[Bug 1536882] Re: upload golang1.6 package for trusty
** Tags added: docteam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to golang in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536882 Title: upload golang1.6 package for trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang/+bug/1536882/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728 Title: man page missing for slapo-nssov To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1523567] [NEW] login greeter misspells OpenStack
Public bug reported: The login greeter for Horizon on Ubuntu has OpenStack misspelled as 'Openstack'. ** Affects: horizon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "horizon_login.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523567/+attachment/4531017/+files/horizon_login.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523567 Title: login greeter misspells OpenStack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1523567/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1452087] Re: slapd [or its init script] does not create necessary directory for nssov socket and fails to start
Can you check /var/log/kern.log to see if this is an apparmor issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452087 Title: slapd [or its init script] does not create necessary directory for nssov socket and fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1452087/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1232258] Re: tomcat7 installer fails to create symbolic links
Removed Ubuntu Server Guide as affected. This is a software problem. ** No longer affects: serverguide -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232258 Title: tomcat7 installer fails to create symbolic links To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1232258/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1395098] [NEW] [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated
Public bug reported: Debian unstable has openldap at version 2.4.40 but the version in the latest stable Ubuntu release (14.10) is 2.4.31 (released upstream in April 2012). A lot of bugs have been fixed since then [1]. Please put version 2.4.40 into the next release of Ubuntu (15.04). [1]: http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [Utopic] OpenLDAP is outdated + [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395098 Title: [Utopic] OpenLDAP version is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1316124] Re: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for "serious" use
Once Utopic syncs with the new Debian version I think the best option is to make a request via the Ubuntu Backports Project (-backports). ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316124 Title: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for "serious" use To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1316124/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1316124] Re: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for "serious" use
Please add Debian backport bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316124 Title: Actual Ubuntu Slapd totaly useless for "serious" use To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1316124/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1312156] [NEW] [Precise] Potential for data corruption
Public bug reported: Under certain conditions there is faulty logic in function tengine_stonith_notify() which can incorrectly add successfully fenced nodes to a list, causing Pacemaker to subsequently erase that node’s status section when the next DC (Designated Controller) election occurs. With the status section erased, the cluster considers that node is down and starts corresponding services on other nodes. Multiple instances of the same service can cause data corruption. Conditions: 1. fenced node must have been the previous DC and been sufficiently functional to request its own fencing 2. fencing notification must arrive after the new DC has been elected but before it invokes the policy engine Pacemaker versions affected: 1.1.6 - 1.1.9 Stable Ubuntu releases affected: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Ubuntu 12.10 (EOL?) Fix: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/f30e1e43 References: https://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg19509.html http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2014/potential-for-data-corruption-in-pacemaker-1-dot-1-6-through-1-dot-1-9/ ** Affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: precise quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312156 Title: [Precise] Potential for data corruption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1312156/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade
Clarification. I logs I uploaded are:
/var/log/dist-upgrade/{apt.log,main.log}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741
Title:
apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade
Here are the APT logs. ** Attachment added: "apt_logs.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+attachment/4035684/+files/apt_logs.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741 Title: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade
I redid the test (install, upgrade) and simply asked to install nfs- kernel-server. It worked (?). See attachment. ** Attachment added: "nfs_upgrade.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+attachment/4035668/+files/nfs_upgrade.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741 Title: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 863741] Re: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade
I just observed this after a Lucid:Precise upgrade. It was a fresh Lucid install and all that was done was a simple NFS server share export and then do-release-upgrade. My workaround was purging nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server and then reinstalling them. Results: The following extra packages will be installed: libtirpc1 rpcbind The following packages will be REMOVED: portmap The following NEW packages will be installed: libtirpc1 nfs-common nfs-kernel-server rpcbind -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rpcbind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863741 Title: apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/863741/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1245921] Re: postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory
Probably an apparmor thing. /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.slapd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245921 Title: postinstaller expects slapd.d to be a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1245921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
Let me clarify. Once the henrix kernel is installed, the normal and proposed keepalived can be installed and tested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
Confirmed. Once the henrix kernel [1] is installed the new keepalived on Raring works. $ apt-cache policy keepalived keepalived: Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 Version table: *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main amd64 Packages [1]: http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp1238494/ ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
On a KVM guest the freeze happens upon starting the normal (non- proposed) keepalived. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
Hm, I tried again and it installed ok. I need more time to verify this. Don't know what's going on. $ apt-cache policy keepalived keepalived: Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 Version table: *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.13.04.1 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main amd64 Packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
There is something seriously wrong with the Raring package. Starting keepalived caused my system to lock up. The same happened after trying it on a few different platforms. My last attempt was with a traditional KVM guest. After the freeze I reset the guest and I was able to capture a screenshot of a kernel panic. ** Attachment added: "keepalived_raring.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+attachment/3859403/+files/keepalived_raring.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
** Tags added: verification-done-quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
Ditto for Quantal - all good. $ sudo apt-cache policy keepalived keepalived: Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1 Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1 Version table: *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2.12.10.1 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 Packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
I redid both tests (description) and re-confirmed both failures. I then installed the -proposed version below and re-did the tests. They both passed. $ apt-cache policy keepalived keepalived: Installed: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:1.2.2-3ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages ** Tags added: verification-done-precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
Obviously, the above verification was done for Precise. I will soon do the same for Quantal and Raring. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876 Title: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1211876] Re: keepalived reload buggy due to improper ipv4 address comparison
** Description changed:
[Impact]
There are at least 2 identified problems with keepalived on Precise when
trying to reload the configuration (/etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf):
(a) The removal of a server from the cluster does not work when the port
of that server is in use by another member server
(b) The change of weight of a cluster member does not work
Reload is done by either:
1. sudo service keepalived reload
2. sudo kill -HUP `pidof keepalived`
The upstream devel list suggests that issue (a) [1] has been resolved in
version 1.2.3 which is currently only in Debian unstable via version
1.2.7. I can't find the actual bug supposedly filed by 'Ronie Gilberto
Henrich'. I have not tested 1.2.7 as it is not easily available to me.
The pertinent entry for (a) in the upstream changelog [2] I believe is
here:
{{{ * check : Fix IPv4 address comparison routine. }}}
This bug is a request to have fixes for both issues ([3] for (a))
introduced into Ubuntu 12.04.
[1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.keepalived.devel/3708
[2]: http://www.keepalived.org/changelog.html
[3]:
https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/commit/e7931c851ecd359379c6bbc5b39287e36cbfbf25
[Test Case]
+
+ 4A. Steps to reproduce issue #1:
+
(a) Stop keepalived
$ sudo service keepalived stop
(b) Begin with a simple configuration file (attached: keepalived.conf)
$ cat keepalived.conf | sudo tee /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf
$ sudo service keepalived start
$ sudo ipvsadm -Ln
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
- -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+ -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
- -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
(c) Add a stanza to the configuration file (a server with a port that is
in use by another server)
--
- real_server 192.168.1.103 8080 {
- weight 1
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.103 8080 {
+ weight 1
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
--
(d) Reload the configuration
$ sudo service keepalived reload
$ sudo ipvsadm -Ln
--
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
- -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+ -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
- -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
--
(e) Remove the .103 stanza
(f) Perform step (d) above
--
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
- -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+ -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
- -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq 1 0 0
--
Note the .103 server remains.
- 4B. Steps to Reproduce issue #2:
+ 4B. Steps to reproduce issue #2:
(a) Perform steps (a) and (b) from 4A
(b) Edit a stanza in the configuration file (change weight from '1' to '0' in
the .102 server)
--
- real_server 192.168.1.102 8080 {
- weight 0
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.102 8080 {
+ weight 0
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
--
(c) Perform step (d) from 4A
--
P Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
- -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
+ -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr
- -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
- -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq 1 0 0
+ -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq 1 0 0
--
Note the original weight of '1' for .102 server remains.
- 4C. Steps to Counterprove issue #1:
+ 4C. Steps to counterprove issue #1:
(a) Perform steps (a) and (b) from 4A
(b) Add a stanza to the configuration file (a server with a port that is not
in use by another server)
--
- real_server 192.168.1.103 8081 {
- weight 1
- inhibit_on_failure
- }
+ real_server 192.168.1.103 8081 {
+ weight 1
+ inhibit_on_failure
+ }
--
(c) Perform step (d) from 4A
--
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Po
[Bug 1211876] [NEW] [Precise] keepalived reload buggy
Public bug reported:
There are at least 2 identified problems with keepalived on Precise when
trying to reload the configuration (/etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf):
(a) The removal of a server from the cluster does not work when the port
of that server is in use by another member server
(b) The change of weight of a cluster member does not work
Reload is done by either:
1. sudo service keepalived reload
2. sudo kill -HUP `pidof keepalived`
The upstream devel list suggests that issue (a) [1] has been resolved in
version 1.2.3 which is currently only in Debian unstable via version
1.2.7. I can't find the actual bug supposedly filed by 'Ronie Gilberto
Henrich'. I have not tested 1.2.7 as it is not easily available to me.
The pertinent entry for (a) in the upstream changelog [2] I believe is
here:
{{{ * check : Fix IPv4 address comparison routine. }}}
This bug is a request to have fixes for both issues ([3] for (a))
introduced into Ubuntu 12.04.
[1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.keepalived.devel/3708
[2]: http://www.keepalived.org/changelog.html
[3]:
https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/commit/e7931c851ecd359379c6bbc5b39287e36cbfbf25
** Affects: keepalived (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211876
Title:
[Precise] keepalived reload buggy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepalived/+bug/1211876/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm
This is what I'm seeing: $ sudo ipvsadm -Ln IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP 192.168.0.100:80 wrr -> 192.168.1.101:8080 Masq1 0 0 -> 192.168.1.102:8080 Masq1 0 0 -> 192.168.1.103:8080 Masq1 0 0 $ sudo ipvsadm -e -t 192.168.0.100:80 -r 192.168.1.103:8080 -w 0 Memory allocation problem -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585 Title: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm
Ah, I needed to specify the -m ! $ sudo ipvsadm -e -t 192.168.0.100:80 -r 192.168.1.103:8080 -m -w 0 This works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585 Title: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm
@Ralf 1. "Edit the real server without specifying the -m" ipvsadm -e -t 10.131.208.21.80 -r 192.168.0.5 -w 0 -m But you did specify the -m ^^^ "ipvsadm -e -t -t 10.131.208.21.80 -r 192.168.0.5 -w 0 -m works." "-t -t" ? Really? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585 Title: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1068145] Re: Fix for CVE-2012-3867 (puppet) is too restrictive - TLS certificates now break
I see that the backport request for Precise, Quantal, and Raring has been rejected. Where do we stand with this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068145 Title: Fix for CVE-2012-3867 (puppet) is too restrictive - TLS certificates now break To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1068145/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error
** Package changed: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error
I tried the mainline 3.8.1 kernel [1] on Precise and the command works. This suggests that there is something in the Ubuntu-distributed kernel that is causing the problem. [1]: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.8.1-raring/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error
This appears to be a kernel problem. The command works in Precise and Quantal but not Raring. I tested this on Precise using the HWE stack [1]. $ sudo /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ide_smart -n -d /dev/sda OK - Operational (7/7 tests passed) Output after changing to the Raring kernel: CRITICAL - SMART_ENABLE: Input/output error CRITICAL - SMART_CMD_ENABLE [1]: sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic-lts-quantal sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic-lts-raring ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 833994] Re: debian-installer does not support https when using with preseed files
Related: "wget-udeb should install to /usr/bin/wget instead of /usr/bin/wget.gnu" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1172101 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler-enlist in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833994 Title: debian-installer does not support https when using with preseed files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler-enlist/+bug/833994/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057024] Re: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions
After loading the module I was able to start my guest: $ sudo modprobe kvm_intel The main question is why this did not occur automatically after rebooting (after I upgraded to the -proposed version of qemu-kvm)? Note that everything worked very well on 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057024 Title: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1057024/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057024] Re: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions
I just upgraded a server from 11.10 to 12.04 and I got a gnome-keyring error [1] when trying to start a guest. There is some other bug about it and strangely a workaround was to install the 'gnome-keyring' package. I did so in haste and the majority of the error remains, even after upgrading qemu-kvm to proposed version: $ sudo virsh start kvm-blah error: Failed to start domain kvm-blah error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: char device redirected to /dev/pts/1 Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory No accelerator found! $ apt-cache policy qemu-kvm qemu-kvm: Installed: 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 Candidate: 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 Version table: *** 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.2 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 Packages 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu13 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages == [1] p11-kit: couldn't load module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory error: Failed to start domain kvm-misc3 error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output: char device redirected to /dev/pts/1 Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory No accelerator found! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057024 Title: kvm kernel module always loaded, without setting /dev/kvm permissions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1057024/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
I noticed the errant behaviour does not exist starting with Ubuntu 11.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016 Title: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/516016/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1027219] [NEW] [Precise] Default install assumes MaaS
Public bug reported: After installation of cobbler on 12.04 there is a MaaS-specific syslinux configuration: $ cat /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default DEFAULT menu PROMPT 0 MENU TITLE Ubuntu MAAS TIMEOUT 200 TOTALTIMEOUT 6000 ONTIMEOUT local LABEL local MENU LABEL (local) MENU DEFAULT LOCALBOOT -1 MENU end This is strange. ** Affects: cobbler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) Status: New ** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027219 Title: [Precise] Default install assumes MaaS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/1027219/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules
Changed to 'Confirmed'. Several users report that Lucid remains affected. ** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922 Title: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458
Verified on my side. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901 Title: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458
No news yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901 Title: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 839390] Re: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today
@Michael You mentioned SSL. How does that fit in here? You can add bug data from an afflicted, internet-connected, system by running this: $ apport-collect 839390 Otherwise, there are ways to save bug data to file, transfer it to another machine, and then upload it to this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839390 Title: Apache+Kerberos not working anymore since update today To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/839390/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458
@Robie All done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901 Title: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 903901] Re: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458
** Description changed: The problem: Replication fails if an attribute of a multi-value attribute entry is removed if the attribute does not have a equality matching rule defined in the schema. The problem can be mitigated temporarily by a doing a full re-sync by removing the affected database and restarting the service to trigger a full sync. This is fixed upstream beginning with the slapd 2.4.25 branch: openldap-2.4.25/CHANGES: Fixed slapd syncrepl for attributes with no matching rule (ITS#6458) For Ubuntu, this translates to the fix appearing in Oneiric: slapd | 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 | lucid-updates slapd | 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 | natty-updates slapd | 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4 | oneiric-updates I am requesting the fix be backported at least to Lucid. Upstream bug: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=6458;selectid=6458;usearchives=1 SRU Justification: - [Impact]: TBC + [Impact]: Serious. Replication, when used, is there for important reasons. It should not break due to a schema, even if poorly designed. [Development Fix]: Fixed in an upstream release and thus already present since Oneiric [Stable Fix]: lucid-proposed.debdiff, attached - patches taken from upstream git repository - [Test Case]: TBC + [Test Case]: Attached as test_case.txt (from upstream bug; for consistency) [Regression Potential]: looks to be minimal from looking at the patch. There appears to be a comprehensive test suite that continues to pass with this patch applied. ** Attachment added: "SRU test case" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+attachment/2634586/+files/test_case.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901 Title: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 903901] [NEW] [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458
Public bug reported: The problem: Replication fails if an attribute of a multi-value attribute entry is removed if the attribute does not have a equality matching rule defined in the schema. The problem can be mitigated temporarily by a doing a full re-sync by removing the affected database and restarting the service to trigger a full sync. This is fixed upstream beginning with the slapd 2.4.25 branch: openldap-2.4.25/CHANGES: Fixed slapd syncrepl for attributes with no matching rule (ITS#6458) For Ubuntu, this translates to the fix appearing in Oneiric: slapd | 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.6 | lucid-updates slapd | 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 | natty-updates slapd | 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4 | oneiric-updates I am requesting the fix be backported at least to Lucid. Upstream bug: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=6458;selectid=6458;usearchives=1 ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903901 Title: [Lucid] backport fix for ITS#6458 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/903901/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 872437] Re: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 667597 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667597 ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 667597 conf.d directory not a configuration directory -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437 Title: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
Sure, use /etc/rc.local. service openvpn restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016 Title: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/516016/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov
I'm attaching the man page for the nssov overlay from the upstream 2.4.25 branch, which is what Precise will use. ** Attachment added: "slapo-nssov.5" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+attachment/2587902/+files/slapo-nssov.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728 Title: man page missing for slapo-nssov To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 872437] Re: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc
@Serge Done! ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #645192 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645192 ** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645192 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437 Title: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 872437] [NEW] the slapd-config database should not be under /etc
Public bug reported: The live slapd-config database currently reside under /etc/ldap/slapd.d . Can we change it to something like /var/lib/slapd ? Although it *does* consist of configuration material it is also a live database that people always think they can hand-edit due to it being under /etc. ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872437 Title: the slapd-config database should not be under /etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/872437/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 507728] Re: man page missing for slapo-nssov
This is still the case for Ubuntu 11.10 beta2. ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507728 Title: man page missing for slapo-nssov To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/507728/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 833818] [NEW] default DIT suffix should be definable by user (debconf/preseed)
Public bug reported: After much complaining (bug #442498) the slapd package in Natty now sets up a default DIT out of the box. However, the change is a little braindead as it sets up the suffix based on the localdomain of the localhost. I realize the change came in from Debian but I'm sure we can do better than this. Please allow the user to decide (debconf/preseed) what suffix to use for their database! ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833818 Title: default DIT suffix should be definable by user (debconf/preseed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/833818/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658023] Re: registration token computed incorrectly
This bug is present in Ubuntu 10.10 and is fixed by eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4.2+lp658023 in the following PPA: https://launchpad.net/~davewalker/+archive/uec-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658023 Title: registration token computed incorrectly -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
I also tested a patched libgcrypt11 package according to comment #73. I can now su from a local user to a non-local user and have a non-local user use sudo (sudo-ldap). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
Yeah it was more as confirmation. I'm going to test a patched libgcrypt (comment #73) next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
Building the openldap source with openssl instead of gnutls libraries and installing the resulting libldap package works here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 682865] Re: memory leak in vsftpd
May be related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/720095 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682865 Title: memory leak in vsftpd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 702903] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Pakiet jest w złym stanie - powinien zostać przeinstalowany przed usunięciem.
I cannot reproduce this. I translated the error message to this: "The package is in poor condition - it should be reinstalled before removal" How I knew the original was in Polish is beyond me. $ sudo aptitude install tftpd-hpa=5.0-11ubuntu2 $ sudo aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done The following packages will be upgraded: tftpd-hpa 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 46.9kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y Writing extended state information... Done Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1 [46.9kB] Fetched 46.9kB in 0s (106kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 27344 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 (using .../tftpd-hpa_5.0-11ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... tftpd-hpa stop/waiting Unpacking replacement tftpd-hpa ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Setting up tftpd-hpa (5.0-11ubuntu2.1) ... tftpd user (tftp) already exists, doing nothing. tftpd-hpa directory (/var/lib/tftpboot) already exists, doing nothing. tftpd-hpa start/running, process 11999 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Current status: 0 updates [-1]. $ dpkg -l tftpd-hpa Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-== ii tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1 HPA's tftp server -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702903 Title: package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Pakiet jest w złym stanie - powinien zostać przeinstalowany przed usunięciem. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network- required services from starting. I have tried with openvpn and dhcp3-server. So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid. I have tested this on Maverick only. [1]: ifconfig eth0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 ifconfig br0 up ip address add 10.153.107.61/24 brd + dev br0 ip route add default via 10.153.107.1 service openvpn restart ** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Summary changed: - Network bridge does not come up upon boot + Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services ** Description changed: Binary package hint: bridge-utils - On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get - a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration - method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the - networking service gets it to work: - - $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart - - I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that - works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- - required services there as well. - - I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and - it requires a bug of it's own. + On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) a vanilla + bridge does come up upon boot using the standard configuration method + (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]) but it takes too long and this delay + prevents other network services from starting. I have resorted to + putting commands in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static - bridge_ports eth0 - address 10.153.107.93 - netmask 255.255.255.0 - network 10.153.107.0 - broadcast 10.153.107.255 - gateway 10.153.107.1 - --- + bridge_ports eth0 + address 10.153.107.93 + netmask 255.255.255.0 + network 10.153.107.0 + broadcast 10.153.107.255 + gateway 10.153.107.1 + --- Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427.1) Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: - SHELL=/bin/zsh - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 Tags: maverick Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Weird. Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5 seconds). I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: bridge-utils On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- required services there as well. I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and it requires a bug of it's own. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + EcryptfsInUse: Yes + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427.1) + Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/692647/+attachment/1771633/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] [NEW] Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bridge-utils On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- required services there as well. I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and it requires a bug of it's own. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 ** Affects: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687631] Re: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least)
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1]. A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work however: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of the current one? [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687631 Title: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
You seem to be running Lucid. Huh? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
I tried to confirm but everything went well. From my logs: - Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ... Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ... Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ... Not creating home directory `/usr/share/tomcat6'. * Starting Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6 [ OK ] - Strange. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 676094] Re: Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554 tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. * You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+subscribe -- Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after installing 10.10 RC. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly downloaded. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
@R. Jones Go to https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa and follow instructions under "Adding this PPA to your system". Install php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3 I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error after about 10% download of the test ISO file). Can you confirm the same? -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
Yes, we are doing just that. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
This turned out to be a duplicate of http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I sent this bug upstream. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I have confirmed this. A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size 4697126912 bytes and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the above test.php script only gets 402159616 bytes ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings + tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user + tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings -- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
Sorry about that. Confirmed. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
I just tested this on a fresh Hardy install (tomcat55) and it also does not work: == # dpkg-statoverride --add ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5 # aptitude install tomcat5.5 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat5.5/ drwxr-x--- 4 tomcat55 adm 4096 2010-04-09 17:23 /etc/tomcat5.5/ == Here is the same with a fresh Intrepid (tomcat6) install: == # dpkg-statoverride --add ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # apt-cache madison tomcat6 tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 | http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages # aptitude install tomcat6=6.0.18-0ubuntu3 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/ drwxr-xr-x 3 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 2010-04-09 17:43 /etc/tomcat6/ == Then, still on Intrepid: == # aptitude purge tomcat6 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # aptitude install tomcat6=6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/ drwxr-xr-x 4 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 2010-04-09 18:04 /etc/tomcat6/ == So I'm not sure how to interpret this. Anyone? -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources. This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in question: dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3 I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
Strange. I built a Hardy virtual machine and 1.2.9 was installed. Indeed, the archives do say 1.0.10. I'll have to determine what happened with my VM. At any rate, if the error is thrown then that version doesn't support the parameter. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
Hmmm, the default shipped with 8.10 is dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3 but an updated 8.04 has dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu3 Why does this parameter work with the older version? And @Gaylord, why aren't you running the latest available with 8.04 anyway? -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I've only managed to use this parameter with Ubuntu > 8.04 . Otherwise, the error above is thrown. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516016] Re: [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
I doubt it. -- [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516016] [NEW] [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openvpn I have a server that was upgraded from 9.04 to 9.10. I cannot say with certainty what was happening during 9.04 but systematically when I reboot the daemon does not come up: $ sudo service openvpn status [sudo] password for blah: * could not access PID file for VPN 'server' $ sudo service openvpn start * Starting virtual private network daemon(s)... * Autostarting VPN 'server' ...done. $ sudo service openvpn status * VPN 'server' is running The server is currently being assigned an IP address (DHCP). It looks like that OpenVPN is coming up before that address is provided. From /var/log/syslog: openvpn[815]: TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address 11.153.118.61:1194: Cannot assign requested address openvpn[815]: Exiting kernel: [ 13.380034] br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.2 dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium. dhclient: All rights reserved. dhclient: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ dhclient: kernel: [ 14.364042] eth0: no IPv6 routers present kernel: [ 14.428029] br0: no IPv6 routers present dhclient: Listening on LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26 dhclient: Sending on LPF/br0/54:52:00:5e:0a:26 dhclient: Sending on Socket/fallback dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4 dhclient: DHCPOFFER of 11.153.118.61 from 11.153.118.1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 11.153.108.61 on br0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 dhclient: DHCPACK of 11.153.108.61 from 11.153.118.1 dhclient: bound to 11.153.108.61 -- renewal in 102522 seconds ** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [karmic] openvpn service starts before dhclient https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
I did add a sync to the following file
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/disk.py
Here
def umount(self):
self.vm.cancel_cleanup(self.umount)
if (self.type != TYPE_SWAP) and not self.dummy:
logging.debug('Syncing')
run_cmd('sync')
logging.debug('Unmounting %s', self.mntpath)
run_cmd('umount', self.mntpath)
But there is a umount happening before that function is called.
I ran vmbuilder in debug mode and here are the pertinent messages:
===
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG : Reading package lists...
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG : cleaning apt
2009-12-23 09:18:43,386 DEBUG : ['chroot',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root', 'apt-get', 'clean']
2009-12-23 09:18:43,613 DEBUG : Unmounting volatile lrm filesystems
2009-12-23 09:18:43,614 DEBUG : Unbinding /dev and /proc filesystems
2009-12-23 09:24:43,714 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,718 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,723 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,727 INFO: umount:
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,728 INFO: (In some cases useful info about
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO: the device is found by lsof(8) or
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG : Oh, dear, an exception occurred
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 INFO: Cleaning up
2009-12-23 09:24:43,729 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,733 DEBUG : umount:
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc: device is busy.
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG : (In some cases useful info about
processes that use
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG : the device is found by lsof(8) or
fuser(1))
2009-12-23 09:24:43,734 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG : umount:
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev/pts: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,739 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG : umount:
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/dev: not mounted
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG : Syncing
2009-12-23 09:24:43,744 DEBUG : ['sync']
2009-12-23 09:24:43,793 DEBUG : Unmounting
/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/
2009-12-23 09:24:43,794 DEBUG : ['umount',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/target/']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,803 DEBUG : ['kpartx', '-d',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG : loop deleted : /dev/loop2
2009-12-23 09:24:46,813 DEBUG : ['kpartx', '-d',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/disk0.img']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,819 DEBUG : ['rmdir', 'kvm-test-desktop3']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,822 DEBUG : ['rm', '-rf',
'/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM']
2009-12-23 09:24:46,885 INFO: rm: cannot remove
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not
permitted
2009-12-23 09:24:46,886 INFO: rm: cannot remove
`/home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not
permitted
.
.
.
===
So, as suggested, I did run lsof:
$ sudo lsof -R /home/ubuntu/Data/tmp/vmbuilderYt3CgM/root/proc
COMMAND PID PPID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
dd808 1 root0r REG0,30 4026531987 /proc/kmsg
lsof21109 31948 root3r DIR0,30 1 /proc
lsof21109 31948 root6r DIR0,301176729 /proc/21109/fd
So dd (with init as parent) is to blame.
Then:
$ ps ax | grep -w dd
4 0 808 1 20 0 8192 604 syslog Ss ? 0:00 dd bs=1
if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/rsyslog/kmsg
Kernel messages appear to not have finished flushing to disk.
I decided to try a sleep in this file
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/plugins/ubuntu/dapper.py
Here
def unmount_dev_proc(self):
import time
time.sleep(360)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev/pts' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/dev' % self.destdir)
run_cmd('umount', '%s/proc' % self.destdir)
But this did not help.
--
vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
Soory, transcript.txt is actually the shell script I used to do launch vmbuilder. The transcript is actually attached as typescript.txt (from script command). ** Attachment added: "typescript.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854241/typescript.txt -- vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 497258] Re: vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
** Attachment added: "transcript.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36854188/transcript.txt -- vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 497258] [NEW] vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop'
Public bug reported: When using the line --addpkg ubuntu-desktop to the vmbuilder invocation unexpected messages appear near the end of the process: 2009-12-15 20:57:38,007 INFO: Committed revision 2.^M 2009-12-15 20:57:40,097 INFO: umount: /tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc: device is busy.^M 2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: (In some cases useful info about processes that use^M 2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))^M 2009-12-15 20:57:40,107 INFO: Cleaning up^M 2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove `/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/vma': Operation not permitted^M 2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove `/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/bufs': Operation not permitted^M 2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove `/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/queues': Operation not permitted^M 2009-12-15 20:57:51,447 INFO: rm: cannot remove `/tmp/vmbuilderS5ELLk/root/proc/dri/0/clients': Operation not permitted and so on. A complete transcript is attached. After removing the line the process finishes OK. Host is: Linux U910S64-A 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- vmbuilder fails when adding package 'ubuntu-desktop' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
Is this bug only relevant to disk files? I am booting guests fine with raw disks, albeit LVM-based. Details: On a Jaunty KVM host I'm using LVM. When creating a guest I allocated 2 logical volumes (4 GB and 80 GB) to it to be used as raw disks. With virt-manager I used the first one (/dev/vda) for installation (with LVM again; so LVM over LVM) and afterwards added the second one (/dev/vdb). I also set up LVM on the second disk and created a 40 GB logical volume. The VM starts fine. -- libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 429443] [NEW] /usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kvm If we want to make the kvm-ok script really useful then it should be disassociated from the kvm package. Users should not have to install kvm and its dependents in order to discover whether they can use kvm. I propose we move this script into the base Ubuntu install. ** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- /usr/bin/kvm-ok should be disassociated from kvm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 306293] Re: Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU
Chuck, comment added to the corresponding private bug (306601). In short, this PPA appears to solve the problem. I am recommending an SRU for it. -- Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280712] Re: Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
Darn it. I don't suppose you know what Jeremy Allison meant by this post: http://lists-archives.org/samba/40847-long-delay-accessing-print- properties-on-client.html -- Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 280712] [NEW] Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When accessing printing properties for some drivers (Xerox and HP Designjet) the load on the CPU goes way up (90%). There is a latency of 30 to 60 seconds during this time. Other drivers (Ricoh) do not exhibit this behaviour. This has been observed on versions of Samba <= 3.0.28 . ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Accessing printing properties for some drivers causes excessive load on CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 192080] Re: shutdown fails.. nfs
Workaround: In /etc/rc0.d change the symlink K25open-iscsi to S80open-iscsi Then try a shutdown test. If successful, do something similar for /etc/rc6.d. -- shutdown fails.. nfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
