[Bug 1257186] Re: memory leakage messages (no talloc stackframe)
I did a dist-upgrade with trusty proposed and the leakage message is gone for me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257186 Title: memory leakage messages (no talloc stackframe) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1257186/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 943664] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943664 Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/943664/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 943664] [NEW] package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: slapd failed to install during upgrade from lucid to precise ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-server 2.6.32.52+drm33.21 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Feb 29 23:57:43 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: openldap Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package dist-upgrade lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943664 Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/943664/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 943664] Re: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Tags added: dist-upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943664 Title: package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/943664/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 631737] [NEW] gvfsd-smb uses all cpu when trying to connect to samba share
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When I try to connect to a samba share (via typing in the nautilus location bar: smb://servername/sharename) I get an endless hourglass and maximum cpu usage of the gvfsd-smb process. The connection is not possible. This used to work before. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: samba (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.28-generic 2.6.35.3 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 6 18:30:17 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.31.90-0ubuntu3 gvfs 1.6.3-0ubuntu1 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- gvfsd-smb uses all cpu when trying to connect to samba share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631737 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 631740] Re: Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus
** Package changed: dbus (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu) -- Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 631740] Re: Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus
** Description changed: Binary package hint: dbus When I click the network icon to browse the contents of the network I get maximum cpu usage by gvfsd-smb-brows and and the following error: Could not display network:///. Error: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. Please select another viewer and try again. The process has to be killed manually, it does not seem to stop by - itself... + itself. Also, I can't browse the network ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: dbus 1.2.24-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.28-generic 2.6.35.3 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 6 18:38:45 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_US.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: dbus -- Dbus error when clicking network icon in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 532024] Re: gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network
Did this use to work properly with a previous release ?
This was never tested.
dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Version} ${Source} ${Status}\n' | grep samba:
libsmbclient 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
libsmbclient-dev 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
libwbclient0 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
samba-common 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
samba-common-bin 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
smbclient 2:3.4.6~dfsg-1ubuntu1 samba install ok installed
How is the remote share accessed from the Ubuntu system?
nautilus
Connecting with smbclient
this works
smbclient -L //:
Domain=[EBOX] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.0]
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 532024] [NEW] gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When I select Places-Network and then double click the Windows Network directory I get a pop-up saying: Opening Windows Network You can stop this operation by clicking cancel. CPU usage goes up to 100% (gvfsd-smb-brows is causing this). It does not matter how long I wait, nothing changes. When I click cancel on the dialog, the dialog goes away but CPU stays at 100%. After a really long time (20 minutes) I get the following dialog: Unable to mount location DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. If I click on OK on that dialog it goes away but CPU stays at 100%. So I can't enter the windows network and CPU usage is 100%. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 4 18:02:42 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' Package: samba (not installed) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.29.91-0ubuntu2 gvfs 1.5.4-0ubuntu1 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 532024] Re: gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network
** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40180015/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- gvfsd-smb-brows uses 100% cpu after selecting Places--Network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected
Yes it is... ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected
1. Yes 2. I can reproduce it via the following steps: *Boot xubuntu Karmic 32 bit (with openssh service running) login with an account with restricted rights (no sudo etc.). *Boot another machine (in my case Ubuntu karmic 64bit). Use this machine to connect with xubuntu machine via ssh. Enter sudo bash within the ssh session to create elevated privileges on the remote (xubuntu) machine. *Shut down the xubuntu machine via the menu (GUI desktop) with the restricted account. The following two things happen on my end: 1The machine shuts down, obviously stopping the ssh connection and kicking the user with elevated privileges out. (this was not the case in previous versions and is hazardous, what if the ssh connection is doing important stuff etc.) 2The machine does not shut down but displays a GUI password dialog, and the restricted account is not able to shut down even if the user with elevated privileges disconnects. (So now all of a sudden you need to login as a unrestricted user to be able to shutdown the machine). -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 441669] Re: User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected
I don't know what exact version. With previous version I mean Jaunty (and Intrepid, and hardy, and gutsy). The behaviour was different: If the restricted user tried to shutdown (the local machine) while a remote user(with elevated privileges) was logged in, the restricted user would get a dialog staing the system could not be shut down because an elevated user was using the machine. Once the elevated user was logged out the restricted user could shut down the machine... ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- User with restricted rights is able to shutdown machine while ssh superuser is connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
