[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
xenial verification Confirming bug: ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ apt-cache policy sasl2-bin sasl2-bin: Installed: 2.1.26.dfsg1-14build1 Candidate: 2.1.26.dfsg1-14build1 Version table: *** 2.1.26.dfsg1-14build1 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages Confirmed saslauthd at 100% CPU after the test command: PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND root 20 0 90860972 0 R 100.0 0.0 0:05.72 saslauthd subsequent testsaslauthd commands just block, as expected due to the bug. Repeating the test with the package from proposed: ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ apt-cache policy sasl2-bin sasl2-bin: Installed: 2.1.26.dfsg1-14ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 2.1.26.dfsg1-14ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 2.1.26.dfsg1-14ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages Not only does saslauthd not start eating cpu, it keeps working: with dovecot stopped: ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu 0: NO "authentication failed" Starting up dovecot and trying again: ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ sudo service dovecot start ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu 0: OK "Success." ubuntu@xenial-saslauthd:~$ Xenial verification completed successfully. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Roberto, are you able to test this update? If not, I can do it, but it would be better if someone not involved with the fix could do it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The rimap authentication mechanism in saslauthd can hit a condition
where it will start spinning and using all available CPU. This condition
can be easily encountered when an authentication is happening and the
imap service is being restarted.
Furthermore, the saslauthd child process that picked up that
authentication request and that is spinning now won't be reaped nor can
it service further requests. If all children are left in this state, the
authentication service as a whole won't be working anymore.
[Test Case]
This test can be performed in a LXD or VM.
* install the needed packages. mail-stack-delivery is used to have an
imap server available on localhost that needs no further configuration.
Accept the defaults for all debconf prompts:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install sasl2-bin mail-stack-delivery
* set the password "ubuntu" for the ubuntu user
echo ubuntu:ubuntu | sudo chpasswd
* start saslauthd like this, with just one child:
sudo /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost -r -n 1
* restart dovecot
sudo service dovecot restart
* test saslauthd authentication:
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
0: OK "Success."
* Now let's break it. In one terminal watch the output of top:
top
* in another terminal, run the following:
sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu & sleep 1; sudo service dovecot stop
* observe in the "top" terminal that saslauthd is consuming a lot of
cpu. If that's not happening, try starting dovecot again and adjusting
the sleep value in the previous test command, but 1s was enough in all
my runs.
* start dovecot and repeat the authentication request. Since the only
saslauthd child is now spinning, this will block:
sudo service dovecot start
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
[Regression Potential]
+ This fix relies on read(2) returning zero bytes when the connection is
dropped, and that is clearly documented in its manpage:
- * discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
- of this change.
+ "On success, the number of bytes read is returned (zero indicates
+ end of file),"
- * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
- upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
- to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
- event of a regression.
+ The select manpage also documents such a case being a valid case to
+ indicate that a socket is ready to be read from, and that it won't
+ block:
- * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
- and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
+ "The file descriptors listed in readfds will be watched to see if
+ characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a
+ read will not block; in particular, a file descriptor is also ready
+ on end-of-file)"
+
+ This patch is what was used upstream, and is also present in bionic.
+
+ I can't think of regressions specific to this change, other than the
+ usual risk of rebuilding a widely used library (sasl2) in an environment
+ different from the one from when xenial was released, i.e., different
+ libraries available, maybe different system-wide build options, etc.
[Other Info]
+ Trusty is still not accounting for read() returning zero being an end-of-file
case, but the loop there has a counter and it eventually exits, not leading to
a perpetual spin or high cpu usage (see comment #17 for a brief history on how
this fix was dropped in the xenial package).
- * Anything else you think is useful to include
- * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
- * and address these questions in advance
+ The fix is simple and could be applied there as well, if the SRU team
+ prefers.
+
[Original Description]
sasl2-bin version 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4ubuntu contains a bug
that causes heavy cpu utilization, impacting normal operation of one of
our mail servers following an upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.
We are running the daemon with the following options:
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O our.imap.server -r -m
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd -n 5
We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of
one of the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following
behaviour:
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The rimap authentication mechanism in saslauthd can hit a condition
where it will start spinning and using all available CPU. This condition
can be easily encountered when an authentication is happening and the
imap service is being restarted.
Furthermore, the saslauthd child process that picked up that
authentication request and that is spinning now won't be reaped nor can
it service further requests. If all children are left in this state, the
authentication service as a whole won't be working anymore.
[Test Case]
This test can be performed in a LXD or VM.
* install the needed packages. mail-stack-delivery is used to have an
imap server available on localhost that needs no further configuration.
Accept the defaults for all debconf prompts:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install sasl2-bin mail-stack-delivery
* set the password "ubuntu" for the ubuntu user
echo ubuntu:ubuntu | sudo chpasswd
* start saslauthd like this, with just one child:
sudo /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost -r -n 1
* restart dovecot
sudo service dovecot restart
* test saslauthd authentication:
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
0: OK "Success."
* Now let's break it. In one terminal watch the output of top:
top
* in another terminal, run the following:
sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu & sleep 1; sudo service dovecot stop
* observe in the "top" terminal that saslauthd is consuming a lot of
cpu. If that's not happening, try starting dovecot again and adjusting
- the sleep value in the previous test command.
+ the sleep value in the previous test command, but 1s was enough in all
+ my runs.
- * repeat the authentication request. Since the only saslauthd child is now
spinning, this will block:
+ * start dovecot and repeat the authentication request. Since the only
saslauthd child is now spinning, this will block:
+ sudo service dovecot start
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
-
[Regression Potential]
* discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
of this change.
* It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
event of a regression.
* This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
[Other Info]
* Anything else you think is useful to include
* Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
* and address these questions in advance
[Original Description]
sasl2-bin version 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4ubuntu contains a bug
that causes heavy cpu utilization, impacting normal operation of one of
our mail servers following an upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.
We are running the daemon with the following options:
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O our.imap.server -r -m
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd -n 5
We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of
one of the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following
behaviour:
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
.
with further inspection showing that the file descriptor in question was
a socket connected to our imap server in CLOSE_WAIT.
Browsing saslauthd/auth_rimap.c in the source package for sasl2-bin, we
came across the following code, repeated in two locations:
while( select (fds, , NULL, NULL, ) >0 ) {
if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
if ( ret<0 ) {
rc = ret;
break;
} else {
rc += ret;
}
}
}
It looks like this loop is expected to run until a read error is
encountered or the timeout of 1 second is reached. There is no test to
check that 0 bytes were read, indicating that the
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Ok, trusty isn't affected because the loop there has an exit clause:
+ ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
+ if ( ret<0 ) {
+ rc = ret;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ loopc += 1;
+ } else {
+ loopc = 0;
+ }
+ if (loopc > sizeof(rbuf)) { // arbitrary chosen value
+ break;
+ }
That comes from trusty's patch named 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch. So
trusty does loop for a bit (sizeof(rbuf) is 1000), but won't get stuck. Someone
added the loop counter as a safety net, but didn't change the "ret<0" check
into "ret<=0" which would also have fixed this.
In precise, that same patch (0034) adds the loop, but *without* an exit
clause, hence this bug.
Xenial is interesting. Upstream at some point adopted the patch that
does *NOT* exit the loop, but the code is so similar that someone
decided the patch from the package was already applied and dropped it
from the package, reintroducing the bug.
To add to the confusion, in xenial that patch file was super slightly renamed
from 0034_fix_dovecot_authentication.patch to
0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch (can you spot what changed?) and got
totally different contents:
--- cyrus-sasl2.orig/lib/checkpw.c
+++ cyrus-sasl2/lib/checkpw.c
@@ -587,16 +587,14 @@ static int read_wait(int fd, unsigned de
/* Timeout. */
errno = ETIMEDOUT;
return -1;
- case +1:
- if (FD_ISSET(fd, )) {
- /* Success, file descriptor is readable. */
- return 0;
- }
- return -1;
case -1:
if (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN)
continue;
default:
+ if (FD_ISSET(fd, )) {
+ /* Success, file descriptor is readable. */
+ return 0;
+ }
/* Error catch-all. */
return -1;
}
>From bionic onwards, the upstream version has the loop with no loop
counter, but it checks read()'s result for <= 0, not just 0, so it's
fixed there.
Bottom line, only xenial is currently affected (and precise, but precise
is EOL).
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217
Title:
salsauthd maxes cpu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
I'm unable to trigger this bug when running the test case on trusty, even though the same code is there. I also tried adjusting the sleep. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The rimap authentication mechanism in saslauthd can hit a condition
where it will start spinning and using all available CPU. This condition
can be easily encountered when an authentication is happening and the
imap service is being restarted.
-
- Once the saslauthd daemon enters this loop, it stops responding to
- authentication requests.
[Test Case]
This test can be performed in a LXD or VM.
* install the needed packages. mail-stack-delivery is used to have an
imap server available on localhost that needs no further configuration.
Accept the defaults for all debconf prompts:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install sasl2-bin mail-stack-delivery
* set the password "ubuntu" for the ubuntu user
echo ubuntu:ubuntu | sudo chpasswd
* start saslauthd like this:
sudo /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost -r -n 5
* restart dovecot
sudo service dovecot restart
* test saslauthd authentication:
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
0: OK "Success."
* Now let's break it. In one terminal watch the output of top:
top
* in another terminal, run the following:
sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu & sleep 1; sudo service dovecot stop
* observe in the "top" terminal that saslauthd is consuming a lot of
cpu. If that's not happening, try starting dovecot again and adjusting
the sleep value in the previous test command.
-
- * Try authenticating again, while saslauthd is spinning. It should fail:
- $ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
- 0: NO "authentication failed"
[Regression Potential]
* discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
of this change.
* It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
event of a regression.
* This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
[Other Info]
* Anything else you think is useful to include
* Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
* and address these questions in advance
[Original Description]
sasl2-bin version 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4ubuntu contains a bug
that causes heavy cpu utilization, impacting normal operation of one of
our mail servers following an upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.
We are running the daemon with the following options:
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O our.imap.server -r -m
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd -n 5
We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of
one of the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following
behaviour:
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
.
with further inspection showing that the file descriptor in question was
a socket connected to our imap server in CLOSE_WAIT.
Browsing saslauthd/auth_rimap.c in the source package for sasl2-bin, we
came across the following code, repeated in two locations:
while( select (fds, , NULL, NULL, ) >0 ) {
if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
if ( ret<0 ) {
rc = ret;
break;
} else {
rc += ret;
}
}
}
It looks like this loop is expected to run until a read error is
encountered or the timeout of 1 second is reached. There is no test to
check that 0 bytes were read, indicating that the connection was closed
by the remote peer. Since select() will immediately return the size of
the set of the partially closed descriptor (1, which is >0), and calls
to read() will always yield 0 bytes, there's the potential for execution
to get stuck in this non blocking loop and I'm presuming that that's
what's happening here.
We've not performed any further analysis to prove that this is really
what's happening
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+ The rimap authentication mechanism in saslauthd can hit a condition
+ where it will start spinning and using all available CPU. This condition
+ can be easily encountered when an authentication is happening and the
+ imap service is being restarted.
- * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
-
- * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
-explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
+ Once the saslauthd daemon enters this loop, it stops responding to
+ authentication requests.
[Test Case]
- * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug
+ This test can be performed in a LXD or VM.
- * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected
-package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package fixes
-the problem.
+ * install the needed packages. mail-stack-delivery is used to have an
+ imap server available on localhost that needs no further configuration.
+ Accept the defaults for all debconf prompts:
+
+ sudo apt update
+ sudo apt install sasl2-bin mail-stack-delivery
+
+ * set the password "ubuntu" for the ubuntu user
+ echo ubuntu:ubuntu | sudo chpasswd
+
+ * start saslauthd like this:
+ sudo /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost -r -n 5
+
+ * restart dovecot
+ sudo service dovecot restart
+
+ * test saslauthd authentication:
+ $ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
+ 0: OK "Success."
+
+ * Now let's break it. In one terminal watch the output of top:
+ top
+
+ * in another terminal, run the following:
+ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu & sleep 1; sudo service dovecot stop
+
+ * observe in the "top" terminal that saslauthd is consuming a lot of
+ cpu. If that's not happening, try starting dovecot again and adjusting
+ the sleep value in the previous test command.
+
+ * Try authenticating again, while saslauthd is spinning. It should fail:
+ $ sudo testsaslauthd -u ubuntu -p ubuntu
+ 0: NO "authentication failed"
+
[Regression Potential]
- * discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
+ * discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
of this change.
- * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
-upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
-to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
-event of a regression.
+ * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
+ upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
+ to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
+ event of a regression.
- * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
-and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
+ * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
+ and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
[Other Info]
-
- * Anything else you think is useful to include
- * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
- * and address these questions in advance
+ * Anything else you think is useful to include
+ * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
+ * and address these questions in advance
[Original Description]
sasl2-bin version 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4ubuntu contains a bug
that causes heavy cpu utilization, impacting normal operation of one of
our mail servers following an upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.
We are running the daemon with the following options:
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O our.imap.server -r -m
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd -n 5
We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of
one of the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following
behaviour:
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
.
with further inspection showing that the file descriptor in question was
a socket connected to our imap server
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+
+ * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
+
+ * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
+explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
+
+ [Test Case]
+
+ * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug
+
+ * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected
+package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package fixes
+the problem.
+
+ [Regression Potential]
+
+ * discussion of how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result
+ of this change.
+
+ * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before
+upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important
+to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the
+event of a regression.
+
+ * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered,
+and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU.
+
+ [Other Info]
+
+ * Anything else you think is useful to include
+ * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and
the Technical Board
+ * and address these questions in advance
+
+
+ [Original Description]
+
sasl2-bin version 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4ubuntu contains a bug
that causes heavy cpu utilization, impacting normal operation of one of
our mail servers following an upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.
We are running the daemon with the following options:
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O our.imap.server -r -m
/var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd -n 5
-
- We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of one of
the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following behaviour:
+ We noticed that users were unable to send mail and that the saslauthd
+ processes were using approximately 100% of each cpu core. An strace of
+ one of the runaway process showed that it was stuck in the following
+ behaviour:
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
select(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [8], left {0, 0})
read(8, "", 940)= 0
.
-
- with further inspection showing that the file descriptor in question was a
socket connected to our imap server in CLOSE_WAIT.
+ with further inspection showing that the file descriptor in question was
+ a socket connected to our imap server in CLOSE_WAIT.
Browsing saslauthd/auth_rimap.c in the source package for sasl2-bin, we
came across the following code, repeated in two locations:
while( select (fds, , NULL, NULL, ) >0 ) {
-if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
- ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
- if ( ret<0 ) {
- rc = ret;
- break;
- } else {
- rc += ret;
- }
-}
- }
+ if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
+ ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
+ if ( ret<0 ) {
+ rc = ret;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ rc += ret;
+ }
+ }
+ }
-
- It looks like this loop is expected to run until a read error is encountered
or the timeout of 1 second is reached. There is no test to check that 0 bytes
were read, indicating that the connection was closed by the remote peer. Since
select() will immediately return the size of the set of the partially closed
descriptor (1, which is >0), and calls to read() will always yield 0 bytes,
there's the potential for execution to get stuck in this non blocking loop and
I'm presuming that that's what's happening here.
+ It looks like this loop is expected to run until a read error is
+ encountered or the timeout of 1 second is reached. There is no test to
+ check that 0 bytes were read, indicating that the connection was closed
+ by the remote peer. Since select() will immediately return the size of
+ the set of the partially closed descriptor (1, which is >0), and calls
+ to read() will always yield 0 bytes, there's the potential for execution
+ to get stuck in this non blocking loop and I'm presuming that that's
+ what's happening here.
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
I reproduced the problem in xenial by timing a "testsaslauthd" call with a "service dovecot stop" one (dovecot being my test imap server on localhost). This is good enough for an SRU test case, thanks all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
The patch 0034 mentioned in comment #10 is applied in the xenial package
2.1.26.dfsg1-14build1, so what Roberto hit could be a different issue
requiring a different fix.
Might have been this:
cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.26.dfsg1-15) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add fix for auth_rimap infinite loop (hang) when IMAP server closes
connection (Closes: #815208)
Patch is
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=815208;filename=auth_rimap_socket_closed.patch;msg=5:
--- a/saslauthd/auth_rimap.c
+++ b/saslauthd/auth_rimap.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@
while( select (fds, , NULL, NULL, ) >0 ) {
if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
- if ( ret<0 ) {
+ if ( ret<=0 ) {
rc = ret;
break;
} else {
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
while( select (fds, , NULL, NULL, ) >0 ) {
if ( FD_ISSET(s, ) ) {
ret = read(s, rbuf+rc, sizeof(rbuf)-rc);
- if ( ret<0 ) {
+ if ( ret<=0 ) {
rc = ret;
break;
} else {
** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217
Title:
salsauthd maxes cpu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Trusty has 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch, but it lacks the above fix as well. ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags removed: precise ** Tags added: server-next ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Just a short note: With the 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch from saucy package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/amd64/sasl2-bin/2.1.25.dfsg1-17 all systems are running fine so far (for 9 days now), without high load of saslauthd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
If you need a fix for an existing stable release, please comment with a justification against https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When and complete steps 1 through 4 in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Hi Robie, Justification against https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When: * severe regression bug: Package sasl2-bin is unusable after Upgrade from Lucid LTS to Precise LTS since saslauthd eats up 100% CPU on production mailservers when using rimap and needs regular restarts. saslauthd in Lucid LTS did work just fine with rimap. Complete steps 1 through 4 in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure Step 1) Check that the bug is fixed in the current development release, and that its bug task is Fix Released. -- Yes, launchpad bug #997217 has status Fix released. Check. Step 2) Ensure that the bug report for this issue is public. -- Yes, launchpad bug #997217 is public. Step 3) Update the bug report description and make sure it contains the following information: [Impact] * High Load on production mailservers since Upgrade of Long Term Support Release from Lucid 10.04 LTS to Precise 12.04 LTS [Test Case] * Sporadically running into high load (infinite loop in saslauthd) when running saslauthd via Remote (rimap) against nginx mailproxy from nginx-extras package on mailservers with high imap traffic [Regression] * The bug itself is a regression in comparison to Lucid 10.04. Step 4) Ask someone in the Ubuntu bug control team to nominate the bug for the appropriate Ubuntu release(s)/series (e. g. the current LTS and latest stable release). -- Nominated for Precise by Adolfo Jayme Barrientos Is anything missing? Regards Daniel ** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Daniel, Please could you elaborate on the test case? Neither me nor the stable update verification team will be able to reproduce or test the presence of the bug or a fix for it based on the description you've given. These need to be step-by-step instructions that anybody can follow, including somebody not familiar with the specifics of the package. Will you be OK to test the proposed fix once it is built and ready, so that the update will be able to land for general use? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
I'm sorry to say, that there is no simple test case. The problem cannot be reproduced with simple instructions. You need to run saslauthd -a rimap for a few days in front of nginx-extras+dovecot IMAP and do a lot of imap logins to trigger the bug. But the bug is already fixed by the newer patch version of 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch in 2.1.25.dfsg1-17. Some more system information: Precise nginx: mail01:~# dpkg -l nginx* |grep ^ii ii nginx-common 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.4 small, but very powerful and efficient web server (common files) ii nginx-extras 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.4 nginx web server with full set of core modules and extras Self-compiled known-to-be-working stable dovecot release 2.1.16: mail01:~# doveconf -n |head -2 # 2.1.16: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-56-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Saslauthd ist running with following parameters, where 10.10.10.10 is the remote dovecot imap server: /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a rimap -O 10.10.10.10 -r -c -t 60 -m /var/run/saslauthd -n 5 In the meanwhile I took 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch from the saucy package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/amd64/sasl2-bin/2.1.25.dfsg1-17, updated the patch 0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch in the precise package and installed it on our servers. I'll run for a few days (or weeks) now, and see if the CPU problem goes away. If you want to test an official package update for precise, we can do so on one of the machines. Regards Daniel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
This bugs represents a severe regression on upgrade from Ubuntu 10.04 LTS to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The package is rather unusable since it eats up 100% CPU on production mailservers after upgrade to current LTS. Would you please include the fix http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=0034-fix_dovecot_authentication.patch;att=1;bug=708552 or a backport of 2.1.25.dfsg1-7 in the current LTS Release 12.04 Precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Fixed in version cyrus-sasl2/2.1.25.dfsg1-7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Thanks. Saucy is now on 2.1.25.dfsg1-7, so marking Fix Released. If you need a fix for an existing stable release, please comment with a justification against https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#When and complete steps 1 through 4 in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Bug patch for Debian Wheezy are here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708552 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #708552 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708552 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 997217] Re: salsauthd maxes cpu
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997217 Title: salsauthd maxes cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/997217/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
