Public bug reported:
I'm sure this has been noted before but I can't find an explanation.
Why are non-major version numbers in the package names for the openldap
libraries? Package names like 'libldap-2.4-2' seem to make it unnecessarily
hard to package third party software with sensible dependencies.
Is there a good excuse for this?
I don't know a huge amount about debian packaging but is there an
obvious way another package could specify something like "libldap >
2.3"? Would that be possible if the libldap2.4blahblah package had a
'provides' specification?
Cheers,
Tim
** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Version number in package name makes life hard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
