "wlan0: deauthenticating from ... by local choice (reason=3)". The problem appeared within last few weeks. xubuntu 13.04 x86_64 ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211335 Title: openvpn breaks wi-fi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1211335/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211335] Re: openvpn breaks wi-fi
ubuntu version is in the bug report, wpasupplicant 1.0-3ubuntu2, openvpn 2.2.1-8ubuntu3 which log files do you need exactly? were you able to reproduce it? ** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211335 Title: openvpn breaks wi-fi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1211335/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] [NEW] failed to create\start vm
Public bug reported:
In 10.10 virt-manager fails to start or create vm with following error:
Unable to complete install ' Unable to create
cgroup for debs: No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1555, in do_install
dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/virtinst/Guest.py", line 973, in
start_install
return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/virtinst/Guest.py", line 1038, in
_do_install
"install")
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/virtinst/Guest.py", line 1009, in
_create_guest
dom = self.conn.createLinux(start_xml, 0)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/libvirt.py", line 1277, in createLinux
if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed',
conn=self)
libvirtError: Unable to create cgroup for debs: No such file or directory
'
** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216
Title:
failed to create\start vm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
"sudo service libvirt-bin restart" is required after every run of virt- manager to make it work again. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216 Title: failed to create\start vm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
No, I don't have cgroup-bin installed. Bug still present with 0.8.7-1ubuntu2 ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216 Title: failed to create\start vm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
Error starting domain: Unable to create cgroup for squid: No such file
or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 45, in cb_wrapper
callback(asyncjob, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/engine.py", line 959, in asyncfunc
vm.startup()
File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/domain.py", line 1114, in startup
self._backend.create()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libvirt.py", line 365, in create
if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainCreate() failed', dom=self)
libvirtError: Unable to create cgroup for squid: No such file or directory
___
here 'squid' is the VM name.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216
Title:
failed to create\start vm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
apport-collect failed with the message: Package libvirt not installed and no hook available, ignoring although libvirt-bin and libvirt0 are installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216 Title: failed to create\start vm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
virsh 'start squid' fails with error: Unable to create cgroup for squid: No such file or directory ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216 Title: failed to create\start vm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 796216] Re: failed to create\start vm
dpkg -l | grep libvirt ii libvirt-bin 0.9.2-5ubuntu0+dnjl0~natty0 the programs for the libvirt library ii libvirt00.9.2-5ubuntu0+dnjl0~natty0 library for interfacing with different virtualization systems ii libvirtodbc06.1.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu4 high-performance database - ODBC libraries ii python-libvirt 0.9.2-5ubuntu0+dnjl0~natty0 libvirt Python bindings dpkg -S `which libvirtd` libvirt-bin: /usr/sbin/libvirtd I've updated using aptitude dist-upgrade so there might be some related quirks indeed. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796216 Title: failed to create\start vm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/796216/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 665512] Re: can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10
same problem. -- can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 676094] [NEW] Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 The tomcat6 init script does not pass the --pid-file argument to start- stop-daemon when it launches tomcat. This causes start-stop-daemon to look for processes with matching names, uids and gids when trying to determine if tomcat is already running. Due to the way the tomcat6 init script is written, this means that tomcat will not start if an existing instance of /bin/bash is running with the same user and group as that which tomcat runs as. The offending lines are in 148-154 of /etc/init.d/tomcat6: # Run the catalina.sh script as a daemon set +e touch "$CATALINA_PID" "$CATALINA_BASE"/logs/catalina.out chown $TOMCAT6_USER "$CATALINA_PID" "$CATALINA_BASE"/logs/catalina.out start-stop-daemon --start -u "$TOMCAT6_USER" -g "$TOMCAT6_GROUP" \ -c "$TOMCAT6_USER" -d "$CATALINA_TMPDIR" \ -x /bin/bash -- -c "$AUTHBIND_COMMAND $TOMCAT_SH" $TOMCAT_SH causes catalina.sh to be run, which maintains the pid file. However, start-stop-daemon is unaware of this pid file. Other uses of start-stop-daemon in the init script pass the --pid-file option. Can it just be added to this one? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: tomcat6 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-server 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 16 15:00:06 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: tomcat6 ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 676094] Re: Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
-- Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 590537] Re: "lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions" keeps showing up in the system log
The message: "lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions" Is also logged when starting google "Chromium 10.0.648.127 (Developer Build 76697) Ubuntu 10.04" on a system patched upto "2.6.32-29-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590537 Title: "lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions" keeps showing up in the system log -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] [NEW] tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 I run tomcat6 on Ubuntu 8.10, installed from the tomcat6 package. I need to run tomcat as a different user to 'tomcat6' so have configured this via the TOMCAT6_USER variable in /etc/default/tomcat6. I then manually changed the ownership of tomcat's various directories for this to work. This has been fine for over a year and has survived updates to the tomcat6 package. However, this morning I upgraded to 6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 and afterwards found that tomcat no longer ran. After investigation, I found that the upgrade had chowned and chgrped tomcat's directories to the tomcat6 user/group. This left tomcat unable to run as it couldn't read or write key directories. Looking at the tomcat6 package, this happens in the postinst script, during the configure stage. The same also happens in the current tomcat6 package in Ubuntu 10.04. I would suggest that these chowns/chgrps either be removed, or that they are made aware of the user that tomcat runs as. Could this be done by passing options through debconf? ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories
I've just added the following stat overrides on a system that had not yet upgraded to the latest tomcat6 package: dpkg-statoverride --add cms cms 750 /var/log/tomcat6/ dpkg-statoverride --add cms cms 755 /var/lib/tomcat6/temp/ dpkg-statoverride --add cms cms 750 /var/cache/tomcat6 dpkg-statoverride --add root cms 775 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina dpkg-statoverride --add root cms 775 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost dpkg-statoverride --add root cms 775 /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps I then ran a dist-upgrade. After the upgrade, the directories listed above had all had their user and or group changed as follows: r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /var/log/tomcat6/ drwxr-x--- 2 tomcat6 adm 4096 2010-04-08 09:47 /var/log/tomcat6/ r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /var/lib/tomcat6/temp/ drwxr-xr-x 2 tomcat6 cms 4096 2009-12-21 15:11 /var/lib/tomcat6/temp/ r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /var/cache/tomcat6 drwxr-x--- 2 tomcat6 adm 4096 2010-04-08 10:37 /var/cache/tomcat6 r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/Catalina drwxrwxr-x 3 root tomcat6 4096 2009-10-12 09:27 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost drwxrwxr-x 2 root tomcat6 4096 2010-04-08 10:37 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost r...@host:/var/lib/tomcat6# ls -ld /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps drwxrwxr-x 4 root tomcat6 4096 2009-12-18 09:36 /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps Before the upgrade, the permissions and ownership of the directories matched those specified in the statoverrides. The postinst scripts for tomcat6_6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3_all.deb and tomcat6_6.0.24-2ubuntu1_all.deb both contain chowns and chmods like the following (from 6.0.18): chown -R tomcat6:adm /var/log/tomcat6 /var/cache/tomcat6 chmod 750 /var/log/tomcat6 /var/cache/tomcat6 chgrp tomcat6 /etc/tomcat6/tomcat-users.xml chmod 640 /etc/tomcat6/tomcat-users.xml chown tomcat6 /var/lib/tomcat6/temp chgrp tomcat6 /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps chmod 775 /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps chgrp tomcat6 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost chmod 775 /etc/tomcat6/Catalina /etc/tomcat6/Catalina/localhost I don't know much about dpkg, but these certainly seem to be hardcoded to the tomcat6 and adm groups. -- tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should respect dpkg-statoverride (support running as a different user)
Looking at the version of the tomcat6 package in 10.04, there are several other instances where the user is hard-coded to tomcat6, e.g. in the creation of the tomcat6 user itself, and the set-up of authbind. This therefore requires more than just respecting dpkg-statoverride. I think it would need the ability to configure a user that tomcat should run as using debconf-set-selections so this could be set before installing the package. The default version of /etc/default/tomcat6 installed by the tomcat6 package contains this as its first line: # Run Tomcat as this user ID. Not setting this or leaving it blank will use the # default of tomcat6. #TOMCAT6_USER=tomcat6 Given the current broken state of the tomcat6 package, this line is at best extremely misleading. -- tomcat6 package should respect dpkg-statoverride (support running as a different user) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
You are only testing /etc/tomcat6/. This is not in the list of files that the package is modifying. See comment 2 in this bug or the package's postinst script. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
Why the change in subject? I believe the original, as edited by Thierry Carrez is correct. The problem is more than just the fact that tomcat6 does not respect statoverrides. See comments 3, 4 & 5. -- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
It sounds like either 2 or 3 would 'fix' the bug. Solution two strikes me as the simplest from the end-user perspective, and has the added advantage that it would allow future package updates to tweak permissions. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
As far as I can tell, this is now working okay. I haven't been able to test a package upgrade, but have tried installing a new package with and without /etc/default/tomcat6 already existing and with/without TOMCAT6_[USER|GROUP] being set and all seems well. If the tomcat6 user and group are customised, the package sets the ownership as requested and also does not create any extra users or groups. The only slight problem is that the group for the log and cache directories is hard-coded to adm and any post-installation changes will be reverted by package updates. I think we can live with this, but we had previously changed this group to be the same as the group for the other directories. It is not possible for a sysadmin to tweak the permissions of directories as these will not be honoured by future package updates (no statoverride checks). I believe this is intentional. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1130599] [NEW] make openvpn's net-tools dependency optional
Public bug reported: The net-tools package (provides ifconfig etc) is deprecated on GNU/Linux for decades already in favor of iproute2. Openvpn is capable to work with iproute2 if compiled with ./configure --enable-iproute2 Thus openvpn package should be compiled with --enable-iproute2 and depend on iproute2 instead of net-tools. ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130599 Title: make openvpn's net-tools dependency optional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1130599/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1129029] Re: ACL not respected if an attachment file name contains the € character
these are the the changes i made to /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data: deny message = Questa mail contiene un allegato di tipo .$found_extension che non e' accettato dal server poiche' potrebbe contenere virus. Se dovete assolutamente inviare questo allegato, modificate l'estensione del file, es.: da exe a exo, oppure comprimetelo in formato bz o tar.gz - This mail contains an attachment of a type wich we do not accept ($found_extension) because it could contain some virus. If you absolutely need to send this file, plese rename its extension, ex: from exe to exo, or compress it as bz or tar.gz demime = bat:com:exe:pif:prf:vbs:cpl:hta:cmd:js:jse:vbe:wsf:wsh:wswh:como:hqx:bhx:mim:uue:uu:b64:xxe:asx:mht:scr this an example email, i removed my email address and ip: Return-path: Envelope-to: x...@csc.it Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:46:12 +0100 Received: from [192.168.153.151] by mail.xxx.it with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAI32-0001tE-FG for i...@csc.it; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:46:12 +0100 Message-ID: <512c9274.3070...@xxx.it> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:46:12 +0100 From: Max Franco User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: i...@csc.it Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="090701040008010405060908" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.153.151 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: x...@xxx.it X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: xx_sender...@xxx.it X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.csc.it X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Subject: launchpad bug #1129029 test email X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:31:22 +) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.csc.it) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --090701040008010405060908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just a test email to verify the bug in subject -- *Massimiliano Franco* --090701040008010405060908 Content-Type: application/x-msdos-program; name="test =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=A4=2Ebat?=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*=ISO-8859-15''%74%65%73%74%20%A4%2E%62%61%74 dGVzdAo= --090701040008010405060908-- ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129029 Title: ACL not respected if an attachment file name contains the € character To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1129029/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1007966] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I got an error message while updating but Samba never really worked properly here ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 BothFailedConnect: Yes Date: Sat Jun 2 23:29:17 2012 DuplicateSignature: Setting up linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic (3.2.0-24.39) ... Running depmod. Failed to symbolic-link /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic to initrd.img: File exists dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NmbdLog: SambaServerRegression: No SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: failed to retrieve printer list: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (36 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007966 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1007966/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1007966] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007966 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1007966/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015678] [NEW] Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs
Public bug reported: We automatically update cobbler profiles to provision systems for jobs running in jenkins, and when we run commands such as: sudo cobbler system edit --name=acer-veriton-01 --profile=quantal-2012-06-20_16-00-37-acer-veriton-01-x86_64 --netboot-enabled=Y cobbler shows an error: internal error, unknown system name acer-veriton-01 but still exits with status 0. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cobbler 2.2.2-0ubuntu33 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jun 20 16:16:13 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111011) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cobbler UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-18 (33 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.cobbler.ubuntu.server.preseed: 2012-05-16T20:38:45.876247 ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015678 Title: Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1015678/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015678] Re: Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015678 Title: Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1015678/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Looks like smbd starts before cups. Change "start on" parameter in /etc/init/smbd.conf to "start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up and started cups)" solved the problem for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1015678] Re: Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs
TESTCASE: Run: sudo cobbler system edit --name=this-name-matches-no-existing-cobbler-system Expected results: "internal error, unknown system name this-name-matches-no-existing-cobbler-system" on stdout, exit status of 0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015678 Title: Cobbler exits with status 0 when failure occurs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1015678/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 913857] [NEW] ntp-keygen documentation lists options that ntp-keygen does not support
Public bug reported: I'm running precise amd64, but the problem appears to exist on oneiric i386 and amd64 as well. Natty and older versions support a -p option in ntp-keygen, i.e. ntp-keygen -p test Oneiric and precise do not support this, but the man page has not been updated, and the referenced documentation at /usr/share/doc/ntp-doc/html/keygen.html (in the ntp-doc package) mentions the -p option as well. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ntp 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jan 9 10:54:45 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) NtpStatus: ntpq: read: Connection refused ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ntp UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-09 (0 days ago) ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apparmor apport-bug manual-testing precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913857 Title: ntp-keygen documentation lists options that ntp-keygen does not support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/913857/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 913857] Re: ntp-keygen documentation lists options that ntp-keygen does not support
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913857 Title: ntp-keygen documentation lists options that ntp-keygen does not support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/913857/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 236931] [NEW] openssh-server does not find dsa keys authorized_keys file
Public bug reported: using: server os: ubuntu 8.04 openssh-server: 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2 client os: debian etch 4.0 openssh-client: 4.3p2-9etch2 what I wanted: needed to login without password into ubuntu server from debian client as root. what I did: 1. on client: 1.1 created dsa key with the command: ssh-keygen -t dsa 1.2 copied public key to the server's authorized_keys file. 1.3 tried to login, failed (have been asked for a password) 2. on server: 2.1 increased loglevel to: LogLevel DEBUG3 on the server 2.2 restarted the server: invoke-rc.d ssh restart 2.3. polled on /var/log/auth.log 3. back on client side: 3.1 tried to login, as root: ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have been asked for password 4. on server in the poll I got: === start dump == Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: Failed none for root from xxx.yyy.zzz.www port 39449 ssh2 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_request_receive entering Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: monitor_read: checking request 21 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed entering Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: key_from_blob: 0xb80022a8 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: Checking blacklist file /etc/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 0/0 (e=0/0) Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: trying public key file /root/.ssh/authorized_keys Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: checking '/root/.ssh' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: checking '/root' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: terminating check at '/root' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug2: key not found Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 0/0 (e=0/0) Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: trying public key file /root/.ssh/authorized_keys2 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: checking '/root/.ssh' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: checking '/root' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: secure_filename: terminating check at '/root' Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug2: key not found Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: Failed publickey for root from xxx.yyy.zzz.www port 39449 ssh2 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: key 0xb80022a8 is disallowed Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_request_send entering: type 22 Jun 3 00:19:30 sshserver sshd[6525]: debug3: mm_request_receive entering === stop dump == 5. on client: 5.1 created RSA key: ssh-keygen -t rsa 5.2 copied the public key to the server 5.3 tried to login SUCCESS.. my conclusion: something is wrong with DSA keys handling. Please fix. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- openssh-server does not find dsa keys authorized_keys file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 830277] [NEW] ntpdate manpage is inconsistent about threshold
Public bug reported: from `man ntpdate`: Time adjustments are made by ntpdate in one of two ways. If ntpdate determines the clock is in error more than 0.5 second it will sim‐ ply step the time by calling the system settimeofday() routine. If the error is less than 0.5 seconds, it will slew the time by call‐ ing the system adjtime() routine. The latter technique is less disruptive and more accurate when the error is small, and works quite well when ntpdate is run by cron every hour or two. but later on: -B Force the time to always be slewed using the adjtime() system call, even if the measured offset is greater than +-128 ms. The default is to step the time using settimeofday() if the offset is greater than +-128 ms. Note that, if the offset is much greater than +-128 ms in this case, that it can take a long time (hours) to slew the clock to the correct value. During this time. the host should not be used to synchronize clients. Is the true value 0.128 s or 0.5 s? ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830277 Title: ntpdate manpage is inconsistent about threshold To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/830277/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 869905] Re: Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869905 Title: Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+bug/869905/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 869905] [NEW] Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null
Public bug reported: etckeeper calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null As a result, a puzzling line of output appears in the terminal. See /etc/etckeeper/commit.d/50vcs-commit.sh This bug is in the Ubuntu delta vs. Debian. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: etckeeper 0.56ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 7 12:18:24 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: etckeeper UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-06 (1 days ago) ** Affects: etckeeper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869905 Title: Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+bug/869905/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 869905] Re: Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null
The puzzling line of output is something like: root which appears without any explanation in the output of an apt operation when etckeeper is invoked. A suitable "patch" would be to simply add >/dev/null to the "bzr whoami" invocation in 50vcs-commit.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869905 Title: Calls 'bzr whoami' for the exit code, but does not redirect stdout to /dev/null To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+bug/869905/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 682500] Re: Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
Pedro, Please reproduce the failure, then run "echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK" in the same shell, and tell us whether the result begins /tmp/ssh- or /tmp/keyring- : this will ascertain whether you are using the openssh ssh-agent, or the reimplementation of the ssh-agent protocol in gnome-keyring-daemon. I suspect the latter, in which case this bug needs to be on the gnome- keyring package, not the openssh one. -- Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1071529] [NEW] Version bump request to 2.0.6+
Public bug reported: As per: http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-2.0-current/Changes mod_perl 2.0.6 has been out since April 24, 2012 and 2.0.7 since June 5, 2012. They include significant bug fixes, including a fix for a race condition that makes mod_perl unreliable on Ubuntu Server (see: http://www .gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/104026). Thank you! ** Affects: libapache2-mod-perl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libapache2-mod-perl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071529 Title: Version bump request to 2.0.6+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-perl2/+bug/1071529/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1071529] Re: Version bump request to 2.0.6+
> What version of Ubuntu are you requesting this for? The sooner the better! I'd thought it would be in 12.10, but noticed today that all future Ubuntu versions show 2.0.5-5ubuntu2. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-perl2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libapache2-mod-perl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071529 Title: Version bump request to 2.0.6+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-perl2/+bug/1071529/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1084028] Re: openvswitch based interfaces not started in time during boot
Mee too. Ubuntu 14.04 + Openstack Kilo. Br-eth1 is not starting on system boot but if I do `ifup br-eth1` all things are doing well. # grep -vE "(^#|^$)" /etc/network/interfaces.d/ovs-bridge.cfg iface eth0 inet manual iface eth1 inet manual auto br-eth1 allow-ovs br-eth1 iface br-eth1 inet static address 10.0.64.67/24 gateway 10.0.64.64 ovs_type OVSBridge ovs_ports bond1 allow-br-eth1 bond1 iface bond1 inet manual ovs_bridge br-eth1 ovs_type OVSBond ovs_bonds eth0 eth1 ovs_options bond_mode=balance-slb lacp=active -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084028 Title: openvswitch based interfaces not started in time during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1084028/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] [NEW] sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
Public bug reported: When I preseed a desktop install using utah for daily iso testing, the ssh service is not running when it starts up. journalctl -u ssh shows no entries. If I manually start the ssh service, it seems to work. If I reboot, sshd is running. On the first boot, however, it is not. This problem appears to have started on the March 5 image. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
Can I pin i-s-h during install or is there some other way I can help verify this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
I re-ran this job: https://platform-qa-jenkins.ubuntu.com/view/smoke-default/job/ubuntu-xenial-desktop-amd64-smoke-default/ It installs from the daily iso using utah. It uses a preseed here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-test-case-dev/ubuntu-test-cases/desktop/view/head:/preseeds/default.cfg that installs openssh-server via pkgsel. To verify what was going on, I connected virt-manager to the jenkins executor node (venonat) and opened a console on the VM while it was waiting to time out. If you need assistance setting up this recreate method, I can provide that. On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > I tried to purge and reinstall openssh-server on today's cloud image > (with i-s-h 1.29ubuntu1) and ssh.service does start up right away as > expected. So this naïve reproducer doesn't work. Max, how does openssh- > server get installed in your case? Sorry for my ignorance, I don't know > much about preseeding -- is this just translated into some apt-get > install calls? Do they happen in a chroot with a policy-rc.d or similar? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 > > Title: > sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system > > Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > When I preseed a desktop install using utah for daily iso testing, the > ssh service is not running when it starts up. journalctl -u ssh shows > no entries. If I manually start the ssh service, it seems to work. If > I reboot, sshd is running. On the first boot, however, it is not. This > problem appears to have started on the March 5 image. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
FWIW, this doesn't happen on current server installs, just desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
This is blocking current image promotions. Is there something I can do to provide more data for getting it fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
I've confirmed that openssh-server is installed on the system, and can be started manually after the first reboot. I previously saw that it started automatically after the second reboot, but I haven't confirmed that this week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1554266] Re: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system
If we enable oem config in the preseed, this problem doesn't occur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554266 Title: sshd does not start on newly installed desktop system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1554266/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1451572] [NEW] 'SMART error (FailedOpenDevice) detected' emails now being sent to root after removing a USB portable hard drive
Public bug reported: Since upgrading from trusty to vivid, it appears that smartd has started sending 'SMART error (FailedOpenDevice) detected' alert emails each time a USB external hard drive is attached and then removed (subject to it being attached long enough to be caught by smartd's polling period). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: smartmontools 6.3+svn4002-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-15.15-generic 3.19.3 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon May 4 22:00:28 2015 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-29 (340 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) SourcePackage: smartmontools UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to vivid on 2015-03-29 (36 days ago) ** Affects: smartmontools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to smartmontools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1451572 Title: 'SMART error (FailedOpenDevice) detected' emails now being sent to root after removing a USB portable hard drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smartmontools/+bug/1451572/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1328958] [NEW] Local provider fails to bootstrap on utopic
Public bug reported: I'm trying to init and bootstrap the juju local provider on utopic. I keep getting a chown: invalid user error: max@eden:~$ rm -rf .juju max@eden:~$ juju init A boilerplate environment configuration file has been written to /home/max/.juju/environments.yaml. Edit the file to configure your juju environment and run bootstrap. max@eden:~$ juju switch local amazon -> local max@eden:~$ juju bootstrap uploading tools for series [utopic precise trusty] Logging to /home/max/.juju/local/cloud-init-output.log on remote host chown: invalid user: ‘ubuntu:ubuntu’ Bootstrap failed, destroying environment ERROR exit status 1 max@eden:~$ ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328958 Title: Local provider fails to bootstrap on utopic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1328958/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1329429] Re: local bootstrap fails
I see this with the amazon provider as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1329429 Title: local bootstrap fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1329429/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1328958] Re: Local provider run on cloud images want ubuntu user
I still have the same problem on my workstation running utopic after a long series of upgrades, so I don't think it's exclusive to cloud images. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328958 Title: Local provider run on cloud images want ubuntu user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1328958/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1328958] Re: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user
There we go! I have /home/ubuntu left over from an old setup simulating the conditions in the CI lab, but I have no ubuntu user. I'll delete /home/ubuntu and try again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328958 Title: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1328958/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1328958] Re: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user
The deployments I've been doing all need swift, so I had to get canonistack working anyway. I'll retry this later this week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328958 Title: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1328958/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1328958] Re: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user
So mine is working if I remove /home/ubuntu. Is there something else I should check? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328958 Title: Local provider run on server images requires an ubuntu user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1328958/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1362224] [NEW] local provider creates all containers with the same MAC address
Public bug reported:
When I run juju with the local provider on utopic, all of the containers are
created with the same MAC address. I tried adding lxc-clone: true and
lxc-clone-aufs: true to my environments.yaml local section, but now I can't get
a bootstrap to complete, with or without those options. I get:
max@ursus:~/bzr/merges/nfss-insert-timestamp$ juju bootstrap
uploading tools for series [precise trusty utopic]
Logging to /home/max/.juju/local/cloud-init-output.log on remote host
Bootstrapping Juju machine agent
Starting Juju machine agent (juju-agent-max-local)
345b964937a7e650135bca9443637a92bacf83dfaae1323589f1946a010b97ff
/home/max/.juju/local/tools/1.20.5.1-utopic-amd64/tools.tar.gz
2014-08-27 15:37:04 INFO juju.cmd supercommand.go:37 running jujud
[1.20.5.1-utopic-amd64 gc]
2014-08-27 15:37:04 DEBUG juju.agent agent.go:377 read agent config, format
"1.18"
2014-08-27 15:37:04 INFO juju.provider.local environprovider.go:42 opening
environment "local"
2014-08-27 15:37:04 DEBUG juju.cmd.jujud bootstrap.go:210 starting mongo
2014-08-27 15:37:04 DEBUG juju.cmd.jujud bootstrap.go:235 calling
ensureMongoServer
2014-08-27 15:37:04 INFO juju.mongo mongo.go:171 Ensuring mongo server is
running; data directory /home/max/.juju/local; port 37017
2014-08-27 15:37:04 INFO juju.mongo mongo.go:326 installing juju-mongodb
2014-08-27 15:37:04 INFO juju.utils.apt apt.go:128 Running: [apt-get
--option=Dpkg::Options::=--force-confold
--option=Dpkg::options::=--force-unsafe-io --assume-yes --quiet install
juju-mongodb]
2014-08-27 15:37:05 DEBUG juju.mongo mongo.go:275 using mongod:
/usr/lib/juju/bin/mongod --version: "db version v2.4.10\nWed Aug 27
11:37:05.432 git version: nogitversion\n"
2014-08-27 15:37:05 DEBUG juju.worker.peergrouper initiate.go:41 Initiating
mongo replicaset; dialInfo &mgo.DialInfo{Addrs:[]string{"127.0.0.1:37017"},
Direct:false, Timeout:3000, FailFast:false, Database:"", Source:"",
Service:"", Mechanism:"", Username:"", Password:"", PoolLimit:0,
DialServer:(func(*mgo.ServerAddr) (net.Conn, error))(nil), Dial:(func(net.Addr)
(net.Conn, error))(0x5be180)}; memberHostport "10.0.3.1:37017"; user "";
password ""
2014-08-27 15:37:05 DEBUG juju.mongo open.go:96 connection failed, will retry:
dial tcp 127.0.0.1:37017: connection refused
2014-08-27 15:37:05 DEBUG juju.mongo open.go:96 connection failed, will retry:
dial tcp 127.0.0.1:37017: connection refused
2014-08-27 15:37:05 INFO juju.mongo open.go:104 dialled mongo successfully
2014-08-27 15:37:05 INFO juju.replicaset replicaset.go:67 Initiating replicaset
with config replicaset.Config{Name:"juju", Version:1,
Members:[]replicaset.Member{replicaset.Member{Id:1, Address:"10.0.3.1:37017",
Arbiter:(*bool)(nil), BuildIndexes:(*bool)(nil), Hidden:(*bool)(nil),
Priority:(*float64)(nil), Tags:map[string]string{"juju-machine-id":"0"},
SlaveDelay:(*time.Duration)(nil), Votes:(*int)(nil)}}}
2014-08-27 15:37:05 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:06 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:06 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:07 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:08 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:08 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:09 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:09 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:10 WARNING juju.replicaset replicaset.go:87 Initiate: fetching
replication status failed: cannot get replica set status: Received
replSetInitiate - should come online shortly.
2014-08-27 15:37:10 INFO juju.mongo open.go:104 dialled mongo successfully
2014-08-27 15:37:10 WARNING juju.replicaset
[Bug 1025244] Re: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual limit
@Mario, in theory an image "that should be taking up 30 GB" with four snapshots should be taking up at most about 150 GB, of course. Now the question is what you mean by "should be taking up 30 GB" and by "is taking 600+ GB". For the latter, did you query the file length (ls -l) or the actual size (qemu-img info, "disk size")? For the former, if you have a virtual disk size of 1 TB and the guest reports 30 GB are used, that doesn't mean that qemu knows that only 30 GB are used. If you delete a file in the guest, it will report less space being used; however, qemu doesn't know about that unless the guest bothers to discard the now unused sectors. If it doesn't (and I don't see a reason why a guest should discard sectors on an HDD), the guest will just remove the file metadata but the data will stay there (and may be overwritten later by the guest when creating new files etc.). qemu has no idea that that data is now unused, therefore it must treat those sectors as being in use. If your image indeed has a virtual disk size of 30 GB, has four snapshots, is clean (qemu-img check) and does take up 600+ GB of actual disk space, that should indeed not be happening (unless there's some case I forgot to consider). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025244 Title: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual limit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1025244/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS issue (was not resolved on #207441)
This is a very old and well known problem. See also http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=772774 and http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=293513&highlight=cifs+vfs I wonder why this bug is not fixed yet! It has been proposed to change S31umountnfs.sh to K14umountnfs.sh in /etc/rc0.d and /etc/rc6.d. For me that works fine, but I am not shure that it can't create inconveniences in other cases. Please have a look at this simple workaround whether it can be recommended. -- CIFS/SMBFS issue (was not resolved on #207441) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS issue (was not resolved on #207441)
I agree with flaccid: This perpetuating and ennoying bug should be fixed as soon as possible! That has even become more important with Hardy, since "smbfs" does not exist as a workaround any more, "smbmount" being nothing more than a wrapper for "mount.cifs". The simple solution proposed in the link quoted by flaccid is the same as what I mentionned above, changing the shutdown-sequence. Would please an expert have a look at this to make sure it cannot cause other troubles! -- CIFS/SMBFS issue (was not resolved on #207441) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
This annoying bug is known for a very long time now. I wonder why nothing has been done yet! -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
> mv /etc/rc0.d/S31umountnfs.sh /etc/rc0.d/S14umountnfs.sh > mv /etc/rc6.d/S31umountnfs.sh /etc/rc6.d/S14umountnfs.sh This fix is a rather old thing; it had been published more than two years ago. I had asked here if this solution was correct and really safe, but I did not get any answer yet! -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 294728] [NEW] Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Folders in my home directory can not be shared with guest access permission, even if the acces mode is set to 0777. That is the case with net usershare as well as with shares in /etc/samba/smb.conf. The automatic adding of permissions in Nautilus does not help either. Obviously this is a bug in samba 3.0.28 a ( Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron), because it is fixed in Samba 3.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.10 Intrepid Ibex). Please fix it in Hardy too (Hardy is LTS!). ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 294728] Re: Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04)
What do you actually mean by "configuration section"? The few lines for the share only or the [global] part also? [Gemeinsam] path = /home/farber/Gemeinsam available = yes browsable = yes public = yes writable = yes The share is not accessible at all even if /home/farber/Gemeinsam is set to mode 0777. As soon as I comment out the line "# public = yes", personal access is possible. -- Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
@ luchio We are already waiting for years, and nothing did really happen. It is a shame. Even if it is far from being a perfect solution, it is better to propose a workaround like the script of Scott Severance than to do just nothing. -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 294728] Re: Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04)
@ Mathias Gug Is that what you did need? Perhaps that can help you: Public shares inside a directory (in this case it is "/home/farber/") are possible only if the access to the *whole* directory is allowed for everyone. This is not normal. It should be enough to allow access to the share. It had always been like that before, and it is so in Intrepid again, but not in Hardy. Nobody would like to set his entire home directory to mode 0777 to be able to install public shares! -- Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
I am afraid the problem is that in this case nobody really feels responsible. Is it a problem of the shutdown sequence (Ubuntu problem), of the cifs Kernel module (Linux general) or a Samba bug? Who has got to fix it? As long as nobody feels responsible there is not much hope indeed. -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
I am sorry. I never wanted to speak for others. It is my opinion, but it would be better if I had said nothing at all. >considering scripts existed already and were simply executed at the wrong stage of the shutdown sequence Do these scripts really fix the problem? Please read the posting of Mathias Gug: >Adjusting the timeouts or moving/adding init scripts shouldn't matter at all. But I do not want to speak for Mathias. He explained it much better himself. -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
I can't understand that the importance of this bug is still set to "low" in samba after such a long time! -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 294728] Re: Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04)
I am surprised that the status of this bug report is still "incomplete". The bug must be known by the samba crew, because it is fixed in samba 3.2.3 implemented in Intrepid. What I am asking for is to fix it in Hardy too because Hardy is LTS! -- Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 294728] Re: Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04)
I was not at home last week. Sorry for not answering sooner. Thierry Carrez is right; the bug seemes to be fixed now. I have done nothing else but installing the usual updates, and public shares now do work in Hardy as well as in Intrepid. Thanks, Max -- Public shares not possible in home folder (Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down
I have the same problem, but I had never used Network Manager. I always use WICD. -- CIFS/SMBFS shares not unmounted before network is shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 837482] [NEW] package libaio-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1
Public bug reported: needed by Oracle installation ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libaio-dev (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64 AptOrdering: libaio-dev: Install libaio-dev: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 30 16:18:28 2011 ErrorMessage: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) SourcePackage: libaio Title: package libaio-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-29 (123 days ago) ** Affects: libaio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libaio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837482 Title: package libaio-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaio/+bug/837482/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 837482] Re: package libaio-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libaio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837482 Title: package libaio-dev (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/include/libaio.h », qui appartient aussi au paquet libaio:i386 0.3.104-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaio/+bug/837482/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
I can reproduce it on Lucid and Maverick under the following conditions: - the network is a WLAN - the connection is made by Network Manager or WICD I don't know what the condition "net-device-up IFACE!=lo" in /etc/init/nmbd.conf is really needed for. Can it be recommended to leave it out and to change the line to "start on local-filesystems", as it is in /etc/init/smbd.conf? Could that leed to some inconveniences? A workaround is a post-connection script in WICD with the command "service nmbd start". -- nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
Thanks for this status update. As Thuerry Carrez proposed, I tried to avoid system wide CIFS mounts via fstab by monting my cifs shares manually with "mount.cifs ..." in my home folder. The shutdown problem is still the same. Using GNOME vfs pseudomounts is not a solution for me because the cifs UNIX extensions would not work. -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 34181] Re: locale and charset problem in mysql - default character set should be set to utf8
very annoying bug because mysqldump is running as utf-8 (system language) but your server in running as latin1 (default for Ubuntu) somysqldump is doing a conversion which fails -- locale and charset problem in mysql - default character set should be set to utf8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
An other important reason is that gvfs does not support "cifs UNIX Extensions" yet. -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
Not fixed for wireless network with WICD too ! -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
I absolutely do agree with Tom and varanasi. This is a serious usability problem that should be fixed as soon as possible! -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
I had already mentioned above: It's not only a network-manager problem because it is exactly the same with WICD. -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
