[Bug 1257063] [NEW] irqbalance leaking memory on omap4 armhf platform
Public bug reported: TI Omap4 Pandaboard rev a3 Ubuntu 3.5.0-235.51-omap4 3.5.7.23 Uptime 4 days, irqbalance memory consumption equals 228MB and growing. Memory usage grows until system goes unstable. dpkg -l irqbalance | grep -E "^ii" | tr -s ' ' | cut -d' ' -f3 1.0.6-2 irqbalance -d -f This machine seems not NUMA capable. Package 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0003 (load 0) Cache domain 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0001 (load 0) CPU number 0 numa_node is -1 (load 0) Cache domain 1: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0002 (load 0) CPU number 1 numa_node is -1 (load 0) NUMA NODE NUMBER: -1 LOCAL CPU MASK: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,f fff,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - Package 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0003 (load 0) Cache domain 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0001 (load 0) CPU number 0 numa_node is -1 (load 0) Cache domain 1: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0002 (load 0) CPU number 1 numa_node is -1 (load 0) - Rescanning cpu topology Package 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0003 (load 0) Cache domain 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0001 (load 0) CPU number 0 numa_node is -1 (load 0) Cache domain 1: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0002 (load 0) CPU number 1 numa_node is -1 (load 0) Package 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0003 (load 0) Cache domain 0: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0001 (load 0) CPU number 0 numa_node is -1 (load 0) Cache domain 1: numa_node is -1 cpu mask is 0002 (load 0) CPU number 1 numa_node is -1 (load 0) - . . . ** Affects: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: armhf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257063 Title: irqbalance leaking memory on omap4 armhf platform To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1257063/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1247107] Re: Runaway irqbalance consuming CPU and Memory
Also seen on OMAP4 Pandaboard with Ubuntu 13.10 (GNU/Linux 3.5.0-236-omap4 armv7l) CPU Usage is not a problem until irqbalance has eaten almost all ram. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247107 Title: Runaway irqbalance consuming CPU and Memory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1247107/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] nss-ldap, SUID executables, gcrypt
Hi all, this bug has been brought to my attention by my boss today. If I understand the situation correctly, the problem is: • OpenLDAP links against GnuTLS (gnutls26) • gnutls26 links against gcrypt, which has the bug • gnutls28 links against nettle, but also gmp which is LGPLv3+ • OpenLDAP thus can’t link against gnutls28, as it has reverse dependencies that are not LGPLv3-/GPLv3-compatible • the package affected is libnss-ldap though For some reason, neither nscd nor unscd seem to be able to work around this bug, so it has become rather critical (e.g. for use in company networks). Why not do a readline and provide *two* versions of the OpenLDAP client libraries, keep libldap-2.4-2 linked against gnutls26 and add another shared library plus development package (with at least the two shared library packages coïnstallable) to link against gnutls28 and build these BOTH from the SAME source package at the SAME time, so an upload of OpenLDAP will not need another package to be (re-)built to stay in sync. Did anyone think of it already and will shoot this idea down immediately? Or could it work? bye, //mirabilos • t...@debian.org -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314 HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Elmar Geese -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/423252/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
Ah right, there would be the usecase of LDAP with SSL used by non-GPL-compatible programmes. So the proper fix is to have three sets of LDAP (client) libraries. The rest of the packages (server and utilities) can then be built against whatever of those the maintainers see best fit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/423252/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #658739 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739 ** Also affects: gnutls26 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: openldap (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/423252/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 179497] Re: use of deprecated update-modules command in postinst/postrm
** Changed in: setserial (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to setserial in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179497 Title: use of deprecated update-modules command in postinst/postrm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irda-utils/+bug/179497/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 407316] Re: problem in installing dependancies
mailman and openssh-server are the two failing packages ** Also affects: mailman (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gforge (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mailman in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407316 Title: problem in installing dependancies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gforge/+bug/407316/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765897] Re: package gforge-dns-bind9 4.8.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
not in Fusionforge but in BIND ** Package changed: gforge (Ubuntu) => bind9 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765897 Title: package gforge-dns-bind9 4.8.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/765897/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 722505] [NEW] openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu2) hardy-proposed MISSES UPDATES FROM openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2) hardy-security
Public bug reported: Regression in hardy-proposed: ssh-vulnkey disappeared: openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu2) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * Backport from upstream: - Only listen for IPv6 connections on AF_INET6 sockets (LP: #713002). -- Colin Watson Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:49:01 + openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes: - Add support for registering ConsoleKit sessions on login. -- Colin Watson Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:44:11 +0100 Top of changelog.Debian.gz from hardy-security: openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2) hardy-security; urgency=low * Add a FILES section to ssh-vulnkey(1) (thanks, Hugh Daniel). * ssh-vulnkey handles options in authorized_keys (LP: #230029), and treats # as introducing a comment even if it is preceded by whitespace (thanks Colin Watson) -- Jamie Strandboge Wed, 14 May 2008 08:32:08 -0400 openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.1) hardy-security; urgency=low * Mitigate OpenSSL security vulnerability thanks to Colin Watson: - Add key blacklisting support. Keys listed in /etc/ssh/blacklist.TYPE-LENGTH will be rejected for authentication by sshd, unless "PermitBlacklistedKeys yes" is set in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. - Add a new program, ssh-vulnkey, which can be used to check keys against these blacklists. - Depend on openssh-blacklist. - Force dependencies on libssl0.9.8 / libcrypto0.9.8-udeb to at least 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.1. - Automatically regenerate known-compromised host keys, with a critical-priority debconf note. (I regret that there was no time to gather translations.) * added README.compromised-keys thanks to Colin Watson * References CVE-2008-0166 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-612-1 -- Jamie Strandboge Mon, 12 May 2008 23:44:33 -0400 openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes: - Add support for registering ConsoleKit sessions on login. -- Colin Watson Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:44:11 +0100 Please resynchronise, thanks! ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722505 Title: openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu2) hardy-proposed MISSES UPDATES FROM openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2) hardy-security -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4
ssh-vulnkey and ssh’ing out WFM too. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 394164] [NEW] uninstallable: incorrect dependencies after security update
Public bug reported: Both hardy-updates and hardy-security contain libsasl2-modules 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2.1 whereas hardy contained libsasl2-modules 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2 (according to a-c policy). When installing a fresh system with security already included (after all, no need to first install from hardy then upgrade, I mean, why install packages twice?) the system is uninstallable: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal: Depends: libsasl2-modules (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2) but 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages ** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- uninstallable: incorrect dependencies after security update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 522074] Re: fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and installee
** Patch added: "debdiff fixing this issue" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39211564/kvm_84%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu12.4%7Ehardy1tarent1.debdiff -- fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and installee https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 522074] [NEW] fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and installee
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kvm-source
The version of the kernel used by the Kubuntu Installer and the version of the
kernel
that actually gets installed differ. When adding kvm-source during the
installation,
for example via a preseed late-command using in-target, it fails to configure,
leading
to failures on dependent packages, such as a ${companyname}-desktop metapackage.
The patch fixes this: it still displays the warning, but DKMS will merely
ensure that
the module is built after the reboot.
Please apply this patch and ensure the next hardy-backport version will also
contain it.
Thanks!
** Affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: patch
--
fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and
installee
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522074
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 522074] Re: fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and installee
Considering I mentioned hardy-backports, and the filename of the debdiff is http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39211564/kvm_84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.4~hardy1tarent1.debdiff that should’ve been obvious ;-) We’re using hardy with hardy-backports. ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and installee https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] [NEW] hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) ... chmod: invalid mode: `root' Try `chmod --help' for more information. dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of apache2-mpm-prefork: apache2-mpm-prefork depends on apache2.2-common (= 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16); however: Package apache2.2-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing apache2-mpm-prefork (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of apache2: apache2 depends on apache2-mpm-worker (>= 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) | apache2-mpm-prefork (>= 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) | apache2-mpm-event (>= 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16); however: Package apache2-mpm-worker is not installed. Package apache2-mpm-prefork is not configured yet. Package apache2-mpm-event is not installed. dpkg: error processing apache2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured The problem lies here: if [ -e /usr/sbin/apache2 ]; then if [ "`dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2`" = "" ]; then chmod +x /usr/sbin/apache2 else chmod `dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 | cut -f 3` /usr/sbin/apache2 fi fi $ dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 root root 644 /usr/sbin/apache2 $ dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 | cut -f 3 root root 644 /usr/sbin/apache2 With “set -x” added to /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postinst: Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) ... + [ configure != configure ] + NETSTAT=netstat + [ -e /usr/sbin/apache2 ] + dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 + [ root root 644 /usr/sbin/apache2 = ] + dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 + cut -f 3 + chmod root root 644 /usr/sbin/apache2 /usr/sbin/apache2 chmod: invalid mode: `root' […] ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable
Hrm, so now how do I set the severity in LP? This is critical. If this wents from proposed to updates, we have a problem. -- hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable
@Dave: Old install of hardy (these are our desktop systems at work), which got upgraded (as it is, daily). My machine has proposed in sources.list as I’m the admin in charge of them. @Colin: Yes, -x’ing apache was intentional, to have it installed/usable but not enabled by default. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail
@Dave: I agree, but please make sure that the package version which gives me the issue does not propagate to hardy-updates because otherwise I may have several dozen angry people on me. Changing the affected line to chmod `dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 | cut -d' ' -f 3` /usr/sbin/apache2 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postinst does indeed fix my problem (locally). Thanks for the quick help, and thanks in advance for providing an updated Apache 2 package before this migrates ;-) -- If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail
Thank you *VERY MUCH* for breaking a lot of our computers now. Now I know why we’re still using Kubuntu. The priority of this bug ought to be raised to critical now, as the next upgrade on many of our machines will fail: r...@bkix:~ # apt-cache policy apache2.2-common apache2.2-common: Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16 Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16 Version table: *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.15 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-security/main Packages 2.2.8-1 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy/main Packages -- If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail
Can’t have been this hard… the attached debdiff fixes the issue for me. I’ve deployed that in our internal repo right now, thanks again for all the breakage. ** Patch added: "debdiff fixing this issue, for Hardy, tested" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50002725/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1.debdiff -- If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 594477] [NEW] 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 vanished
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php5 $ apt-cache policy php5-cli php5-cli: Installed: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 Candidate: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 Version table: *** 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.10 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-updates/main Packages 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-security/main Packages 5.2.4-2ubuntu5 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy/main Packages ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 vanished https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 594477] Re: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 vanished
As you can see in LP: #583698, helping out in testing does not get us bugs fixed, au contraire, it raises the level of annoyance at people ignoring the bugs reported. Anyway, I’m only tunning on proposed because then I can catch things like this before they affect my cow-orkers… no Sybase here. -- 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 vanished https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 583698] Re: [SRU] If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail
Yeah, works for me, thanks! tgl...@tglase:~ $ sudo env LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Starting Starting 2 Done Done The following packages will be upgraded: apache2 apache2-doc apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-common 5 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 3105kB of archives. After this operation, 8192B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main apache2-utils 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 [141kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main apache2-mpm-prefork 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 [232kB] Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main apache2.2-common 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 [756kB] Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main apache2 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 [46.2kB] Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main apache2-doc 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 [1930kB] Fetched 3105kB in 2s (1324kB/s) (Reading database ... 350291 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace apache2-utils 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 (using .../apache2-utils_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement apache2-utils ... Preparing to replace apache2-mpm-prefork 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 (using .../apache2-mpm-prefork_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17_i386.deb) ... No apache MPM package installed Unpacking replacement apache2-mpm-prefork ... Preparing to replace apache2.2-common 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 (using .../apache2.2-common_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement apache2.2-common ... Preparing to replace apache2 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 (using .../apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement apache2 ... Preparing to replace apache2-doc 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 (using .../apache2-doc_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement apache2-doc ... Setting up apache2-utils (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17) ... Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17) ... Setting up apache2-mpm-prefork (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17) ... No apache MPM package installed Setting up apache2 (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17) ... Setting up apache2-doc (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17) ... No apache MPM package installed tgl...@tglase:~ $ apt-cache policy apache2.2-common apache2.2-common: Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 Version table: *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.17 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy/tarent Packages 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-updates/main Packages 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.15 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy-security/main Packages 2.2.8-1 0 500 http://mirror.bonn.tarent.de hardy/main Packages -- [SRU] If /usr/sbin/apache2 is set -x, upgrades fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device
** Package changed: ubuntu => multipath-tools (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407 Title: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device
Hi Canonical Server Team, on another distro with a previous version of multipath-tools (0.4.9) I can not see this misbehaviour. Although 0.5.0 isn't that new, I don't know of another distro for s390x with 0.5.0 where I could check this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407 Title: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1527882] Re: package pax 1:20120606-2+deb7u1 failed to install/upgrade: package pax is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
** Changed in: pax (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527882 Title: package pax 1:20120606-2+deb7u1 failed to install/upgrade: package pax is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pax/+bug/1527882/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1527882] Re: package pax 1:20120606-2+deb7u1 failed to install/upgrade: package pax is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
Try: sudo dpkg -a --configure Or: sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/pax_*.deb Or: sudo apt-get install --reinstall pax -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527882 Title: package pax 1:20120606-2+deb7u1 failed to install/upgrade: package pax is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pax/+bug/1527882/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1320906] [NEW] Bacula init scripts don't stop, status, reload
Public bug reported: service scripts for bacula-director, bacula-sd und bacula-fd don't stop, reload or give status when the respective daemon is launched on a different port (directive dirport, sdport, fdport). The cause is that the start script generates a PID file with the port number in its name. Despite of that, the stop, reload and status function of the init script queries for a PID with the default port in the PID file name: """ status_of_proc -p /var/run/bacula/bacula-sd.9103.pid /usr/sbin/bacula-sd bacula-sd """ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: bacula (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-49.74~precise1-generic 3.5.7.32 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-49-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon May 19 16:34:29 2014 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04.2 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20130214) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: TERM=screen PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/usr/bin/fizsh SourcePackage: bacula UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320906 Title: Bacula init scripts don't stop, status, reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1320906/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1320906] Re: Bacula init scripts don't stop, status, reload
The bug is also occuring in 14.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320906 Title: Bacula init scripts don't stop, status, reload To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1320906/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1357880] [NEW] /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhclient needs updated regex
Public bug reported:
The regex on line 12 in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhclient needs
updating since it does not match the current output from dhclient
The current line (12) as included in version 1.3.16 of logcheck-database looks
like this:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhclient(-2.2.x)?: DHCP(REQUEST|RELEASE) (of
[.0-9]{7,15} )?on [[:alnum:].-]+ to [.0-9]{7,15} port 67$
The line should look something like this is order to match the current outpt
format of dhclient:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dhclient(-2.2.x)?(\[[[:digit:]]+\])?:
DHCP(REQUEST|RELEASE) (of [.0-9]{7,15} )?on [[:alnum:].]+ to [.0-9]{7,15} por
t 67( \(xid=0x[0-9a-f]+\))?$
This has been observed on a fresh install of ubuntu server 14.04.1 (no upgrades
from previous versions).
Procedure to reproduce:
- Install system that has at least one interface running dhcpclient
- Wait for dhclient to request or renew it's ip lease
- Wait for logwatch to run and send out its notification
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: logcheck-database 1.3.16
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-34.60-generic 3.13.11.4
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-34-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Aug 17 10:09:15 2014
Dependencies:
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-14 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64
(20140722.3)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: logcheck
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.kernel: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.rlogind: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.rsh: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.smartd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.tftpd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.cracking.d.uucico: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.bind: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.cron: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.incron: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.logcheck: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.postfix: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.ppp: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.pureftp: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.qpopper: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.squid: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.ssh: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.stunnel: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.sysklogd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.telnetd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.tripwire: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.paranoid.usb: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.acpid: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.amandad: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.amavisd.new: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.anacron: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.anon.proxy: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.apache: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.apcupsd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.arpwatch: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.asterisk: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.automount: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.bind: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.bluez.utils: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.courier: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cpqarrayd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cpufreqd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cron: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cron.apt: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cups.lpd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cvs.pserver: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cvsd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.cyrus: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dcc: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.ddclient: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dhclient: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dhcp: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dictd: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dkfilter: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dkim.filter: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dnsmasq: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dovecot: [deleted]
modified.conffile..etc.logcheck.ignore.d.server.dropbear: [deleted]
modified.conf
[Bug 1393611] Re: pax is not POSIX compliant
Yes, the new “pax” archive format, and some of the new -o options, are not supported. This utility is compatible with an older version of POSIX. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393611 Title: pax is not POSIX compliant To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pax/+bug/1393611/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1322431] Re: libsnmp-dev: Cannot create snmpv3 user with net-snmp-config command
@Canoncial: quick win This really is an easy to solve issue / quick win. Please include: /usr/bin/net-snmp-create-v3-user this will fix this issue (see comment #10 by Wylie for details) @all other users: Workaround does really work === Adding a the createUser line to snmpd as described by Sascha Lucas in comment #4 works also, because is is basically the same steps the script does. Do not be confused, while starting the snmpd does this steps: 1. read the "createUser" line in /var/lib/snmp/snmpd.conf 2. add a new "usmUser" line in /var/lib/snmp/snmpd.conf 3. remove the "createUser" line Sure, this may look as if nothing is done or the file is just reset to default, but the user is really created. Verify User Creation Say you created user icinga authprotocol SHA authpassphrase 'P1' privacyprotocol AES privacypassphrase 'P2' then you can check if there is output for: # snmpwalk -v3 -u icinga -l authPriv -a SHA -A 'P1' -x AES -X 'P2' localhost Kind regards, Thorsten -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322431 Title: libsnmp-dev: Cannot create snmpv3 user with net-snmp-config command To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1322431/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
