Re: Ubuntu Studio 8.10, -rt and 2.6.27

2008-09-14 Thread hollunder
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:03:12 +1000
Chris Wenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:51 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> 
> > 
> > As of now, the situation is totally up in the air, and somewhat out
> > of our hands. We're trying to get -rt merged into .27 but things
> > are nuts in Ubuntu land as far as the kernel goes.
> > 
> > We don't even know yet what will happen.
> > 
> > Best case scenario, we ship a .27-rt kernel in line with main
> > Ubuntu or we ship -generic with a SRU to -rt later after release.
> > 
> > That's all I know atm. You guys know what I do.
> 
> Sorry Cory - i didn't mean to sound so critical - your hard work is
> appreciated!
> 
> Is a .26-rt kernel completely out of the question? I note that there
> is a .26 based linux-rt package in the archives, but attempting to
> install results in:
> 
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   linux-restricted-modules-rt: Depends:
> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.26-1-rt but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
> 
> 
> Chris

>From what I read about .26, midi timing is totally messed up for some
reason, dunno if other stuff as well. There was a recent thread on the
LAD-list I believe.

Try to install linux-image(versionnumber)-rt instead of linux-rt to
avoid the dependency on restricted modules.

Philipp

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio 8.10, -rt and 2.6.27

2008-09-14 Thread Chris Wenn
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:51 -0400, Cory K. wrote:

> 
> As of now, the situation is totally up in the air, and somewhat out of
> our hands. We're trying to get -rt merged into .27 but things are nuts
> in Ubuntu land as far as the kernel goes.
> 
> We don't even know yet what will happen.
> 
> Best case scenario, we ship a .27-rt kernel in line with main Ubuntu or
> we ship -generic with a SRU to -rt later after release.
> 
> That's all I know atm. You guys know what I do.

Sorry Cory - i didn't mean to sound so critical - your hard work is
appreciated!

Is a .26-rt kernel completely out of the question? I note that there is
a .26 based linux-rt package in the archives, but attempting to install
results in:

Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-restricted-modules-rt: Depends:
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.26-1-rt but it is not installable
E: Broken packages


Chris



-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio 8.10, -rt and 2.6.27

2008-09-14 Thread Cory K.
Chris Wenn wrote:
> Without wanting to go back on the discussions that have already
> happened, staying on Hardy is not a good option for me - as I've been
> through over a period of months here, and on the forums, and on
> launchpad, my firewire host card does not work with the Hardy kernel.
> The issue is fixed as of .26, so in order to avoid several hundred
> dollars worth of hardware sitting idle in my studio I need a -rt that
> works on Intrepid. It's an expensive prospect for me, seeing as the
> A$500 I spent on my Focusrite is almost as much as I earn in a fortnight.
>
> Just my $0.05.

As of now, the situation is totally up in the air, and somewhat out of
our hands. We're trying to get -rt merged into .27 but things are nuts
in Ubuntu land as far as the kernel goes.

We don't even know yet what will happen.

Best case scenario, we ship a .27-rt kernel in line with main Ubuntu or
we ship -generic with a SRU to -rt later after release.

That's all I know atm. You guys know what I do.

-Cory K.


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Ubuntu Studio 8.10, -rt and 2.6.27

2008-09-14 Thread Chris Wenn
Without wanting to go back on the discussions that have already happened,
staying on Hardy is not a good option for me - as I've been through over a
period of months here, and on the forums, and on launchpad, my firewire host
card does not work with the Hardy kernel. The issue is fixed as of .26, so
in order to avoid several hundred dollars worth of hardware sitting idle in
my studio I need a -rt that works on Intrepid. It's an expensive prospect
for me, seeing as the A$500 I spent on my Focusrite is almost as much as I
earn in a fortnight.

Just my $0.05.
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: newbie question - grub

2008-09-14 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Karlheinz Noise wrote:
>> this time i just let it go on its own, and it found windows loader on
>> first disk, and it added it to grub
> 
> One thing you should consider:
> 
> All versions of Windows need to boot from the BIOS boot partition. That
> is, if you are pointing your BIOS to the C: drive as your primary
> partition, then Windows needs to boot from the C: drive.
> 
> This is something that is hard-coded into Windows, and you cannot change
> it. I believe that Windows thinks that booting from a non-primary
> partition is some sort of "security risk" or something equally backwards.

You can actually get GRUB to work around this bug/feature in Windows.
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#DOS_002fWindows

Again, I strongly recommend an RTFM in this case.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIzOqswRXgH3rKGfMRAkXcAJ99L9MO4xoTgbTrc/AD2xTZD+0r0gCglouS
A5dby5fmMGTlr2klct50vo0=
=NqP/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users