[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package vm-builder - 0.12.0-0ubuntu1

---
vm-builder (0.12.0-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low

  * New upstream release. (FFe: LP: #525741)
- All patches incorporated upstream.
 -- Soren Hansen so...@ubuntu.com   Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:56:18 +0100

** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
[FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Just to clarify, what will make maintenance in Lucid more difficult if
we stick with vmbuilder 0.11.3?

-- 
[FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Soren Hansen
The delta between the 0.11 and 0.12 branches is vast, and bugfixes from
0.12 are going to be a hassle to backport to 0.11.

The upstream focus of development is 0.12, and certainly lucid+1 will
have 0.12 (or later), so 0.11 will, unless someone dedicates ressources
to maintaining it, be abandoned.

After Hardy was released, ubuntu-vm-builder was rewritten from a rather
large shell script to the python project that is VMBuilder. The Hardy
version really could have benefited from a lot of the bugs we fixed in
the new implementation, but backporting them was an extreme hassle, and
as a result the version in Hardy was virtually left to rot. Arguably,
the situation isn't quite as bad this time (it's, after all, still the
same programming language), but I'd really like to have the LTS version
of VMBuilder be as maintainable as possible for as long as possible, and
I think 0.12 gives us that.

-- 
[FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
FFe granted, please upload ASAP.

** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs