Re: Which of jackd's will be in main?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:28:46PM CEST, Артём Попов wrote: > 2010/7/19 Luke Yelavich : > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:15:07PM CEST, Артём Попов wrote: > >> Hi (especially Luke), > >> > >> I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in > >> Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been > >> using for 2 months without problems), there could be reasons for > >> sticking with jackd1. So, which is going to be in Maverick's main? > >> Reasons? Thanks. > > > > All jack source packages, i.e jackd-defaults, jackd2, and > > jack-audio-connection-kit will be in main. All binaries from jackd2 and > > jackd-defaults will also be in main. Only two binaries from > > jack-audio-connection-kit, libjack0, and libjack-dev, will be in main, the > > rest will be demoted to universe. This will enable all jack using packages > > to be built against jack-audio-connection-kit, i.e jack1, but jackd2 will > > still be the default daemon that people use. > > > > Good to know! Is there a main inclusion report already? No, I will be writing those reports this week. Luke -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Which of jackd's will be in main?
2010/7/19 Luke Yelavich : > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:15:07PM CEST, Артём Попов wrote: >> Hi (especially Luke), >> >> I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in >> Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been >> using for 2 months without problems), there could be reasons for >> sticking with jackd1. So, which is going to be in Maverick's main? >> Reasons? Thanks. > > All jack source packages, i.e jackd-defaults, jackd2, and > jack-audio-connection-kit will be in main. All binaries from jackd2 and > jackd-defaults will also be in main. Only two binaries from > jack-audio-connection-kit, libjack0, and libjack-dev, will be in main, the > rest will be demoted to universe. This will enable all jack using packages to > be built against jack-audio-connection-kit, i.e jack1, but jackd2 will still > be the default daemon that people use. > Good to know! Is there a main inclusion report already? --Artem -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Which of jackd's will be in main?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:15:07PM CEST, Артём Попов wrote: > Hi (especially Luke), > > I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in > Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been > using for 2 months without problems), there could be reasons for > sticking with jackd1. So, which is going to be in Maverick's main? > Reasons? Thanks. All jack source packages, i.e jackd-defaults, jackd2, and jack-audio-connection-kit will be in main. All binaries from jackd2 and jackd-defaults will also be in main. Only two binaries from jack-audio-connection-kit, libjack0, and libjack-dev, will be in main, the rest will be demoted to universe. This will enable all jack using packages to be built against jack-audio-connection-kit, i.e jack1, but jackd2 will still be the default daemon that people use. Luke -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Which of jackd's will be in main?
Hi (especially Luke), I wonder if there has been any planning of which jackd will be in Maverick's main component. While I'd prefer jackd2 (which I have been using for 2 months without problems), there could be reasons for sticking with jackd1. So, which is going to be in Maverick's main? Reasons? Thanks. --Artem -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
