Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf

>>> Purple is a mix between red and blue, just as video is a mix of
>>> audio and graphics. Orange is not red, but close enough. Pure red
>>> may be too aggressive. On top of that, both orange and purple are
>>> used a lot of Ubuntu vanilla, so there's that too.

Actually what humans usually consider as being "red", already is an
"orange" tone.

In design the complementary colours could become important, regarding
interaction of foreground and background, resp. the so called
colour-in-itself contrast, enhanced by the complementary contrast.

purple, aka violet - yellow
blue   - orange (some people, perhaps Kandinsky, at least I,
 prefer blue - yellow instead of orange,
 theory of colours isn't objective)
red/magenta - green (actually what we call red isn't red, red is
 an orange tone)

It differs for technical systems (RGB), but that's unimportant
regarding the sentiment, while OTOH issues with colour rendering could
become important, at least for television "red" is a critical colour.

However, yet the above is unimportant.

Important is that the idea of "video is a mix of audio and graphics"
needs to work for the viewer.

What we humans usually call "red"and "blue" becomes "violet", but
what we humans usually call "orange" and "blue" doesn't.

If you consider "red" as too aggressiv and perhaps too dominating, then
replacing it by "orange" breaks your idea of "video is a mix of audio
and graphics".

You could solve it by not replacing "red" by "orange", but instead by
giving the colours a pastel shade.

IOW instead of

   "Blue -violet -orange" consider to use
"pastel blue - pastel violet - pastel red"

so the viewer is able to follow the idea of "video is a mix of audio
and graphics". The "pastel blue" isn't the Ubuntu Studio logo default
colour, but that doesn't matter and anyway wouldn't make sense, since
Ubuntu Studio isn't = audio, audio is just the most likely most
important domain of Ubuntu Studio, which is good represented by a
different shade of blue.

You not necessarily need to follow the idea [1] "video is a mix of audio
and graphics", but if you do so, it needs to "add up", you also could
mix "blue" with another colour, but then the result needs to be
plausible for at least one, additive mixing of colours or for
subtractive mixing of colours.

[1] Actually video not necessarily is a mix of audio and video, keyword
"silent movie", OTOH the idea to mix colours for the design is a
good idea, makes sense, but it's not absolutely correct, video and
audio always are two separated things, even while film comes with
analog optical sound,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Dynamic_Digital_Sound#/media/File:35mm_film_audio_macro.jpg
we usually often can't mix optical impressions with audio
impressions, especially for digital television that often isn't
lip-sync :D.



-- 
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-18 Thread public

On 2016-02-17 22:33, Jimmy Sjölund one.com wrote:

On 2016-02-17 22:23, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:44 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:39 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:

I have an idea, which I do think we should be able to get done. It's
pretty simple, and symbolic. It should not be hard to make it look 
good.


These are some possible elements of the image that we could develop
together:

* Incorporate the CoF somehow
* A fairly dark and neutral background color.
* Three fuzzy lights, like stage lights, each one representing a 
main
category (blue for audio, but the exact colors for graphics and 
video

need to be reevaluated).
* Visual elements from the kind of digital tools we provide, like
sequencer graphics (not a real sequencer, but a simple design), 3D 
model

fundamentals, a photograph, that sort of thing

The visual elements could be in a single color, using the category
colors for each. That way, three fuzzy lights may be superfluous, and
the image would be even more focused.


# Did a mockup, but not going to show you yet

I took some time to play around. I found that using three colors for 
the

background works pretty well. It sits right, both visually and
symbolically. So, I really feel like doing something with the three
colors as basis is the way to go. I don't have a mockup worthy to show
you, but just want to spill my thoughts on that, in case someone wants
to pick this up and do some stuff with it.

# About the colors

The colors that feel the most right to me are:

* blue for audio (our standard blue, used for our CoF)
* orange for graphics
* purple for video

The logic behind the colors:
Purple is a mix between red and blue, just as video is a mix of audio
and graphics. Orange is not red, but close enough. Pure red may be too
aggressive. On top of that, both orange and purple are used a lot of
Ubuntu vanilla, so there's that too.

If having the colors side by side, purple seems the best fit to have 
in
the middle, considering the relationship between the colors. I would 
put

blue to the left (which from a western POW is the start of a page).

We are already using those colors in ubuntustudio-menu, but that 
doesn't
mean we can't change them, if we want. I would like to revisit the 
exact

hue of those though.

# Schedule

I'm not going to work too intensively on this myself during the next
week, at least. But, I will revisit as soon as I'm able.
We should have a final candidate of the default wallpaper ready about 
1

month before release (final beta), but we can always make last minute
changes, if we really need to.


Sounds like a plan to me!


Nice! I agree with the direction in terms of colors and direction
I created this page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Artwork/OfficialXenial
I invite you all to help me keep it up to date.

The look and themeing and iconing has many different branches in 
launchpad,
i have listed all those that seem to fit for anything related to look 
and feel.
Probably included some that shouldn't be there or missed other, but i 
can't

help but notice that it is infact many different , ehm, "sources?"
I need help to understand how these things are packaged. :) To tighten 
up the
consistency of the look, we could benefit from tightening up these 
branches.
I'm not sure, as y'all know i'm still trying to familiarize myself to 
the

launchpad system.

ANyways! lets do this! :)

Yours,
Set

--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel