[Bug 986085] [NEW] package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100
Public bug reported: unable to install mysql server 5.1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.56-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic i686 AptOrdering: mysql-server-5.1: Install mysql-server-5.1: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 20 14:40:34 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: mysql-5.1 Title: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986085 Title: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/986085/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 986085] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986085 Title: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.61-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/986085/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1027538] [NEW] Bad handle of # for comments in munin-node config file
Public bug reported: My config : Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 Package: munin-node: Installé : 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1 Candidat : 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1 Table de version : *** 1.4.6-3ubuntu3.1 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.4.6-3ubuntu3 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages Found this problem using a # in a password for Mysql user root with a config file containing things like that : [mysql*] user root env.mysqlopts --defaults-file=/etc/mysql/debian.cnf env.mysqluser root env.mysqlpassword test#test Searching in the code, I've solved the problem (for me) changing line 96 of /usr/share/perl5/Munin/Common/Config.pm : - $_[0] =~ s/#.*//; + $_[0] =~ s/(^|\s+)#.*//; ** Affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027538 Title: Bad handle of # for comments in munin-node config file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/1027538/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1027538] Re: Bad handle of # for comments in munin-node config file
Well, this is good news ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027538 Title: Bad handle of # for comments in munin-node config file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/1027538/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1045194] [NEW] usershares created in nautilus not working
Public bug reported: When I try to create a read-only guest share in nautilus the share is appearing in the network but it is not accessible (access denied). In the samba log there is following statement: --- [2012/09/03 09:10:07.162628, 0] param/loadparm.c:8843(check_usershare_stat) check_usershare_stat: file /var/lib/samba/usershares/ owned by uid 0 is not a regular file --- %: ls -al /var/lib/samba drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4.0K Aug 22 10:42 . drwxr-xr-x 67 root root 4.0K Aug 26 12:12 .. -rw--- 1 root root36K Aug 22 10:42 account_policy.tdb -rw--- 1 root root696 Aug 22 10:42 group_mapping.tdb -rw--- 1 root root36K Sep 3 07:49 passdb.tdb drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4.0K Aug 22 10:42 printers -rw--- 1 root root 104K Aug 22 10:42 registry.tdb -rw--- 1 root root44K Aug 22 10:42 secrets.tdb -rw--- 1 root root36K Sep 3 09:09 share_info.tdb drwxrwx--T 2 root sambashare 4.0K Sep 3 09:04 usershares ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 3 09:13:19 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425) NmbdLog: ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/zsh SambaServerRegression: No SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: SourcePackage: samba UbuntuFailedConnect: Yes UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045194 Title: usershares created in nautilus not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1045194/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1045194] Re: usershares created in nautilus not working
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045194 Title: usershares created in nautilus not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1045194/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1045194] Re: usershares created in nautilus not working
I had to put following into the smb.conf to get it work (see below). The core problem is that nautilus does not check these options like it does in other cases to get something to work. Probably the whole problem is related to "nautilus-share" then but I am not sure. --- security = share guest account = th --- "th" is my user account. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045194 Title: usershares created in nautilus not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1045194/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 835715] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100
Setting up mysql-server-5.1 (5.1.54-1ubuntu4) ... 120312 12:54:32 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 8.0M 120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool 120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 44233 120312 12:54:32 InnoDB: Starting shutdown... 120312 12:54:37 InnoDB: Shutdown completed; log sequence number 0 44233 invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/mysql not found. dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.1 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mysql-server: mysql-server depends on mysql-server-5.1; however: Package mysql-server-5.1 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing mysql-server (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Errors were encountered while processing: mysql-server-5.1 mysql-server E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835715 Title: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/835715/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 114505] Re: ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover
I just finished a fresh U8.10-rc install. Plain vanilla, all I added was the NTP package. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /etc/rc5.d/S2[38]* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 26 14:18 /etc/rc5.d/S23ntp -> ../init.d/ntp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Oct 26 10:10 /etc/rc5.d/S28NetworkManager -> ../init.d/NetworkManager NTP starts before Network Manager, meaning that NTP won't have DNS available at startup. It tends to work, but moving NTP's startup after Network Managers should make it more reliable. It will also allow NTPDATE to run (it's called from the ip-up scripts, but will fail as NTPD will already own the socket). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep ntp-server /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ NTP servers still aren't requested by default. If whoever set up your DHCP server knows enought to advertise NTP server(s) then chances are you should use them (or at the very least PREPEND them). -- ntp brought up before network is ready; fails not resolve any ip or host names; ntp does not recover https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302542] [NEW] upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.27-7-generic Errors were encountered while processing: samba-common smbclient ubuntu-desktop winbind samba ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Package: samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.1 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Uname: Linux 2.6.24-21-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302542] Re: upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19970472/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19970473/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342578] [NEW] mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mysql-client-5.0 Ubuntu 8.04.1 mysql-client-5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.1 /usr/bin/mysqldump doesn't read /etc/mysql/my.cnf - it tries to read /etc/my.cnf and $HOMEDIR/.my.cnf, but thats it. An upstream, i.e. debian fellow told me that the debian package does work as it should. I've helped myself out with a symlink from /etc/my.cnf, but this should be fixed. Yes, I know mysql-5.1 will also look for /etc/mysql/my.cnf (http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/option-files.html), but again, this is still 5.0. ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342578] Re: mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf
Hrm... weird enough, this is what my strace tells me (a symlink from
/etc/my.cnf to /etc/mysql/my.cnf exists):
$ strace mysqldump 2>&1 | grep my.cnf
stat64("/etc/my.cnf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=3959, ...}) = 0
open("/etc/my.cnf", O_RDONLY) = 3
stat64("/home/tkeller/.my.cnf", 0xbf8ccdb4) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
stat64("/usr/local/Zend/Core/etc/my.cnf", 0xbf8ccdb4) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
I have no idea why it looks for /usr/local/Zend/... (this directory path
doesn't exist entirely), but if you say it works for you, its probably
some weird local issue.
--
mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 342578] Re: mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf
Ok guys, sorry for the noise. It was indeed this stupid Zend code thing which was once installed on this server (and got not cleanly uninstalled later on), this thread points to the solution: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=876252 I guess one cannot do anything on Debian's / Ubuntu's side to issue a warning, but hey, at least you're now aware of the issue ;) Thanks again for your time, Thomas. -- mysqldump doesn't pick up /etc/mysql/my.cnf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 496922] Re: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules
apt-get install snmp-mibs-downloader Fixed it for me in 12.04. I'll spare everyone the deluge of obscenities I'm currently spewing at everyone within earshot of my brain. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496922 Title: Ubuntu snmpd package doesn't include all net-snmpd modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/496922/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 820743] Re: package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820743 Title: package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/820743/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 820743] [NEW] package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: You are using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - the Lucid Lynx - released in April 2010 and supported until April 2013. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Aug 4 06:05:48 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) SourcePackage: bind9 Title: package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820743 Title: package bind9 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/820743/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 727293] [NEW] /usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and `/etc/resolv.conf' are the same file run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update-lib
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 /etc/apache2/conf.d$ sudo apt-get install upgrade-system [sudo] password for buzz: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done upgrade-system is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Setting up bind9 (1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2ubuntu0.2) ... * Stopping domain name service... bind9 [ OK ] * Starting domain name service... bind9 /usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and `/etc/resolv.conf' are the same file run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix exited with return code 1 * Reloading Squid HTTP Proxy 3.x configuration files ...done. run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update.d/libc exited with return cod ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: bind9 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.48-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Mar 1 18:35:39 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: bind9 ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727293 Title: /usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and `/etc/resolv.conf' are the same file run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix exited with return code 1 * Reloading Squid HTTP Proxy 3.x configuration files ...done. run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update.d/libc exited with return code 1 invoke-rc.d: initscript bind9, action "restart" failed. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 727293] Re: /usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and `/etc/resolv.conf' are the same file run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727293 Title: /usr/sbin/postconf: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory cp: `/etc/resolv.conf' and `/etc/resolv.conf' are the same file run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/postfix exited with return code 1 * Reloading Squid HTTP Proxy 3.x configuration files ...done. run-parts: /etc/resolvconf/update.d/libc exited with return code 1 invoke-rc.d: initscript bind9, action "restart" failed. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 597445] [NEW] tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 Tomcat 6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04. I have tried both "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" and "sudo /usr/share/tomcat6/bin/./shutdown.sh" an still when I go to either "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" I get the tomcat "It Works!" pagein FireFox. Tomcat 6 used to shutdown with "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" in Ubuntu 9.10 but since I upgraded to Ubuntu 10.04 I can not shutdown Tomcat 6. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jun 22 15:55:59 2010 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-branding 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762972/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762973/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "default_profile_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762974/default_profile_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50762975/profiles.ini.txt -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
o...@obi:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 start
[sudo] password for obi:
* invalid CATALINA_BASE: /var/lib/tomcat6
o...@obi:~$ ps -ef | grep tomcat6
obi 8271 7943 0 10:21 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto tomcat6
o...@obi:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop
* Stopping Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6[ OK ]
o...@obi:~$ ps -ef | grep tomcat6
obi 8287 7943 0 10:25 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto tomcat6
o...@obi:~$ cat /var/run/tomcat6.pid
cat: /var/run/tomcat6.pid: No such file or directory
o...@obi:~$
/etc/init.d/tomcat --
#!/bin/sh
#
# /etc/init.d/tomcat6 -- startup script for the Tomcat 6 servlet engine
#
# Written by Miquel van Smoorenburg .
# Modified for Debian GNU/Linux by Ian Murdock .
# Modified for Tomcat by Stefan Gybas .
# Modified for Tomcat6 by Thierry Carrez .
# Additional improvements by Jason Brittain .
#
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: tomcat6
# Required-Start:$local_fs $remote_fs $network
# Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network
# Should-Start: $named
# Should-Stop: $named
# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Start Tomcat.
# Description: Start the Tomcat servlet engine.
### END INIT INFO
set -e
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
NAME=tomcat6
DESC="Tomcat servlet engine"
DEFAULT=/etc/default/$NAME
JVM_TMP=/tmp/tomcat6-tmp
if [ `id -u` -ne 0 ]; then
echo "You need root privileges to run this script"
exit 1
fi
# Make sure tomcat is started with system locale
if [ -r /etc/default/locale ]; then
. /etc/default/locale
export LANG
fi
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
if [ -r /etc/default/rcS ]; then
. /etc/default/rcS
fi
# The following variables can be overwritten in $DEFAULT
# Run Tomcat 6 as this user ID and group ID
TOMCAT6_USER=tomcat6
TOMCAT6_GROUP=tomcat6
# The first existing directory is used for JAVA_HOME (if JAVA_HOME is not
# defined in $DEFAULT)
JDK_DIRS="/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-ibm"
# Look for the right JVM to use
for jdir in $JDK_DIRS; do
if [ -r "$jdir/bin/java" -a -z "${JAVA_HOME}" ]; then
JAVA_HOME="$jdir"
fi
done
export JAVA_HOME
# Directory where the Tomcat 6 binary distribution resides
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/share/$NAME
# Directory for per-instance configuration files and webapps
CATALINA_BASE=/var/lib/$NAME
# Use the Java security manager? (yes/no)
TOMCAT6_SECURITY=no
# Default Java options
# Set java.awt.headless=true if JAVA_OPTS is not set so the
# Xalan XSL transformer can work without X11 display on JDK 1.4+
# It also looks like the default heap size of 64M is not enough for most cases
# so the maximum heap size is set to 128M
if [ -z "$JAVA_OPTS" ]; then
JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128M"
fi
# End of variables that can be overwritten in $DEFAULT
# overwrite settings from default file
if [ -f "$DEFAULT" ]; then
. "$DEFAULT"
fi
if [ ! -f "$CATALINA_HOME/bin/bootstrap.jar" ]; then
log_failure_msg "$NAME is not installed"
exit 1
fi
POLICY_CACHE="$CATALINA_BASE/work/catalina.policy"
if [ -z "$CATALINA_TMPDIR" ]; then
CATALINA_TMPDIR="$JVM_TMP"
fi
# Set the JSP compiler if set in the tomcat6.default file
if [ -n "$JSP_COMPILER" ]; then
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Dbuild.compiler=\"$JSP_COMPILER\""
fi
SECURITY=""
if [ "$TOMCAT6_SECURITY" = "yes" ]; then
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.security.manager
-Djava.security.policy=\"$POLICY_CACHE\""
SECURITY="-security"
fi
# Define other required variables
CATALINA_PID="/var/run/$NAME.pid"
CATALINA_SH="$CATALINA_HOME/bin/catalina.sh"
# Look for Java Secure Sockets Extension (JSSE) JARs
if [ -z "${JSSE_HOME}" -a -r "${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/jsse.jar" ]; then
JSSE_HOME="${JAVA_HOME}/jre/"
fi
catalina_sh() {
# Escape any double quotes in the value of JAVA_OPTS
JAVA_OPTS="$(echo $JAVA_OPTS | sed 's/\"/\\\"/g')"
AUTHBIND_COMMAND=""
if [ "$AUTHBIND" = "yes" -a "$1" = "start" ]; then
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true"
AUTHBIND_COMMAND="/usr/bin/authbind --deep /bin/bash -c "
fi
# Define the command to run Tomcat's catalina.sh as a daemon
# set -a tells sh to export assigned variables to spawned shells.
TOMCAT_SH="set -a; JAVA_HOME=\"$JAVA_HOME\"; source \"$DEFAULT\"; \
CATALINA_HOME=\"$CATALINA_HOME\"; \
CATALINA_BASE=\"$CATALINA_BASE\"; \
JAVA_OPTS=\"$JAVA_OPTS\"; \
CATALINA_PID=\"$CATALINA_PID\"; \
CATALINA_TMPDIR=\"$CATALINA_TMPDIR\"; \
LANG=\"$LANG\"; JSSE_HOME=\"$JSSE_HOME\"; \
cd \"$CATALINA_BASE\"; \
\"$CATALINA_SH\" $@"
if [ "$AUTHBIND" = "yes" -a "$1" = "start" ]; then
TOMCAT_SH="'$TOMCAT_SH'"
fi
Re: [Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
I didn't manually remove tomcat 6 but I did uninstall OpenJDK so I could install SUNJDK. I noticed when I uninstalled OpenJDK it also uninstalled tomcat 6 and some other things. Which I had to reinstall afterwords. I used the Ubuntu software center to reinstall the programs and I had used apt to remove OpenJDK. Also, tomcat 6 is running it just won't shutdown. Should I remove tomcat 6 and reinstall it, using apt? --- On Fri, 7/2/10, Thierry Carrez wrote: From: Thierry Carrez Subject: [Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 To: t.beg...@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday, July 2, 2010, 7:13 AM The script is complaining that you don't have a /var/lib/tomcat6/conf directory... which points to a rather broken install. I suspect you removed /etc/tomcat6 manually and now you can't use the init script to start or stop tomcat. -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “tomcat6” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Binary package hint: tomcat6 Tomcat 6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04. I have tried both "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" and "sudo /usr/share/tomcat6/bin/./shutdown.sh" an still when I go to either "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" I get the tomcat "It Works!" pagein FireFox. Tomcat 6 used to shutdown with "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" in Ubuntu 9.10 but since I upgraded to Ubuntu 10.04 I can not shutdown Tomcat 6. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jun 22 15:55:59 2010 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-branding 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/597445/+subscribe -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
I ran "sudo apt-get purge tomcat6 tomcat6-common" and tomcat is still running. There is nothing at /usr/share/tomcat6/bin or /etc/init.d/tomcat6 , so I'am not sure what is going on. This is a Ubuntu upgrade to 10.04 and I used to be able to run "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" and tomcat would shutdown. Still stuck. --- On Fri, 7/2/10, Thierry Carrez wrote: From: Thierry Carrez Subject: [Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 To: t.beg...@sbcglobal.net Date: Friday, July 2, 2010, 10:26 AM Right, you should $ sudo apt-get purge tomcat6 tomcat6-common $ sudo apt-get install tomcat6 Note that you don't have to remove OpenJDK to install Sun's JDK. I'll mark the bug as Invalid, please reopen if you still have issue. ** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “tomcat6” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Binary package hint: tomcat6 Tomcat 6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04. I have tried both "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" and "sudo /usr/share/tomcat6/bin/./shutdown.sh" an still when I go to either "localhost" or "127.0.0.1" I get the tomcat "It Works!" pagein FireFox. Tomcat 6 used to shutdown with "sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop" in Ubuntu 9.10 but since I upgraded to Ubuntu 10.04 I can not shutdown Tomcat 6. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jun 22 15:55:59 2010 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-branding 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/597445/+subscribe -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 597445] Re: tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04
I had another problem with my Ubuntu 10.04 installation bug #610455. So, I just reinstalled Ubuntu 10.04 in a separate partition and now in the process of reinstalling all my applications and transferring over my files. -- tomcat6 will not shutdown in Ubuntu 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 643477] [NEW] package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nmap Installed using apt-get from terminal (sudo apt-get install nmap) It gets stuck at this point: Preparing to replace nmap 5.00-3 (using .../archives/nmap_5.00-3_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement nmap .. I already tried "sudo killall apt-get", "sudo rm /var/lib/dpkg/lock" and "sudo dpkg --configure -a" as well as "sudo apt-get install -f" It just stays stuck at "unpacking replacement..." ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nmap 5.00-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx AptOrdering: nmap: Remove Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 20 14:31:25 2010 Dependencies: ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. PackageArchitecture: unknown SourcePackage: nmap Title: package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. ** Affects: nmap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package lucid unknown -- package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 643477] Re: package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
** Attachment added: "Df.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477/+attachment/1613039/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477/+attachment/1613040/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477/+attachment/1613041/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 643477] Re: package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
Thanks for the quick reply, I found out that it was some kind of hard drive issue: while installing nmap there was a rsync job copying over 200 GB from one drive to another. It somehow froze the "apt-get install nmap" command at the point of unpacking. Strange this is that I could use the computer for everything else without slowdowns of any sorts, but trying to install new software did not work. After the rsync job finished, i reinstalled nmap and everything went fine. -- package nmap 5.00-3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1498229] [NEW] Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop
Public bug reported: Every time I close the lid or suspend the system from the menu, the screen goes dark, but the machine does not enter suspend. I have to hold the power button to kill it and reboot. I did not have this problem until a recent kernel package update that was automatically installed. I have attached the /var/crash log that was created. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498229 Title: Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1498229/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1498229] Re: Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop
** Attachment added: "susres.2015-09-21_16:54:33.468646.crash" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1498229/+attachment/4470785/+files/susres.2015-09-21_16%3A54%3A33.468646.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498229 Title: Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1498229/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1498229] Re: Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop
** Package changed: openssh (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498229 Title: Oops during every suspend on Gateway NV570P laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1498229/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1275262] [NEW] package vsftpd 2.3.5-1ubuntu2 failed to remove: Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
Public bug reported: I Installed vsftpd normally but after a few weeks removed ist, but there is an error schown while the remove is in progress ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: vsftpd 2.3.5-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-54.82-generic 3.2.50 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-54-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.5 AptOrdering: vsftpd: Remove inetutils-ftpd: Install inetutils-ftpd: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Feb 1 16:14:24 2014 DpkgTerminalLog: Entfernen von vsftpd ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von vsftpd (--remove): Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück DuplicateSignature: package:vsftpd:2.3.5-1ubuntu2:Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: vsftpd Title: package vsftpd 2.3.5-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2013-10-12 (112 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.vsftpd.conf: 2014-02-01T15:38:40.677022 ** Affects: vsftpd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 need-duplicate-check precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275262 Title: package vsftpd 2.3.5-1ubuntu2 failed to remove: Unterprozess installiertes post-removal-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/1275262/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1257186] Re: memory leakage messages
Confirmed with 14.04 (x86) and latest updates. Fresh install with minimal iso; afterwards in tasksel selected "Basic Ubuntu Server", "OpenSSH server", "Mail-Server" and "Samba file server". When sudo-ing the first time after running tasksel, the error occured. Fix: run "pam-auth-update" and remove "SMB password synchronization". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257186 Title: memory leakage messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1257186/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 971028] Re: kerberos auth doesn't work because of kerberos server not found
# dpkg -S /etc/ldap/ldap.conf libldap-2.4-2: /etc/ldap/ldap.conf # dpkg -S /etc/ldap.conf dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/ldap.conf. For /etc/ldap/ldap.conf package libldap-2.4-2 has installed it. While /etc/ldap.conf does not have a candidate, but it is installed by libpam- ldapd. /etc/ldap/ldap.conf is used by various ldap tools to set defaults, while /etc/ldap.conf instructs pam how to read the ldap- database for user information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971028 Title: kerberos auth doesn't work because of kerberos server not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/971028/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 971056] Re: Upgrade overwrites LDAP config with defaults
I've migrated an other server to 12.04 LTS beta. Seems fixed since today: Apr. 25th, 2012. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971056 Title: Upgrade overwrites LDAP config with defaults To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/971056/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 875395] Re: After upgrading to 11.10 bacula exhausts sql errors
This is because the necessary db-update-script isn't run by upgrading. You'll have to run it manually afterwards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875395 Title: After upgrading to 11.10 bacula exhausts sql errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/875395/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 988301] [NEW] lxc-ubuntu fails if no name is provided
Public bug reported: If I call lxc-ubuntu without providing the name parameter, it fails because some parameters get shifted in the script: /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-ubuntu -p vm debootstrap is /usr/sbin/debootstrap Checking cache download in /var/cache/lxc/precise/rootfs-i386 ... Copy /var/cache/lxc/precise/rootfs-i386 to vm/rootfs ... Copying rootfs to vm/rootfs ... /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-ubuntu: line 280: [: =: unary operator expected /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-ubuntu: line 285: [: =: unary operator expected grep: vm/config: No such file or directory /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-ubuntu: line 454: [: -eq: unary operator expected Passing -n foo doesn't produce that error. ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988301 Title: lxc-ubuntu fails if no name is provided To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/988301/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 980189] Re: Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula
dbconfig is used. But the update not applied. The script in /usr/share /bacula-director differs from the one given in the bacula sources (where I found it). The differences are minor and shouldn't matter, but it is a pitty to find scripts referenced to be found at /etc/bacula/scripts in the manual at /usr/share/bacula-director. This means the manuals would have to be updated too, but this wasn't done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980189 Title: Database not upgraded while upgrading bacula To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/980189/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 988301] Re: lxc-ubuntu fails if no name is provided
Thanks for info! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988301 Title: lxc-ubuntu fails if no name is provided To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/988301/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 971028] Re: kerberos auth doesn't work because of kerberos server not found
It doesn't matter if debconf used or not. /etc/ldap.conf is overwritten in all cases with a new, sometimes partly correct (as changed by me) version (server names are correct, but not selection rules), sometimes at whole. Recovering is easy: just take a /etc/ldap.conf from on of your working servers and copy it over. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971028 Title: kerberos auth doesn't work because of kerberos server not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/971028/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks logging in some wireless networks
Based on the information you have provided so far I think that dnsmasq is the most likely culprit so I will reassign this issue over there. If you get your hands on an affected machine then please let us know so that we can continue the investigation. ** Package changed: resolvconf (Ubuntu) => dnsmasq (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks logging in some wireless networks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 875950] Re: /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf empty on boot
This may have been a bug in resolvconf, specifically #366967 et al. If so then it has been fixed in Precise. Please check. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875950 Title: /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf empty on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/875950/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured
Lieven Van Acker: Can you investigate this further to figure out why dnsmasq isn't being asked to look up 'host2.domain2.local'? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/781557/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 661599] Re: lucid: dnsmasq isn't available on the server cd
Just checked http://nl.releases.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-12.04-alternate- amd64.list. Lists dnsmasq-base but not dnsmasq. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661599 Title: lucid: dnsmasq isn't available on the server cd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/661599/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 995495] [NEW] Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 breaks slapd
Public bug reported: After upgrading from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 gssapiauth doesn't work any more with slapd (OpenLDAP): # ldapsearch SASL/GSSAPI authentication started ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional info: SASL(-1): generic failure: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information () While on some other 11.10 system: # ldapsearch >/dev/null SASL/GSSAPI authentication started SASL username: x@XX SASL SSF: 56 SASL data security layer installed. Konfiguration files where kept and edited manually afterwards. No really big changes: mostly additional comments and local configuration missing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-virtual 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-virtual x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 6 16:16:14 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: TERM=screen-bce PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openldap UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-06 (0 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.default.slapd: 2012-05-06T14:43:48.436029 mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.slapd: 2012-05-06T14:54:46.076029 ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995495 Title: Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 breaks slapd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/995495/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 995495] Re: Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 breaks slapd
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995495 Title: Upgrade from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 breaks slapd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/995495/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks
Is there some officially correct way of disabling the NM-driven dnsmasq? If so, what is it? When dnsmasq is disabled as above, does this problem (#993794) go away? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks
Sergio: When dnsmasq is disabled (by commenting out the entry in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf) does the problem (#993794) go away? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks
This issue doesn't affect resolvconf directly, so someone please remove resolvconf from the Affects list. The malfunction described here is probably caused by #1003842. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP
** Summary changed: - Precise resolvconf+dnsmasq setup breaks login in some wireless networks + Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 993794] Re: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1003842 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1003842 Upgrading to Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993794 Title: Precise can't connect to a network guarded by an authentication webserver whose address can only be looked up with one of the nameservers whose address is provided by DHCP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/993794/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 974667] Re: dnsmasq does not bind to a port
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 993379 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993379 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 993379 Network Manager starts before the loopback device is ready, leading to dnsmasq not listening on any interface, breaking DNS resolution -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974667 Title: dnsmasq does not bind to a port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/974667/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1004949] Re: dnsmasq killed and restarted every 2 minutes
PArnal: The "dnsmasq" package is not installed but the "dnsmasq-base" package is installed. The latter contains the executable which is controlled by NM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004949 Title: dnsmasq killed and restarted every 2 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1004949/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1004949] Re: dnsmasq killed and restarted every 2 minutes
Same as #1004775? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004949 Title: dnsmasq killed and restarted every 2 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1004949/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1003842] Re: Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers
In addition to devising an algorithm for dnsmasq to detect all and only NNNs, the implementation of which will no doubt take a while, we should consider implementing a quick fix too, along the lines suggested by Sergio in #19. NM could be changed to do the following. "If the nameserver address list to be fed to dnsmasq contains one or more local addresses followed by one or more non-local addresses then run dnsmasq with the --strict-order option." I must confess that I am not sure what exactly should fall under "local addresses" here. In IPv4 I presume that these would be the familiar ranges 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, but what about IPv6? Nevertheless, I think we can safely proceed with this fix without being sure that we have exactly the right definition of local address since dnsmasq works no worse than libc in strict-order mode. ** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: resolvconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 Title: Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1003842] Re: Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers
I have marked this issue as affecting dnsmasq since we may want to implement a solution there along the lines of #28 or similar. I have marked this issue as affecting resolvconf since we may want to implement a fix there along the lines of #29 or similar. (In the absence of NM and in the presence of dnsmasq, resolvconf also feeds a nameserver list to dnsmasq.) ** Summary changed: - Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers + dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-equivalent nameservers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 Title: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non- equivalent nameservers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1003842] Re: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-equivalent nameservers
> I have marked this issue as affecting resolvconf > since we may want to implement a fix there along > the lines of #29 or similar. (In the absence of NM > and in the presence of dnsmasq, resolvconf also > feeds a nameserver list to dnsmasq.) Just remembered that the resolvconf hook script that does this feeding is located in the dnsmasq package. ** No longer affects: resolvconf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 Title: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non- equivalent nameservers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 875950] Re: /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf empty on boot
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875950 Title: /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf empty on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/875950/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured
Lieven Van Acker: Can you investigate this further to figure out why dnsmasq isn't being asked to look up 'host2.domain2.local'? ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/781557/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 991073] Re: dnsmasq failed to resolve most fqdn
Jim Tarvid: We are waiting for more information from you concerning Launchpad bug #991073 which you filed against the Ubuntu dnsmasq package. Please submit the information described in comment #1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991073 Title: dnsmasq failed to resolve most fqdn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/991073/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 526386] Re: dnsmasq with --interface exits immediately if the interface does not exist yet
** Summary changed: - dnsmasq exits using --interface if the interface does not exist yet + dnsmasq with --interface exits immediately if the interface does not exist yet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526386 Title: dnsmasq with --interface exits immediately if the interface does not exist yet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/526386/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
Wolf: Please post the FULL contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file as it is when the reported problem occurs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
Wolf: In #3 you post some output but I don't know how to interpret it. You start with a "ping s4" which yields "unknown host". You end with "ping s4" which successfully pings. What happened in the meantime to change the results? Did you edit something? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 661599] Re: The "dnsmasq" package isn't available on the server ISO
** Summary changed: - lucid: dnsmasq isn't available on the server cd + The "dnsmasq" package isn't available on the server ISO -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661599 Title: The "dnsmasq" package isn't available on the server ISO To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/661599/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1007273] [NEW] autofs does not start automatically after reboot
Public bug reported: After rebooting and logging in, I am prompted with "no home for user. logging in with /". looking for a running autofs I find it not started. Executing "sudo service autofs start" starts autofs. After "cd ~" my home is mounted and available. This error is erratic, but only on 12.04 systems. 10.04.4 LTS, 11.04, or 11.10 are not affected. AFAICD autofs is sometimes started by upstart without the necessary services running (mainly DNS, just because Networking is not completely up) making autofs bail out. Starting it later it finds all necessities and starts. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: autofs (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-virtual 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-virtual x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jun 1 08:16:46 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100816.2) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: autofs5 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-12 (49 days ago) ** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007273 Title: autofs does not start automatically after reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/1007273/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 991073] Re: dnsmasq failed to resolve most fqdn
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991073 Title: dnsmasq failed to resolve most fqdn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/991073/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
Wolf: You list problems with dnsmasq. In this report (#998712) let's continue to discuss the name resolution failure that you originally reported. One of the other problems you listed is being discussed in #1003842. For the remaining problems you listed, please submit your information to bug reports (possibly newly opened by you) focusing on those problems. Let's talk about the situation where name resolution fails on your system. When you have the following... /etc/resolv.conf: nameserver 127.0.0.1 search rsb.intern rsb.at /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf server=192.168.0.1 ... what is the output of "ps -elf|grep dnsmasq"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Standalone dnsmasq is not compatible out of the box with NM+dnsmasq
** Summary changed: - Don't start local resolver if a DNS server is installed + Standalone dnsmasq is not compatible out of the box with NM+dnsmasq -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Standalone dnsmasq is not compatible out of the box with NM+dnsmasq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other
Emmet in #14> So, my plan is as follows: Should #959037 be taken into consideration here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060 Title: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 231060] Re: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231060 Title: packages dnsmasq and libvirt-bin conflict with each other To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/231060/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
> Please understand that I don't have the time OK, marking this as invalid. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
I'd just like to note here before leaving this issue that the submitter originally said that he was running bind. If bind was set up to listen on 127.0.0.1#53 but was not correctly set up to provide name service then I imagine that this could have interfered with the NM-controlled dnsmasq. Exploring this possibility would have required cooperation by the submitter, but, unfortunately, the submitter is no longer willing to cooperate because he lacks time and has found a workaround that he is satisfied with. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured
In the absence of interest on the submitter's part in pursuing the matter, and since there seems to be no problem in either resolvconf or dnsmasq, marking Invalid. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/781557/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1008126] Re: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d, not update.d
Hi and thanks for the report. In the title, "Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d, not update.d", you suggest a configuration change, but this is for several reasons not a good idea. What is this change supposed to achieve? What exactly is the problem you are reporting? Is this it?: Jun 3 16:23:49 lenny ntpdate[29359]: Can't find host ntp.ubuntu.com: Name or service not known (-2) ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008126 Title: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update- libc.d, not update.d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1008126/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
On the affected system when it is manifesting the problem you reported (can't resolve names), is named running locally? (In your original submission you said that bind was running.) What role does this named play in your network? How is it configured? What happens if you stop this named? And then restart network-manager? All these questions pertain, obviously, to the hypothesis that local named may be interfering with local dnsmasq. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/781557/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
The hypothesis was that named started before dnsmasq, preventing dnsmasq from binding port 53 on 127.0.0.1. But the hypothesis is false, since you are not running named after all. Returning to your dig output, it can be summarized as follows. dig s4 -> FAILURE dig @10.1.0.4 s4 -> FAILURE dig @10.1.0.4 s4.rsb.intern -> SUCCESS (Wolf did something here) dig s4 -> FAILURE ping s4 -> SUCCESS Notice that domain name completion failed even when the external server was specified. As Simon wrote in #4, domain name completion happens in the resolver library. So there seems to be something wrong with the resolver library: it doesn't complete domain names with the domain search suffixes when dnsmasq is in use. Am I right? Does "dig @127.0.0.1 s4.rsb.intern" work on the affected system running NM-controlled dnsmasq? ** Summary changed: - dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken + domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 781557] Re: multiple search domains not honoured
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 998712 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Marking as duplicate since it's similar. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 998712 domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781557 Title: multiple search domains not honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/781557/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used
Wolf: I forgot to mention earlier that the reason I have to keep asking questions is that I am unable to reproduce the problem here. On my system, domain name completion works as expected with NetworkManager+dnsmasq. I just tried installing nscd to see if that made any difference, but it did not seem to do so; so I don't need to ask you if you are using nscd. Also adding entries to /etc/hosts didn't seem to make any difference, so I don't have to ask about /etc/hosts either. Does "dig @127.0.0.1 s4.rsb.intern" work on the affected system running NM-controlled dnsmasq? If it does work then I think we can conclude that the dnsmasq at 127.0.0.1 behaves the same way as the nameserver at 10.1.0.4 and that your issue is not dnsmasq-related; then we can start looking elsewhere for the cause of the problem. My next guess would be that the resolver library on the affected system can't read /etc/resolv.conf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1003842] Re: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-equivalent nameservers
#991347 describes a case where there's a nameserver in the list that always replies very quickly with "no data". Dnsmasq currently selects this nameserver because it's quick, the result being that all names fail to be resolved. Ungood. The measures proposed above would also improve handling of the case just described, so long as it's not the first-listed nameserver that's misbehaving, even though in the case just described a better response would be to detect the malfunction and to ignore the malfunctioning nameserver until it gets fixed. (An even better behavior would be for dnsmasq autonomously to construct a map of which servers can resolve for which domains, but this is asking a lot.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 Title: dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non- equivalent nameservers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1009206] [NEW] krb5-user deinstalled because of unmet dependencies
Public bug reported: # apt-get install krb5-user Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: krb5-user : Depends: libkrb5-3 (= 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2) but 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Because of these unmet dependencies krb5-user was deinstalled. Consequence: various necessary scripts relying on ksu do not run any more. ABSOLUTELEY FATAL. SHOWSTOPER. NEEDS TO BE FIXED!!! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: krb5-user (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-virtual 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-virtual x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jun 5 22:37:09 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100816.2) ProcEnviron: TERM=screen-bce PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: krb5 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-13 (174 days ago) ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009206 Title: krb5-user deinstalled because of unmet dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1009206/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1009206] Re: krb5-user deinstalled because of unmet dependencies
Don't think so: # # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS _Lucid Lynx_ - Release amd64 (20100816.2)]/ natty main restricted # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS _Lucid Lynx_ - Release amd64 (20100816.2)]/ natty main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports' ## repository. ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports' ## repository. ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. # deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-backports main restricted universe multiverse # deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-backports main restricted universe multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu natty partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu natty partner deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse # deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse # deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse Directory /etc/apt/sources.list.de is empty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009206 Title: krb5-user deinstalled because of unmet dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1009206/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Don't start local resolver if a DNS server is installed
@Alkis: Your title "Dont..." is not a description of a problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Don't start local resolver if a DNS server is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running
I just re-read the whole discussion and thought it would be useful (for me, at least) to summarize it. The original bug report was that NM+dnsmasq and standalone dnsmasq are incompatible because they have overlapping network socket address ranges, 0.0.0.0:53 and 127.0.0.1:53. One solution is for the administrator to comment out "dns=dnsmasq" in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf. Another solution is as described by the submitter's title: "[Hey NetworkManager,] Don't start local resolver if a DNS server is installed". Another solution favored by Mathieu is for the NM-enslaved dnsmasq and the standalone dnsmasq to use disjoint network socket address ranges. Early on, Mathieu said that solving this problem would not be a top priority because not many users want to combine the DNS server role (running bind or dnsmasq) with the DNS client role (running NM+dnsmasq). Alkis argued that the incompatibility is a serious bug that should be prevented using package dependencies or eliminated automatically by maintainer scripts or other means. The administrator shouldn't have to search the web to figure out how to make the dnsmasq package work. Troublesome is the fact that standalone dnsmasq sometimes works, sometimes doesn't, in the presence of NM+dnsmasq. Along the way Alkis levelled some fundamental criticisms against the design of NM+dnsmasq. I think that there is a clash of civilizations here: the Debian way (modular components that just work together in any combination allowed by package dependencies) versus the RedHat way (big daemons with limited options that own subsystems). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running
Alkis: Why do you need the dnsmasq package at all? You want NM and dnsmasq. Why not just use the NM-enslaved dnsmasq? If the latter doesn't meet your needs, could it be adapted somehow to meet your needs? Assuming that there are good reasons for using NM and standalone dnsmasq, I'd be inclined to agree with Alkis (if I understood him correctly) that a good solution would be to put the NM-dnsmasq integration stuff into a package and make this conflict with the standalone dnsmasq package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running
Hmm, I wasn't very clear. What I meant in my questions above (#34) was this. If NM+dnsmasq is the best solution for name service for the local host, isn't it also a better solution than NM-together-with-standalone- dnsmasq for remote hosts? If so then another solution approach is to enhance NM so that its enslaved dnsmasq listens on non-loopback addresses too. Once this is implemented the network-manager package could be made to Conflict with the dnsmasq package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running
What lies behind the problem being discussed here is the simple fact that there exists no single adequate network configuration utility for GNU/Linux. I am most familiar with Debian. From Debian we inherit ifupdown which was designed for static configuration. Debian developers have known for more than ten years that ifupdown needed to be replaced, but have never managed to come up with a replacement. From RedHat we get NetworkManager which was never intended to be a general network configurer but in the absence of any alternative continues to be enhanced with new features. Considerable effort has obviously been spent in Ubuntu just to get NM to coexist with other networking packages. It still doesn't fully cooperate with them (see #47379 for another example) and will probably never be well integrated with them. So we are still forced to choose between two network configuration approaches, NM-oriented in the desktop version and ifupdown-oriented in the server version. Each one has its limitations. If you try to combine the two, as you (Alkis) want to do, then you are confronted with these limitations. You are lucky that all you have to do is comment out one line in a configuration file to get things to work! We can continue playing around with the existing tools so that they work better in particular use cases but what we really need is a properly designed network configuration utility to supersede both ifupdown and NM. I am vaguely aware of the Wicd project. Must go read up on that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running
* Some thinking about[0][1], if not much coding of[2], a successor to ifupdown was done in the netconf project[3] led by Debian Developer martin krafft[4][5]. [0]http://people.debian.org/~madduck/talks/netconf_fosdem_2007.02.25/slides.s5.html [1]http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/ [2]http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-commits/ [3]https://alioth.debian.org/projects/netconf/ [4]madduck AT debian.org [5]http://people.debian.org/~madduck/ * One small step toward harmonizing desktop network configuration and server network configuration was taken with the introduction of resolvconf in both versions of 12.04. But there again, NM integrates bare-minimally with resolvconf; NM doesn't let resolvconf prioritize nameserver information according to interface-order(5) but sends resolvconf one big lump of nameserver information called "NetworkManager". * If Ubuntu doesn't switch to wicd or netconf or something else then another possibility to be explored is to break up NM into components that can be better integrated with other parts of the distro. This is, of course, rather difficult without cooperation from upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used
Having just re-read the discussion, I realize that I may have misunderstood the problem. I'll try to summarize it. Wolf, are you saying that when using the NM-enslaved dnsmasq, fully qualified domain names can always be resolved using the resolver(3) but short domain names cannot be resolved using the resolver, despite the correct "search" option being present in /etc/resolv.conf; that this anomaly does not occur at boot time, but does occur later and lasts one to thirty minutes? What triggers the anomaly to occur? I will assume that in the anomalous situation, /etc/resolv.conf contains the following nameserver 127.0.0.1 search rsb.intern rsb.at and /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contains the following server=10.1.0.4 and the following fails with "unknown host s4". ping s4 When the anomaly occurs, does "dig s4.rsb.intern" work on the affected system? When the anomaly occurs, does "dig s4 +search" work on the affected system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running
Based on comment #28, marked as affecting djbdns. ** Summary changed: - Local resolver prohibits DNS servers from running + NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running ** Also affects: djbdns (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used
Reggie: First of all, thanks for providing information about the malfunction on your system. We will get to the bottom of this! To get very clear on what's happening I will summarize. Let me know if any of the following is wrong. With the following resolv.conf (omitting comments) nameserver 127.0.0.1 search home.lan libc resolution of "lenin" repeatedly fails but "lenin.home.lan" repeatedly succeeds, whereas with nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 192.168.99.2 search home.lan both of them repeatedly succeed. Dnsmasq listens at 127.0.0.1, configured with the following. server=192.168.99.2 server=24.177.176.38 server=97.81.22.195 Only 192.168.99.2 can resolve the name "lenin.home.lan"; the others cannot. Now, what's going on here? First I'd like to rule out the possibility of side-effects of #1003842. Please eliminate the lines server=24.177.176.38 server=97.81.22.195 from /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf and run all your tests again. That is, repeatedly (at least twice) try "ping lenin" and "ping lenin.home.lan" both with only nameserver 127.0.0.1 listed in /etc/resolv.conf, and with nameserver 127.0.0.1 and nameserver 192.168.99.2 listed in /etc/resolv.conf. Report the results back here. In the case where you add "nameserver 192.168.99.2" to /etc/resolv.conf and name resolution subsequently succeeds, is there a noticeable delay? After you have edited /etc/resolv.conf, is /etc/resolv.conf still a symbolic link to /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf? That is, did you in fact edit /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf as I am assuming you did? According to resolv.conf(5) the following environment variables can affect the behavior of the resolver: LOCALDOMAIN, RES_OPTIONS. Is either of these set in your environment? (Run, e.g., the env |grep '\(DOMAIN\|RES\)' command to check this.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used
Reggie, I wrote: > First I'd like to rule out the possibility of side-effects of #1003842. > Please eliminate the lines > > server=24.177.176.38 > server=97.81.22.195 > > from /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf Just thought of a hitch. After removing these lines dnsmasq has to be restarted or it won't notice the change. But you can't just kill the NM-controlled dnsmasq because NM then gets horribly confused. So you have to eliminate those lines in another way, the safest way probably being: temporarily reconfigure your DHCP server so that it only sends one nameserver address (192.168.99.2) to the client, then restart network-manager on the client. Make sure that /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contains only the one address. THEN run all your tests again. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1008126] Re: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d, not update.d
Daniel, can you please provide some more information? Why do you think that dnsmasq's hook script should be moved? What is this supposed to achive? What exactly is the problem you are reporting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008126 Title: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update- libc.d, not update.d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1008126/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages
** Summary changed: - NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running + NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages
But enough dreaming. Given the world as it is, the immediate challenge is to make NM+dnsmasq compatible with standalone nameservers. (Otherwise network-manager should Conflict with those nameservers' packages.) Solutions mentioned earlier: * Tell the administrator to comment out "dns=dnsmasq" in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf after installing dnsmasq or another DNS server package. * Change NM so that it acts as if "dns=dnsmasq" is absent if a DNS server package is installed. * Change standalone dnsmasq such that it doesn't listen on 0.0.0.0:53, doesn't listen on 127.0.1.1:53 and change NM so that its dnsmasq listens only on 127.0.1.1:53. Here's a new idea. * Enhance the resolver(3) so that nameservers can be specified in resolv.conf using the : notation * Change NM such that it causes its slave dnsmasq to listen on another (than 53) port number P and sends "nameserver 127.0.0.1:P" to resolvconf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1008126] Re: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d, not update.d
Daniel, if you base your suggestion that dnsmasq be triggered from update-libc.d/ and not from update.d/ on what you read in the manpage, then you have misunderstood. The hook scripts in update-libc.d are run only after /etc/resolv.conf has been updated. Dnsmasq's hook script needs to run when any nameserver information (in /run/resolvconf/interface) changes and this doesn't have to be synchronized with changes to /etc/resolv.conf which dnsmasq does not read in "resolvconf mode". ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008126 Title: Install resolvconf listener for dnsmasq into /etc/resolvconf/update- libc.d, not update.d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1008126/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used
Wolf, dnsmasq is not going to be taken out of the distribution. Probably you meant that NM-driven dnsmasq shouldn't be enabled by default. If so then please file another report against network-manager with the title "Please don't enable dnsmasq by default so long as it's so buggy." But that measure will do nothing to address the issue in this report (#998712) which is the fact that domain name completion gets broken under certain circumstances when dnsmasq *is* used. To remind you, we are still in the phase where we are trying to figure out exactly what those circumstances are. I believe you when you say that the failure occurs. But usually name service doesn't fail; so what is the trigger? Finding some reproducible circumstances that trigger the malfunction is a precondition for preparing "test equipment". Characterizing those circumstances is also useful for isolating the bug. In addressing this issue I know you'd like to be helpful, but for various reasons you can't be helpful. You can't provide the information I asked for in #17, for example, for security reasons, and because you are too busy, and so on. I understand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 959037] Re: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages
I meantioned Wicd and Netconf above. While investigating another problem I stumbled across Connman http://connman.net which appears to be another alternative to NetworkManager worth watching. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from running, yet network-manager doesn't Conflict with their packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
