[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
I'd really like to see this backported to lucid since that's the LTS release we're using on our servers. Thanks -Bruce -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
I'll vote for gerry's patch. -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, gerry skerbitz <632...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > The problem is fixed if we add `-p "$CATALINA_PID"` to the > start-stop-daemon line in catalina_sh(). Isn't that something we should be > able to rely on? > {{{ > *** tomcat6~2010-10-11 13:21:52.0 -0500 > --- tomcat6 2010-11-03 12:19:04.0 -0500 > *** > *** 152,154 >start-stop-daemon --start -b -u "$TOMCAT6_USER" -g "$TOMCAT6_GROUP" > \ > ! -c "$TOMCAT6_USER" -d "$CATALINA_TMPDIR" \ >-x /bin/bash -- -c "$AUTHBIND_COMMAND $TOMCAT_SH" > --- 152,154 >start-stop-daemon --start -b -u "$TOMCAT6_USER" -g "$TOMCAT6_GROUP" > \ > ! -c "$TOMCAT6_USER" -d "$CATALINA_TMPDIR" -p "$CATALINA_PID" > \ >-x /bin/bash -- -c "$AUTHBIND_COMMAND $TOMCAT_SH" > }}} > > Seems like a perfectly reasonable fix. I have a hard time understanding why it wasn't done this way at first. > -- > tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > I agree that we should not force tomcat6 to run under a user that has no > bash running. > > Note that the proposed patch breaks use of AUTHBIND. This should rather > be fixed by shipping once and for all the catalina.sh wrapper to use > (rather than recreate it every time). Furthermore this should be shipped > in /usr/share/tomcat6 rather than in /etc/init.d/. > > That does sound like a better option. Is someone else looking at this or should I take a crack at it. Note, I'm not very good at java env stuff. :-) > ** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Triaged > > -- > tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
Left debug info in patch...sorry. New patch attached. ** Patch added: "Patch - without debug info and correct offsets this time." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+attachment/1555462/+files/tomcat6-init.patch -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 632554] Re: tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
** Patch added: "This is a fix that does not alter the behavior in any way, but fixes ths problem." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554/+attachment/1554204/+files/tomcat6-init.patch -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 632554] [NEW] tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 While it's not recommended to run tomcat as root, there are circumstances that make it a necessity, like embedded systems. (IMHO Linux should not enforce policy at this level) Anyway, setting the following in /etc/default/tomcat6 TOMCAT6_USER=root Yields this when trying to start tomcat: #> /etc/init.d/tomcat6 start * Starting Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6 /bin/bash already running. If there are _any_ login sessions on the machine, IOW if there are any bash instances, it fails to run. So, here's a patch that fixes this while not making any changes to policy or who can run what as who. Here's the relevant version info: Ubuntu 64 bit 10.04 ii libtomcat6-java 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.2 Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries ii tomcat-cfg 6.0.15-01 OSA tomcat config ii tomcat6 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.2 Servlet and JSP engine ii tomcat6-admin 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.2 Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications ii tomcat6-common 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.2 Servlet and JSP engine -- common files ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
Pin it back to Jaunty...groan. Package: slapd Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 Package: ldap-utils Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 Package: libldap-2.4-2 Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3 Pin-Priority: 1100 -Bruce On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, trader...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Trying to get LDAP working on Ubuntu is my worst linux experience yet. > Still can't do it. Every tutorial a different, incomprehensible error > code. Hours and hours wasted. Someone needs to sort this can of worms > out. > > -- > openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get fixed? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net /openldap-dit/) It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago. Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The former may work wheres the latter is hardly a solution for the current problem. I assume one need to use bzr to pull off the source and build it? Anyone else tried this yet? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done at all for this slapd-dit package? Why is this marked as "Won't fix"? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise they'll get from the enterprisey first reviewer? I'm trying to plan for a development platform that was going to be 10.4 based, but needs ldap first out. Is there a workaround that can be used with pbuilder based chroots? All the hacks I've seen so far require that one have slapd already running on the target machine. What if one is building an inert filesystem for NFS boot ? How are we supposed to get ldap installed and initialized with no debconf support to prime the database? Yes there are no docs on how to do this but I would argue strongly against this being a doc issue. This is plain incomplete. This move should have waited until the slapd-dit package was complete. Can this be rolled back until it's ready? The current state of slapd makes 10.4 unusable for us. Has anyone tried building a previous ldap source drop on 10.4? What's the last known working slapd package version? I might give the slapd downgrade option a shot before giving up and going over to Debian. They even have dom0 kernels that are less than 2 years old... -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to strip out the default ldap config? I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just worked. The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress, OK, fine. This release however is completely unusable out of the box. How can Ubuntu be so close to a final release of an LTS version and not be able to support an LDAP authentication server without massive amounts of googling and cursing? Why does everyone need to be an LDAP specialist to get it to work. -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly
I'd like to bump the priority on this as it makes it impossible for servers to come up clean. For an LTS release, I would expect that having servers boot clean would be a priority. -- portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 511245] Re: portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly
Gets worse if you add SAN volumes that are NFS exported. There's a corner case here that's not working at all: 1 - QLogic SAN - Fails to come up until I reload qla driver with modprobe -r/modprobe 2 - NFS export, since #1 didn't come up, export also fails. 3 - Since #2 didn't come up, autofs also fails. -- portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 375493] Re: tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda
While I agree that it is possible to get the same behavior with the addition of: JAVA_OPTS="-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8000,server=y,suspend=n -Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128M" to default/tomcat6, it is finding this information that is non-trivial. A simple -d switch, or testing for $DEBUG in the init script would be much friendlier. If this is the standard debug incantation for tomcat6, what's wrong with making it so the user doesn't have to google or RTFM to find it. Perhaps put something like this in the packages default/tomcat6: # To enable remore debugging uncomment the following line. You will then be able to use a java debugger on port 8000 # JAVA_OPTS="-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8000,server=y,suspend=n -Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128M" -Bruce -- tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 375493] [NEW] tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 I had filed this in the wrong place, but I don't see any links to it now. Apologies if it's a dup. Bits and pieces pasted here from different sources but it all describes the prob. tomcat 6 in jaunty: dpkg -l | grep tomcat6 ii libtomcat6-java 6.0.18-0ubuntu6 Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries ii tomcat6 6.0.18-0ubuntu6 Servlet and JSP engine ii tomcat6-admin6.0.18-0ubuntu6 Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications ii tomcat6-common 6.0.18-0ubuntu6 Servlet and JSP engine -- common files ii tomcat6-user 6.0.18-0ubuntu6 Servlet and JSP engine -- tools to create user instances I've installed the stock tomcat6 package on Intrepid, and I want to configure it for remote JPDA debugging (listening on port 8000) for debugging a webapp from eclipse. The normal way to do this is to edit /usr/share/tomcat6/bin/startup.sh so it starts in debug mode: exec "$PRGDIR"/"$EXECUTABLE" jpda start "$@" However, the Ubuntu system startup script doesn't seem to follow the normal tomcat6 startup procedure. /etc/init.d/tomcat6 runs /usr/bin/jsvc instead of executing the normal startup scripts in /usr/share/tomcat6/bin: DAEMON=/usr/bin/jsvc . . . $DAEMON -user "$TOMCAT6_USER" -cp "$JSVC_CLASSPATH" \ -outfile SYSLOG -errfile SYSLOG \ -pidfile "$CATALINA_PID" $JAVA_OPTS "$BOOTSTRAP_CLASS" How should I configure it to start the debugger? The attached patch is crude way of accomplishing this. I'm sure there are better ways. ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 375493] Re: tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda
** Attachment added: "Adds jpda debug option to tomcat6 init.d" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26639186/tomcatinit.patch -- tomcat6 needs debug start mode with jpda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils
Found a workaround, disabling TOMCAT_SECURITY in /etc/init.d/tomcat6 allows this app to run. -Bruce -- tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils
** Attachment added: "This is the web service that exhibits the problem on tomcat6" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26540236/service-war.war -- tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 374567] Re: tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils
Forgot platform details: This is an up to data jaunty 64 bit system. It's running without an X server, if that matters. I know some java apps barf because of this. #> update-java-alternatives -l java-6-openjdk 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk java-gcj 1042 /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj It's set to java-6-openjdk Other than adding a tomcat user I have zero changes to the tomcat6 config. Let me know if you need _anything_ else. I would very much like to use the prepackaged tomcat6 as opposed to the apache tgz for reasons of recreatibility, integration and simplicity. -Bruce -- tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 374567] [NEW] tomcat6 with spring throws org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 Here's a stack trace when I try to load my app with the ubuntu packaged jaunty tomcat6: May 10, 2009 11:11:28 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/springframework/core/NestedExceptionUtils at org.springframework.core.NestedRuntimeException.getMessage(NestedRuntimeException.java:67) at java.lang.Throwable.getLocalizedMessage(Throwable.java:284) at java.lang.Throwable.toString(Throwable.java:360) at org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException.toString(BeanCreationException.java:150) at java.lang.String.valueOf(String.java:2838) at java.io.PrintWriter.println(PrintWriter.java:727) at java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:526) at org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException.printStackTrace(BeanCreationException.java:176) at java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter.format(SimpleFormatter.java:94) at org.apache.juli.FileHandler.publish(FileHandler.java:129) at java.util.logging.Logger.log(Logger.java:476) at java.util.logging.Logger.doLog(Logger.java:498) at java.util.logging.Logger.logp(Logger.java:698) at org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger.log(Jdk14Logger.java:101) at org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger.error(Jdk14Logger.java:149) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:215) at org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized(ContextLoaderListener.java:45) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3843) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4342) at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.start(ManagerServlet.java:1247) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.start(HTMLManagerServlet.java:604) at org.apache.catalina.manager.HTMLManagerServlet.doGet(HTMLManagerServlet.java:129) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil$1.run(SecurityUtil.java:244) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Subject.java:537) at org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.execute(SecurityUtil.java:276) at org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.doAsPrivilege(SecurityUtil.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:283) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000(ApplicationFilterChain.java:56) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain$1.run(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:185) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:525) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:845) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.springframework.core.NestedExceptionUtils at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1233) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:336) ... 49 more The same problem reported here: http://www.mail-ar